Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients benefit from antiplatelet therapy after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) for an acute coronary syndrome. Whether the addition of ticagrelor to aspirin, as compared with aspirin alone, further reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes is unclear. In this open-label, registry-based, clinical trial conducted at 22 Nordic cardiothoracic surgery centers, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ticagrelor plus aspirin or aspirin alone for 1 year after CABG for an acute coronary syndrome. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization, evaluated at 1 year. A key secondary outcome was net adverse clinical events, defined as a primary-outcome event or major bleeding. A total of 2201 patients were randomly assigned to receive ticagrelor plus aspirin (1104 patients) or aspirin alone (1097 patients). The mean age of the patients was 66 years, and 14.4% were women. A primary-outcome event occurred in 53 patients (4.8%) in the ticagrelor-plus-aspirin group and 50 (4.6%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.56; P = 0.77). Net adverse clinical events occurred in 9.1% of patients in the ticagrelor-plus-aspirin group and 6.4% in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.97). Major bleeding occurred in 4.9% of patients in the ticagrelor-plus-aspirin group and 2.0% in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.52 to 4.11). Among patients who underwent CABG for an acute coronary syndrome, ticagrelor plus aspirin did not result in a lower incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat coronary revascularization than aspirin alone at 1 year. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; TACSI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03560310; EudraCT number, 2017-001499-43; EU Clinical Trials number, 2023-508551-40-00.).

In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, stopping aspirin early after PCI and using P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was not noninferior to dual therapy with respect to the risk of death or ischemic events but did reduce bleeding events.

In low-risk patients with MI and early complete revascularization, stopping aspirin after 1 month and continuing P2Y12 monotherapy was noninferior to dual antiplatelet therapy for ischemic outcomes and led to reduced bleeding at 1 year.

•We report the design and rationale of an investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial.•2700 STEMI and non-STEMI patients at high bleeding risk are considered for inclusion after PCI.•This multiarm trial tests CYP2C19 genotype-guided de-escalation to clopidogrel and abbreviated DAPT.•One-year coprimary outcomes are NACE and major and minor bleeding.•This trial seeks to improve the safety without compromising efficacy of DAPT in high-risk patients. Approximately one-third of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of bleeding side-effects when on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). High bleeding risk is often accompanied by high ischemic risk, thus challenging the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor and duration of DAPT. The optimal DAPT strategy for these patients remains debated, and it is unknown whether genotype-guided DAPT de-escalation to clopidogrel and aspirin, with or without abbreviation of DAPT to 3 months, is noninferior in terms of net adverse clinical events (NACE) and superior in reducing bleeding side-effects compared with standard DAPT for 6 months. The DAN-DAPT trial is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, multiarm, randomized controlled trial conducted at all Danish hospitals performing PCI. From 2022 to 2029, we planned to randomize 2,700 patients with MI and high bleeding risk in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 groups: CYP2C19-genotyping and 6 months DAPT (experimental group 1), CYP2C19-genotyping and 3 months DAPT (experimental group 2), and 6 months DAPT with prasugrel (or ticagrelor) and aspirin (control group). The coprimary outcomes are NACE defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, and BARC type 3-5 bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium), and major and minor bleedings defined as the composite of BARC type 2-5 bleedings at 1 year. DAN-DAPT trial is an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing genotype-guided DAPT de-escalation to clopidogrel - with or without DAPT abbreviation to 3 months - and standard DAPT for 6 months after PCI in high bleeding risk patients with MI. As of March 2025, 36% of the planned 2,700 patients have been enrolled in the study. ClincialTrials.gov (NCT05262803) and EU number (2022-500125-32-00).

In patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving potent antiplatelet therapy, the bleeding risk remains high during the maintenance phase. We sought data on a uniform unguided de-escalation strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction. In this open-label, assessor-masked, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised trial (TALOS-AMI), patients at 32 institutes in South Korea with acute myocardial infarction receiving aspirin and ticagrelor without major ischaemic or bleeding events during the first month after index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a de-escalation (clopidogrel plus aspirin) or active control (ticagrelor plus aspirin) group. Unguided de-escalation without a loading dose of clopidogrel was adopted when switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding type 2, 3, or 5 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria from 1 to 12 months. A non-inferiority test was done to assess the safety and efficacy of de-escalation DAPT compared with standard treatment. The hazard ratio (HR) for de-escalation versus active control group in a stratified Cox proportional hazards model was assessed for non-inferiority by means of an HR margin of 1·34, which equates to an absolute difference of 3·0% in the intention-to-treat population and, if significant, a superiority test was done subsequently. To ensure statistical robustness, additional analyses were also done in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02018055. From Feb 26, 2014, to Dec 31, 2018, from 2901 patients screened, 2697 patients were randomly assigned: 1349 patients to de-escalation and 1348 to active control groups. At 12 months, the primary endpoints occurred in 59 (4·6%) in the de-escalation group and 104 (8·2%) patients in the active control group (pnon-inferiority<0·001; HR 0·55 [95% CI 0·40–0·76], psuperiority=0·0001). There was no significant difference in composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke between de-escalation (2·1%) and the active control group (3·1%; HR 0·69; 95% CI 0·42–1·14, p=0·15). Composite of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding occurred less frequently in the de-escalation group (3·0% vs 5·6%, HR 0·52; 95% CI 0·35–0·77, p=0·0012). In stabilised patients with acute myocardial infarction after index PCI, a uniform unguided de-escalation strategy significantly reduced the risk of net clinical events up to 12 months, mainly by reducing the bleeding events. ChongKunDang Pharm, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific.

Despite the wide variety of antiplatelet regimens and durations, the optimal treatment approach for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients remains a subject of ongoing debate. While current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel, the development of drug-eluting stents (DES) and more potent agents has sparked interest in shorter DAPT regimens, followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, as a potential alternative. Recent trials and meta-analyses have shown that this approach may provide similar protection against thrombotic events with reduced bleeding risk. Despite promising data, the safety and efficacy of Ticagrelor monotherapy specifically in CCS patients have not been rigorously tested in randomized trials. TICALONE is a non-inferiority, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy compared to DAPT in CCS patients following PCI. Eligible patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents will be randomly assigned to receive either conventional DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) or ticagrelor monotherapy for six months. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-PCI to assess efficacy and safety endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and the need for revascularization. The primary safety endpoint is the occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. The secondary endpoints include components of the primary efficacy endpoint, any bleeding event (BARC type 1-5), and all-cause mortality. Ancillary endpoints are other adverse events including dyspnea, drug adherence, and reaction. All endpoints will be monitored by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and Trial Management Committee (TMC). Statistical analysis and reporting of trial results will follow the estimand framework. Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used to assess event rates, while the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis will be employed to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between the groups. This trial may serve as a crucial step toward eliminating aspirin from post-PCI regimens, specifically in CCS patients. By comparing the safety and efficacy of Ticagrelor monotherapy with the conventional DAPT regimen and addressing potential risks of aspirin-free therapy and adverse events like dyspnea, this study could offer valuable insights into the possibility of P2Y12 monotherapy's safe adoption in this population. TICALONE is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with the identifier NCT06509893.

Following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement to treat acute coronary syndromes, international clinical guidelines generally recommend dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for 12 months to prevent myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. However, data on single antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor earlier than 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with an acute coronary syndrome are scarce. The aim of this trial was to assess whether the use of ticagrelor alone, compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, could reduce the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding events without an accompanying increase in major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, patients aged 18 years or older with an acute coronary syndrome who completed the IVUS-ACS study and who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events after 1-month treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus oral aspirin (100 mg once daily) or oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus a matching oral placebo, beginning 1 month and ending at 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (11 months in total). Recruitment took place at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK. Patients were required to remain event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents. Randomisation was done using a web-based system, stratified by acute coronary syndrome type, diabetes, IVUS-ACS randomisation, and site, using dynamic minimisation. The primary superiority endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [known as BARC] types 2, 3, or 5). The primary non-inferiority endpoint was MACCE (defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation), with an expected event rate of 6·2% in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group and an absolute non-inferiority margin of 2·5 percentage points between 1 month and 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The two co-primary endpoints were tested sequentially; the primary superiority endpoint had to be met for hypothesis testing of the MACCE outcome to proceed. All principal analyses were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed. Between Sept 21, 2019, and Oct 27, 2022, 3400 (97·0%) of the 3505 participants in the IVUS-ACS study were randomly assigned (1700 patients to ticagrelor plus aspirin and 1700 patients to ticagrelor plus placebo). 12-month follow-up was completed by 3399 (>99·9%) patients. Between month 1 and month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention, clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 35 patients (2·1%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 78 patients (4·6%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·30 to 0·66]; p<0·0001). MACCE occurred in 61 patients (3·6%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 63 patients (3·7%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (absolute difference –0·1% [95% CI –1·4% to 1·2%]; HR 0·98 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·39]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001, psuperiority=0·89). In patients with an acute coronary syndrome who had percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents and remained event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy, treatment with ticagrelor alone between month 1 and month 12 after the intervention resulted in a lower rate of clinically relevant bleeding and a similar rate of MACCE compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. Along with the results from previous studies, these findings show that most patients in this population can benefit from superior clinical outcomes with aspirin discontinuation and maintenance on ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and the Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project. For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

•Developed a liposomal carrier using nanotechnology for low-dose dual antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel and aspirin).•Demonstrated high drug encapsulation efficiency and sustained release properties of the liposomal carriers.•Conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the nanoparticle drug delivery system with traditional therapy in CHD patients.•Found superior efficacy and lower incidence of complications with the novel delivery system.•Suggested the nanoparticle drug delivery approach as a promising therapeutic strategy for managing CHD, with potential for further validation through larger studies. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of global mortality, and antiplatelet drugs are crucial in its treatment. Traditional therapy, however, often faces issues like inconsistent efficacy, frequent dosing, and high complication rates. This study aimed to develop a liposomal carrier for low-dose dual antiplatelet drugs (clopidogrel and aspirin) using nanotechnology and evaluate its efficacy and safety in CHD patients. The study first prepared drug carriers for clopidogrel and aspirin using a liposomal approach, and the characteristics and in vitro drug release properties of these carriers were evaluated using various techniques. Subsequently, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with 270 patients diagnosed with CHD, who were divided into the control group (receiving 75 mg of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin daily) and the treatment group (receiving the same regimen as the control group, with the addition of a nanoparticle drug delivery system), with 135 patients in each group. The efficacy and safety of the two interventions were then evaluated. The liposomal carriers demonstrated high drug encapsulation efficiency and sustained release. Clinical trials showed superior efficacy and fewer complications with the nanoparticle drug delivery system compared to traditional antiplatelet therapy. The nanoparticle drug delivery system for low-dose dual antiplatelet drugs shows promise as a novel therapeutic strategy for CHD patients. Further validation through larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up studies is necessary.

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the cornerstone for prevention ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the optimal antiplatelet strategy for ACS patients with both high bleeding and high ischemic risks is unclear. The OPT-BIRISK trial is a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized study designed to test the superiority of extended antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel monotherapy compared with aspirin and clopidogrel for reduction of bleeding events in ACS patients with both high bleeding and high ischemic risks (“bi-risk”). A total of 7,700 patients who completed 9- to 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of ACS will be randomized to receive clopidogrel monotherapy or aspirin plus clopidogrel for 9 months followed by aspirin monotherapy for 3 months. The primary end point is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleedings at 9 months after randomization. The key secondary end point is major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 9 months after randomization, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary artery revascularization. OPT-BIRISK is the first large-scale randomized trial aimed to explore the optimal antiplatelet strategy for bi-risk ACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention in current clinical practice. The results will add evidence regarding de-escalation antiplatelet therapy for patients at special risk.

AbstractObjectivesTo investigate whether a less intense antiplatelet regimen could be used for people receiving drug coated balloons.DesignMulticentre, randomised, open label, assessor blind, non-inferiority trial (REC-CAGEFREE II).Setting41 hospitals in China between 27 November 2021 and 21 January 2023.Participants1948 adults (18-80 years) with acute coronary syndrome who received treatment exclusively with paclitaxel-coated balloons according to the international drug coated balloon consensus.InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the stepwise dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) de-escalation group (n=975) consisting of aspirin plus ticagrelor for one month, followed by five months of ticagrelor monotherapy, and then six months of aspirin monotherapy, or to the standard DAPT group (n=973) consisting of aspirin plus ticagrelor for 12 months.Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (all cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding) at 12 months in the intention-to-treat population. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the one sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the absolute risk difference was smaller than 3.2%.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 59.2 years, 74.9% were men, 30.5% had diabetes, and 20.6% were at high bleeding risk. 60.9% of treated lesions were in small vessels, and 17.8% were in-stent restenosis. The mean drug coated balloon diameter was 2.72 mm (standard deviation 0.49). At 12 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 87 (8.9%) participants in the stepwise de-escalation group and 84 (8.6%) in the standard group (difference 0.36%; upper boundary of the one sided 95% CI 2.47%; Pnon-inferiority=0.013). In the stepwise de-escalation versus standard groups, BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in four versus 16 participants (0.4% v 1.6%, difference −1.19% (95% CI −2.07% to −0.31%), P=0.008), and all cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and revascularisation occurred in 84 versus 74 participants (8.6% v 7.6%, difference 1.05% (95% CI −1.37% to 3.47%), P=0.396). Treated as having hierarchical clinical importance by the win ratio method, more wins were noted with the stepwise de-escalation group (14.4% wins) compared with the standard group (10.1% wins) for the predefined hierarchical composite endpoint of all cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, BARC type 3 bleeding, revascularisation, and BARC type 2 bleeding (win ratio 1.43 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.83), P=0.004). Results from the per-protocol and the intention-to-treat analysis were similar.ConclusionsAmong participants with acute coronary syndrome who could be treated by drug coated balloons exclusively, a stepwise DAPT de-escalation was non-inferior to 12 month DAPT for net adverse clinical events.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04971356