Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated efficacy in many tumor types, but predictors of responsiveness to anti-PD1 ICB are incompletely characterized. In this study, we analyzed a clinically annotated cohort of patients with melanoma (n = 144) treated with anti-PD1 ICB, with whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing of pre-treatment tumors. We found that tumor mutational burden as a predictor of response was confounded by melanoma subtype, whereas multiple novel genomic and transcriptomic features predicted selective response, including features associated with MHC-I and MHC-II antigen presentation. Furthermore, previous anti-CTLA4 ICB exposure was associated with different predictors of response compared to tumors that were naive to ICB, suggesting selective immune effects of previous exposure to anti-CTLA4 ICB. Finally, we developed parsimonious models integrating clinical, genomic and transcriptomic features to predict intrinsic resistance to anti-PD1 ICB in individual tumors, with validation in smaller independent cohorts limited by the availability of comprehensive data. Broadly, we present a framework to discover predictive features and build models of ICB therapeutic response.Analysis of fully clinically annotated and sequenced melanoma tumor samples collected before anti-PD1 treatment suggests that determinants of response differ on the basis of previous anti-CTLA4 therapy, and that tumor mutational burden may not be a strong predictor of response across melanoma subtypes.

Immune checkpoint blockade, which blocks inhibitory signals of T cell activation, has shown tremendous success in treating cancer, although success still remains limited to a fraction of patients. To date, clinically effective CD8+ T cell responses appear to target predominantly antigens derived from tumour-specific mutations that accumulate in cancer, also called neoantigens. Tumour antigens are displayed on the surface of cells by class I human leukocyte antigens (HLA-I). To elicit an effective antitumour response, antigen presentation has to be successful at two distinct events: first, cancer antigens have to be taken up by dendritic cells (DCs) and cross-presented for CD8+ T cell priming. Second, the antigens have to be directly presented by the tumour for recognition by primed CD8+ T cells and killing. Tumours exploit multiple escape mechanisms to evade immune recognition at both of these steps. Here, we review the tumour-derived factors modulating DC function, and we summarize evidence of immune evasion by means of quantitative modulation or qualitative alteration of the antigen repertoire presented on tumours. These mechanisms include modulation of antigen expression, HLA-I surface levels, alterations in the antigen processing and presentation machinery in tumour cells. Lastly, as complete abrogation of antigen presentation can lead to natural killer (NK) cell-mediated tumour killing, we also discuss how tumours can harbour antigen presentation defects and still evade NK cell recognition.Immune checkpoint inhibition does not benefit all patients. This Review discusses how antigen presentation, which is crucial for the success of this therapy, may be disrupted in tumours and dendritic cells of patients, and how tumours may further evade natural killer cell recognition.

Despite impressive durable responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors do not provide a long-term benefit to the majority of patients with cancer. Understanding genomic correlates of response and resistance to checkpoint blockade may enhance benefits for patients with cancer by elucidating biomarkers for patient stratification and resistance mechanisms for therapeutic targeting. Here we review emerging genomic markers of checkpoint blockade response, including those related to neoantigens, antigen presentation, DNA repair, and oncogenic pathways. Compelling evidence also points to a role for T cell functionality, checkpoint regulators, chromatin modifiers, and copy-number alterations in mediating selective response to immune checkpoint blockade. Ultimately, efforts to contextualize genomic correlates of response into the larger understanding of tumor immune biology will build a foundation for the development of novel biomarkers and therapies to overcome resistance to checkpoint blockade.Responders and non-responders to cancer immunotherapy can be identified through a range of genomic markers.

Alterations in gut microbiota impact the pathophysiology of several diseases, including cancer. Radiotherapy (RT), an established curative and palliative cancer treatment, exerts potent immune modulatory effects, inducing tumor-associated antigen (TAA) cross-priming with antitumor CD8+ T cell elicitation and abscopal effects. We tested whether the gut microbiota modulates antitumor immune response following RT distal to the gut. Vancomycin, an antibiotic that acts mainly on gram-positive bacteria and is restricted to the gut, potentiated the RT-induced antitumor immune response and tumor growth inhibition. This synergy was dependent on TAA cross presentation to cytolytic CD8+ T cells and on IFN-γ. Notably, butyrate, a metabolite produced by the vancomycin-depleted gut bacteria, abrogated the vancomycin effect. In conclusion, depletion of vancomycin-sensitive bacteria enhances the antitumor activity of RT, which has important clinical ramifications.

Key Points MHC class II molecules bind antigenic peptides that are generated in endosomal–lysosomal antigen-processing compartments. These peptides are derived from proteins that access these compartments using various endocytic pathways and also as a result of autophagy. Proteolysis in antigen-processing compartments is regulated in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to favour the formation of antigenic peptides that can bind to MHC class II and to avoid the complete hydrolysis of proteins to very short peptides or to amino acids. Nonspecific endocytosis processes are terminated following dendritic cell (DC) activation, but mature DCs can still internalize antigen by receptor-mediated endocytosis or phagocytosis. Using these pathways, mature DCs can generate peptide–MHC class II complexes and activate naive CD4 + T cells. The formation of antigen-processing compartments is regulated during APC activation. B cell activation results in MHC class II recruitment to endosomes and lysosomes to form these compartments, whereas in DCs, lysosomal proteases relocalize to antigen-processing compartments and enhance antigen proteolysis. APC activation leads to efficient generation of peptide–MHC class II complexes and markedly increases the expression of these complexes on the APC plasma membrane. Increased surface expression of peptide–MHC class II complexes on activated APCs is a result of enhanced MHC class II transcription and/or translation, movement of intracellular peptide–MHC class II complexes to the APC plasma membrane and reduced lysosomal MHC class II degradation. Expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH1 by immature APCs promotes rapid turnover of peptide–MHC class II complexes. DC activation terminates MARCH1 expression and ubiquitylation of peptide–MHC class II complexes, thus increasing the half-life of peptide–MHC class II complexes. To play their part in the generation of effective adaptive immune responses, different types of antigen-presenting cell (APC) take up and process antigen in different ways. The length of time that peptide–MHC class II complexes are present on APC surfaces can also vary depending on the cell type. This Review describes the different modes and mechanisms that regulate MHC class II processing and presentation. Antigenic peptide-loaded MHC class II molecules (peptide–MHC class II) are constitutively expressed on the surface of professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs), including dendritic cells, B cells, macrophages and thymic epithelial cells, and are presented to antigen-specific CD4 + T cells. The mechanisms of antigen uptake, the nature of the antigen processing compartments and the lifetime of cell surface peptide–MHC class II complexes can vary depending on the type of APC. It is likely that these differences are important for the function of each distinct APC subset in the generation of effective adaptive immune responses. In this Review, we describe our current knowledge of the mechanisms of uptake and processing of antigens, the intracellular formation of peptide–MHC class II complexes, the intracellular trafficking of peptide–MHC class II complexes to the APC plasma membrane and their ultimate degradation.

SignificanceAside from its undisputed role in the import of newly synthesized proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Sec61 translocon was proposed to ensure the reverse transport of misfolded proteins to the cytosol. Based on this model, Sec61 was also proposed to be the channel exporting internalized antigens from endosomes to the cytosol, for degradation and cross-presentation. Establishing Sec61’s contribution to these connected trafficking pathways has nevertheless proven difficult, due to a technical incapacity to blunt its activity acutely. Here, we took advantage of a recently identified Sec61 blocker to determine whether or not Sec61 can mediate retrograde protein transport. Both ER-to-cytosol and endosome-to-cytosol protein export were intact in mycolactone-treated cells, which argues against Sec61 operating as a retrotranslocon. Although antigen cross-presentation in dendritic cells (DCs) is critical to the initiation of most cytotoxic immune responses, the intracellular mechanisms and traffic pathways involved are still unclear. One of the most critical steps in this process, the export of internalized antigen to the cytosol, has been suggested to be mediated by Sec61. Sec61 is the channel that translocates signal peptide-bearing nascent polypeptides into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and it was also proposed to mediate protein retrotranslocation during ER-associated degradation (a process called ERAD). Here, we used a newly identified Sec61 blocker, mycolactone, to analyze Sec61’s contribution to antigen cross-presentation, ERAD, and transport of internalized antigens into the cytosol. As shown previously in other cell types, mycolactone prevented protein import into the ER of DCs. Mycolactone-mediated Sec61 blockade also potently suppressed both antigen cross-presentation and direct presentation of synthetic peptides to CD8+ T cells. In contrast, it did not affect protein export from the ER lumen or from endosomes into the cytosol, suggesting that the inhibition of cross-presentation was not related to either of these trafficking pathways. Proteomic profiling of mycolactone-exposed DCs showed that expression of mediators of antigen presentation, including MHC class I and β2 microglobulin, were highly susceptible to mycolactone treatment, indicating that Sec61 blockade affects antigen cross-presentation indirectly. Together, our data suggest that the defective translocation and subsequent degradation of Sec61 substrates is the cause of altered antigen cross-presentation in Sec61-blocked DCs.

Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1) 1 are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation, which is required to prime CD8 + T cells 2 , 3 , whereas cDC2 are specialized for priming CD4 + T cells 4 , 5 . CD4 + T cells are also considered to help CD8 + T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms 6 – 11 , including a process whereby CD4 + T cells ‘license’ cDC1 for CD8 + T cell priming 12 . However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of help-dependent tumour rejection. Here we generated an Xcr1 Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1 and CD8 + T cell priming required the expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4 + T cells against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, and this was not simply because they transport antigens to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, as selective deletion of major histocompatibility class II molecules in cDC1 also prevented early CD4 + T cell priming. Furthermore, deletion of either major histocompatibility class II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4 + T cell interactions and CD40 signalling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signalling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8 + T cell priming, but also for initial CD4 + T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and of the direct orchestration of their cross-talk that is required for optimal anti-tumour immunity. Conventional type 1 dendritic cells perform antigen processing and priming of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells against tumour antigens, orchestrating their cross-talk to effect anti-tumour immunity.

As crucial antigen presenting cells, dendritic cells (DCs) play a vital role in tumor immunotherapy. Taking into account the many recent advances in DC biology, we discuss how DCs (1) recognize pathogenic antigens with pattern recognition receptors through specific phagocytosis and through non-specific micropinocytosis, (2) process antigens into small peptides with proper sizes and sequences, and (3) present MHC-peptides to CD4 + and CD8 + T cells to initiate immune responses against invading microbes and aberrant host cells. During anti-tumor immune responses, DC-derived exosomes were discovered to participate in antigen presentation. T cell microvillar dynamics and TCR conformational changes were demonstrated upon DC antigen presentation. Caspase-11-driven hyperactive DCs were recently reported to convert effectors into memory T cells. DCs were also reported to crosstalk with NK cells. Additionally, DCs are the most important sentinel cells for immune surveillance in the tumor microenvironment. Alongside DC biology, we review the latest developments for DC-based tumor immunotherapy in preclinical studies and clinical trials. Personalized DC vaccine-induced T cell immunity, which targets tumor-specific antigens, has been demonstrated to be a promising form of tumor immunotherapy in patients with melanoma. Importantly, allogeneic-IgG-loaded and HLA-restricted neoantigen DC vaccines were discovered to have robust anti-tumor effects in mice. Our comprehensive review of DC biology and its role in tumor immunotherapy aids in the understanding of DCs as the mentors of T cells and as novel tumor immunotherapy cells with immense potential.

Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (CPB) therapies often leads to prolonged responses in patients with metastatic melanoma, but the common mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to these agents remain incompletely characterized and have yet to be validated in large cohorts. By analyzing longitudinal tumor biopsies from 17 metastatic melanoma patients treated with CPB therapies, we observed point mutations, deletions or loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in beta-2-microglobulin ( B2M ), an essential component of MHC class I antigen presentation, in 29.4% of patients with progressing disease. In two independent cohorts of melanoma patients treated with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1, respectively, we find that B2M LOH is enriched threefold in non-responders (~30%) compared to responders (~10%) and associated with poorer overall survival. Loss of both copies of B2M is found only in non-responders. B2M loss is likely a common mechanism of resistance to therapies targeting CTLA4 or PD1. Resistance to immune-checkpoint blockade often occurs in treated patients. Here, the authors demonstrate that B2M loss is a mechanism of primary and acquired resistance to therapies targeting CTLA4 or PD-1 in melanoma patients.

Immune response to disease requires coordinated expression of an army of molecules. The highly polymorphic MHC class I and class II molecules are key to control of specificity of antigen presentation. Processing of the antigen, to peptides or other moieties, requires other sets of molecules. For classical class I, this includes TAP peptide transporters, proteasome components and Tapasin, genes which are encoded within the MHC. Similarly, HLA-DO and -DM, which influence presentation by HLA class II molecules, are encoded in the MHC region. Analysis of MHC mutants, including point mutations and large deletions, has been central to understanding the roles of these genes. Mouse genetics has also played a major role. Many other genes have been identified including those controlling expression of HLA class I and class II at the transcriptional level. Another genetic approach that has provided insight has been the analysis of microorganisms, including viruses and bacteria that escape immune recognition by blocking these antigen processing and presentation pathways. Here, we provide a brief history of the genetic approaches, both traditional and modern, that have been used in the quest to understand antigen processing and presentation.