Explore the vast range of titles available.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in municipal effluents directly affect the sexual development and reproductive success of fishes, but indirect effects on invertebrate prey or fish predators through reduced predation or prey availability, respectively, are unknown. At the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario, Canada, a long-term, whole-lake experiment was conducted using a before-after-control-impact design to determine both direct and indirect effects of the synthetic oestrogen used in the birth control pill, 17α-ethynyloestradiol (EE2). Algal, microbial, zooplankton and benthic invertebrate communities showed no declines in abundance during three summers of EE2 additions (5–6 ng l−1), indicating no direct toxic effects. Recruitment of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) failed, leading to a near-extirpation of this species both 2 years during (young-of-year, YOY) and 2 years following (adults and YOY) EE2 additions. Body condition of male lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and male and female white sucker (Catostomus commersonii) declined before changes in prey abundance, suggesting direct effects of EE2 on this endpoint. Evidence of indirect effects of EE2 was also observed. Increases in zooplankton, Chaoborus, and emerging insects were observed after 2 or 3 years of EE2 additions, strongly suggesting indirect effects mediated through the reduced abundance of several small-bodied fishes. Biomass of top predator lake trout declined by 23–42% during and after EE2 additions, most probably an indirect effect from the loss of its prey species, the fathead minnow and slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus). Our results demonstrate that small-scale studies focusing solely on direct effects are likely to underestimate the true environmental impacts of oestrogens in municipal wastewaters and provide further evidence of the value of whole-ecosystem experiments for understanding indirect effects of EDCs and other aquatic stressors.

Methylmercury contamination of fisheries from centuries of industrial atmospheric emissions negatively impacts humans and wildlife worldwide. The response of fish methylmercury concentrations to changes in mercury deposition has been difficult to establish because sediments/soils contain large pools of historical contamination, and many factors in addition to deposition affect fish mercury. To test directly the response of fish contamination to changing mercury deposition, we conducted a whole-ecosystem experiment, increasing the mercury load to a lake and its watershed by the addition of enriched stable mercury isotopes. The isotopes allowed us to distinguish between experimentally applied mercury and mercury already present in the ecosystem and to examine bioaccumulation of mercury deposited to different parts of the watershed. Fish methylmercury concentrations responded rapidly to changes in mercury deposition over the first 3 years of study. Essentially all of the increase in fish methylmercury concentrations came from mercury deposited directly to the lake surface. In contrast, <1% of the mercury isotope deposited to the watershed was exported to the lake. Steady state was not reached within 3 years. Lake mercury isotope concentrations were still rising in lake biota, and watershed mercury isotope exports to the lake were increasing slowly. Therefore, we predict that mercury emissions reductions will yield rapid (years) reductions in fish methylmercury concentrations and will yield concomitant reductions in risk. However, a full response will be delayed by the gradual export of mercury stored in watersheds. The rate of response will vary among lakes depending on the relative surface areas of water and watershed.

Macrofauna secondary responses to controlled eutrophication within two MARICULT/MAST-III projects, EULIT and COMWEB, are compared. EULIT utilises a nutrient gradient established in eight hard bottom mesocosms, whereas the data from COMWEB originate from a whole-ecosystem study - the case of experimental nutrient addition to Hopavågen lagoon. In both systems, nutrient addition started in May 1998, after initial studies of the background macrofauna communities, thus allowing application of Before-After-Control-Impact-Pairs techniques (BACIP). The main objectives have been to investigate the macrofauna responses to eutrophication in littoral rocky shore ecosystems and to evaluate if similar responses could occur in mesocosm and `field' systems, despite their inherent differences. Apart from a distinct increase in numbers of Littorina littorea L. and some indications of increased abundance of the genus Jaera, no significant changes, caused by 2.5 years of nutrient addition, could be detected in the mesocosm fauna. It is interesting, however, that these two possibly stimulated animal groups have two things in common: (1) both belong to the rather few mobile taxa, which are not flushed out of the system through the mesocosm outlets, (2) both feed on microalgae and green algae in the upper littoral zone, i.e., algal groups that have shown the clearest response to the nutrient addition. In Hopavågen, 1.5 years of nutrient addition only caused modest plant and animal responses in the rocky shore ecosystem, although there was a markedly increased settlement of Mytilus edulis L. at one lagoon site. This increase was probably due to elevated levels of digestible particles (increased phytoplankton production) caused by the nutrient addition. There were also some indications of increased production of filamentous algae at this same lagoon site. All in all, both studies demonstrate only minor responses to increased nutrient levels within the littoral community (both plants and animals). One explanation to this may be that longer time-scales are needed in order for clear-cut changes to occur. Several observations also indicate that wave exposure (significant in both systems) may largely modulate the impact of increased nutrient load on the structure of littoral communities. Another explanation is the high degree of stability among littoral macroalgae-dominated communities with internal biological regulation factors (like grazing) possibly being able to counteract effects.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]