Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have proven effective in the treatment of numerous cancers; however, they have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), among which cytokine release syndrome (CRS) has been reported in a few case reports. To describe the burden of ICI-related CRS and raise awareness of CRS as irAE, we queried VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of spontaneously reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and retrieved safety reports of suspected CRS associated with ICIs, gathered in the database through January 12 2020. We assessed ICI-related CRS safety reports in terms of geographical and temporal patterns of reporting, patient demographics and clinical features, treatment characteristics, CRS clinical presentation, timing, seriousness, and outcome. We retrieved 58 cases of whom 43 (74%) reported CRS with anti-programmed death-1/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 agents. Melanoma (n=17, 29%) and hematologic malignancies (n=16, 28%) were the most common underlying cancers. ICIs were the solely suspected drugs in 37 (64%) cases. Typical signs and symptoms of CRS were reported in 25 (43%) patients. ICI-related CRS developed a median of 4 weeks after ICI initiation (IQR 1-18 weeks, n=9, 16%). Besides two fatal cases, CRS recovered/was recovering at the time of reporting in 35 (60%) cases. We observed differences in the geographical pattern of ICI-related CRS reporting, with a high proportion of ICI-related CRS cases in Australia and North America (0.14 and 0.10% respectively). Due to ICI expanding indications, clinicians should be aware that ICIs could contribute to CRS onset in cancer patients as pharmacological triggers.

The development of monoclonal antibodies has dramatically changed the outcome of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), the most common hematological malignancy. However, despite the satisfying results of monoclonal antibody treatment, only few NHL patients are permanently cured with single-agent therapies. In this context, radioimmunotherapy, the administration of radionuclides conjugated to monoclonal antibodies, is aimed to augment the single-agent efficacy of immunotherapy in order to deliver targeted radiation to tumors, particularly CD20+ B-cell lymphomas. Based on evidence from several trials in NHL, the radiolabeled antibodies 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals) and 131I-tositumomab (Bexxar, GlaxoSmithKline) received FDA approval in 2002 and 2003, respectively. However, none of the two radioimmunotherapeutic agents has been broadly applied in clinical practice. The main reason for the under-utilization of radioimmunotherapy includes economic and logistic considerations. However, concerns about potential side effects have also been raised. Driven by these developments, we performed retrospective analysis of adverse events reporting Zevalin or Bexxar, extracted from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the World Health Organization’s VigiBase repository. Our results indicate that the two radioimmunotherapeutic agents have both related and distinct side effect profiles and confirm their known toxicological considerations. Our work also suggests that computational analysis of real-world post-marketing data can provide informative clinical insights. While more prospective studies are necessary to fully characterize the efficacy and safety of radioimmunotherapy, we expect that it has not yet reached its full therapeutic potential in modern hematological oncology.

Background Antidepressants-induced movement disorders are rare and imperfectly known adverse drug reactions. The risk may differ between different antidepressants and antidepressants’ classes. The objective of this study was to assess the putative association of each antidepressant and antidepressants’ classes with movement disorders. Methods Using VigiBase®, the WHO Pharmacovigilance database, disproportionality of movement disorders’ reporting was assessed among adverse drug reactions related to any antidepressant, from January 1967 to February 2017, through a case/non-case design. The association between nine subtypes of movement disorders (akathisia, bruxism, dystonia, myoclonus, parkinsonism, restless legs syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, tics, tremor) and antidepressants was estimated through the calculation first of crude Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), then adjusted ROR on four potential confounding factors: age, sex, drugs described as able to induce movement disorders, and drugs used to treat movement disorders. Results Out of the 14,270,446 reports included in VigiBase®, 1,027,405 (7.2%) contained at least one antidepressant, among whom 29,253 (2.8%) reported movement disorders. The female/male sex ratio was 2.15 and the mean age 50.9 ± 18.0 years. We found a significant increased ROR for antidepressants in general for all subtypes of movement disorders, with the highest association with bruxism (ROR 10.37, 95% CI 9.62–11.17) and the lowest with tics (ROR 1.49, 95% CI 1.38–1.60). When comparing each of the classes of antidepressants with the others, a significant association was observed for all subtypes of movement disorders except restless legs syndrome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) only. Among antidepressants, mirtazapine, vortioxetine, amoxapine, phenelzine, tryptophan and fluvoxamine were associated with the highest level to movement disorders and citalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine and mirtazapine were the most frequently associated with movement disorders. An association was also found with eight other antidepressants. Conclusions A potential harmful association was found between movement disorders and use of the antidepressants mirtazapine, vortioxetine, amoxapine, phenelzine, tryptophan, fluvoxamine, citalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine, bupropion, clomipramine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, mianserin, sertraline, venlafaxine and vilazodone. Clinicians should beware of these adverse effects and monitor early warning signs carefully. However, this observational study must be interpreted as an exploratory analysis, and these results should be refined by future epidemiological studies.

Objective To analyze the serious medication errors (MEs) on dabigatran, and their related factors, in order to avoid or reduce the occurrence of adverse events. Methods Serious MEs related to dabigatran were extracted from the WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products (VigiBase) by using “Medication errors and other product use errors and issues” High Level Group Term (HLGT) of the international Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Well-documented reports, vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80, or with an informative narrative were analyzed with a focus on the clinical features of the cases. The PCNE Classification for drug-related problems (DRP) was used to classify medication errors in our analysis of cases. Results Until January 26, 2020, there were 453 cases with serious MEs related to dabigatran in VigiBase, and 113 were well-documented. Among these, 69 patients (61%) were hospitalized or had prolonged hospitalization, 16 (14%) had life-threatening events, and 12 (11%) died. The MEs occurred in the prescription phase in 77 cases, in administration in 35, and at the dispensing stage in one case. The MEs in prescription were related to a drug selection error in 44 cases (24 concerning contraindications and 20 drug interactions) and to dose error in 33 cases (17 with excessive dose; eight with insufficient frequency; four had an incorrect time; in three, the dose was too low; and in one, too frequent). The MEs in administration were medical-staff-related errors in five cases (three with wrong administration route, one administration omission, and one overdose), patient-related errors in 28 (14 insufficient dose or no administration, seven improper drug storage, four wrong administration method, and three over prescribed dose), and other errors in two (without efficacy monitoring). The dispensing error of a wrong drug strength occurred in a pharmacy. The main adverse events in the 113 patients were haemorrhage in 57 cases (50%) and ischemia in 29 cases (26%). Conclusion Based on the analysis of reports in VigiBase, serious MEs related to dabigatran mainly occurred during prescription and administration. Although the incidence of MEs with clinical consequences in the use of dabigatran cannot be determined, attention should be paid to selection of the appropriate dose to a right patient in the prescription, and to patient compliance and storage in drug administration. The patient harm mainly manifested itself as bleeding or ischemia including fatal outcome in rare patients.

Background: Hydroxychloroquine is a long-used medication, most commonly used to treat and prevent malaria, that also has anti-inflammatory and antiviral characteristics. Therefore, specialists have shown interest in the underlying mechanism of its antiviral activity. I n vitro experiments have demonstrated its efficiency against SARS coronavirus, and in vitro and in vivo research on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is being conducted. We aimed to investigate reports on adverse events of hydroxychloroquine submitted to the Iraqi Pharmacovigilance Centre and compare the incidence of these reported adverse events in Iraq to globally reported cases during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 using information component (IC) 025 values. Methods: The reported adverse events of hydroxychloroquine to the national Pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase™ a WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products, were investigated qualitatively (age, sex, and severity) and quantitatively (using IC 025) as a measure of the existence of new/altered safety information associated with hydroxychloroquine. Results: A total of 132 reports were found, with women representing 37.1% and men representing 60.6% of cases, while the rest were unidentified, with the predominant age groups ranging from 18-44 years old accounting for 47.4% of cases. The most reported adverse events were upper (17%) and lower abdomen pain (21%), nausea (14%), diarrhea (13%), and electrocardiogram (ECG) QT prolongation (13%). There were 44 different drug-adverse reaction pairings in which the adverse reaction reports included more than one event. The IC 025 value for the most widely reported adverse events showed a positive comparable value for upper (2/0.3) and lower abdominal pain (1.8/-0.0), palpitation (1.6/-0.4), and dyspepsia (1.1/0.6). There was a decreased value for IC 025 in cases of ECG QT prolongation (3.5/5), diarrhea (0.3/0.8), abdominal discomfort (0.1/2), and oral fungal infection (-0.4/0.6). Conclusions: The IC 025 helped determine the higher reporting rate of adverse events compared to the average global rates.

Abstract Background Mogamulizumab is a humanized anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody used for relapsed/refractory adult T-cell leukemia, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and/or Sézary syndrome. Reports of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in these patients are increasing, and the association between irAEs and mogamulizumab remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the association between mogamulizumab and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), as well as to characterize the irAEs associated with mogamulizumab using data from a large-scale spontaneous reporting system. Methods We performed an exploratory hypothesis-generating analysis of patients from 1967 to September 2023 using VigiBase, a World Health Organization spontaneous adverse event reporting system database. We performed a disproportionality analysis and determined the reporting odds ratios and information components between the drugs of interest and each irAE. Results Mogamulizumab was associated with some irAEs, including myocarditis, severe cutaneous adverse reactions, hepatitis, and myositis. Mogamulizumab exhibited significantly higher reporting rates of these 4 irAEs compared to the anticancer agents other than mogamulizumab. Conversely, the reporting rate of other irAEs, including endocrine autoimmune diseases induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, was not significant in patients who received mogamulizumab. Conclusions Mogamulizumab is associated with irAEs, including myocarditis, severe cutaneous adverse reactions, hepatitis, and myositis.

Background: Growing evidence supports a bidirectional association between diabetes and depression; promising but limited and conflicting data from human studies support the intriguing possibility that antidiabetic agents may be used to relieve effectively depressive symptoms in diabetic patients. We investigated the potential antidepressant effects of antidiabetic drugs in a high-scale population data from the two most important pharmacovigilance databases, i.e. , the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the VigiBase. Material and methods: From the two primary cohorts of patients treated with antidepressants retrieved from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and VigiBase we identified cases (depressed patients experiencing therapy failure) and non-cases (depressed patients experiencing any other adverse event). We then calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM), and Empirical Bayes Regression-Adjusted Mean (ERAM) for cases versus non-case s in relation with the concurrent exposure to at least one of the following antidiabetic agent: A10BA Biguanides; A10BB Sulfonylureas; A10BG Thiazolidinediones; A10BH DPP4-inhibitors; A10BJ GLP-1 analogues; A10BK SGLT2 inhibitors ( i.e ., those agents for which preliminary evidence from literature supports our pharmacological hypothesis). Results: For GLP-1 analogues, all the disproportionality scores showed values <1, i.e. , statistically significant, in both analyses [from the FAERS: ROR confidence interval of 0.546 (0.450–0.662); PRR ( p -value) of 0.596 (0.000); EBGM (CI) of 0.488 (0.407–0.582); ERAM (CI) of 0.480 (0.398–0.569) and VigiBase: ROR (CI) of 0.717 (0.559–0.921); PRR ( p -value) of 0.745 (0.033); EBGM (CI) of 0.586 (0.464–0.733); ERAM of (CI): 0.515 (0.403–0.639)]. Alongside GLP-1 analogues, DPP-4 Inhibitors and Sulfonylureas showed the greatest potential protective effect. With regard to specific antidiabetic agents, liraglutide and gliclazide were associated with a statistically significant decrease in all disproportionality scores, in both analyses. Conclusion: The findings of this study provide encouraging results, albeit preliminary, supporting the need for further clinical research for investigating repurposing of antidiabetic drugs for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Background Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can occur in a variety of clinical conditions, such as severe hypertension, pregnancy, inflammatory diseases, hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplantation. Apart increased blood pressure levels and altered renal function, several drugs have been reported as potential triggering factor. These descriptions are nevertheless limited to case reports or small case series. Systematic analysis of drugs associated with PRES using global pharmacovigilance database is lacking and can be useful. Methods We performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, using the information component (IC). The IC compares observed and expected values to find associations between drugs and PRES using disproportionate Bayesian reporting. An IC 0.25 (lower end of the IC 95% credibility interval) > 0 is considered statistically significant. Results Here we present an analysis of 3278 cases of PRES reported in VigiBase. These results identified 73 molecules statistically associated with PRES using full database as background with an IC 0.25  > 0. Only 34% ( N  = 25/73) of them had this information written in the summary of product characteristics. The main drug classes involved were antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents and the drugs with the greatest number of cases were tacrolimus, cyclosporin, bevacizumab, methotrexate, and vincristine. An overall mortality of 8.1% ( N  = 267/3278) was identified in cases of drug-associated PRES. Conclusion These results will help clinicians identify potential suspected drugs associated with PRES and decide which drug to discontinue and eventually lead to a re-evaluation of drug labels for some molecules.

Background Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can occur unexpectedly and be life-threatening when gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used. Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE) have been controversial for a long time. However, similar studies are currently incomplete or outdated. Therefore, comparing the safety of different GBCAs in terms of HSRs and GDD/SAGE using the latest post-marketing safety data should yield further insights into safely using GBCAs. Methods The safety differences between all GBCAs to GDD and the spectrum of GBCA-related HSRs were all compared and analyzed by using the World Health Organization database VigiBase and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in this study. A further analysis of SAGE was also conducted using FAERS data. The lower limit of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval was used for signal detection. Moreover, the frequency of HSRs was calculated by dividing the number of reports in VigiBase by the total sales volume (measured in millions) from 2008 to 2022 in the IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. All adverse events were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 26.0. Results This study shows that all GBCAs have the potential to induce HSRs, with nonionic linear GBCAs exhibiting a comparatively lower signal. According to standardized MedDRA query stratification analysis, gadobutrol had a greater ROR 025 for angioedema. The ROR 025 of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoteridol is larger for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions. Regarding severe cutaneous adverse reactions, only gadoversetamide and gadodiamide showed signals in FAERS and VigiBase. There were also differences in the frequency of HSRs between regions. Regarding GDD, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoteridol had a lower ROR 025 . An analysis of the 29 preferred terms linked to SAGE indicated that special consideration should be given to the risk of skin induration associated with gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoteridol. Additionally, gadodiamide and gadoteridol pose a greater risk of skin tightness compared to other GBCAs. Conclusions The risk differences among GBCAs using data from several sources were compared in this study. However, as a hypothesis-generating method, a clear causal relationship would require further research and validation.

Relapsed/refractory hematological malignancies increasingly utilize bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), yet their postmarketing hepatobiliary toxicity profiles remain inadequately characterized. This study aimed to bridge this knowledge gap by conducting the first comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis of BiTE-associated hepatobiliary toxicity using real-world data from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the World Health Organization's global Individual Case Safety Report database (VigiBase). Hepatobiliary reports were extracted from patients with hematological malignancy deposited in FAERS and VigiBase (2015–2024). Disproportionality analyses, multivariate logistic regression analyses, and time-to-onset analyses were employed to identify safety signals across CD19, non-CD19-targeting BiTE, and non-BiTE receivers, characterize hepatobiliary toxicity, and assess their impact on patients’ survival. Sixteen safety signals emerged, including four previously under-reported adverse events beyond package insert documentation: ascites, hepatobiliary disease, graft-versus-host disease in liver, and veno-occlusive liver disease. This analysis revealed that non-CD19 BiTEs were relatively safe in terms of hepatobiliary toxicities, whereas CD19 BiTE receivers had significantly earlier hepatobiliary toxicity onset (median: 6 vs 14 days; P = 0.002) and higher mortality rate compared with non-BiTE users (ORFAERS = 3.28 [2.8–3.82]; PFAERS = 2.05E–16; ORVigiBase = 3.13 [2.60–3.76]; PVigiBase = 2.0E–16). These real-world insights complement clinical trial data; however, the disproportionality analyses employed are susceptible to reporting and utilization biases due to the lack of denominator data. The reported odds ratios and significance should be interpreted as measures of reporting association rather than true risk.