Explore the vast range of titles available.

3D object printing technology is a resource increasingly used in medicine in recent years, mainly incorporated in surgical areas like orthopedics. The models made by 3D printing technology provide surgeons with an accurate analysis of complex anatomical structures, allowing the planning, training, and surgery simulation. In orthopedic surgery, this technique is especially applied in oncological surgeries, bone, and joint reconstructions, and orthopedic trauma surgeries. In these cases, it is possible to prototype anatomical models for surgical planning, simulating, and training, besides printing of instruments and implants. The purpose of this paper is to describe the acquisition and processing from computed tomography images for 3D printing, to describe modeling and the 3D printing process of the biomodels in real size. This paper highlights 3D printing with the applicability of the 3D biomodels in orthopedic surgeries and shows some examples of surgical planning in orthopedic trauma surgery. Four examples were selected to demonstrate the workflow and rationale throughout the process of planning and printing 3D models to be used in a variety of situations in orthopedic trauma surgeries. In all cases, the use of 3D modeling has impacted and improved the final treatment strategy. The use of the virtual anatomical model and the 3D printed anatomical model with the additive manufacturing technology proved to be effective and useful in planning and performing the surgical treatment of complex articular fractures, allowing surgical planning both virtual and with the 3D printed anatomical model, besides being useful during the surgical time as a navigation instrument.

Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery is a challenging and very demanding field that involves the treatment of congenital and acquired conditions of the face and head. Due to the complexity of the head and facial region, various tools and techniques were developed and utilized to aid surgical procedures and optimize results. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) has revolutionized the way craniomaxillofacial surgeries are planned and executed. It uses 3D imaging computer software to visualize and simulate a surgical procedure. Numerous studies were published on the usage of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery. However, the researchers found inconsistency in the previous literature which prompted the development of this review. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the findings of the studies by conducting an integrated approach to synthesize the literature related to the use of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Twenty-nine related articles were selected as a sample and synthesized thoroughly. These papers were grouped assigning to the four subdisciplines of craniomaxillofacial surgery: orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, trauma surgery and implant surgery. The following variables – treatment time, the accuracy of VSP, clinical outcome, cost, and cost-effectiveness – were also examined. Results revealed that VSP offers advantages in craniomaxillofacial surgery over the traditional method in terms of duration, predictability and clinical outcomes. However, the cost aspect was not discussed in most papers. This structured literature review will thus provide current findings and trends and recommendations for future research on the usage of VSP in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare conventional (CSP) versus customized virtual surgical planning (VSP) in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. The primary goal was to compare the accuracy of defined angles. The secondary purpose was to analyze the accuracy of the splints, the time required for surgery, and the costs of both methods.Materials and methodsA total of 21 patients (nCSP = 12; nVSP = 9) treated by two-jaw orthognathic surgery were analyzed prospectively between the years 2014 and 2016. Customized VSP consisted of virtual planning as well as CAD/CAM printing of splints and pre-bent osteosynthesis plates. The evaluated parameters were the difference between planned and postoperative situation (SNA/SNB/ANB), accuracy of splints, time required for surgery (min), and total costs of planning (€).ResultsWhen compared to CSP, VSP appears to be a more accurate method for orthognathic treatment planning with significant differences in the angle outcome (SNA p < 0.001; SNB p = 0.002; ANB p < 0.001). There were significant differences in splint accuracy in favor of CAD/CAM splints (p = 0.007). VSP significantly reduced the duration of operation (p = 0.041). Nevertheless, VSP increased the total costs (481.80 € vs. 884.00 €).ConclusionsWhen using virtual 3D technology in combination with printed acrylic splints, 3D models of the jaws and pre-bent osteosynthesis, there is a noticeable reduction in the duration of the operation in conjunction with an improvement in accuracy.Clinical relevanceVirtual model surgery and the prefabrication of splints and plates may replace traditional orthognathic surgery as it becomes cost-effective.

Compared to traditional manufacturing methods, additive manufacturing and 3D printing stand out in their ability to rapidly fabricate complex structures and precise geometries. The growing need for products with different designs, purposes and materials led to the development of 3D printing, serving as a driving force for the 4th industrial revolution and digitization of manufacturing. 3D printing has had a global impact on healthcare, with patient-customized implants now replacing generic implantable medical devices. This revolution has had a particularly significant impact on oral and maxillofacial surgery, where surgeons rely on precision medicine in everyday practice. Trauma, orthognathic surgery and total joint replacement therapy represent several examples of treatments improved by 3D technologies. The widespread and rapid implementation of 3D technologies in clinical settings has led to the development of point-of-care treatment facilities with in-house infrastructure, enabling surgical teams to participate in the 3D design and manufacturing of devices. 3D technologies have had a tremendous impact on clinical outcomes and on the way clinicians approach treatment planning. The current review offers our perspective on the implementation of 3D-based technologies in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, while indicating major clinical applications. Moreover, the current report outlines the 3D printing point-of-care concept in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

This comprehensive review explores the advancements in Orthognathic and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, focusing on the integration of 3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP). Traditional surgical methods, while effective, come with inherent risks and complications, and can lead to variability in outcomes due to the reliance on the surgeon’s skill and experience. The shift towards patient-centric care necessitates personalized surgical methods, which can be achieved through advanced technology. The amalgamation of 3D printing and VSP revolutionizes surgical planning and implementation by providing tactile 3D models for visualization and planning, and accurately designed surgical guides for execution. This convergence of digital planning and physical modeling facilitates a more predictable, personalized, and precise surgical process. However, the adoption of these technologies presents challenges, including the need for extensive software training and the steep learning curve associated with computer-aided design programs. Despite these challenges, the integration of 3D printing and VSP paves the way for advanced patient care in orthognathic and oral maxillofacial surgery.

Background The aim of the study was to compare the hinge axis position (Ax) determined by virtual (VSP) versus conventional orthognathic surgery planning (CSP). Methods This retrospective cohort study included 320 (female/male = 204/116, median age 24.0 years) adult patients who received single- or two-jaw surgery originally planned using the CSP method and subsequently reevaluated using the VSP method. Three parameters ( = angle between the occlusal plane and reference plane, AxV = perpendicular distance between Ax and the occlusal plane, AxH = perpendicular distance between the upper incisor and AxV) for determining Ax were measured on cephalograms, both in VSP and CSP. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Results Both methods differed significantly with a bias of -1.83 (95% CI -2.04 to -1.62) for , -0.24 mm (95% CI -0.41 to -0.08) for AxV and 0.46 mm (95% CI 0.27 to 0.65) for AxH, with negative values indicating an overestimation by the CSP method. All differences were within the range considered as clinically acceptable. Conclusions There were statistically significant differences in all parameters; however, these differences were small and within the range generally considered to be clinically acceptable.

Virtual surgical planning is the process of planning and rehearsing a surgical procedure completely within the virtual environment on computer models. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing is gaining popularity in veterinary oromaxillofacial surgery and are viable tools for the most basic to the most complex cases. These techniques can provide the surgeon with improved visualization and, thus, understanding of the patients' 3D anatomy. Virtual surgical planning is feasible in a clinical setting and may decrease surgical time and increase surgical accuracy. For example, pre-operative implant contouring on a 3D-printed model can save time during surgery; 3D-printed patient-specific implants and surgical guides help maintain normocclusion after mandibular reconstruction; and the presence of a haptic model in the operating room can improve surgical precision and safety. However, significant time and financial resources may need to be allocated for planning and production of surgical guides and implants. The objectives of this manuscript are to provide a description of the methods involved in virtual surgical planning and 3D printing as they apply to veterinary oromaxillofacial surgery and to highlight these concepts with the strategic use of examples. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the methods as well as the required software and equipment will be discussed.

Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS) is a transformative surgical approach aimed at aligning the facial features of transgender women with their gender identity. Through a systematic analysis, this paper explores the clinical differences between male and female facial skeletons along with the craniofacial techniques employed in FFS for each region. The preoperative planning stage is highlighted, emphasizing the importance of virtual planning and AI morphing as valuable tools to be used to achieve surgical precision. Consideration is given to special circumstances, such as procedure sequencing for older patients and silicone removal. Clinical outcomes, through patient-reported outcome measures and AI-based gender-typing assessments, showcase the efficacy of FFS in achieving proper gender recognition and alleviating gender dysphoria. This comprehensive review not only offers valuable insights into the current state of knowledge regarding FFS but also emphasizes the potential of artificial intelligence in outcome evaluation and surgical planning to further advance patient care and satisfaction with FFS.

Background Preoperative planning of orthognathic surgery is indispensable for achieving ideal surgical outcome regarding the occlusion and jaws' position. However, orthognathic surgery planning is sophisticated and highly experience-dependent, which requires comprehensive consideration of facial morphology and occlusal function. This study aimed to investigate a robust and automatic method based on deep learning to predict reposition vectors of jawbones in orthognathic surgery plan. Methods A regression neural network named VSP transformer was developed based on Transformer architecture. Firstly, 3D cephalometric analysis was employed to quantify skeletal-facial morphology as input features. Next, input features were weighted using pretrained results to minimize bias resulted from multicollinearity. Through encoder-decoder blocks, ten landmark-based reposition vectors of jawbones were predicted. Permutation importance (PI) method was used to calculate contributions of each feature to final prediction to reveal interpretability of the proposed model. Results VSP transformer model was developed with 383 samples and clinically tested with 49 prospectively collected samples. Our proposed model outperformed other four classic regression models in prediction accuracy. Mean absolute errors (MAE) of prediction were 1.41 mm in validation set and 1.34 mm in clinical test set. The interpretability results of the model were highly consistent with clinical knowledge and experience. Conclusions The developed model can predict reposition vectors of orthognathic surgery plan with high accuracy and good clinically practical-effectiveness. Moreover, the model was proved reliable because of its good interpretability.

Purpose Bony changes after orthognathic surgery are always followed by changes of the overlying soft tissues. Therefore, morphologic changes of the nose may be expected after procedures involving the maxilla. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the nasal region due to orthognathic surgery using computed tomography (CT) images of virtually planned patients. Methods 35 patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy, with or without bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, were included. 3D measurements on preoperative and postoperative images were performed and analyzed. Results The results revealed that aesthetically acceptable results can be achieved by orthognathic surgery alone. Conclusions According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that it is best to reserve decisions on rhinoplasty to the post-orthognathic period.