Explore the vast range of titles available.

Workplace accommodation requests and pertinent psychological and social factors were compared among a national sample of 528 participants recruited from multiple organizations serving people with disabilities. For the purpose of statistical analyses, the sample was grouped into three education levels (i.e., graduate degree or higher, associate or bachelor's degree, and high school degree or less). Participants with a high school degree or less were less likely to request accommodations compared to the other two groups. Participants with a highschool degree or less were less likely to request assistive technology, telework, physical alteration of office and/or work environment, and assistance by others. Participants with a master's degree or higher reported significantly higher levels of willingness to request accommodations than other participants. Participants with a master's degree or higher reported a significantly higher level of self- efficacy in requesting accommodations than the other two groups. Statistically significant differences were found among the three groups on self-efficacy in goal setting, knowledge of ADA, and knowledge of accommodations. Implications for rehabilitation counselors and transition professionals are discussed.

Autistic adults are inadequately supported in the workplace. This study sought a definition of ‘reasonable’ and explored facilitators and barriers to employers making reasonable adjustments. 98 employers and employees across a UK city completed a survey; 15% identified as being autistic. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. Reasonable adjustments were defined as having a positive impact on autistic employees’ wellbeing and work outputs without being detrimental to non-autistic employees or the organisation; they were low cost and easily implemented. Recommendations were for autism awareness training, low-stimulus work spaces, clear instructions and flexible working hours. A definition of reasonable is added to the literature, with suggestions of where to invest support efforts. Recommendations mostly apply to the education sector.

Are social competency skills, like political skill, linked to the efforts extended by employees with disabilities to acquire workplace accommodations? Based on survey data collected from 197 employees with disabilities, this research question was addressed by testing five hypotheses: political skill was hypothesized to correlate significantly with accommodation request withholding (hypothesis 1), formal accommodation requesting (hypothesis 2), informal accommodation requesting (hypothesis 3), accommodation crafting (hypothesis 4), and overall accommodation seeking behavior (hypothesis 5). Hypotheses 1, 3, 4, and 5 were confirmed while hypothesis 2 was refuted. A secondary question was: how often do employees with disabilities engage in accommodation seeking behaviors? When looking only at frequency rates for the three accommodation seeking behaviors, no significant differences between the frequency of engagement in each of the strategies was found. A finding that some employees did engage in accommodation crafting without also engaging in formal accommodation requesting suggests that some employees may have moved beyond concerns over job security (a key goal for accommodation requesting) and onward to pursue self-initiated job changes, known as task crafting. Theoretical, empirical and practical implications are discussed.

The purpose of this paper is to address the \"What's next?\" question asked by employees with disabilities when they have created a \"level playing field,\" that is, one with job security and equitable opportunities. Some employees answer such questions by engaging in task crafting, which involves creating changes in the scope, number of tasks, or type of job activities performed by employees. For employees with disabilities, successful task crafting may require involvement in a self-controlled strategy to acquire the accommodations they will need for successful task crafting, known as accommodation crafting. Using the survey responses from seventy-two participants with disabilities, a statistically significant correlation (r = .27) between these two crafting constructs was found as hypothesized, along with frequency results. Study findings have implications for employees with disabilities, vocational rehabilitation counselors and managers.

Background Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research. Objectives To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with return-to-work outcomes. Methods Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the grey literature were searched from January 1, 2004 to September 1, 2013. Systematic reviews addressing return-to-work in various conditions and injuries were selected. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to identify low risk of bias reviews. Results Of the 36,193 titles screened and the 94 eligible studies reviewed, 56 systematic reviews were accepted as low risk of bias. Over half of these focused on musculoskeletal disorders, which were primarily spine related (e.g., neck and low back pain). The other half of studies assessed workers with mental health or cardiovascular conditions, stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis or other non-specified health conditions. Many factors have been assessed, but few consistently across conditions. Common factors associated with positive return-to-work outcomes were higher education and socioeconomic status, higher self-efficacy and optimistic expectations for recovery and return-to-work, lower severity of the injury/illness, return-to-work coordination, and multidisciplinary interventions that include the workplace and stakeholders. Common factors associated with negative return-to-work outcomes were older age, being female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, previous sick leave and unemployment, and activity limitations. Conclusions Expectations of recovery and return-to-work, pain and disability levels, depression, workplace factors, and access to multidisciplinary resources are important modifiable factors in progressing return-to-work across health and injury conditions. Employers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders can use this information to facilitate return-to-work for injured/ill workers regardless of the specific injury or illness. Future studies should investigate novel interventions, and other factors that may be common across health conditions.

Workplace mental health challenges have emerged as a significant concern post-pandemic. Despite this, the pervasive stigma surrounding mental illness leads to the concealment of symptoms and reluctance to seek professional help among employees. This study aims to explore the perception of different stakeholders towards the ‘Detection and disclosure’ of workplace mental health challenges in the Indian context. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with human resource professionals, counselors, and employees who had previously experienced mental health challenge(s). Thematic analysis was done to identify recurring themes and sub-themes. Three critical pathways were identified: minimizing the inhibitory factors , including lack of awareness, denial, low self-efficacy, stigma, and underestimating organizational capability; maximizing the encouraging factors , including psychological safety, perceived social support, and communicating success stories; and implementing supportive organizational practices , including generating awareness and literacy, build the organizational capability, strengthen the role of managers, leadership advocacy, policies, and processes. By fostering a culture of support and prioritizing employee well-being, organizations in India can create healthier and more resilient work environments, benefiting both individuals and the larger society.

Background In addition to several sequelae of post-COVID-19, individuals also experience significant limitations in work ability, resulting in negative consequences for the return-to-work (RTW) process. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the impact of post-COVID-19 on work ability and RTW of individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods Studies on the work ability and RTW of patients with post-COVID-19 (more than 12 weeks after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection) were regarded eligible for inclusion. Systematic search of literature was performed up to March 2023 using five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and WHO COVID 19). Study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement. A meta-analysis estimated the overall success rate of RTW. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results 19 relevant studies, published between 2021 and 2023, were included in the systematic review, involving 21.155 patients from 14 different countries. The findings indicate that a significant proportion of individuals with post-COVID-19 experience persistent symptoms and functional impairments, with fatigue being the most prominent symptom. These persistent symptoms can have a considerable (negative) impact on individuals’ physical and psychological capacity to participate in work-related activities, leading to lower work ability and increased absenteeism. The RTW for post-COVID-19 patients is complex, with approximately 60.9% of patients successfully returning to work after 12 or more weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among those who successfully returning to work, a considerable number need modifications in their work duties or hours to cope with residual impairments. Factors such as workplace accommodations, supportive policies, and occupational rehabilitation programs play a crucial role in facilitating successful RTW. Conclusions The systematic review underscores the substantial impact of post-COVID-19 on work-related outcomes. The implications of this research highlight the need for healthcare providers, employers, and policymakers to collaborate in creating inclusive work environments and implementing tailored rehabilitation programs to support individuals recovering from post-COVID-19. Further research should focus on long-term follow-up studies with mixed methods to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the long-term consequences of post-COVID-19 on work ability and RTW outcomes. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023385436.

This study investigated the association between post-stroke fatigue and inability to return to work/drive in young patients aged <60 years with first stroke who were employed prior to infarct while controlling for stroke severity, age, extent of disability, cognitive function, and depression. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to evaluate post-stroke fatigue in this 1-year prospective cohort study. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, and 12 months post rehabilitation discharge. A total of 112 patients were recruited, 7 were excluded, due to loss to follow-up (n = 6) and being palliative (n = 1), resulting in 105 participants (71% male, average age 49 ±10.63 years). Stroke patients receiving both inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation were consecutively recruited. Persistent fatigue remained associated with inability to return to work when controlling for other factors at 3 months (adjusted OR = 18, 95% CI: 2.9, 110.3, p = 0.002), 6 months (adjusted OR = 29.81, 95% CI: 1.7, 532.8, p = 0.021), and 12 months (adjusted OR = 31.6, 95% CI: 1.8, 545.0, p = 0.018). No association was found between persistent fatigue and return to driving. Fatigue at admission was associated with inability to return to work at 3 months but not return to drive. Persistent fatigue was found to be associated with inability to resume work but not driving. It may be beneficial to routinely screen post-stroke fatigue in rehabilitation and educate stroke survivors and employers on the impacts of post-stroke fatigue on return to work.

Background Common mental health problems, such as stress, anxiety and depression, are highly prevalent among workers and often lead to long-term absenteeism and work disability. Effective elements found in previous researched interventions were to explicitly focus on return to work (RTW) and not solely on symptom reduction, to take into account the employees’ cognition towards RTW and to include the workplace environment. Based on these elements, a stepped-care approach was developed. The aim of this paper is to present the study design of a randomized controlled trial (RESTART), evaluating the effectiveness of the stepped-care approach on lasting RTW and the implementation process. Methods RESTART is a randomized controlled trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design and a follow-up of one year. Employees eligible for this study are those who reported sick within 2 to 8 weeks with psychological distress based on a distress screener. Participants will be randomized to a group receiving a tailored e-Health app or usual care, as well as randomized to a group receiving a Participatory Approach (PA; conversational method) in the workplace or usual care. The PA will however only be provided in case of persistent sickness absence at 8 weeks. Measurements take place at baseline, after the e-Health intervention period (3 months), and after the PA intervention period (6 months) and 12 months. Primary outcome is lasting RTW, defined as full RTW in previous or equal work for at least four consecutive weeks. Secondary outcomes are (the severity of) stress-related symptoms, total number of sickness absence days, self-efficacy for RTW and self-reported health. A process evaluation including a realist evaluation will also be conducted. Discussion Early intervention that focuses on RTW, the cognition towards RTW despite symptoms and involves the workplace environment, plays a crucial role in managing sickness absence among employees with psychological distress. If effective, the stepped-care approach is relevant for employees, employers and society as a whole. Trial Registration ISRCTN: 90663076. Registered on 5 October 2023.

Unemployment and underemployment have consistently been shown to be higher in autistic adults relative to non-autistic adults. This may be due, in part, to a lack of workplace accommodations being made for autistic people. One factor that may contribute to employment inequalities in autistic people is differences in attitudes towards interpersonal touch. This study acts as a preliminary investigation into whether employed autistic and non-autistic participants differ in their attitudes towards touch in the workplace, and in their loneliness and wellbeing. The current dataset was drawn from a larger online survey (the Touch Test) designed to explore attitudes and experiences towards touch. We found that employed autistic participants had more negative attitudes to general, social and workplace touch relative to non-autistic participants. Autistic participants also experienced greater loneliness and reduced wellbeing. Attachment-related anxiety was the only significant predictor of wellbeing in employed autistic adults. However, attachment-related anxiety, general attitudes to touch and the role of touch in the workplace predicted wellbeing in employed non-autistic adults. With regards to loneliness, general attitudes to touch and the role of touch in the workplace predicted loneliness in autistic participants. We also replicated the finding that a greater proportion of autistic participants were unemployed relative to non-autistic participants. Collectively, this research highlights the importance of considering touch in research investigating employment, and its impact on loneliness and wellbeing, in autistic participants.