Explore the vast range of titles available.

The aim of the present study was to examine how different types of tracking - between-school streaming, within-school streaming, and course-by-course tracking - shape students' mathematics self-concept. This was done in an internationally comparative framework using data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). After controlling for individual and track mean achievement, results indicated that generally for students in course-by-course tracking, high-track students had higher mathematics self-concepts and low-track students had lower mathematics self-concepts. For students in between-school and within-school streaming, the reverse pattern was found. These findings suggest a solution to the ongoing debate about the effects of tracking on students' academic self-concept and suggest that the reference groups to wich students compare themselves differ according to the type of tracking. (DIPF/Orig.).

The big-fish—little-pond effect (BFLPE) predicts that equally able students have lower academic self-concepts (ASCs) when attending schools where the average ability levels of classmates is high, and higher ASCs when attending schools where the school-average ability is low. BFLPE findings are remarkably robust, generalizing over a wide variety of different individual student and contextual level characteristics, settings, countries, long-term follow-ups, and research designs. Because of the importance of ASC in predicting future achievement, coursework selection, and educational attainment, the results have important implications for the way in which schools are organized (e.g., tracking, ability grouping, academically selective schools, and gifted education programs). In response to Dai and Rinn (Educ. Psychol. Rev., 2008), we summarize the theoretical model underlying the BFLPE, minimal conditions for testing the BFLPE, support for its robust generalizability, its relation to social comparison theory, and recent research extending previous implications, demonstrating that the BFLPE stands up to scrutiny.

Using cross-classified multilevel modeling, this study attempted to improve our understanding of the group-level conditional effects of student–faculty interaction by examining the function of academic majors in explaining the effects of student–faculty interaction on students' academic self-concept. The study utilized data on 11,202 undergraduate students who completed both the 2003 Freshman Survey and the 2007 College Senior Survey at 95 baccalaureate institutions nationwide. The results show that the strength of the relationship between having been a guest in a professor's home and students' academic self-concept varies by academic major. Findings also suggest that some aspects of departmental climate, such as a racially more diverse student body and greater faculty accessibility, can possibly magnify the beneficial effects of student–faculty interaction. The study discusses the theoretical and practical implications of the findings.

The big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) was evaluated with 4,461 seventh to ninth graders in Singapore where a national policy of ability streaming is implemented. Consistent with the BFLPE, when prior achievement was controlled, students in the high-ability stream had lower English and mathematics self-concepts (ESCs and MSCs) and those in the lower-ability stream had higher ESCs and MSCs. Consistent with the local-dominance effect, the effect of stream-average achievement on ESCs and MSCs was more negative than—and completely subsumed—the negative effect of school-average achievement. However, stream-average achievement was stronger than, or as strong as, the more local class-average achievement. Taken together, findings highlight the potential interplay of a local dominance effect with variability and/or salience of target comparisons in academic self-concept formations.

Academic motivation enables students to face challenges in their studies and is important for student performance. Academic self-concept refers to students' perceptions of their competencies and ability to learn. The goal of the study was to evaluate academic motivation and self-concept of undergraduate optometry students. We used a mixed methods research design involving a self-administered questionnaire and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Saturated sampling was used to recruit participants. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and thematic content analysis. The sample consisted of 166 participants aged between 18 years and 24 years with more females (n = 121) and fourth year students (n = 64). The mean score for extrinsic motivation (4.91 ± 1.42) was larger than the mean scores for intrinsic motivation (4.24 ± 1.48) and amotivation (1.58 ± 1.02). There was no difference in the mean scores for motivation between the different levels of study (p ≥ 0.122) or gender groups (p ≥ 0.100). The mean scores for academic confidence and academic effort were 4.45 ± 0.38 and 4.51 ± 0.69, respectively. The main factors that influenced student motivation were online learning, prospect of graduation, financial independence and support systems. Optometry students have positive perceptions of their academic capabilities and competence, and are motivated to engage in their studies. Students' motivation was influenced by external factors such as higher salaries, prestigious jobs, affluent lifestyle and recognition. Optometry lecturers and curriculum developers should consider academic motivation and self-concept when interacting with students for optimal student well-being. Contribution This article focusses on academic motivation and self-concept of undergraduate students that may be of interest because of the ongoing corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the changes students have experienced for teaching and learning activities. Students must remain motivated to achieve their academic goals. Thus, this study can assist students to better understand how motivation affects their learning and what factors affect their motivation. Information from the study can also inform parents, lecturers and administrators on how to optimally support student growth and development as well as create learning environments better suited to the needs of students.

The big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) refers to the theoretical prediction that equally able students will have lower academic self-concepts in higher-achieving or selective schools or programs than in lower-achieving or less selective schools or programs, largely due to social comparison based on local norms. While negative consequences of being in a more competitive educational setting are highlighted by the BFLPE, the exact nature of the BFLPE has not been closely scrutinized. This article provides a critique of the BFLPE in terms of its conceptualization, methodology, and practical implications. Our main argument is that the BFLPE, while having added to our understanding of the origins of self-concepts, disproportionately emphasizes one aspect of social comparison to the exclusion of many other intervening factors. In light of our critique, we suggest a broader conception of social comparison effects on academic self-concept that emphasizes a more active role of individuals in regulating their social cognition and motivation, as well as a more distinct effect of social-contextual influences. We also suggest alternative research designs that would incorporate contextual, developmental, and individual differences as potential moderators or mediators of the BFLPE.

The purpose of the study was to investigate if academic and social selfconcept and motivation to improve in academic school subjects mediated the negative effect of summative assessment (grades) for low-ability students' achievement in compulsory school. In two previous studies, summative assessment (grading) was found to have a differentiating effect on students' subsequent achievement in school (Klapp et al. 2014; Klapp 2015). Differences between subgroups of students (cognitive ability, gender, and socioeconomic status) were controlled for in the analyses. Data was retrieved from the Evaluation Through Follow-up (ETF) longitudinal project containing register and questionnaire data on a large national representative sample of Swedish compulsory school students (N = 8558). Due to a unique natural circumstance, municipalities in Sweden could decide whether or not to grade their students in sixth grade which made it possible to apply a quasi-experimental design. In the sample, 50% of the students were graded in sixth grade while all students were graded in seventh grade. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) have been estimated. The results show that the negative effect of summative assessment (grading) for low-ability students on their subsequent achievement is fully mediated by academic self-concept in mathematics and Swedish, and motivation to improve in academic school subjects.

Using path analysis, the present study focuses on the development of a model describing the impact of four judgments of self-perceived academic competence on higher education students' achievement goals, learning approach, and academic performance. Results demonstrate that academic self-efficacy, self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-concept, and perceived level of understanding are conceptually and empirically distinct self-appraisals of academic competence which have a different impact on student motivation, learning, and academic performance. Furthermore, the current study suggests that students reflecting high scores on the four measures of self-perceived competence, are more persistent, more likely to adopt mastery and/or performance approach goals, less anxious, process the learning material at a deeper level, and achieve better study results. However, this study also warns that high self-perceived competence (e.g., perceived level of understanding), if not accompanied by a mastery goal orientation, can turn into overconfidence resulting in lower persistence levels and poorer study results. A base d'une analyse confirmatoire des coefficients de direction, l'étude présente écrit le développement et l'évaluation d'un modèle concernant l'impact de quatre jugements de compétence universitaire sur les buts d'accomplissement, l'approche d'apprentissage et les résultats académiques. Les analyses démontrent que l'auto-efficacité académique, l'auto-efficacité pour une étude autodirigée, l'auto-concept académique et le niveau perçu de son propre compréhension sont—conceptuellement—quatre jugements distinctes de compétences universitaires qui ont un impact différentiel sur la motivation de l'étudiant, le processus d'apprentissage et les résultats académiques. En outre, l'étude actuelle suggère qu'un niveau élevé pour les quatre jugements de compétence universitaire invoque une attitude plus persistante dans l'étudiants, une plus grande probabilité d'adopter des buts envers une grande maîtrise, un niveau d'anxiété plus baisse, une approche d'étudier plus profonde. Cela aboutira aux résultats d'étude plus hauts. Cependant, cette étude nous avertit qu'une perception trop haute de son propre niveau de compréhension—non accompagné par une orientation envers des buts de maîtrise—peut aboutir à une attitude présomptueuse et des résultats d'étude inférieurs.

This systematic review examined how anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders relate to academic achievement, school dropout, and academic self-concept. Studies with children or adult samples were included in seven meta-analyses (ks for number of samples ranged from 5 to 156; N’s for participants ranged from 780 to 37, 203). Results revealed significant but very small effect sizes for the relations between anxiety and overall academic achievement ( r = −.06), language achievement ( r = −.07), and math achievement ( r = −.09), and a nonsignificant effect size for science achievement ( r = −.01). Participants with greater anxiety were also significantly more likely to not complete high school ( r = .11). They also had a poorer overall academic self-concept ( r = −.25) and mathematics self-concept ( r = −.30). Few methodological moderators (e.g., study design, age) were significant. Results show that anxiety does not strongly hinder academic achievement, but it is an important correlate of dropout and academic self-concept, which in turn could contribute to poorer life outcomes. Interventions and preventive programs need to consider ways to ameliorate the relations of anxiety with academic outcomes, especially school continuation and academic self-concept. Future studies should identify risk factors that may amplify these relations.