Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose This Phase I, multicenter, randomized study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01220128) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) protein combined with the immunostimulant AS15 (WT1-immunotherapeutic) as neoadjuvant therapy administered concurrently with standard treatments in WT1-positive breast cancer patients. Methods Patients were treated in 4 cohorts according to neoadjuvant treatment (A: post-menopausal, hormone receptor [HR]-positive patients receiving aromatase inhibitors; B: patients receiving chemotherapy; C: HER2-overexpressing patients on trastuzumab–chemotherapy combination; D: HR-positive/HER2-negative patients on chemotherapy). Patients (cohorts A–C) were randomized (2:1) to receive 6 or 8 doses of WT1-immunotherapeutic or placebo together with standard neoadjuvant treatment in a double-blind manner; cohort D patients received WT1-immunotherapeutic in an open manner. Safety was assessed throughout the study. WT1-specific antibodies were assessed pre- and post-vaccination. Results Sixty-two patients were randomized; 60 received ≥ one dose of WT1-immunotherapeutic. Two severe toxicities were reported: diarrhea (cohort C; also reported as a grade 3 serious adverse event) and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (cohort B; also reported as a grade 2 adverse event). Post-dose 4 of WT1-immunotherapeutic, 10/10 patients from cohort A, 0/8 patients from cohort B, 6/11 patients from cohort C, and 2/3 patients from cohort D were humoral responders. The sponsor elected to close the trial prematurely. Conclusions Concurrent administration of WT1-immunotherapeutic and standard neoadjuvant therapy was well tolerated and induced WT1-specific antibodies in patients receiving neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors. In patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy or trastuzumab–chemotherapy combination, the humoral response was impaired or blunted, likely due to either co-administration of corticosteroids and/or the chemotherapies themselves.

T cells with specificity for antigens derived from Wilms Tumor gene (WT1), Proteinase3 (Pr3), and mucin1 (MUC1) have been demonstrated to lyse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and multiple-myeloma (MM) cells, and strategies to enhance or induce such tumor-specific T cells by vaccination are currently being explored in multiple clinical trials. To test safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine composed of WT1-, Pr3-, and MUC1-derived Class I-restricted peptides and the pan HLA-DR T helper cell epitope (PADRE) or MUC1-helper epitopes in combination with CpG7909 and MontanideISA51, four patients with AML and five with MM were repetitively vaccinated. No clinical responses were observed. Neither pre-existing nor naive WT1-/Pr3-/MUC1-specific CD8⁺ T cells expanded in vivo by vaccination. In contrast, a significant decline in vaccine-specific CD8⁺ T cells was observed. An increase in PADRE-specific CD4⁺ T helper cells was observed after vaccination but these appeared unable to produce IL2, and CD4⁺ T cells with a regulatory phenotype increased. Taken into considerations that multiple clinical trials with identical antigens but different adjuvants induced vaccine-specific T cell responses, our data caution that a vaccination with leukemia-associated antigens can be detrimental when combined with MontanideISA51 and CpG7909. Reflecting the time-consuming efforts of clinical trials and the fact that 1/3 of ongoing peptide vaccination trails use CpG and/or Montanide, our data need to be taken into consideration.

Background Pancreatic cancer is a refractory malignancy, and the development of a new effective treatment strategy is needed. We generated a dendritic cell vaccine by culturing monocytes obtained by apheresis of blood from each patient, inducing their differentiation into dendritic cells, and pulsing with tumor antigen peptides. However, the clinical efficacy of the vaccine has not been established. We therefore decided to conduct an exploratory clinical trial of dendritic cell vaccine loaded with Wilms’ tumor gene 1 peptides (TLP0-001) as a potential new treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. Methods This is an investigator-initiated, double-blind, comparative trial. The patients were allocated to two groups in a 1:1 ratio through a central registration by dynamic allocation. A total of 185 patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were refractory or intolerant to standard primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel will be allocated to secondary treatment either with placebo in combination with S-1 (the control group) or TLP0-001 in combination with S-1 (the investigational product group). The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy (as measured by overall survival) of the investigational product by comparing the two groups. This clinical trial will be performed in accordance with Japanese Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Discussion Clinical trials of the standard regimen, including gemcitabine, for advanced pancreatic cancer are ongoing worldwide. However, a strategy for after the primary treatment has not been established. We therefore decided to conduct this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TLP0-001 as a secondary treatment for pancreatic cancer in anticipation of the approval of this new drug in Japan. This trial is conducted with full consideration of safety, as it is the first-in-human clinical trial of TLP0-001; thus, the trial will be conducted only at the Second Department of Surgery at Wakayama Medical University until the safety is confirmed by interim analysis. We plan to conduct a multicenter trial at 18 institutions in Japan after confirmation of the safety. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000027179 . Registered on 9 April 2017.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are clinically effective in a limited set of leukemia patients. However, CAR T-cell therapy thus far has been largely restricted to targeting extracellular tumor-associated antigens (TAA). Herein, we report a T-cell receptor-mimic (TCRm) CAR, termed WT1-28z, that is reactive to a peptide portion of the intracellular onco-protein Wilms Tumor 1(WT1), as it is expressed on the surface of the tumor cell in the context of HLA-A*02:01. T cells modified to express WT1-28z specifically targeted and lysed HLA-A*02:01+ WT1+ tumors and enhanced survival of mice engrafted with HLA-A*02:01+, WT1+ leukemia or ovarian tumors. This in vivo functional validation of TCRm CAR T cells provides the proof-of-concept necessary to expand the range of TAA that can be effectively targeted for immunotherapy to include attractive intracellular targets, and may hold great potential to expand on the success of CAR T-cell therapy.

Active immunization using tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells holds promise for the adjuvant treatment of cancer to eradicate or control residual disease, but so far, most dendritic cell trials have been performed in end-stage cancer patients with high tumor loads. Here, in a phase I/II trial, we investigated the effect of autologous dendritic cell vaccination in 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Wilms' tumor 1 protein (WT1), a nearly universal tumor antigen, was chosen as an immunotherapeutic target because of its established role in leukemogenesis and superior immunogenic characteristics. Two patients in partial remission after chemotherapy were brought into complete remission after intradermal administration of full-length WT1 mRNA-electroporated dendritic cells. In these two patients and three other patients who were in complete remission, the AML-associated tumor marker returned to normal after dendritic cell vaccination, compatible with the induction of molecular remission. Clinical responses were correlated with vaccine-associated increases in WT1-specific CD8⁺ T cell frequencies, as detected by peptide/HLA-A*0201 tetramer staining, and elevated levels of activated natural killer cells postvaccination. Furthermore, vaccinated patients showed increased levels of WT1-specific IFN-γ–producing CD8⁺ T cells and features of general immune activation. These data support the further development of vaccination with WT1 mRNA-loaded dendritic cells as a postremission treatment to prevent full relapse in AML patients.

Wilms’ tumor protein 1 (WT1)-targeted immunotherapy has been used in patients with leukemia and solid tumors. However, the spontaneous WT1-specific immune response before WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with WT1-expressing tumors (PTs) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated whether WT1-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T-lymphocytes (CTLs) are clonally expanded in the peripheral blood outside of tumor sites. Clonal expansion of WT1126 peptide (a.a.126–134)-specific CTLs (WT1126-CTLs) was compared between seven PTs and five healthy volunteers (HVs), and their T-cell receptors (TCRs) were analyzed at the single-cell level. Overall, 433 and 351 TCR β-chains of WT1126-CTLs were detected from PTs and HVs, respectively, and complementarity-determining region 3 was sequenced for clonality analysis. The frequencies of WT1126-CTLs were higher in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01+ PTs than in HLA-A*02:01+ HVs, although the difference was not statistically significant. WT1126-CTLs of differentiated types, including memory and effector, were higher in PTs than in HVs; whereas, those of the naïve type were higher in HVs than in PTs. WT1126-CTL clonality was significantly higher in PTs than in HVs. Furthermore, the frequency of effector WT1126-CTLs positively correlated with WT1126-CTL clonality in PTs; whereas, the frequency of naïve phenotype WT1126-CTLs tended to be negatively correlated with clonality. In conclusion, these results suggest that the WT1 protein in tumor cells is highly immunogenic, thereby stimulating endogenous naïve-type WT1126-CTLs and enabling them to clonally expand and differentiate into effector-type WT1126-CTLs.

PurposeThe safety and clinical efficacy of WT1 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I peptide vaccine have been established, but the safety of a cocktail vaccine of WT1 HLA class I and II peptides has not. To verify its safety, we performed a phase I clinical trial for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas and assessed the immunological responses and survival data.Patients and methodsFourteen HLA-A*24:02-positive patients with recurrent malignant glioma (2 with grade 3, 12 with grade 4) were enrolled. Every week, the patients received alternately a vaccine containing 3 mg of WT1 HLA-A*24:02-restricted (HLA class I) peptide and a cocktail vaccine of the HLA class I peptide and one of 0.75, 1.5 or 3 mg of the WT1 HLA class II peptide. For patients who showed no significant adverse effects within 6 weeks, the WT1 vaccine was continued at 2–4-week intervals.ResultsEleven of the 14 patients completed WT1 vaccination for 6 weeks, while 3 patients dropped out earlier due to disease progression. All patients showed grade I level of skin disorders at the injection sites. No grade III/IV toxicity or dose-limiting toxicity was observed for any dose of WT1 HLA class II peptide. Six of the 14 patients had stable disease at 6 weeks. Median OS and 1-year OS rates were 24.7 weeks and 36%, respectively.ConclusionThe safety of a cocktail vaccine of WT1 HLA class I and II peptides for malignant gliomas was verified. This vaccine is, therefore, considered promising for patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

Relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is usually fatal. We previously reported that post-HCT immunotherapy with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific donor CD8 + T cells engineered to express a Wilms Tumor Antigen 1-specific T-cell receptor (T TCR-C4 ) appeared to prevent relapse in high-risk patients. In this phase I/II clinical trial (NCT01640301), we evaluated safety (primary endpoint), persistence and efficacy (secondary endpoints) of EBV- or Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T TCR-C4 in fifteen patients with active AML post-HCT. Infusions were well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities or serious adverse events related to the product. However, T TCR-C4 cells did not clearly improve outcomes despite EBV-specific T TCR-C4 cells showing enhanced potential for prolonged persistence compared to CMV-specific T TCR-C4 . Investigating the fate of persisting T TCR-C4 , we identified a shift towards natural killer-like (NKL) terminal differentiation, distinct from solid tumor-associated canonical exhaustion programs. In one patient, treatment with azacitidine appeared to mitigate this NKL skewing, promoting T TCR-C4 persistence. These findings suggest that AML drives a distinct form of T-cell dysfunction, highlight the need for targeted approaches that preserve T-cell fitness, ultimately improving the efficacy of cellular therapies for AML. Relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) postallogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has limited treatment options. Here the authors report the clinical results and immune correlates of a phase I/II trial of adoptively transferred virus-specific donor CD8 + T cells engineered to express a WT1-specific T cell receptor in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and active disease post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapies have been created for a broad expanse of cancers, and DC vaccines prepared with Wilms’ tumor protein 1 (WT1) peptides have shown great therapeutic efficacy in these diseases. In this paper, we report the results of a phase I/II study of a DC-based vaccination for advanced breast, ovarian, and gastric cancers, and we offer evidence that patients can be effectively vaccinated with autologous DCs pulsed with WT1 peptide. There were ten patients who took part in this clinical study; they were treated biweekly with a WT1 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical and immunological responses as the principal endpoints. All of the adverse events to DC vaccinations were tolerable under an adjuvant setting. The clinical response was stable disease in seven patients. Karnofsky Performance Scale scores were enhanced, and computed tomography scans revealed tumor shrinkage in three of seven patients. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)/WT1-tetramer and cytoplasmic IFN-γ assays were used to examine the induction of a WT-1-specific immune response. The immunological responses to DC vaccination were significantly correlated with fewer myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.045) in the pretreated peripheral blood. These outcomes offered initial clinical evidence that the WT1 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination is a potential treatment for advanced cancer.

Cell therapies, including tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells used as therapeutic cancer vaccines, offer treatment options for patients with malignancies. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, immunogenicity, and clinical activity of adjuvant vaccination with Wilms’ tumor protein (WT1) mRNA-electroporated autologous dendritic cells ( WT1 -mRNA/DC) in a single-arm phase I/II clinical study of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving standard therapy. Disease status and immune reactivity were evaluated after 8 weeks and 6 months. WT1 -mRNA/DC vaccination was feasible in all patients, except one. Vaccination was well tolerated without evidence of systemic toxicity. The disease control rate and overall response rate among a total of 39 evaluable patients were 74.4% and 12.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 43.7 months among 13 patients with glioblastoma multiforme, 41.9 months among 12 patients with metastatic breast cancer, and 48.8 months among 10 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, comparing favourably with historical controls reported in the literature. OS was longer in patients with stable disease at 8 weeks and disease control at 6 months versus patients without disease control at either time point. Disease control and higher OS were associated with antigen-specific type 1 CD4 + and/or CD8 + T-lymphocyte responses, mainly induced by WT1 -mRNA/DC vaccination. Antigen-nonspecific type 2 CD8 + T-cell responses were common before WT1 -mRNA/DC vaccination but did not show any association with clinical outcome. Collectively, these data indicate that WT1 -mRNA/DC vaccination is feasible, safe, and immunogenic and shows clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, suggesting that it has the potential to help improve their survival.