Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this double-blind, randomized trial, vancomycin was added to cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis for arthroplasty. Surgical-site infections occurred in 4.5% of vancomycin recipients and 3.5% of placebo recipients.

Treatment of acute bacterial skin infection is becoming more complicated as antimicrobial resistance increases. In this trial of dalbavancin, a lipoglycopeptide with a long half-life, once-weekly dosing was shown to be noninferior to vancomycin–linezolid for treating infection. Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections are among the most common reasons for the hospitalization of adults in the United States today. 1 These infections are caused most often by Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci. 2 Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) accounts for many of these infections and presents a particular treatment challenge because current therapies are limited by toxicity, resistance, or the lack of an oral formulation. 3 Associated medical costs are substantial. 4 Dalbavancin (Durata Therapeutics) is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic agent with in vitro and in vivo activity against gram-positive pathogens, including a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) required to inhibit the growth of 90% . . .

In this randomized trial of fidaxomicin as compared with vancomycin in 629 patients, oral fidaxomicin was shown to be noninferior to oral vancomycin in the treatment of C. difficile infection and was associated with lower rates of recurrence. Clostridium difficile infection generally occurs after exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The incidence and severity of C. difficile infection are increasing. The increases have been ascribed to the emergence of a hypervirulent C. difficile strain, known variously as North American Pulsed Field type 1 (NAP1), restriction-endonuclease analysis (REA) type BI, or polymerase-chain-reaction ribotype 027 (referred to collectively as the NAP1/BI/027 strain). 1 – 4 Furthermore, the rates of death associated with C. difficile infection are rising, 5 – 7 and the infection is occurring in populations that were previously considered to be at low risk, such as young, healthy persons living in the community and . . .

In this trial, a new lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with a prolonged half-life, oritavancin, was compared with vancomycin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. A single intravenous dose of oritavancin was found to be noninferior to 7 to 10 days of vancomycin. The economic burden of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections remains substantial 1 and is driven by the high costs of hospitalization 2 , 3 and by treatment with agents that require dosing once or twice daily for a duration of 7 to 10 days or more. 2 , 4 – 12 Treatment of these infections often requires agents that are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which continues to be an important causative pathogen in many countries. 13 , 14 Even treatment in an outpatient setting cannot overcome the disadvantage of multiple administrations, incomplete adherence to medication regimens, 15 and the complexity of monitoring therapeutic drug levels. 16 Oritavancin . . .

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea, leading to high morbidity, recurrence, and healthcare costs. Probiotics like Saccharomyces boulardii show potential as an adjunct therapy to standard CDI treatment, but further trials are needed to confirm their efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of S. boulardii combined with vancomycin for treating mild to moderate CDI. 120 CDI patients diagnosed with positive stool toxin test were randomly assigned to receive two capsules of 250 mg of S. boulardii or a placebo every 12 h alongside 125 mg of vancomycin every 6 h for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate, with secondary endpoints including recurrence, global cure rate, and diarrheal outcomes. Clinical cure rates were similar between groups (98.4% vs. 98.3%), but the combination group had a significantly higher global cure rate (96.6% vs. 85.3%, p  = 0.044) and lower recurrence rate (1.7% vs. 13.1%, p  = 0.032). No significant differences were found in diarrheal outcomes, functional ability, or adverse events. No patients discontinued treatment due to intolerance. In conclusion, adding S. boulardii to vancomycin reduced CDI recurrence without affecting functional recovery or increasing adverse events.

Background. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI). Increasing antimicrobial resistance in cSSSI has led to a need for new safe and effective therapies. Ceftaroline was evaluated as treatment for cSSSI in 2 identical phase 3 clinical trials, the pooled analysis of which is presented here. The primary objective of each trial was to determine the noninferiority of the clinical cure rate achieved with ceftaroline monotherapy, compared with that achieved with vancomycin plus aztreonam combination therapy, in the clinically evaluable (CE) and modified intent-to-treat (MITT) patient populations. Methods. Adult patients with cSSSI requiring intravenous therapy received ceftaroline (600 mg every 12 h) or vancomycin plus aztreonam (1 g each every 12 h) for 5–14 days. Results. Of 1378 patients enrolled in both trials, 693 received ceftaroline and 685 received vancomycin plus aztreonam. Baseline characteristics of the treatment groups were comparable. Clinical cure rates were similar for ceftaroline and vancomycin plus aztreonam in the CE (91.6% vs 92.7%) and MITT (85.9% vs 85.5%) populations, respectively, as well as in patients infected with MRSA (93.4% vs 94.3%). The rates of adverse events, discontinuations because of an adverse event, serious adverse events, and death also were similar between treatment groups. Conclusions. Ceftaroline achieved high clinical cure rates, was efficacious against cSSSI caused by MRSA and other common cSSSI pathogens, and was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the cephalosporin class. Ceftaroline has the potential to provide a monotherapy alternative for the treatment of cSSSI. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00424190 for CANVAS 1 and NCT00423657 for CANVAS 2.

A gold standard diagnostic for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) does not exist. An area of controversy is how to manage patients whose stool tests positive by nucleic acid amplification tests but negative by toxin enzyme immunoassay. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is most commonly diagnosed using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT); the low positive predictive value of these assays results in patients colonized with C. difficile unnecessarily receiving CDI treatment antibiotics. The risks and benefits of antibiotic treatment in individuals with such cases are unknown. Fecal samples of NAAT-positive, toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-negative patients were collected before, during, and after randomization to vancomycin ( n  = 8) or placebo ( n  = 7). C. difficile and antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs) were selectively cultured from fecal and environmental samples. Shotgun metagenomics and comparative isolate genomics were used to understand the impact of oral vancomycin on the microbiome and environmental contamination. Overall, 80% of placebo patients and 71% of vancomycin patients were colonized with C. difficile posttreatment. One person randomized to placebo subsequently received treatment for CDI. In the vancomycin-treated group, beta-diversity ( P =  0.0059) and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) resistance genes ( P =  0.037) increased after treatment; C. difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) environmental contamination was found in 53% of patients and 26% of patients, respectively. We found that vancomycin alters the gut microbiota, does not permanently clear C. difficile , and is associated with VRE colonization/environmental contamination. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT03388268.) IMPORTANCE A gold standard diagnostic for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) does not exist. An area of controversy is how to manage patients whose stool tests positive by nucleic acid amplification tests but negative by toxin enzyme immunoassay. Existing data suggest most of these patients do not have CDI, but most are treated with oral vancomycin. Potential benefits to treatment include a decreased risk for adverse outcomes if the patient does have CDI and the potential to decrease C. difficile shedding/transmission. However, oral vancomycin perturbs the intestinal microbiota and promotes antibiotic-resistant organism colonization/transmission. We conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial to assess the risk-benefit of oral vancomycin treatment in this population. Oral vancomycin did not result in long-term clearance of C. difficile , perturbed the microbiota, and was associated with colonization/shedding of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. This work underscores the need to better understand this population of patients in the context of C. difficile /ARO-related outcomes and transmission.

Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) after instrumented spine fusion surgery may occur in up to 12% of cases and lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Numerous retrospective studies suggest the use of intrawound vancomycin powder in spine surgery to be protective against SSIs. The use of intrawound vancomycin powder is controversial, and there is a paucity of well-designed prospective trials evaluating its safety and efficacy in spine surgery. The objective of the VANCO Trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder in open instrumented spine fusion surgery to prevent SSIs. Methods The VANCO Trial is a multicenter, 1:1 randomized superiority trial with a total of 7 recruiting spine institutions in Switzerland. Adult patients scheduled for an open spinal fusion procedure will be screened for eligibility. Randomization of participants will take place intraoperatively before wound closure. Patients randomized into the treatment arm will receive 1–2 g of vancomycin powder (depending on length of skin incision: ≤ 20 cm vs. > 20 cm), which will be administered above the closed muscle fascia (suprafascially-subcutaneously) before wound closure. The main outcome and measure is the rate of superficial and deep SSIs within 90 days following surgery. Discussion The VANCO Trial is one of the first clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder in a selected spine surgery population. Routine administration of intrawound vancomycin powder in selected spine surgery patients could fundamentally advance international standards for reducing SSIs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04017468.

Two phase 3, double-blind studies in hospitalized adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI) determined the safety and efficacy of tigecycline versus that of vancomycin-aztreonam. Patients received tigecycline (100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice daily) plus aztreonam (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. Populations were as follows: 1116 patients (566 treated with tigecycline, and 550 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, 1057 patients (538 treated with tigecycline, and 519 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the clinical mITT (c-mITT) population, and 833 patients (422 treated with tigecycline, and 411 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the clinically evaluable population. Clinical responses to tigecycline and vancomycin-aztreonam at test-of-cure were similar: c-mITT, 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.1%–83.1%) versus 81.9% (95% CI, 78.3%–85.1%) (P = .4183); and clinically evaluable, 86.5% (95% CI, 82.9%–89.6%) versus 88.6% (95% CI, 85.1%–91.5%) (P = .4233). Adverse events were similar, with increased nausea and vomiting in the tigecycline group and increased rash and elevated hepatic aminotransferase levels in the vancomycin-aztreonam group. Tigecycline monotherapy is as safe and efficacious as the vancomycin-aztreonam combination in treating patients with cSSSI.

Target-controlled infusion (TCI) could provide a patient-tailored approach for vancomycin dosing. This study aimed to externally evaluate the predictive performance of a previously constructed pharmacokinetic model of vancomycin (Choi model) specifically optimized for TCI administration of vancomycin differing from the existing model, and to assess the feasibility of administering vancomycin via TCI in clinical practice. Additionally, clinical outcomes were exploratively compared between the TCI and intermittent infusion (standard) methods for vancomycin administration. Clinically ill patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the TCI or standard group. In the TCI group, vancomycin was administered using the Choi model, targeting an initial concentration of 25 mg/L, adjusted to maintain therapeutic levels (20-30 mg/L). The standard group received a loading dose of 25 mg/kg, then 15 mg/kg every 12 hours. Vancomycin concentrations for analysis were obtained from three blood samples per patient at set times, along with routine therapeutic drug monitoring data. Predictive performance was assessed using four parameters: inaccuracy, divergence, bias, and wobble. The occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during and up to 7 days after vancomycin was investigated. The study was terminated early due to challenges in enrolling subjects (TCI: n=12, standard: n=13). Thirty-seven serum concentration measurements from the TCI group were analyzed. Pooled median bias and inaccuracy (95% confidence interval) were -2.7 (-7.3 to 1.9) and 17.0 (13.9 to 20.2), respectively. AKI incidence was similar between groups (TCI: n=0, standard: n=1) in this exploratory analysis, but caution is warranted in interpreting these outcomes as the planned sample size was not met. The predictive performance of the TCI system integrated with the Choi model was suitable for clinical use. Further studies with a large cohort should be performed to determine the clinical effectiveness of vancomycin administered via the TCI method. This study was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service of the Korean National Institute of Health (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr), with registration number KCT0003462, on January 31, 2019).