Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionAstroblastoma is a rare tumour of the central nervous system that often manifests with non-specific clinical symptoms and lacks distinct histological features. There is a pressing need for further understanding of the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of Astroblastoma. Identifying mutant genes can aid in reliable and early diagnosis, as well as provide insights for the development of targeted therapies.MethodsThis study aims to investigate the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of astroblastoma. A total of four patients diagnosed with astroblastoma were included in the analysis. Clinical features, histological findings, and immunohistochemistry results were reviewed and analyzed. Genetic alterations were identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), followed by patient follow-up.ResultsThe study included four female patients, ranging in age from 8 to 44 years. One patient had a tumour in the right parietal lobe, while the other three had tumours in the spinal cord. Histology is usually characterized by pseudorosettes of astroblasts and hyalinization of blood vessels. These tumors showed a growth pattern similar to traditional intracranial astroblastoma, and the histological manifestations of the four patients were all high-grade, showing features of high-density areas of tumor cells or necrosis. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that all four patients expressed OLIG2, EMA, and vimentin, while three patients also expressed GFAP and S-100. The Ki-67 positivity index was approximately 15% in three cases and 10% in one case. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using break-apart probes showed EWRS1 breaks in three patients and MN1 breaks in one. Further DNA or RNA-targeted biallelic sequencing identified an EWSR1(Exon1-7)-BEND2(Exon2-14) fusion in case 1, and an EWSR1(Exon1-7)-BEND2(Intergenic) fusion in case 2. In case 3, an EWSR1(Exon1-7)-NUDT10(Intergenic) fusion was present, and in case 4, an MN1(Exon1)-BEND2(Exon2) fusion was identified. The EWSR1-NUDT10 gene fusion is a new fusion type in astroblastoma. The patients were followed up for 76.5, 17.6, 33.7, and 61.3 months, respectively. Three cases experienced tumour recurrences at the spinal cord site, with multiple recurrences in case 4.DiscussionOur study unveiled the distinctive clinicopathological and molecular mutational characteristics of astroblastoma, while also identifying rare mutated genes. Additionally, the detection of MN1 or EWSR1 gene fusion through FISH or next-generation sequencing can provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms and aid in the differential diagnosis of astroblastoma.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2025.1483833.].

Three distinct MN1::BEND2 fusion‐positive tumors in pediatric patients. (A) Clinical course for each patient was variable in part due to differences in initial diagnosis. Each patient responded favorably to gross total resection and is stable at last follow‐up. (B) Histologic diversity, lack of prominent classical astroblastoma features, and variable immunoexpression of key markers makes microscopic diagnosis challenging.

Purpose Review of the clinicopathologic and genetic features of early ependymal tumor with MN1-BEND2 fusion (EET MN1-BEND2), classical astroblastomas, and recently described related pediatric CNS tumors. I also briefly review general mechanisms of gene expression silencing by DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling, and genomic DNA methylation profiling as a powerful new tool for CNS tumor classification. Methods Literature review and illustration of tumor histopathologic features and prenatal gene expression timelines. Results Astroblastoma, originally descried by Bailey and Cushing in 1926, has been an enigmatic tumor. Whether they are of ependymal or astrocytic derivation was argued for decades. Recent genetic evidence supports existence of both ependymal and astrocytic astroblastoma-like tumors. Studies have shown that tumors exhibiting astroblastoma-like histology can be classified into discrete entities based on their genomic DNA methylation profiles, gene expression, and in some cases, the presence of unique gene fusions. One such tumor, EET MN1-BEND2 occurs mostly in female children, and has an overall very good prognosis with surgical management. It contains a gene fusion comprised of portions of the MN1 gene at chromosomal location 22q12.1 and the BEND2 gene at Xp22.13. Other emerging pediatric CNS tumor entities demonstrating ependymal or astroblastoma-like histological features also harbor gene fusions involving chromosome X, 11q22 and 22q12 breakpoint regions. Conclusions Genomic DNA profiling has facilitated discovery of several new CNS tumor entities, however, traditional methods, such as immunohistochemistry, DNA or RNA sequencing, and cytogenetic studies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization, remain necessary for their accurate biological classification and diagnosis.

Purpose Central nervous system high-grade neuroepithelial tumor with MN1 alteration (CNS-HGNET- MN1 ) is a rare entity defined by its DNA methylation pattern and pathologically considered to be high-grade with mixed patterns, stromal hyalinization, and with astrocytic differentiation. Our aim was to present six pediatric cases to contribute to the characterization of this group of tumors. Material and methods Six female patients aged 4 to 12 years with CNS tumors with MN1 alteration identified using genome-wide methylation arrays and/or RT-PCR were included. Clinicopathological, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings were analyzed. Results Tumor location was the parietal lobe in four and the intramedullary spinal cord in two. Two were morphologically diagnosed as ependymomas, one as gliofibroma, one as a HGNET- MN1 altered and the other two were difficult to classify. All were well-defined tumors, with a cystic component in three. Only two tumors had extensive stromal hyalinization, three had pseudopapillary formations, and four had other patterns. Multinucleated, clear, and rhabdoid cells were present. Necrosis and histiocyte clusters were also observed. Proliferative index was >10 in four. GFAP, EMA, CK, and SYN were variable, while Olig2 staining was mostly positive. Four of six patients with supratentorial tumors and complete resections were alive and tumor free after 2 to 10 years of follow-up. The two cases with medullary involvement and incomplete resections were alive and undergoing treatment 2 years after surgery. Conclusion Neuroepithelial-MN1 tumors are challenging and suspicion requires molecular confirmation. Our pediatric data contribute to the knowledge for accurate diagnosis. Although further studies with a larger number of cases should be conducted in order to draw more robust conclusions regarding clinico-pathological features, here we present valuable pediatric data to increase the knowledge that may lead to the accurate management of this group of tumors.

Astroblastomas are central nervous system tumours with unknown cell of origin and clinical behaviour. These tumours occur most commonly in cerebral hemispheres with spinal astroblastomas being very rare. We report a case of spinal astroblastoma which harboured MN1 alteration.

Purpose Supratentorial (ST) ependymoma subgroups are defined by two different fusions with different prognoses. Astroblastomas, MN1 -altered, have ependymal-like histopathologic features and represent a differential diagnosis in children. We hypothesized that ZFTA -fused ependymoma and YAP1 -fused ependymoma on the one hand, and astroblastoma, MN1 -altered, on the other hand, show different MRI characteristics. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative imaging of 45 patients with ST ependymoma or astroblastoma between January 2000 and September 2020, blinded to histomolecular grouping. Several characteristics, such as location, tumor volume, calcifications, solid/cystic component, and signal enhancement or diffusion were evaluated. We compared imaging characteristics according to their molecular subtype ( ZFTA -fused, YAP1 -fused, and astroblastoma, MN1 -altered). Results Thirty-nine patients were classified as having an ependymoma, 35 with a  ZFTA fusion and four with a  YAP1 fusion, and six as having an astroblastoma, MN1 -altered. YAP1 -fused ependymomas were more likely to involve at least 3 lobes than ZFTA -fused ependymomas. Astroblastomas were located in the frontal lobe in 100% of the tumors versus 49% of the ependymomas. Cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling was higher in astroblastomas than in ependymomas. There were no differences in the other characteristics between the molecular groups. All the tumors showed common features: intra-axial extra-ventricular tumors, very frequent contrast enhancement (39/43, 91%), a cystic/necrotic component (41/45, 91%), restricted diffusion (32/36, 89%), calcifications (15/18, 83%), and peri-tumoral edema (38/44, 86%). Conclusion The distinction between ST ependymoma subtypes and astroblastomas can be guided by several imaging features. These tumors share common imaging features that may help to differentiate ST ependymomas and astroblastomas from other pediatric ST tumors.

Purpose Astroblastomas (AB) are high-grade neoplasms which typically occur within the cerebral hemisphere. However, given the rarity of this neoplasm and the number of variants, the relevance of this molecular makeup is unknown. We sought to describe the clinical presentation, treatment, and pathological analysis of a novel MN1 (meningioma 1) cervical spinal cord astroblastoma variant presenting in a pediatric patient. Methods A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed with an emphasis on neuroimaging, perioperative course, and pathological analysis. Results An 11-month-old male with no significant history presented with two weeks of neck stiffness and cervicalgia. Neurologically, the patient was intact without signs of infection or trauma. Cervical CT was unremarkable. A subsequent MRI demonstrated a heterogeneously enhancing intramedullary lesion extending from the craniocervical junction to T4. The patient was treated with perioperative steroids and underwent C1-C3 laminectomies and C4-T4 laminotomies for tumor resection. Upon completion of the durotomy, an exophytic gray-red tumor was appreciated within the epidural space and gross total resection was achieved (no change on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring) and confirmed on post-operative imaging. Immunohistochemical analysis was consistent with an astroblastoma with atypical diffuse positivity of CD56, CD99, and nuclear OLIG2 . Molecular analysis revealed not only MN1 alterations but also changes in genes encoding APC and LRP1B. Both alterations were not previously documented to be associated with an astroblastoma. Conclusion Our case represents the first report of an infant with an MN1 astroblastoma with APC and LRP1B gene alterations in the cervical spine. Gross total resection paired with a detailed histopathologic analysis is vital for optimizing adjuvant treatment.

Astroblastomas are unique tumours with unresolved issues in terms of their origin, molecular biology, clinical behaviour, and response to treatment. To decipher the characteristics of this tumour, we reviewed cases histologically diagnosed as astroblastoma in our institute over the past 8 years, with immunohistochemistry, and performed fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), for the newly emerged MN1 rearrangement which was reported in central nervous system high-grade neuroepithelial tumours. The mean age at diagnosis was 18.6 years with all cases seen in females and with supratentorial localisation. The tumours showed typical circumscription and bubbly appearance on imaging. The cohort included eight cases diagnosed as astroblastoma (two low grades; six anaplastic) based on histology and proliferative index. The tumours displayed characteristic astroblastic pseudorosettes with hyalinised vascular core and variable immunopositivity for glial fibrillary acidic protein, pan cytokeratin, and epithelial membrane antigen. MN1 break-apart by FISH was found in 5/8 of our cases (62.5%), which included 2 low-grade and 3 anaplastic tumours. Tumour recurrence was noted in three cases, with MN1 alteration in two. We account for one of the few series to study the MN1 rearrangement in astroblastoma and conclude that MN1 alteration is seen in a subset of these tumours.