Explore the vast range of titles available.

Registered index-linked annuities (RILAs) are increasingly popular equity-based retirement savings products offered by US life insurance companies. They combine features of fixed-index annuities and traditional variable annuities (TVAs), offering investors equity exposure with downside protection in a tax-deferred setting. This article introduces RILAs to the academic literature by describing the products' key features, developing a general pricing model, and deriving the providers' hedging strategy by decomposing their liabilities into short-term European options. Numerical illustrations show that RILAs offer investors similar risk profiles (in the long run) as TVAs with maturity guarantees, and that many products currently sold appear to be priced quite favorably for investors. For providers, RILAs may be a preferable alternative or complement to TVAs as they greatly simplify the management of the embedded equity risk and can naturally reduce the TVA capital requirements. These features position RILAs as a viable long-term solution for this product space.

This paper proposes a novel high-water mark fee structure and investigates its impact on the marketability of variable annuities. To evaluate the welfare effects of holding a variable annuity, we adopt meanvariance analysis. By also examining the welfare effects of holding two alternative investments, we introduce a quantitative measure, namely a compatible set of risk aversions, to assess the marketability of the variable annuity under a certain fee structure. Comparing the compatible sets and the welfare effects of holding the variable annuity under the high-water mark fee structure with those under a constant and a state-dependent fee structure, we find that the high-water mark fee structure improves the variable annuity's marketability in two aspects: First, it makes the variable annuity preferable to the alternative investments for a broader range of policyholders. Second, when the variable annuity is preferred over the alternative investments, it produces the highest welfare for the policyholder.

This paper proposes a two-phase deep reinforcement learning approach, for hedging variable annuity contracts with both GMMB and GMDB riders, which can address model miscalibration in Black-Scholes financial and constant force of mortality actuarial market environments. In the training phase, an infant reinforcement learning agent interacts with a pre-designed training environment, collects sequential anchor-hedging reward signals, and gradually learns how to hedge the contracts. As expected, after a sufficient number of training steps, the trained reinforcement learning agent hedges, in the training environment, equally well as the correct Delta while outperforms misspecified Deltas. In the online learning phase, the trained reinforcement learning agent interacts with the market environment in real time, collects single terminal reward signals, and self-revises its hedging strategy. The hedging performance of the further trained reinforcement learning agent is demonstrated via an illustrative example on a rolling basis to reveal the self-revision capability on the hedging strategy by online learning.

In this paper, we study a variational inequality arising from variable annuity (VA) to find the optimal surrender strategy for a VA investor when the underlying asset follows a mean reverting process. We formulate the problem as a free boundary partial differential equation (PDE) to obtain the optimal strategy. The PDE is solved analytically by the Mellin transform approach. Using the Mellin transform, we derive the integral equations for the value of the VA and the optimal surrender boundary. Since the solutions are obtained as the integral equations, we use the recursive integration method to determine the optimal surrender strategy. Finally, we provide the optimal surrender boundaries and values of VA with respect to some significant parameters to show the impacts of mean reversion.

Given the computational challenges associated with valuing large variable annuity (VA) portfolios, a variety of data mining frameworks, including metamodeling and active learning, have been proposed in recent years. Active learning, a promising alternative to metamodeling, enhances the efficiency of VA portfolio assessments by adaptively improving a predictive regression model. This is achieved by augmenting data for model training with strategically selected informative samples. Successful application of active learning requires an effective metric in order to gauge the informativeness of data. Current sampling methods, which focus on prediction error-based informativeness, typically rely solely on prediction variance and assume an unbiased predictive model. In this paper, we address the fact that prediction bias can be nonnegligible in large VA portfolio valuation and investigate the impact of prediction bias in both the modeling and sampling stages of active learning. Our experimental results suggest that bias-based sampling can rival the efficacy of traditional ambiguity-based sampling, with its success contingent upon the extent of bias present in the predictive model.

This paper extends the stratified approximation method using lognormal and gamma distributions - first introduced to price Asian options - to derive a close formula for pricing and hedging of periodic-premium variable annuities. We used the moment matching method to fit the lognormal and gamma distributions to the conditional distribution of the integral of the underlying asset on a time interval, given the terminal value of the underlying asset. The highly oscillating double integrals for computing an expectation about the integral of the underlying assets are simplified down to a single integral, which greatly reduces the computation time for pricing periodic-premium variable annuities. This method allowed us to construct a different delta hedging strategy, other than the one used in the existing literature for embedded option of periodic-premium variable annuities. Compared with the existing research on pricing periodic-premium variable annuities, we obtained more accurate results using the stratified approximation method than the numerical method of partial differential equations, and found that the underpricing problem with periodic-premium variable annuities is even more severe than previously stated in existing literature. We further investigated the price gap between single-premium and periodic-premium variable annuities in a variety of settings, and examined the impact that the model and product parameters had on the price gap. The robustness and accuracy of the proposed method is tested by numerical examples.

In this work, the pricing problem of a variable annuity (VA) contract embedded with a guaranteed lifelong withdrawal benefit (GLWB) rider has been considered. VAs are annuities whose value is linked with a sub-account fund consisting of bonds and equities. The GLWB rider provides a series of regular payments to the policyholder during the policy duration when he is alive irrespective of the portfolio performance. Also, the remaining fund value is given to his nominee, at the time of death of the policyholder. The appropriate modelling of fund plays a crucial role in the pricing of VA products. In the literature, several authors model the fund value in a VA contract using a geometric Brownian motion (GBM) model with a constant variance. However, in real life, the financial assets returns are not Normal distributed. The returns have non-zero skewness, high kurtosis, and leverage effect. This paper proposes a discrete-time model for annuity pricing using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) models, which overcome the limitations of the GBM model. The proposed model is analyzed with numerical illustration along with sensitivity analysis.

Accurately valuing large portfolios of Variable Annuities (VAs) poses a significant challenge due to the high computational burden of Monte Carlo simulations and the limitations of spatial interpolation methods that rely on manually defined distance metrics. We introduce a residual portfolio valuation network (ResPoNet), a novel residual neural network architecture enhanced with weighted loss functions, designed to improve valuation accuracy and scalability. ResPoNet systematically accounts for mortality risk and path-dependent liabilities using residual layers, while the custom loss function ensures better convergence and interpretability. Numerical results on synthetic portfolios of 100,000 contracts show that ResPoNet achieves significantly lower valuation errors than baseline neural and spatial methods, with faster convergence and improved generalization. Sensitivity analysis reveals key drivers of performance, including guarantee complexity and contract maturity, demonstrating the robustness and practical applicability of ResPoNet in large-scale VA valuation.

Understanding how crises like the COVID-19 pandemic affect variable annuity pricing is crucial, especially in emerging markets like India. The motivation is that financial stability and risk management in these markets depend heavily on accurate pricing models. While prior research has primarily focused on Western markets, there is a significant gap in analyzing the impact of extreme volatility and regime-dependent dynamics on variable annuities in emerging economies. This study investigates how regime shifts during the COVID-19 pandemic influence variable annuity pricing in the Indian stock market, specifically using the Nifty 50 Index data from 7 September 2017 until 7 September 2023. Advanced methodologies, including regime-switching hidden Markov models, artificial neural networks, and Monte Carlo simulations, were applied to analyze pre- and post-COVID-19 market behavior. The regime-switching hidden Markov models effectively capture latent market regimes and their transitions, which traditional models often overlook, while neural networks provide flexible functional approximations that enhance pricing accuracy in highly non-linear environments. The Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm was employed to achieve robust calibration and enhance pricing accuracy. The analysis showed significant pricing variations across market regimes, with heightened volatility observed during the pandemic. The findings highlight the effectiveness of regime-switching models in capturing market dynamics, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty and turbulence. This research contributes to the understanding of variable annuity pricing under regime-dependent dynamics in emerging markets and offers practical implications for improved risk management and policy formulation.

Variable annuities (VAs) and other long-term equity-linked insurance products are typically difficult to hedge in the incomplete markets. A state-dependent fee tied with market volatility for VAs is designed to contribute the risk-sharing mechanism between policyholders and insurers. Different from prior research, we discuss several aspects on a fair valuation, fee-rate determination and hedging with volatility-dependent fees from the perspective of a VA hedger. A method of efficient hedging strategy as a benchmark compared to other strategies is developed in the stochastic volatility setting. We illustrate this method in guaranteed minimum maturity benefits (GMMBs), but it is also applicable to other equity-linked insurance contracts.