Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious clinical challenge. There is a pressing need for improved diagnostic testing methods; biomarkers offer one potentially promising approach. Questions/purposes We evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of 16 promising synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI. Methods Synovial fluid was collected from 95 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. All patients were being evaluated for a revision hip or knee arthroplasty, including patients with systemic inflammatory disease and those already receiving antibiotic treatment. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition was used to classify 29 PJIs and 66 aseptic joints. Synovial fluid samples were tested by immunoassay for 16 biomarkers optimized for use in synovial fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to assess for diagnostic performance. Results Five biomarkers, including human α-defensin 1-3, neutrophil elastase 2, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and lactoferrin, correctly predicted the MSIS classification of all patients in this study, with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PJI. An additional eight biomarkers demonstrated excellent diagnostic strength, with an area under the curve of greater than 0.9. Conclusions Synovial fluid biomarkers exhibit a high accuracy in diagnosing PJI, even when including patients with systemic inflammatory disease and those receiving antibiotic treatment. Considering that these biomarkers match the results of the more complex MSIS definition of PJI, we believe that synovial fluid biomarkers can be a valuable addition to the methods utilized for the diagnosis of infection. Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background A number of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) hold promise as new drugs owing to their potent bactericidal activity and because they are often refractory to the development of drug resistance. Cryptdins (Crps) are a family of antimicrobial peptides found in the small intestine of mice, comprising six isoforms containing three sets of disulfide bonds. Although Crp4 is actively being investigated, there have been few studies to date on the other Crp isoforms. A prerequisite for detailed characterization of the other Crp isoforms is establishment of efficient sample preparation methods. Results To avoid degradation during recombinant expression of Crps in E. coli , co-expression of Crps with the aggregation-prone protein human α-lactalbumin (HLA) was used to promote the formation of stable inclusion bodies. Using this method, the production of Crp4 and Crp6 by the BL21 strain was effective, but the expression of other Crp isoforms was not as efficient. The results of a cell-free system study suggested that Crps were degraded, even though a substantial amounts of Crps were synthesized. Therefore, using the Origami™ B strain, we were able to significantly increase the expression efficiency of Crps by promoting the formation of erroneous intermolecular disulfide bonds between HLA and Crps, thereby promoting protein aggregation and inclusion body formation, which prevented degradation. The various Crp isoforms were successfully refolded in vitro and purified using reversed-phase HPLC. In addition, the yield was further improved by deformylation of formyl-Crps. We measured the antibacterial activity of Crps against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Each Crp isoform exhibited a completely different trend in antimicrobial activity, although conformational analysis by circular dichroism did not reveal any significant steric differences. Conclusion In this study, we established a novel and efficient method for the production of the cryptdin family of cysteine-containing antimicrobial peptides. Additionally, we found that there were notable differences in the antibacterial activities of the various Crp family members. The expression system established in this study is expected to provide new insights regarding the mechanisms underlying the different antibacterial activities of the Crp family of peptides.

Background The alpha-defensin test has been previously demonstrated to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), nearly matching the Musculoskeletal Infection Society definition for PJI. However, the relationship between alpha-defensin levels and differing infecting organism has not yet been investigated. Questions/purposes The purpose of this study is to describe the breadth of organisms that can trigger a positive synovial fluid alpha-defensin test result in the setting of PJI and also to assess the magnitude of the alpha-defensin result in terms of various pathogen characteristics. Methods Between December 2012 and March 2014, one laboratory processed 2319 synovial fluid samples for alpha-defensin testing. The present study reviewed the results of the 1937 samples that simultaneously had a synovial fluid culture performed; these came from 418 surgeons in 42 states. The overall culture-positive rate was 49% (244 of 498) among alpha-defensin-positive synovial fluids and 1% (19 of 1439) among alpha-defensin-negative synovial fluids. The organisms recovered from 244 alpha-defensin-positive, culture-positive fluids were recorded and grouped based on various characteristics, including Gram type, species, virulence, oral pathogenicity, and source joint. Alpha-defensin-negative samples served as uninfected controls. Median alpha-defensin levels were calculated for each group, and Dunn’s multiple comparison test for nonparametric data was used to identify any statistically significant (p < 0.05) organism-specific differences in the alpha-defensin level. Results The alpha-defensin test for PJI was positive in the setting of a wide spectrum of organisms typically causing PJI. The median alpha-defensin level for all 244 alpha-defensin-positive, culture-positive samples (4.7 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3.7–5.3]) was higher than negative controls (0.26 [IQR, 0.22–0.33]) with a median difference of 4.4 (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the median alpha-defensin levels when performing a multiple comparison test among Gram-positive organisms (4.7 [IQR, 3.6–5.3]), Gram-negative organisms (4.8 [IQR, 4.2–5.3]), yeast (4.1 [IQR, 2.2–5.1]), virulent organisms (4.7 [IQR, 3.8–5.2]), less virulent organisms (4.8 [IQR, 3.6–5.4]), oral pathogens (4.5 [IQR, 3.2–5.2]), knees (4.7 [IQR, 3.7–5.3]), hips (4.9 [IQR, 4.1–5.8]), or shoulders (5.3 [IQR, 4.0–10.7]) with all comparisons having a p > 0.999. Conclusions The alpha-defensin test provides consistent results regardless of the organism type, Gram type, species, or virulence of the organism and should be seriously considered to be a standard diagnostic tool in the evaluation for PJI. Future research should focus on the performance of this test in specific clinical scenarios such as the immediate postoperative period in the setting of severe immunocompromise and in the setting of a native joint. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

Background A key issue in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the correct diagnosis. The main problem is lack of diagnostic tools able to diagnose a PJI with high accuracy. Alpha-defensin has been proposed as a possible solution, but in the current literature, there is a lack of independent validation. Questions/purposes We performed a prospective study to determine (1) what is the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and the negative predictive values of the alpha-defensin immunoassay test in diagnosing PJI; and (2) which clinical features may be responsible for false-positive and false-negative results? Methods Preoperative aspiration was performed in all patients presenting with a painful hip/knee arthroplasty, including both primary and revision implants. Metallosis, other inflammatory comorbidities, and previous/concomitant antibiotic therapy were not considered as exclusion criteria. An inadequate amount of synovial fluid for culture was an exclusion criterion. A total of 156 patients (65 knees, 91 hips) were included in this prospective study. At the time of revision, synovial fluid samples were taken to perform the alpha-defensin assay. During surgical débridement of tissue, samples for cultures and histologic evaluation were taken, and samples were cultured until positive or until negative at 14 days. A diagnosis of PJI was confirmed in 29 patients according to the International Consensus Group on PJI. Results The sensitivity of the alpha-defensin immunoassay was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%–99%), the specificity was 97% (95% CI, 92%–99%), the positive predictive value was 88% (95% CI, 81%–92%), and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI, 96%–99%). Among four false-positive patients, two had metallosis and one had polyethylene wear. The false-negative case presented with a draining sinus, and intraoperative cultures were also negative. Conclusions Alpha-defensin assay appears to be a reliable test, but followup evaluation is needed to estimate longer term performance of the test. The authors believe that alpha-defensin has demonstrated itself to be sufficiently robust that PJI diagnostic criteria now should include this test. Future studies are needed to compare the differences among the diagnostic capability of the available tests, in particular when metallosis is present, because metallosis may predispose the test to a false-positive result. Level of Evidence Level I, diagnostic study.

Background Diagnosing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires a complex approach using various laboratory and clinical criteria. A novel approach to diagnosing these infections uses synovial fluid biomarkers. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1) is one such synovial-fluid biomarker. However little is known about the performance of the AD-1 assay in the diagnosis of PJI. Questions/purposes We sought to (1) determine the sensitivity and specificity of the AD-1 assay in a population of patients being evaluated for PJI, using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria as the reference standard, and (2) compare the AD-1 assay with other currently available clinical tests, specifically cell count, culture, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. Patients and Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing workup for a PJI at our institution from January to June 2013. Sixty-one AD-1 assays were done in 57 patients. The group included 51 patients with 55 painful joints and six patients who underwent aspiration before second-stage reimplantation. Patients were considered to have a PJI if they met the MSIS criteria. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the AD-1 synovial fluid assay, and compared it with the sensitivity and specificity of the synovial fluid cell count, culture, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. There were 19 diagnosed infections in the 61 aspirations, with 21 positive and 40 negative AD-1 assays. There were two false positive and no false negatives AD-1 assays. Results The sensitivity and specificity for the AD-1 assay were 100% (95% CI, 79%–100%) and 95% (95% CI, 83%–99%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the other tests ranged from 68% to 95% and 66% to 88%, respectively. The AD-1 assay results outperformed the other tests but did not reach statistical significance except for the sensitivity of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of the synovial fluid AD-1 assay exceeded the sensitivity and specificity of the other currently available clinical tests evaluated here but did not reach significance. The AD-1 assay offers another test with high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing a PJI especially in the case where the diagnosis of PJI is uncertain, but larger studies will be needed to determine significance and cost effectiveness. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background Synovial fluid biomarkers have demonstrated diagnostic accuracy surpassing the currently used diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Questions/purposes The purpose of this study is to directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of the synovial fluid α-defensin immunoassay to the leukocyte esterase (LE) colorimetric test strip. Methods Synovial fluid was collected from 46 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. Synovial fluid samples were tested with both a novel synovial-fluid-optimized immunoassay for α-defensin and the LE colorimetric test strip. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition was used to classify 23 periprosthetic infections and 23 aseptic failures; this classification was used as the standard against which the two diagnostic tests were compared. Results The synovial fluid α-defensin immunoassay correctly predicted the MSIS classification of all patients in the study, demonstrating a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of PJI. The α-defensin assay could be read for all samples, including those with blood in the synovial fluid. The leukocyte esterase test strip could not be interpreted in eight of 46 samples (17%) as a result of blood interference. Analysis of the LE strips that could be interpreted yielded a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusions The synovial fluid α-defensin immunoassay outperformed the LE colorimetric test strip in this study and provided reliable results even when the LE test strip failed as a result of blood interference. The simple analytic results provided by the α-defensin immunoassay, compared with the more complex and interpretive nature of both the MSIS criteria and LE colorimetric test strip, make it a highly attractive diagnostic tool. Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The mechanisms that maintain sterility in the urinary tract are incompletely understood. Recent studies have implicated the importance of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) in protecting the urinary tract from infection. Here, we characterize the expression and relevance of the AMP human alpha-defensin 5 (HD5) in the human kidney and urinary tract in normal and infected subjects. Using RNA isolated from human kidney, ureter, and bladder tissue, we performed quantitative real-time PCR to show that DEFA5, the gene encoding HD5, is constitutively expressed throughout the urinary tract. With pyelonephritis, DEFA5 expression significantly increased in the kidney. Using immunoblot analysis, HD5 production also increased with pyelonephritis. Immunostaining localized HD5 to the urothelium of the bladder and ureter. In the kidney, HD5 was primarily produced in the distal nephron and collecting tubules. Using immunoblot and ELISA assays, HD5 was not routinely detected in non-infected human urine samples while mean urinary HD5 production increased with E.coli urinary tract infection. DEFA5 is expressed throughout the urinary tract in non-infected subjects. Specifically, HD5 is expressed throughout the urothelium of the lower urinary tract and in the collecting tubules of the kidney. With infection, HD5 expression increases in the kidney and levels become detectable in the urine. To our knowledge, our findings represent the first to quantitate HD5 expression and production in the human kidney. Moreover, this is the first report to detect the presence of HD5 in infected urine samples. Our results suggest that HD5 may have an important role in maintaining urinary tract sterility.

Recently, aging is considered a risk factor for various diseases. Although changes in the intestinal microbiota along with aging are thought to associate with the increased disease risk, mechanisms that cause age-related transition of the intestinal microbiota remain unknown. This study aims to clarify relationships between the amount of human defensin 5 (HD5), a Paneth cell α-defensin, which is known to regulate the intestinal microbiota, and age-related differences of the intestinal microbiota composition. Fecal samples from 196 healthy Japanese (35 to 81 years old) were collected and measured HD5 concentration. HD5 concentration in the elderly group (age > 70 years old) was significantly lower than the middle-aged group (age ≤ 70 years old). Furthermore, individual age was negatively correlated with HD5 concentration ( r  =  − 0.307, p  < 0.001). In β-diversity, the intestinal microbiota of the elderly showed a significantly different composition compared to the middle-aged. At the genus level, relative abundance of Collinsella , Alistipes , Peptococcaceae; unassigned, Lactobacillus , Lactococcus , Weissella , Christensenellaceae R-7 group , Megasphaera , and [Eubacterium] eligens group was significantly higher, and Lachnospiraceae; unassigned, Blautia , Anaerostipes , Fusicatenibacter , Dorea , and Faecalibacterium was significantly lower in the elderly compared to the middle-aged. In addition, HD5 concentration was negatively correlated with Alistipes , Peptococcaceae; unassigned, and Christensenellaceae R-7 group and positively correlated with Lachnospiraceae; unassigned and Dorea . These results provide novel insights into the immunosenescence of enteric innate immunity, indicating low HD5 is suggested to contribute to the age-related differences in the intestinal microbiota and may relate to increased risk of diseases in elderly people.

IntroductionTwo methods are currently available for the assay of α-defensin: the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the lateral flow test. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid α-defensin and to compare the accuracy of the laboratory-based test and the qualitative assessment for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infection.Materials and methodsWe searched (from inception to May 2018) MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies on α-defensin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio were analyzed using the bivariate diagnostic random-effects model. The receiver-operating curve for each method was calculated.ResultsWe included 13 articles in our meta-analysis, including 1170 patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasties revision; 368 (31%) had a joint infection according to MSIS and MSIS-modified criteria. Considering the false-positive result rate of 8% and false-negative result rate of 3%, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.94) and 0.95 (0.92–0.96), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.94 (0.92–0.94). No statistical differences in terms of sensitivity and specificity were found between the laboratory-based and qualitative test. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the two alpha-defensin assessment methods were: laboratory-based test 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.98), respectively; qualitative test 0.83 (95% CI 0.73–0.91) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.89–0.97), respectively.The diagnostic odds ratio of the α-defensin laboratory based was superior to that of the qualitative test (1126.085, 95% CI 352.172–3600.702 versus 100.9, 95% CI 30.1–338.41; p < 0.001). The AUC for immunoassay and qualitative tests was 0.97 (0.95–0.99) and 0.91 (0.88–0.99), respectively.ConclusionDetection of α-defensin is an accurate test for diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infections. The diagnostic accuracy of the two alpha-defensin assessment methods is comparable. The lateral flow assay is a valid, rapid, and more available diagnostic tool, particularly to rule out PJI.

Measurement of immune mediators and antimicrobial activity in female genital tract secretions may provide biomarkers predictive of risk for HIV-1 acquisition and surrogate markers of microbicide safety. However, optimal methods for sample collection do not exist. This study compared collection methods. Secretions were collected from 48 women (24 with bacterial vaginosis [BV]) using vaginal and endocervical Dacron and flocked swabs. Cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) was collected with 10 mL of Normosol-R (n = 20), saline (n = 14), or water (n = 14). The concentration of gluconate in Normosol-R CVL was determined to estimate the dilution factor. Cytokine and antimicrobial mediators were measured by Luminex or ELISA and corrected for protein content. Endogenous anti-HIV-1 and anti-E. coli activity were measured by TZM-bl assay or E. coli growth. Higher concentrations of protein were recovered by CVL, despite a 10-fold dilution of secretions, as compared to swab eluents. After protein correction, endocervical swabs recovered the highest mediator levels regardless of BV status. Endocervical and vaginal flocked swabs recovered significantly higher levels of anti-HIV-1 and anti-E. coli activity than Dacron swabs (P<0.001). BV had a significant effect on CVL mediator recovery. Normosol-R tended to recover higher levels of most mediators among women with BV, whereas saline or water tended to recover higher levels among women without BV. Saline recovered the highest levels of anti-HIV-1 activity regardless of BV status. Endocervical swabs and CVL collected with saline provide the best recovery of most mediators and would be the optimal sampling method(s) for clinical trials.