Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
26,442
result(s) for
"Yellows"
Sort by:
Safety and immunogenicity of a next-generation live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine produced in a Vero cell line in the USA: a phase 1 randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial
2024
Recent outbreaks between 2015–17 and production delays have led to a yellow fever vaccine shortage. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new yellow fever vaccines with improved production scalability. A next-generation live-attenuated yellow fever vaccine candidate (vYF), produced in a Vero cell line has shown similar immunogenicity to licensed yellow fever vaccines in preclinical studies. In this study, we aimed to report the safety and immunogenicity of vYF in human clinical trial participants.
In this first in-human, phase 1 randomised, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial conducted at a single centre in the USA (Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA), 72 healthy adults (aged 18–60 years), without a known history of flavivirus infection or vaccination were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using interactive response technology to receive one dose of either vYF at 4, 5 or 6 Log CCID50 or the licensed YF-VAX (18 individuals per group). The primary outcomes were safety, neutralising antibody (NAb) titres through D180 post-vaccination in the per-protocol analysis set (comprised of yellow fever-naive participants who received their intended vaccine and provided a valid post-vaccination blood sample), and occurrence, and level of yellow fever viraemia in each vaccine group through D14 post-vaccination.
All vYF doses had a safety and tolerability profile similar to YF-VAX. The most frequently reported solicited injection site reactions (vYF groups vs YF-VAX group) were pain (22% [12 of 54 participants, 95% CI 12–36] vs 28% [five of 18 participants, 10–54]), and erythema (13% [seven of 54 participants, 5–25] vs 39% [seven of 18 participants, 17–64]), with headache (32% [17 of 54 participants, 20–46] vs 44% [eight of 18 participants, 22–69]) and malaise (26% [14 of 54 participants, 15–40] vs 33% [six of 18 participants, 13–59]) as the most frequently reported solicited systemic reactions. One grade 3 solicited reaction (erythema) reported in the YF-VAX group resolved spontaneously. No serious unsolicited adverse events or deaths were reported. Viraemia was transiently detected in 50 participants between D4 and D10 in all groups and was observed in more participants or for a longer time in the vYF 6 Log CCID50 and YF-VAX groups. All yellow fever-naive vaccine recipients across the study groups seroconverted yielding four-fold increase from baseline in yellow fever NAb titres measured by yellow fever microneutralisation assay by D28 and were seroprotected with yellow fever NAb titres of at least 10 [1/dil]). Overall, 100% (18 of 18 participants, 95% CI 82–100), 89% (16 participants, 65–99), 100% (18 participants, 82–100), and 94% (17 participants, 73–100) of participants in the vYF 4 Log, vYF 5 Log, vYF 6 Log CCID50 groups, and YF-VAX group, respectively, remained seroprotected through D180.
vYF has a similar safety and immunogenicity profile to YF-VAX. In general, the vYF 5 Log CCID50 dose appeared to show optimal viraemia, safety, and immunogenicity, and was chosen for subsequent development.
Sanofi.
Journal Article
Low-Dose Yellow Fever Vaccine in Adults in Africa
by
Warimwe, George M.
,
Orindi, Benedict
,
Wafula, Jackline
in
Adult
,
Adverse events
,
Antibodies, Viral - blood
2025
Yellow fever vaccine is highly effective with a single dose, but vaccine supply is limited. The minimum dose requirements for seroconversion remain unknown.
In this double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial in Uganda and Kenya, we assigned adults with no history of yellow fever vaccination or infection to receive vaccination with the Institut Pasteur de Dakar 17D-204 yellow fever vaccine at a standard dose (13,803 IU) or at a fractional dose of 1000 IU, 500 IU, or 250 IU. The primary outcome was seroconversion at 28 days after vaccination with each fractional dose as compared with the standard dose, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis. Seroconversion was defined as an antibody titer at day 28 that was at least four times as high as the antibody titer before vaccination, as measured by a plaque reduction neutralization test. We conducted noninferiority analyses in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations. Noninferiority was shown if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the incidence of seroconversion between the fractional dose and the standard dose was higher than -10 percentage points.
A total of 480 participants underwent randomization (120 participants in each group). The incidence of seroconversion was 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94 to 100) with the standard dose. The difference in the incidence of seroconversion between the 1000-IU dose and the standard dose was 0.01 percentage points (95% CI, -5.0 to 5.1) in the intention-to-treat population and -1.9 percentage points (95% CI, -7.0 to 3.2) in the per-protocol population; the corresponding differences between the 500-IU dose and the standard dose were 0.01 percentage points (95% CI, -5.0 to 5.1) and -1.8 percentage points (95% CI, -6.7 to 3.2), and those between the 250-IU dose and the standard dose were -4.4 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 0.7) and -6.7 percentage points (95% CI, -11.7 to 1.6). A total of 111 vaccine-related adverse events were reported: 103 were mild in severity, 7 were moderate, and 1 was severe. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the four groups.
A yellow fever vaccination dose as low as 500 IU was noninferior to the standard dose of 13,803 IU for producing seroconversion within 28 days. (Funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and the Wellcome Trust; NIFTY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04059471.).
Journal Article
Duration of post-vaccination immunity to yellow fever in volunteers ten years after a dose-response study – A complementary study
by
dos Santos, Maria Leticia Borges
,
da Conceição, Deborah Araújo
,
de Lourdes de Sousa Maia, Maria
in
17DD vaccine
,
Adult
,
Adults
2024
•A 2009 Bio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz YF vaccine dose–response study supported WHO's position for fractional dose for outbreaks.•Part of the original cohort was reassessed for immunity duration and seroconversion.•Seroconversion lasted 10 years.•Reduced doses have shown effective seroconversion (>80 %).•Antibody titers in reduced-dose versus full-dose groups remain equivalent.
A single dose of standard yellow fever (YF) vaccine is considered to provide life-long protection. In this study, we evaluate the seropositivity conferred by lower doses 10 years post-vaccination. In 2009, Bio-Manguinhos/Fiocruz performed a dose–response study with the 17DD yellow fever vaccine, administering the vaccine in the usual mean dose of 27.476 IU and in decreasing doses (10.447 IU, 3.013 IU, 587 IU, 158 IU and 31 IU), with the usual volume and route (0,5 ml subcutaneous). The decreasing doses were obtained by dilution in the laboratory of the manufacturer and the lots in test had standard quality control and were produced by good manufacturing practices (GMP). Around 30 days after the vaccination, doses down to 587 IU had similar immunogenicity and the 158 IU and 31 IU were inferior to the full dose. The seropositivity was maintained for 10 months, except on the 31 IU group. Eight years after, 85 % of 318 participants evaluated in a follow-up, maintained seropositivity that was similar across groups. Consistently, antibody titers in the reduced-dose groups were also comparable to those of the full-dose group. The current study, 10 years later, showed similarity between the vaccine groups (six arms who received the YF vaccine in decreasing doses: 27.476 IU, 10.447 IU, 3.013 IU, 587 IU, 158 IU, 31 IU) both in relation of seropositivity and in the evaluation of the geometric mean titers. The seropositivity rates across subgroups were 83,1%, 90 %, 87 %, 93 %, 83,8% and 85 %, correspondingly. These findings provides further support to the long-term immunogenicity of lower doses.
Clinical trial registry: NCT04416477.
Journal Article
Immunogenicity and safety of fractional doses of yellow fever vaccines: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
2021
Stocks of yellow fever vaccine are insufficient to cover exceptional demands for outbreak response. Fractional dosing has shown efficacy, but evidence is limited to the 17DD substrain vaccine. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of one-fifth fractional dose compared with standard dose of four WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines produced from three substrains.
We did this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at research centres in Mbarara, Uganda, and Kilifi, Kenya. Eligible participants were aged 18–59 years, had no contraindications for vaccination, were not pregnant or lactating, had no history of yellow fever vaccination or infection, and did not require yellow fever vaccination for travel. Eligible participants were recruited from communities and randomly assigned to one of eight groups, corresponding to the four vaccines at standard or fractional dose. The vaccine was administered subcutaneously by nurses who were not masked to treatment, but participants and other study personnel were masked to vaccine allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of participants with seroconversion 28 days after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as post-vaccination neutralising antibody titres at least 4 times pre-vaccination measurement measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT50). We defined non-inferiority as less than 10% decrease in seroconversion in fractional compared with standard dose groups 28 days after vaccination. The primary outcome was measured in the per-protocol population, and safety analyses included all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02991495.
Between Nov 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2018, 1029 participants were assessed for inclusion. 69 people were ineligible, and 960 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to vaccine manufacturer and dose (120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz standard dose, 120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz fractional dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides standard dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides fractional dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar standard dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar fractional dose, 120 to Sanofi Pasteur standard dose, and 120 to Sanofi Pasteur fractional dose). 49 participants had detectable PRNT50 at baseline and 11 had missing PRNT50 results at baseline or 28 days. 900 were included in the per-protocol analysis. 959 participants were included in the safety analysis. The absolute difference in seroconversion between fractional and standard doses by vaccine was 1·71% (95% CI −2·60 to 5·28) for Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz, −0·90% (–4·24 to 3·13) for Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, 1·82% (–2·75 to 5·39) for Institut Pasteur Dakar, and 0·0% (–3·32 to 3·29) for Sanofi Pasteur. Fractional doses from all four vaccines met the non-inferiority criterion. The most common treatment-related adverse events were headache (22·2%), fatigue (13·7%), myalgia (13·3%) and self-reported fever (9·0%). There were no study-vaccine related serious adverse events.
Fractional doses of all WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines were non-inferior to the standard dose in inducing seroconversion 28 days after vaccination, with no major safety concerns. These results support the use of fractional dosage in the general adult population for outbreak response in situations of vaccine shortage.
The study was funded by Médecins Sans Frontières Foundation, Wellcome Trust (grant no. 092654), and the UK Department for International Development. Vaccines were donated in kind.
Journal Article
Mutual interference on the immune response to yellow fever vaccine and a combined vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella
by
Maia, Maria de Lourdes S.
,
Siqueira, Marilda M.
,
Castro, Yvone P.
in
Allergy and Immunology
,
antibodies
,
Antibodies, Viral
2011
► Yellow fever vaccines (YFV) were given either simultaneously or 30 days after a combined measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) to compare their immunogenicity and reactogenicity in children. ► The immune response to YFV was substantially weaker when given simultaneously to MMR. ► The immune response to the rubella and mumps components of MMR was also weaker with simultaneous administration of YFV. ► Immune response to the measles component was strong regardless of time interval between vaccines.
A randomized trial was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of yellow fever vaccines (YFV) given either simultaneously in separate injections, or 30 days or more after a combined measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine. Volunteers were also randomized to YFV produced from 17DD and WHO-17D-213 substrains. The study group comprised 1769 healthy 12-month-old children brought to health care centers in Brasilia for routine vaccination. The reactogenicity was of the type and frequency expected for the vaccines and no severe adverse event was associated to either vaccine. Seroconversion and seropositivity 30 days or more after vaccination against yellow fever was similar across groups defined by YFV substrain. Subjects injected YFV and MMR simultaneously had lower seroconversion rates – 90% for rubella, 70% for yellow fever and 61% for mumps – compared with those vaccinated 30 days apart – 97% for rubella, 87% for yellow fever and 71% for mumps. Seroconversion rates for measles were higher than 98% in both comparison groups. Geometric mean titers for rubella and for yellow fever were approximately three times higher among those who got the vaccines 30 days apart. For measles and mumps antibodies GMTs were similar across groups. MMR's interference in immune response of YFV and YFV's interference in immune response of rubella and mumps components of MMR had never been reported before but are consistent with previous observations from other live vaccines. These results may affect the recommendations regarding primary vaccination with yellow fever vaccine and MMR.
Journal Article
Endothelial leak and knowledge gaps: yellow fever virus non-structural protein 1 and the antibodies that bind it
2025
Yellow fever virus, family Orthoflaviviridae, is the causative agent of yellow fever – a lethal mosquito-borne disease endemic to South America and Africa. Recent advances in understanding the mechanism of orthoflavivirus pathogenesis, particularly for dengue (DENV), demonstrate a role for the secreted viral non-structural protein 1 (NS1) in both animal and human models. The NS1 protein’s most well described pathogenic mechanism is its ability to induce vascular endothelial permeability in a tissue organ specific manner, contributing to orthoflavivirus disease severity. Surprisingly, there is minimal research published on the role of NS1 in YFV pathogenesis, despite the clear and present danger of YFV outbreaks in endemic countries. Understanding the role of NS1 in YFV pathogenesis is critical for the development of therapeutic interventions. Notably, while vaccination efforts for orthoflaviviruses have been historically difficult, the live attenuated vaccine (YFV-17D) against YFV has been hailed as not only the most successful orthoflavivirus vaccine but is among the most successful live virus vaccines ever created. Despite YFV-17D’s widespread use since its introduction in the 1930’s, the best described mechanism of protection is the vaccine’s potent neutralizing antibodies. Our knowledge of NS1 pathogenic mechanisms has expanded since the development of YFV-17D, but how vaccine mediated immunity may interact with NS1 during natural YFV infection is not well described. In this review we describe the current knowledge of YFV NS1 mediated pathogenesis and adaptive immunity directed against YFV NS1 in a variety of animal and human models.
Graphical Abstract
Journal Article
Genomic and epidemiological monitoring of yellow fever virus transmission potential
2018
The yellow fever virus (YFV) epidemic in Brazil is the largest in decades. The recent discovery of YFV in Brazilian Aedes species mosquitos highlights a need to monitor the risk of reestablishment of urban YFV transmission in the Americas. We use a suite of epidemiological, spatial, and genomic approaches to characterize YFV transmission. We show that the age and sex distribution of human cases is characteristic of sylvatic transmission. Analysis of YFV cases combined with genomes generated locally reveals an early phase of sylvatic YFV transmission and spatial expansion toward previously YFV-free areas, followed by a rise in viral spillover to humans in late 2016. Our results establish a framework for monitoring YFV transmission in real time that will contribute to a global strategy to eliminate future YFV epidemics.
Journal Article
Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with fractional one-fifth and one-half doses of yellow fever vaccine compared to full dose in children 9–23 months old in Uganda, 2019–2020 — Preliminary report
by
Doshi, Reena H.
,
Twinomuhwezi-Oyet, Ellon
,
Chu, Susan Y.
in
Adverse events
,
Adverse events following immunization
,
AEFI
2024
In 2016, the World Health Organization recommended that a fractional dose of yellow fever (YF) vaccine could be used in persons 2 years of age or older in response to an emergency that resulted in a global shortage of available YF vaccine. However, this recommendation did not extend to the youngest age group licensed for YF vaccine because there were no published data on the use or safety of fractional dose YF vaccination in children aged 9–23 months. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial, comparing the immunogenicity and safety of fractional one-fifth and one-half doses of Bio-Manguinhos 17DD YF vaccine with full dose in children aged 9–23 months old in Uganda. In this paper, we present the interim analysis on safety.
Children aged 9–23 months presenting for routine well-child services were recruited for inclusion at one of three study sites. We collected data during March 26, 2019–August 31, 2020, on all adverse events following immunization (AEFI) during active surveillance for 28 days post-vaccination using multiple collection tools including a diary card with an objective measurement of fever. An independent team from the Uganda national AEFI Committee investigated and classified serious AEFI (SAE) according to Brighton Collaboration Criteria.
Among 1053 enrolled children, 672 (64%) were reported to have a non-serious AEFI (NSAE) and 17 (2%) were reported to have a SAE. The most common AEFI were diarrhoea, fever, and rash, each reported by 355 (34%), 338 (33%), and 188 (18%) participants, respectively. Among 17 participants with SAE, eight were reported to have had seizures and five were hospitalised for seizures or other causes (respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal illness, malaria). Four SAEs (deaths) occurred >28 days after vaccination. There were no reported cases of pre-specified or vaccine-related SAEs. We observed no significant difference in frequency or severity of adverse events among the study groups.
Using comprehensive active surveillance monitoring, we did not identify any unexpected safety concerns among children aged <2 years receiving YF vaccination, including with the fractional doses. Although we identified a high number of both serious and non-serious AEFI, none were determined to be causally related to YF vaccination. These results provide evidence for the safety of fractional dose YF vaccination among children aged 9–23 months.
•During active surveillance monitoring following yellow fever vaccination, we did not identify any unexpected safety concerns.•We identified a high number of serious and non-serious adverse events, but none were causally related to vaccination.•These results provide evidence for the safety of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination among children aged 9–23 months.
Journal Article
Recent sylvatic yellow fever virus transmission in Brazil: the news from an old disease
by
Trindade, Giliane de Souza
,
Silva, Natalia Ingrid Oliveira
,
Drumond, Betânia Paiva
in
Aedes - virology
,
Africa
,
Animals
2020
Yellow fever (YF) is an acute viral disease, affecting humans and non-human primates (NHP), caused by the yellow fever virus (YFV). Despite the existence of a safe vaccine, YF continues to cause morbidity and mortality in thousands of people in Africa and South America. Since 2016, massive YF outbreaks have taken place in Brazil, reaching YF–free zones, causing thousands of deaths of humans and NHP. Here we reviewed the main epidemiological aspects, new clinical findings in humans, and issues regarding YFV infection in vectors and NHP in Brazil. The 2016–2019 YF epidemics have been considered the most significant outbreaks of the last 70 years in the country, and the number of human cases was 2.8 times higher than total cases in the previous 36 years. A new YFV lineage was associated with the recent outbreaks, with persistent circulation in Southeast Brazil until 2019. Due to the high number of infected patients, it was possible to evaluate severity and death predictors and new clinical features of YF.
Haemagogus janthinomys
and
Haemagogus leucocelaenus
were considered the primary vectors during the outbreaks, and no human case suggested the occurrence of the urban transmission cycle. YFV was detected in a variety of NHP specimens presenting viscerotropic disease, similar to that described experimentally. Further studies regarding NHP sensitivity to YFV, YF pathogenesis, and the duration of the immune response in NHP could contribute to YF surveillance, control, and future strategies for NHP conservation.
Journal Article
Yellow Fever Virus Surveillance in Callithrix spp. Marmosets during Epizootic Outbreak, Brazil, 2024–2025
by
Siconelli, Márcio Junio Lima
,
Machado, Eduardo Ferreira
,
de Azevedo Fernandes, Natália Coelho Couto
in
Animals
,
Antigens
,
Brazil - epidemiology
2026
In 2023, a new yellow fever virus (YFV) lineage was introduced in São Paulo state, Brazil. During July 2024-June 2025, nine Callithrix penicillata marmosets tested YFV-positive, showing high viral loads and characteristic organ lesions. Those results highlight the need to include these animals in multispecies surveillance strategies for early YFV detection.
Journal Article