Explore the vast range of titles available.

Fungal infections represent a serious global health threat. The new emerging pathogens and the spread of different forms of resistance are now hardly challenging the tools available in therapy and diagnostics. With the commonly used diagnoses, fungal identification is often slow and inaccurate, and, on the other hand, some drugs currently used as treatments are significantly affected by the decrease in susceptibility. Herein, the antifungal arsenal is critically summarized. Besides describing the old approaches and their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations, the focus is dedicated to innovative strategies which are designed, identified, and developed to take advantage of the discrepancies between fungal and host cells. Relevant pathways and their role in survival and virulence are discussed as their suitability as sources of antifungal targets. In a similar way, molecules with antifungal activity are reported as potential agents/precursors of the next generation of antimycotics. Particular attention was devoted to biotechnological entities, to their novelty and reliability, to drug repurposing and restoration, and to combinatorial applications yielding significant improvements in efficacy. Key points • New antifungal agents and targets are needed to limit fungal morbidity and mortality. • Therapeutics and diagnostics suffer of delays in innovation and lack of targets. • Biologics, drug repurposing and combinations are the future of antifungal treatments.

The morbidity and mortality caused by invasive fungal infections are increasing across the globe due to developments in transplant surgery, the use of immunosuppressive agents, and the emergence of drug-resistant fungal strains, which has led to a challenge in terms of treatment due to the limitations of three classes of drugs. Hence, it is imperative to establish effective strategies to identify and design new antifungal drugs. Drug repurposing is a potential way of expanding the application of existing drugs. Recently, various existing drugs have been shown to be useful in the prevention and treatment of invasive fungi. In this review, we summarize the currently used antifungal agents. In addition, the most up-to-date information on the effectiveness of existing drugs with antifungal activity is discussed. Moreover, the antifungal mechanisms of existing drugs are highlighted. These data will provide valuable knowledge to stimulate further investigation and clinical application in this field.Key points• Conventional antifungal agents have limitations due to the occurrence of drug-resistant strains.• Non-antifungal drugs act as antifungal agents in various ways toward different targets.• Non-antifungal drugs with antifungal activity are demonstrated as effective antifungal strategies.

Isavuconazole is a novel triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. The SECURE trial assessed efficacy and safety of isavuconazole versus voriconazole in patients with invasive mould disease. This was a phase 3, double-blind, global multicentre, comparative-group study. Patients with suspected invasive mould disease were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using an interactive voice–web response system, stratified by geographical region, allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, and active malignant disease at baseline, to receive isavuconazonium sulfate 372 mg (prodrug; equivalent to 200 mg isavuconazole; intravenously three times a day on days 1 and 2, then either intravenously or orally once daily) or voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 1, 4 mg/kg intravenously twice daily on day 2, then intravenously 4 mg/kg twice daily or orally 200 mg twice daily from day 3 onwards). We tested non-inferiority of the primary efficacy endpoint of all-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) using a 10% non-inferiority margin. Safety was assessed in patients who received the first dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00412893. 527 adult patients were randomly assigned (258 received study medication per group) between March 7, 2007, and March 28, 2013. All-cause mortality from first dose of study drug to day 42 for the ITT population was 19% with isavuconazole (48 patients) and 20% with voriconazole (52 patients), with an adjusted treatment difference of −1·0% (95% CI −7·8 to 5·7). Because the upper bound of the 95% CI (5·7%) did not exceed 10%, non-inferiority was shown. Most patients (247 [96%] receiving isavuconazole and 255 [98%] receiving voriconazole) had treatment-emergent adverse events (p=0·122); the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (174 [68%] vs 180 [69%]) and infections and infestations (152 [59%] vs 158 [61%]). Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events by system organ class were similar overall. However, isavuconazole-treated patients had a lower frequency of hepatobiliary disorders (23 [9%] vs 42 [16%]; p=0·016), eye disorders (39 [15%] vs 69 [27%]; p=0·002), and skin or subcutaneous tissue disorders (86 [33%] vs 110 [42%]; p=0·037). Drug-related adverse events were reported in 109 (42%) patients receiving isavuconazole and 155 (60%) receiving voriconazole (p<0·001). Isavuconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for the primary treatment of suspected invasive mould disease. Isavuconazole was well tolerated compared with voriconazole, with fewer study-drug-related adverse events. Our results support the use of isavuconazole for the primary treatment of patients with invasive mould disease. Astellas Pharma Global Development, Basilea Pharmaceutica International.

Rezafungin, a new US Food and Drug Administration-approved, long-acting echinocandin to treat candidaemia and invasive candidiasis, was efficacious with a similar safety profile to caspofungin in clinical trials. We conducted pooled analyses of the phase 2 STRIVE and phase 3 ReSTORE rezafungin trials. ReSTORE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial conducted at 66 tertiary care centres in 15 countries. STRIVE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 2 trial conducted at 44 centres in 10 countries. Adults (≥18 years) with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis were treated with once-a-week intravenous rezafungin (400 mg and 200 mg) or once-a-day intravenous caspofungin (70 mg and 50 mg). Efficacy was evaluated in a pooled modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Primary efficacy endpoint was day 30 all-cause mortality (tested for non-inferiority with a pre-specified margin of 20%). Secondary efficacy endpoint was mycological response. Safety was also evaluated. The STRIVE and ReSTORE trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734862 and NCT03667690, and both studies are complete. ReSTORE was conducted from Oct 12, 2018, to Oct 11, 2021, and STRIVE from July 26, 2016, to April 18, 2019. The mITT population, pooling the data from the two trials, comprised 139 patients for rezafungin and 155 patients for caspofungin. Day 30 all-cause mortality rates were comparable between groups (19% [26 of 139] for the rezafungin group and 19% [30 of 155] for the caspofungin group) and the upper bound of the 95% CI for the weighted treatment difference was below 10% (−1·5% [95% CI −10·7 to 7·7]). Mycological eradication occurred by day 5 in 102 (73%) of 139 rezafungin patients and 100 (65%) of 155 caspofungin patients (weighted treatment difference 10·0% [95% CI −0·3 to 20·4]). Safety profiles were similar across groups. Rezafungin was non-inferior to caspofungin for all-cause mortality, with a potential early treatment benefit, possibly reflecting rezafungin's front-loaded dosing regimen. These findings are of clinical importance in fighting active and aggressive infections and reducing the morbidity and mortality caused by candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. Melinta Therapeutics and Cidara Therapeutics.

The rising prevalence of invasive fungal infections, particularly among immunocompromised individuals, has become a critical public health concern. However, antifungal drug development has not kept pace with this growing need, and treatment options remain limited to a small number of drug classes. The emergence of multidrug-resistant fungal pathogens, such as Candida auris , further exacerbates this crisis by reducing the efficacy of existing therapeutics and increasing the risk of treatment failure. In this study, we evaluate the antifungal potential of FK20, a random peptide mixture (RPM) composed of L-phenylalanine and L-lysine. FK20 displays potent activity against C. auris and other clinically relevant Candida species, impairs biofilm formation, and exhibits synergy with caspofungin. Importantly, FK20 limits the emergence of resistance and demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in a murine model of systemic candidiasis. These findings establish RPMs as a promising new class of antifungals with broad-spectrum activity and clinical potential against drug-resistant fungal infections.

PC945 is a novel antifungal triazole formulated for nebulized delivery to treat lung Aspergillus infections. Pharmacokinetic and safety profiles from nonclinical studies and clinical trials in healthy subjects, and subjects with mild asthma were characterized. Toxicokinetics were assessed following daily 2‐hour inhalation for 14 days. Potential for drug‐drug interactions was evaluated using pooled human liver microsomes. Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed following (a) single inhaled doses (0.5‐10 mg), (b) 7‐day repeat doses (5 mg daily) in healthy subjects; (c) a single dose (5 mg) in subjects with mild asthma. Cmax occurred 4 hours (rats) or immediately (dogs) after a single dose. PC945 lung concentrations were substantially higher (>2000‐fold) than those in plasma. PC945 only inhibited CYP3A4/5 substrate metabolism (IC50: 1.33 µM [testosterone] and 0.085 µM [midazolam]). Geometric mean Cmax was 322 pg/mL (healthy subjects) and 335 pg/mL (subjects with mild asthma) 4‐5 hours (median tmax) after a single inhalation (5 mg). Following repeat, once daily inhalation (5 mg), Day 7 Cmax was 951 pg/mL (0.0016 µM) 45 minutes after dosing. Increases in Cmax and AUC0–24h were approximately dose‐proportional (0.5‐10 mg). PC945 administration was well tolerated in both healthy subjects and subjects with mild asthma. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were mild/moderate and resolved before the study ended. No clinically significant lung function changes were observed. PC945 pharmacokinetics translated from nonclinical species to humans showed slow absorption from lungs and low systemic exposure, thereby limiting the potential for adverse side effects and drug interactions commonly seen with systemically delivered azoles. PC945 pharmacokinetics translated from nonclinical species to humans showed slow absorption from lungs and low systemic exposure, thereby limiting the potential for adverse side effects and drug‐drug interactions commonly seen with systemically delivered azole antifungals.

Treatment of fungal infections is often unsuccessful. Potential causes of antifungal failure include tolerance and persistence, which are poorly understood processes used by fungal pathogens to survive antifungal treatment. This study utilizes detailed experimental protocols and genome-wide screens to discover how Candida glabrata induces tolerance and persistence to a major class of antifungals. The findings suggest that a clinical immunosuppressant may be repurposed to combat tolerance and persistence in this pathogenic yeast, as well as Candida albicans and perhaps other species.

While antimicrobial drug resistance causes adverse effects on human health, drug tolerance can also lead to insufficient pathogen clearance, resulting in infection relapse. However, the mechanisms of antifungal drug tolerance and its evolutionary role in acquired drug resistance in pathogenic fungi, particularly the molds, remain elusive. We identified IngB as a novel regulator of azole tolerance in Aspergillus fumigatus . In a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis treated with voriconazole, loss of ingB facilitated higher fungal burden levels than the wild-type control, suggesting the observed in vitro tolerance translates to the murine pulmonary environment. Importantly, loss of IngB leads to rapid azole drug resistance under azole-selective pressure in vitro and led to the discovery of a new gene associated with azole resistance, umpA . Our work identifies a novel regulator of antifungal tolerance in a critical human fungal pathogen and suggests that drug tolerance can pave the way for resistance emergence.

Voriconazole has been recommended as primary treatment for patients with invasive aspergillosis. Intravenous and tablet formulations of posaconazole that have improved systemic absorption could be an effective alternative to voriconazole. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of posaconazole to voriconazole for the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. We did a randomised, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial comparing posaconazole (intravenous or oral posaconazole 300 mg twice on day 1, followed by 300 mg once a day for days 2–84) with voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenous or 300 mg oral twice on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously or 200 mg orally twice a day for days 2–84) for 12 weeks or less in the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Participants were from 91 study sites in 26 countries, were aged 13 years or older, weighed at least 40 kg, and met criteria for proven, probable, or possible fungal disease. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation schedule with stratification by risk status. The primary endpoint was cumulative all-cause mortality up until day 42 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (defined as randomly assigned participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug), with a 10% non-inferiority margin. The ITT population was also evaluated for safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01782131, and EudraCT, 2011-003938-14. Between Oct 25, 2013, and Sept 10, 2019, of 653 individuals assessed for eligibility, 575 ITT participants were randomly assigned and received one or more doses of study drug (n=288 [50%] posaconazole, n=287 [50%] voriconazole). Mortality up until day 42 was 15% (44 of 288) in the posaconazole group and 21% (59 of 287) in the voriconazole group (treatment difference −5·3% [95% CI −11·6 to 1·0]; p<0·0001). Mortality up until day 42 in the full-analysis-set subpopulation (ITT participants with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis) supported this conclusion: 31 (19%) of 163 participants in the posaconazole group and 32 (19%) of 171 participants in the voriconazole group (treatment difference 0·3% [95% CI −8·2 to 8·8]). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (incidence >3%) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), nausea, hypokalaemia, and vomiting in the posaconazole group and increased ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase, hallucination, increased γ-glutamyltransferase peptidase, nausea, and blurred vision in the voriconazole group. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse event rates in the ITT population was 30% for posaconazole and 40% for voriconazole (treatment difference −10·2% [95% CI −17·9 to −2·4]). Posaconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for all-cause mortality up until day 42 in participants with invasive aspergillosis. Posaconazole was well tolerated, and participants had fewer treatment-related adverse events than in the voriconazole group. This study supports the use of posaconazole as a first-line treatment for the condition. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc.

Only a small number of antifungal therapies for invasive fungal disease (IFD) are currently available, and many pathogens are resistant to one or more of these therapies. Olorofim, the first orotomide antifungal agent to be developed, is active against fungi that are resistant to registered therapies. It impairs fungal pyrimidine biosynthesis, leading to cell death. We sought initial data on the efficacy and safety of olorofim as a therapy for IFD. In this single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study, patients aged 16 years or older with few or no treatment options for proven IFD or probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis were recruited from 22 centres in 11 countries. The first 58 patients received a weight-based loading dose of oral olorofim 180–300 mg in two to three divided doses on day 1 followed by 120–240 mg daily in two to three divided doses from day 2 onwards. On the basis of pharmacokinetic data from the first 25 patients, dosing was simplified from patient 59 onwards to a loading dose of 150 mg twice on day 1 followed by a fixed maintenance dose of 90 mg twice a day up to day 84 (main treatment phase) with extended therapy as needed. The primary endpoint was global response rate (based on a composite of clinical, radiological, and mycological responses) at day 42, determined as success (complete or partial improvement in all three components) or failure (stable disease or progression on any one component or death from any cause) by a data review committee (DRC). Secondary efficacy endpoints included global response rate at day 84 and all-cause mortality at day 42 and day 84. Global response rate with stable disease classified as success and response rate in the clinical component of the global response at day 42 and day 84 were also assessed. Efficacy was analysed for all patients who were confirmed by the DRC to have an IFD and who received at least one dose of olorofim (the modified intention-to-treat population). Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of olorofim (the safety population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03583164, and is completed. Between June 6, 2018, and Sept 8, 2022, 204 patients were enrolled. Of these, 203 were treated with olorofim and 202 (124 male, 78 female) had DRC-adjudicated IFD. Causative pathogens were Aspergillus spp (n=101, including 22 azole-resistant strains), Lomentospora prolificans (n=26), Scedosporium spp (n=22), Coccidioides spp (n=41), and other fungi (n=12). Successful global response was confirmed in 58 of 202 patients (28·7%, 95% CI 22·6–35·5) at day 42 and in 55 patients (27·2%, 21·2–33·9) at day 84. Successful global response with stable disease included in the definition of success was seen in 152 patients (75·2%, 68·7–81·0) at day 42 and in 128 patients (63·4%, 56·3–70·0) at day 84. A successful clinical response was seen in 121 patients (59·9%, 52·8–66·7) at day 42 and in 109 patients (54·0%, 46·8–61·0) at day 84. All-cause mortality was documented in 24 patients (11·9%, 7·8–17·2) at day 42 and in 33 patients (16·3%, 11·5–22·2) at day 84. Mean dosing duration was 73 days (SD 25) for the 203 patients in the main treatment phase (median 84 days [range 2–99, IQR 78–87]) and 361 days (SD 220) for the 114 patients who received extended treatment after the main phase (median 309 days [38–988, 180–502]). Medically significant liver enzyme elevations adjudicated to be at least possibly due to olorofim occurred in 20 (10%) of 203 patients and were managed to resolution by dose modification in 14 (7%) patients or by discontinuation of treatment in six (3%). Gastrointestinal intolerance, which occurred in 20 (10%) patients, was predominantly reported as mild or moderate and self-limiting. There were no treatment-related deaths. Olorofim showed efficacy and good tolerability in patients with IFD with few or no treatment options. Further studies will be needed to fully delineate the role of this new antifungal agent. F2G.