Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a randomized trial, 450 patients with venous leg ulcers were assigned to early endovenous ablation within 2 weeks after randomization or to deferred ablation after ulcer healing. The time to ulcer healing was shorter with early ablation than with deferred ablation.

In this trial, low-dose radioiodine was as effective as high-dose radioiodine in patients with differentiated thyroid tumors, and recombinant human thyrotropin (thyrotropin alfa) was as effective as thyroid hormone withdrawal. Thyroid cancer is the most frequently occurring endocrine cancer, with more than 2100 new cases each year in the United Kingdom and more than 48,000 in the United States. 1 , 2 Most cases are differentiated thyroid cancer, which is associated with a high 10-year survival rate (90 to 95%). 3 Many patients with differentiated thyroid cancer undergo radioiodine ablation to remove residual normal thyroid tissue after surgery. Some nonrandomized studies have suggested that radioiodine ablation reduces rates of death and recurrence. 4 – 7 However, there is uncertainty over the dose (administered activity) of radioiodine required for effective ablation. A systematic review of randomized . . .

To assess the feasibility, safety and precision of organ-based tracking (OBT)-fusion targeted focal microwave ablation (FMA), in patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer. Ten patients with a visible index tumor of Gleason score ≤3+4, largest diameter <20mm were included. Transrectal OBT-fusion targeted FMA was performed using an 18G needle. Primary endpoint was the evidence of complete overlap of the index tumor by ablation zone necrosis on MRI 7 days after ablation. Urinary and sexual function were assessed with IPSS, IIEF5 and MSHQ-EjD-SF. Oncological outcomes were assessed with PSA at 2 and 6 months, and re-biopsy at 6 months. Median [IQR] age was 64.5 [61-72] years and baseline PSA was 5 [4.3-8.1] ng/mL. Seven (70%) and 3 (30%) patients had a low and intermediate risk cancer, respectively. Median largest tumor axis was of 11 [9.0-15.0] mm. Median duration of procedure was of 82 [44-170] min. No patient reported any pain or rectal bleeding, and all 10 patients were discharged the next day. Seven days after ablation, total necrosis of the index tumor on MRI was obtained in eight (80% [95%CI 55%-100%]) patients. One patient was treated with radical prostatectomy. Re-biopsy at 6 months in the other 9 did not show evidence of cancer in 4 patients. IPSS, IIEF-5 and MSHQ-EjD-SF were not statistically different between baseline and 6 months follow up. OBT-fusion targeted FMA was feasible, precise, and safe in patients with low to intermediate risk localized prostate cancer.

Implementing standard-of-care cryotherapy or electrosurgical excision to treat cervical precancers is challenging in resource-limited settings. An affordable technological alternative that is as effective as standard-of-care techniques would greatly improve access to treatment. This randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate the noninferiority efficacy of a portable, battery-driven thermal ablation (TA) device compared to cryotherapy and electrosurgical excision (large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ)) to treat cervical precancer in a screen-and-treat program in Zambia. A total of 3,124 women positive on visual inspection with acetic acid and eligible for ablative therapy were randomized to one of the treatment arms. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was performed at baseline and at the follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as either type-specific HPV clearance at the follow-up in participants positive for HPV at baseline, or a negative visual inspection with acetic acid test for those who had a negative HPV test at baseline. After a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment success rates were 74.0%, 71.1% and 71.4% for the TA, cryotherapy and LLETZ arms, respectively, thus demonstrating noninferiority ( P  = 0.83). TA was a safe and well-accepted procedure. Only 3.6% of those randomized to TA reported moderate-to-severe pain, compared to 6.5% and 1.9% for the cryotherapy and LLETZ arms, respectively. Thus, our randomized controlled trial demonstrates the safety and efficacy of TA, which is not inferior to cryotherapy or surgical excision. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02956239 . A randomized controlled trial performed in a screen-and-treat program in Zambia found that a portable, battery-operated thermal ablation device was not inferior to cryotherapy and electrosurgical excision in cervical precancer treatment.

Image-guided percutaneous ablation is considered best in the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ablation is potentially curative, minimally invasive, and easily repeatable for recurrence. Ethanol injection used to be the standard in ablation. However, radiofrequency ablation has recently been the most prevailing ablation method for HCC. Many investigators have reported that radiofrequency ablation is superior to ethanol injection, from the viewpoints of treatment response, local tumor curativity, and overall survival. New-generation microwave ablation can create a larger ablation volume in a shorter time period. Further comparison studies are, however, mandatory between radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation, especially in terms of complications and long-term survival. Irreversible electroporation, which is a non-thermal ablation method that delivers short electric pulses to induce cell death due to apoptosis, requires further studies, especially in terms of long-term outcomes. It is considerably difficult to compare outcomes in ablation with those in surgical resection. However, radiofrequency ablation seems to be a satisfactory alternative to resection for HCC 3 cm or smaller in Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis. Furthermore, radiofrequency ablation may be a first-line treatment in HCC 2 cm or smaller in Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis. Various innovations would further improve outcomes in ablation. Training programs may be effective in providing an excellent opportunity to understand basic concepts and learn cardinal skills for successful ablation. Sophisticated ablation would be more than an adequate alternative of surgery for small- and possibly middle-sized HCC.

Abstract BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (FUS-T) is an emerging treatment for essential tremor (ET). OBJECTIVE To determine the predictors of outcomes after FUS-T. METHODS Two treatment groups were analyzed: 75 ET patients enrolled in the pivotal trial, between 2013 and 2015; and 114 patients enrolled in the postpivotal trials, between 2015 and 2016. All patients had medication-refractory, disabling ET, and underwent unilateral FUS-T. The primary outcome (hand tremor score, 32-point scale with higher scores indicating worse tremor) and the secondary outcome variables (Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor Part C score: 32-point scale with higher scores indicating more disability) were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo. The operative outcome variables (ie, peak temperature, number of sonications) were analyzed. The results between the 2 treatment groups, pivotal and postpivotal, were compared with repeated measures analysis of variance and adjusted for confounding variables. RESULTS A total of 179 patients completed the 12-mo evaluation. The significant predictors of tremor outcomes were patient age, disease duration, peak temperature, and number of sonications. A greater improvement in hand tremor scores was observed in the postpivotal group at all time points, including 12 mo (61.9% ± 24.9% vs 52.1% ± 24.9%, P = .009). In the postpivotal group, higher energy was used, resulting in higher peak temperatures (56.7 ± 2.5 vs 55.6 ± 2.8°C, P = .004). After adjusting for age, years of disease, number of sonications, and maximum temperature, the treatment group was a significant predictor of outcomes (F = 7.9 [1,165], P = .005). CONCLUSION We observed an improvement in outcomes in the postpivotal group compared to the pivotal group potentially reflecting a learning curve with FUS-T. The other associations of tremor outcomes included patient age, disease duration, peak temperature, and number of sonications.

Background Percutaneous thermal ablation has become the preferred therapeutic treatment option for liver cancers that cannot be resected. Since ablative zone tissue changes over time, it becomes challenging to determine therapy effectiveness over an extended period. Thus, an immediate post‐procedural evaluation of the ablation zone is crucial, as it could influence the need for a second‐look treatment or follow‐up plan. Assessing treatment response immediately after ablation is essential to attain favorable outcomes. This study examines the efficacy of image fusion strategies immediately post‐ablation in liver neoplasms to determine therapeutic response. Methodology A comprehensive systematic search using PRISMA methodology was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PUBMED), and Cochrane Library Central Registry electronic databases to identify articles that assessed the immediate post‐ablation response in malignant hepatic tumors with fusion imaging (FI) systems. The data were retrieved on relevant clinical characteristics, including population demographics, pre‐intervention clinical history, lesion characteristics, and intervention type. For the outcome metrics, variables such as average fusion time, intervention metrics, technical success rate, ablative safety margin, supplementary ablation rate, technical efficacy rate, LTP rates, and reported complications were extracted. Results Twenty‐two studies were included for review after fulfilling the study eligibility criteria. FI's immediate technical success rate ranged from 81.3% to 100% in 17/22 studies. In 16/22 studies, the ablative safety margin was assessed immediately after ablation. Supplementary ablation was performed in 9 studies following immediate evaluation by FI. In 15/22 studies, the technical effectiveness rates during the first follow‐up varied from 89.3% to 100%. Conclusion Based on the studies included, we found that FI can accurately determine the immediate therapeutic response in liver cancer ablation image fusion and could be a feasible intraprocedural tool for determining short‐term post‐ablation outcomes in unresectable liver neoplasms. There are some technical challenges that limit the widespread adoption of FI techniques. Large‐scale randomized trials are warranted to improve on existing protocols. Future research should emphasize improving FI's technological capabilities and clinical applicability to a broader range of tumor types and ablation procedures.

Non-invasive and minimally invasive ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, have emerged as key treatment options for managing renal cell carcinoma, especially for patients who are unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of these emerging treatment methods in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library for publications between Jan 1, 2000, and March 1, 2024. Eligible articles were observational studies and randomised controlled trials including at least five adult patients (age ≥18 years) with primary and localised renal cell carcinoma treated with SBRT, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, or cryoablation and that reported on local control outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and then full texts of eligible studies were independently evaluated by the same reviewers, with disagreements resolved via discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Summary estimates were extracted from published reports manually using a standardised data extraction form. The primary endpoint was local control rate at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after start of treatment. A meta-analysis was conducted using a DerSimonian and Laird model to summarise local control rates. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. We also recorded the frequency and severity of adverse events after treatment on the basis of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) and Clavien-Dindo complication index. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024511840. We identified 6668 records, of which 330 were assessed via full-text review, and 133 were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The eligible studies included data for 8910 patients (mean age 67·9 years [SD 7·3], 2518 [31·4%] of 8018 patients with available data were female and 5500 [68·6%] were male). Local control rates for SBRT were 99% (95% CI 97–100; I2=6%) at 1 year, 97% (95–99; I2=0%) at 2 years, and 95% (89–98; I2=42%) at 5 years; for radiofrequency ablation were 96% (94–98; I2=73%) at 1 year, 95% (92–98; I2=77%) at 2 years, and 92% (88–96; I2=78%) at 5 years; for microwave ablation were 97% (95–99; I2=74%) at 1 year, 95% (92–98; I2=77%) at 2 years, and 86% (75–94; I2=66%) at 5 years; and for cryoablation were 95% (93–96; I2=61%) at 1 year, 94% (91–96; I2=69%) at 2 years, and 90% (87–93; I2=74%) at 5 years. The proportion of patients who reported grade 3–4 adverse events was 3% (121 of 3726) after cryoablation, 2% (39 of 2503) after radiofrequency ablation, 1% (22 of 2069) after microwave ablation, and 2% (11 of 612) after SBRT. Risk of bias was moderate in most studies (70 [53%] of 133) and no publication bias was observed. All investigated ablative methods continue to represent effective treatment choices in renal cell carcinoma, and these findings support multi-disciplinary discussions of these treatment methods, along with surgery and surveillance, to individualise treatment decisions in these patients. Future research should aim to conduct randomised controlled trials across larger patient populations to further elucidate the long-term oncological and survival outcomes associated with these treatments. None.

Minimally invasive thermal ablation of tumours has become common since the advent of modern imaging. This Opinion article examines the mechanisms of tumour cell death that are induced by the most common thermoablative techniques and discusses the rapidly developing areas of research in the field. Minimally invasive thermal ablation of tumours has become common since the advent of modern imaging. From the ablation of small, unresectable tumours to experimental therapies, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and irreversible electroporation have an increasing role in the treatment of solid neoplasms. This Opinion article examines the mechanisms of tumour cell death that are induced by the most common thermoablative techniques and discusses the rapidly developing areas of research in the field, including combinatorial ablation and immunotherapy, synergy with conventional chemotherapy and radiation, and the development of a new ablation modality in irreversible electroporation.

Objectives Previous attempts at meta-analysis and systematic review have not provided clear recommendations for the clinical application of thermal ablation in metastatic colorectal cancer. Many authors believe that the probability of gathering randomised controlled trial (RCT) data is low. Our aim is to provide a consensus document making recommendations on the appropriate application of thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Methods This consensus paper was discussed by an expert panel at The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières 2013. A literature review was presented. Tumour characteristics, ablation technique and different clinical applications were considered and the level of consensus was documented. Results Specific recommendations are made with regard to metastasis size, number, and location and ablation technique. Mean 31 % 5-year survival post-ablation in selected patients has resulted in acceptance of this therapy for those with technically inoperable but limited liver disease and those with limited liver reserve or co-morbidities that render them inoperable. Conclusions In the absence of RCT data, it is our aim that this consensus document will facilitate judicious selection of the patients most likely to benefit from thermal ablation and provide a unified interventional oncological perspective for the use of this technology. Key Points • Best results require due consideration of tumour size, number, volume and location. • Ablation technology, imaging guidance and intra-procedural imaging assessment must be optimised. • Accepted applications include inoperable disease due to tumour distribution or inadequate liver reserve. • Other current indications include concurrent co-morbidity, patient choice and the test-of-time approach. • Future applications may include resectable disease, e.g. for small solitary tumours.