Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
3,185 result(s) for "Virus-like particle"
Sort by:
A phase I/II study of CpG/alum-adjuvanted mammalian-derived quadruple antigen carrying virus-like particle COVID-19 vaccine
Waning Spike-elicited immunity and emerging COVID-19 variants underscore the need for vaccines leveraging multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens, rapidly adaptable to evolving strains. Herein, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a CpG ODN-adjuvanted, alum-adsorbed, virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine displaying the hexaproline stabilized Spike (S) protein and the Nucleocapsid, Membrane, and Envelope proteins of SARS-CoV-2. In phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial, participants (N = 38, aged 18–59) received two subcutaneous injections of either 10 μg or 40 μg of VLP or placebo, 21 days apart. The primary and secondary objectives of the study was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity, respectively. In the double blind, multi-center phase-2 study, participants (N = 349, aged 18–55) were randomized into three cohorts receiving two doses of 40 μg VLPs displaying Wuhan-Spike, Alpha-Spike, or a combination. The primary and secondary objectives were humoral, and cell mediated immunogenicity (CMI) and safety, respectively. Antibody responses were analyzed using ELISA while ELIspot and CBA assays were used to assess the CMI. The VLP vaccine demonstrated a good safety profile, with 255 non-serious adverse events in phase 1 and 308 in phase 2. Five serious AEs were reported in phase 2, all of which were resolved completely. The VLP vaccine, in phase 2, was well-tolerated, elicited moderate but sustained anti-S and anti-N antibody titers for 180 days and induced T-helper-1 biased cellular responses in participants. The VLP platform is rapidly adaptable to accommodate stabilized Spike proteins from emerging variants and inclusion of other structural SARS-CoV-2 proteins could broaden the breadth of T cell-mediated immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04818281 and NCT04962893.
Chikungunya virus virus-like particle vaccine safety and immunogenicity in adolescents and adults in the USA: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Chikungunya disease is a growing global public health concern. Vimkunya (previously chikungunya virus virus-like particle vaccine, previously PXVX0317) is a single-dose, pre-filled syringe for intramuscular injection. Here, we report safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity data for Vimkunya versus placebo in healthy adolescents and adults aged 12–64 years, and evaluate lot-to-lot consistency. This pivotal phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was done at 47 clinical trial sites in the USA. Eligible participants were healthy adolescents and adults aged 12–64 years. Participants were divided into three age strata (12–17 years, 18–45 years, and 46–64 years) within each site and randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) to receive one of three consecutively manufactured lots of Vimkunya or placebo (same excipient composition without chikungunya virus virus-like particle or aluminium hydroxide components) on study day 1. Neither participants, nor clinical site personnel, nor the funder knew participants' individual treatment assignments until all participants completed their involvement in the trial and the database was cleaned and locked. Participants attended a screening visit, followed by a day 1 visit that included random assignment, blood sample collection, and administration of a single dose of Vimkunya or placebo by intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle. The coprimary endpoints were: the difference in chikungunya virus serum neutralising antibody seroreponse rate (vaccine minus placebo) at day 22; chikungunya virus serum neutralising antibody geometric mean titre (GMT) at day 22 for vaccine and placebo; and chikungunya virus serum neutralising GMT ratio at day 22 between all three pairs of vaccine lots (A:B, B:C, and A:C) in adults aged 18–45 years. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05072080 and EudraCT, 2023-001124-42. Between Sept 29, 2021, and Sept 23, 2022, 4215 participants were screened, of whom 3258 were eligible and enrolled (1667 [51·2%] female and 1591 [48·8%] male), and 3254 (99·9%) received either Vimkunya (n=2790) or placebo (n=464). The immunogenicity evaluable population included 2983 participants, of whom 2559 received Vimkunya and 424 received placebo. At day 22, 2503 (97·8%) of 2559 participants in the Vimkunya group had a seroresponse, compared with five (1·2%) of 424 participants in the placebo group for the immunogenicity evaluable population. The seroreponse rate difference was 96·6% (95% CI 95·0–97·5; p<0·0001). In the immunogenicity evaluable population, chikungunya virus serum neutralising antibody GMT at day 22 for the vaccine group was 1618 and for the placebo group was 7·9 (p<0·0001). At day 22, the serum neutralising GMT ratios for the pairs of lots (A:B, B:C, and A:C) were 0·98 (95% CI 0·85–1·14), 0·97 (0·84–1·12), and 0·95 (0·82–1·10), respectively. Vimkunya had a favourable safety profile; most adverse events were self-limiting and grade 1 or 2 in severity. The most common adverse events were injection site pain (656 [23·7%] of 2764 participants in the vaccine group), fatigue (551 [19·9%] of 2764), headache (498 [18·0%] of 2765), and myalgia (486 [17·6%] of 2764). Vimkunya induces a rapid and robust immune response. These findings support the potential for this vaccine to protect individuals aged 12–64 years from disease caused by chikungunya virus. Emergent BioSolutions and Bavarian Nordic.
A Phase 2 randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of aluminum-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus F particle vaccine formulations in healthy women of childbearing age
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in infants. We are developing an RSV fusion (F) protein nanoparticle vaccine for immunization of third trimester pregnant women to passively protect infants through transfer of RSV-specific maternal antibodies. The present trial was performed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of several formulations of RSV F vaccine in 1-dose or 2-dose schedules. Placebo, or vaccine with 60μg or 120μg RSV F protein and 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8mg aluminum, were administered intramuscularly on Days 0 and 28 to healthy women 18–35years old. Immunogenicity was assessed from Days 0 through 91 based on anti-F IgG and palivizumab-competitive antibody (PCA) by ELISA, and RSV A and B neutralizing antibodies by microneutralization (MN) assay. Solicited adverse events were collected through Day 7 and unsolicited adverse events through Day 91. All formulations were well-tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events. Anti-F IgG and PCA responses were correlated and increased after both doses, while MN increased significantly only after the first dose, then plateaued. The timeliest and most robust antibody responses followed one dose of 120μg RSV F protein and 0.4mg aluminum, but persistence through 91days was modestly (∼25%) superior following two doses of 60μg RSV F protein and 0.8mg aluminum. Western blot analysis showed RSV infections in active vaccinees were reduced by 52% overall (p=0.009 overall) over the Day 0 through 90 period. RSV F nanoparticle vaccine formulations were well tolerated and immunogenic. The optimal combination of convenience and rapid response for immunization in the third trimester occurred with 120μg RSV F and 0.4mg aluminum, which achieved peak immune responses in 14days and sufficient persistence through 91days to allow for passive transfer of IgG antibodies to the fetus. NCT01960686.
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion (F) Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine in Healthy Third-Trimester Pregnant Women and Their Infants
Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of infant lower respiratory tract disease and hospitalization worldwide. Methods Safety and immunogenicity of RSV fusion (F) protein nanoparticle vaccine or placebo were evaluated in 50 healthy third-trimester pregnant women. Assessments included vaccine tolerability and safety in women and infants, and RSV-specific antibody measures in women before and after vaccination, at delivery and post partum. Results The vaccine was well tolerated; no meaningful differences in pregnancy or infant outcomes were observed between study groups. RSV-specific antibody levels increased significantly among vaccine recipients, including responses competitive with well-described monoclonal antibodies specific for multiple RSV neutralizing epitopes. No significant antibody increase was seen among placebo recipients, although a shallow upward trend across the RSV season was noted. Transplacental antibody transfer was 90%–120% across assays for infants of vaccinated women. Women with an interval of ≥30 days between vaccination and delivery demonstrated higher placental antibody transfer rates than women with an interval <30 days. Half-lives of RSV-specific antibodies in infants approximated 40 days. There was no evidence of severe RSV disease in infants of vaccinated mothers. Conclusions Data from this phase 2 study support a maternal immunization strategy to protect infants from RSV disease. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02247726. Immunization of pregnant women with an RSV F protein nanoparticle vaccine was well-tolerated by the women and their infants, and produced antibody responses that were transferred via the placenta and exhibited a half-life of approximately 40 days in infants.
Chikungunya virus virus-like particle vaccine safety and immunogenicity in adults older than 65 years: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Adults older than 65 years are at increased risk for atypical presentations of chikungunya disease, as well as for severe outcomes including death. In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, adults aged 65 years and older received a single intramuscular dose of Vimkunya (previously chikungunya virus virus-like particle vaccine) or placebo at ten sites in the USA. Participants, clinical site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to individual treatment assignments until all participants had completed their involvement in the trial and the database was cleaned and locked. Baseline and postvaccination chikungunya virus serum neutralising antibody (SNA) titres (NT80) were assessed at selected timepoints. Safety was assessed up to 183 days after dose administration in all participants from the exposed population who provided safety assessment data. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05349617, and is completed. Between May 12 and Dec 2, 2022, 413 participants were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the Vimkunya vaccine (n=206) or placebo (n=207). The coprimary endpoints of immunologic superiority of chikungunya virus SNA titres compared with placebo and geometric mean titre at day 22 were met. Vimkunya induced a protective seroresponse (SNA NT80≥100, considered the presumptive seroprotective antibody response) in 149 (82%) of 181 participants (95% CI 76·1–87·2) at day 15, in 165 (87%) of 189 participants (81·8–91·3) at day 22, and in 139 (76%) of 184 participants (68·9–81·2) at day 183. Although there was a slightly higher early immune response in the 65–74 years age group at day 15 compared with the 75 years and older age group, the seroresponse rates at day 22 and day 183 were similar. There were no notable differences in adverse event rates between groups, and most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity and of short duration. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or deaths occurred. We provide robust data from adults aged 65 years and older showing that Vimkunya is well tolerated and can provide a high rate of protection within 2 weeks postvaccination and during 6 months of follow-up. Emergent BioSolutions and Bavarian Nordic.
Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent plant-derived virus like particle influenza vaccine candidate—Two randomized Phase II clinical trials in 18 to 49 and ≥50 years old adults
New influenza vaccines eliciting more effective protection are needed, particularly for the elderly who paid a large and disproportional toll of hospitalization and dead during seasonal influenza epidemics. Low (≤15 μg/strain) doses of a new plant-derived virus-like-particle (VLP) vaccine candidate have been shown to induce humoral and cellular responses against both homologous and heterologous strains in healthy adults 18-64 years of age. The two clinical trials reported here addressed the safety and immunogenicity of higher doses (≥15 μg/strain) of quadrivalent VLP candidate vaccine on 18-49 years old and ≥50 years old subjects. We also investigated the impact of alum on the immunogenicity induced by lower doses of the vaccine candidate. In the first Phase II trial reported here (NCT02233816), 18-49 year old subjects received 15, 30 or 60 μg/strain of a hemagglutinin-bearing quadrivalent virus-like particle (QVLP) vaccine or placebo. In the second trial (NCT02236052), ≥50 years old subjects received QVLP as above or placebo with additional groups receiving 7.5 or 15 μg/strain with alum. Along with safety recording, the humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were analyzed. Local and systemic side-effects were similar to those reported previously. The QVLP vaccine induced significant homologous and heterologous antibody responses at the two higher doses, the addition of alum having little-to-no effect. Serologic outcomes tended to be lower in ≥50 years old subjects previously vaccinated. The candidate vaccine also consistently elicited both homologous and heterologous antigen-specific CD4+ T cells characterized by their production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukine-2 (IL-2) and/or tumor-necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) upon ex vivo antigenic restimulation. Overall, the 30 μg dose produced the most consistent humoral and cellular responses in both 18-49 and ≥50 years old subjects, strongly supporting the clinical development of this candidate vaccine. That particular dose was chosen to test in the ongoing Phase III clinical trial.
A Novel Intramuscular Bivalent Norovirus Virus-Like Particle Vaccine Candidate—Reactogenicity, Safety, and Immunogenicity in a Phase 1 Trial in Healthy Adults
Background. Noroviruses are the most important viral causes of gastroenteritis-related morbidity and mortality. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated an adjuvanted bivalent intramuscular norovirus virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. Methods. Forty-eight adults aged 18-49 years received either 2 doses containing genotype GI.1 VLP and a consensus GII. 4 VLP or 2 doses of placebo. Doses (5 µg, 15 µg, 50 µg, or 150 µg of each VLP) were administered 4 weeks apart in the first stage. Subsequently, 54 adults, aged 18-49 (n = 16), 50-64 (n = 19), and 65-85 (n = 19) years, received 2 doses of vaccine containing 50 (µg of each VLP. Total and class-specific antibody responses, as well as histoblood group antigen (HBGA) blocking antibody responses, were measured before and after each dose. Results. Local reactions were mainly injection site pain/tenderness, with no reported fever or vaccine-related serious adverse events. One dose of vaccine containing 50 µg of each VLP increased GI.1 geometric mean titers (GMTs) by 118-fold, 83-fold, and 24-fold and increased GII. 4 GMTs by 49-fold, 25-fold, and 9-fold in subjects aged 18-49,50-64, and 65-83 years, respectively. Serum antibody responses peaked at day 7 after the first dose, with no evidence of boosting following a second dose. Most subjects achieved HBGA-blocking antibody titers of > 200. Conclusions. The vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic. Rapid immune response to a single dose may be particularly useful in military personnel and travelers and in the control of outbreaks.
Explanations for the high potency of HPV prophylactic vaccines
HPV L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines administered in a prime/boost series of three injections over six months have demonstrated remarkable prophylactic efficacy in clinical trials and effectiveness in national immunization programs with high rates of coverage. There is mounting evidence that the vaccines have similar efficacy and effectiveness even when administered in a single dose. The unexpected potency of one dose of these VLP vaccines may largely be attributed to structural features of the particles, which lead to the efficient generation of long-lived antigen-specific antibody-producing cells and unique features of the virus life cycle that make the HPV virions highly susceptible to antibody-mediated inhibition of infection.
Virus-like particles: preparation, immunogenicity and their roles as nanovaccines and drug nanocarriers
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are virus-derived structures made up of one or more different molecules with the ability to self-assemble, mimicking the form and size of a virus particle but lacking the genetic material so they are not capable of infecting the host cell. Expression and self-assembly of the viral structural proteins can take place in various living or cell-free expression systems after which the viral structures can be assembled and reconstructed. VLPs are gaining in popularity in the field of preventive medicine and to date, a wide range of VLP-based candidate vaccines have been developed for immunization against various infectious agents, the latest of which is the vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the efficacy of which is being evaluated. VLPs are highly immunogenic and are able to elicit both the antibody- and cell-mediated immune responses by pathways different from those elicited by conventional inactivated viral vaccines. However, there are still many challenges to this surface display system that need to be addressed in the future. VLPs that are classified as subunit vaccines are subdivided into enveloped and non- enveloped subtypes both of which are discussed in this review article. VLPs have also recently received attention for their successful applications in targeted drug delivery and for use in gene therapy. The development of more effective and targeted forms of VLP by modification of the surface of the particles in such a way that they can be introduced into specific cells or tissues or increase their half-life in the host is likely to expand their use in the future. Recent advances in the production and fabrication of VLPs including the exploration of different types of expression systems for their development, as well as their applications as vaccines in the prevention of infectious diseases and cancers resulting from their interaction with, and mechanism of activation of, the humoral and cellular immune systems are discussed in this review.
Virus-like particle vaccinology, from bench to bedside
Virus-like particles (VLPs) have become key tools in biology, medicine and even engineering. After their initial use to resolve viral structures at the atomic level, VLPs were rapidly harnessed to develop antiviral vaccines followed by their use as display platforms to generate any kind of vaccine. Most recently, VLPs have been employed as nanomachines to deliver pharmaceutically active products to specific sites and into specific cells in the body. Here, we focus on the use of VLPs for the development of vaccines with broad fields of indications ranging from classical vaccines against viruses to therapeutic vaccines against chronic inflammation, pain, allergy and cancer. In this review, we take a walk through time, starting with the latest developments in experimental preclinical VLP-based vaccines and ending with marketed vaccines, which earn billions of dollars every year, paving the way for the next wave of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines already visible on the horizon.