Explore the vast range of titles available.

In patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), hyperactivated inflammation in the brain, particularly microglial hyperactivation in the substantia nigra (SN), is reported to be one of the triggers for the delayed loss of dopaminergic neurons and sequential motor functional impairments. We previously reported that (1) auraptene (AUR), a natural prenyloxycoumain, suppressed inflammatory responses including the hyperactivation of microglia in the ischemic brain and inflamed brain, thereby inhibiting neuronal cell death; (2) 7-isopentenyloxycoumarin (7-IP), another natural prenyloxycoumain, exerted anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects against excitotoxicity; and (3) 4′-geranyloxyferulic acid (GOFA), a natural prenyloxycinnamic acid, also exerted anti-inflammatory effects. In the present study, using an intranigral lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced PD-like mouse model, we investigated whether AUR, 7-IP, and GOFA suppress microglial activation and protect against dopaminergic neuronal cell death in the SN. We successfully showed that these prenyloxyphenylpropanoids exhibited these prospective abilities, suggesting the potential of these compounds as neuroprotective agents for patients with PD.

Auraptene and umbelliprenin are among the most abundant naturally occurring prenyloxy umbelliferone derivatives. Both have been mainly isolated from plants belonging to numerous genera of the Rutaceae (in particular auraptene in Citrus spp.) and Apiaceae (in particular umbelliprenin in Ferula spp.) families, comprising different and widely used medicinal plants and in general plants having beneficial effects to human welfare as well as edible fruits and vegetables. Although known for quite a long time (nearly a century for auraptene and 50 years for umbelliprenin), only in the last two decades the two title natural compounds were revealed to possess valuable and promising pharmacological properties as dietary feeding active cancer chemopreventive, anti-bacterial, anti-protozoal, anti-fungal, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and anti-oxidant agents among the activities best detailed in the recent literature. The aim of this comprehensive review is to outline in detail the effects described in the very last years for auraptene and umbelliprenin and what has been reported about the mechanisms of action underlying the observed pharmacological activities of these oxyprenylated secondary metabolites. In view of the herein described data suggestions on how to address the future research about both natural products in the best ways according to Authors will be also provided.

Despite advances in the treatment of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), the survival rate of this malignancy remains significantly low. Auraptene (AUR) is a natural coumarin with broad-spectrum anticancer activities. To introduce a more effective therapeutic strategy for ATLL, we investigated the combinatorial effects of AUR and arsenic trioxide (ATO) on MT-2 cells. The cells were treated with different concentrations of AUR for 24, 48, and 72 hr, and viability was measured by alamarBlue assay. Then, the combination of AUR (20 μg/ml) and ATO (3 μg/ml) was administrated and the cell cycle was analyzed by PI staining followed by flow cytometry analysis. In addition, the expression of , and was evaluated via qPCR. Assessment of cell viability revealed increased toxicity of AUR and ATO when used in combination. Our findings were confirmed by accumulation of cells in the sub G1 phase of the cell cycle and significant down-regulation of . Obtained findings suggest that combinatorial use of AUR and ATO could be considered for designing novel chemotherapy regimens for ATLL.

Auraptene is a bioactive monoterpene coumarin isolated from Citrus aurantium and Aegle marmelos that belong to the Rutaceae family. Auraptene can modulate intracellular signaling pathways that control cell growth, inflammation and apoptosis and can exert pharmacological properties such as anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, antileishmania and anti-oxidant activity. Auraptene had inhibitory and chemo-preventive effects on the proliferation, tumorigenesis and growth of several cancer cell lines through increase in the activity of glutathione S-transferase, formation of DNA adducts and reduction of the number of aberrant crypt foci. Auraptene exhibits anticancer effects via targeting different cell signaling pathways such as cytokines, genes modulating cellular proliferation, growth factors, transcription factors and apoptosis. The present review is a detailed survey of scientific researches on the cytotoxicity and anticancer activity of Auraptene on cancer cells and tumor bearing animals.

The anti-inflammatory activity of auraptene (AUR), a citrus coumarin, in peripheral tissues is well-known, and we previously demonstrated that AUR exerts anti-inflammatory effects in the ischemic brain; the treatment of mice with AUR for eight days immediately after ischemic surgery suppressed demise and neuronal cell death in the hippocampus, possibly through its anti-inflammatory effects in the brain. We suggested that these effects were at least partly mediated by the suppression of inflammatory mediators derived from astrocytes. The present study showed that (1) AUR, as a pretreatment for five days before and another three days after ischemic surgery, suppressed microglial activation, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in astrocytes, and COX-2 mRNA expression in the hippocampus; (2) AUR suppressed the lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of COX-2 mRNA and the mRNA of pro-inflammatory cytokines in cultured astrocytes; (3) AUR was still detectable in the brain 60 min after its intraperitoneal administration. These results support our previous suggestion that AUR directly exerts anti-inflammatory effects on the brain.

Acute myeloid leukemia is one of the most commonly identified hematological malignancies with poor prognosis. This research was planned to identify the cytotoxic effects of Auraptene on HL60 and U937 cell lines. The cytotoxic effects of Auraptene were measured by AlamarBlue assay (Resazurin) after 24- and 48-h treatments with different doses of Auraptene. The inductive effects of Auraptene on cellular oxidative stress were investigated by determining cellular ROS levels. The cell cycle progression and cell apoptosis were also evaluated by flow cytometry method. Our findings revealed that Auraptene decreased HL60 and U937 cellular proliferation by downregulation of Cyclin D1. Auraptene also induces cellular oxidative stress by upregulation of cellular ROS levels. Auraptene induces cell cycle arrest the early and late phases of apoptosis by upregulation of Bax and p53 proteins. Our data suggest that the anti-tumor function of Auraptene can be mediated by promoting apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and inducing cellular oxidative stress in HL60 and U937 cell lines. These results support that Auraptene may be used as a potent anti-tumor agent against hematologic malignancies in the further studies.

Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of auraptene on inflammation and apoptosis of pneumonia cell model and uncover the mechanism. Methods: WI-38 cells were treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to construct a pneumonia model. Cell counting kit-8 assay, enzyme-linked-immunosorbent serologic assay, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay were conducted to confirm the effects of auraptene on the viability and inflammation of WI-38 cells. Flow cytometry (FCM) and immunoblot assays were conducted to detect the effects of auraptene on the apoptosis of WI-38 cells. Immunoblot assay was performed to confirm the mechanism. Results: We found that auraptene stimulated cell viability in WI-38 cells upon LPS treatment. Auraptene also inhibited cellular inflammation. Furthermore, auraptene inhibited cell apoptosis of WI-38 cells upon LPS treatment. Mechanically, auraptene inhibited the nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway, thereby suppressing the pneumonia. Conclusion: Auraptene alleviates inflammatory injury and cell apoptosis in pneumonia, thus has the potential to act as a pneumonia drug.

Auraptene (AUR) and umbelliprenin (UMB) are naturally occurring prenylated coumarins that have demonstrated promising anticancer effects across various human cancer cell lines. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess, compare, and quantify the anticancer efficacy of AUR and UMB by synthesizing evidence from in vitro studies. A comprehensive literature search identified 27 eligible studies investigating AUR or UMB against cancer cells. Mixed-effects models revealed significant negative associations between coumarin dose and viability for AUR (est. = − 2.27) and UMB (est. = − 3.990), underscoring their dose-dependent cytotoxicity. Meta-regression indicated slightly higher potency for UMB over AUR, potentially due to increased lipophilicity imparted by additional isoprenyl units. Machine learning approaches identified coumarin dose and cancer type as the most influential determinants of toxicity, while treatment duration and the specific coumarin displayed weaker effects. Moderate (AUR) to substantial (UMB) between-study heterogeneity was detected, although the findings proved robust. In summary, this meta-analysis establishes AUR and UMB as promising natural anticancer candidates with clear dose-toxicity relationships across diverse malignancies. The structural insights and quantifications of anticancer efficacy can inform forthcoming efforts assessing therapeutic potential in pre-clinical models and human trials.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), like the devastating type of astrocytic tumors, is one of the most challenging cancers to treat owing to its aggressive nature. Auraptene, as a prenyloxy coumarin from citrus species, represents antioxidant and antitumor activities; however, the underlying antitumor mechanisms of auraptene against GBM remain unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxic and apoptogenic effects of auraptene, as a promising natural product, and the possible signaling pathways affected in human malignant GBM (U87) cells. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production significantly decreased in the first 2, and 6 hours after treatment with auraptene however, ROS levels increased in other incubation times (8 and 24 hours), dramatically. N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) markedly attenuated auraptene-induced ROS production, and consequently reversed auraptene-induced cytotoxicity in 8 and 24 hours after treatment, as well. Induction of apoptosis occurred in the first 24- and 48-hours concentration-dependently. The qRT-PCR showed an up-regulation in p21, CXCL3, and a down-regulation in Cyclin D1 genes expression. Western blot analysis confirmed the up-regulation of the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio protein levels concentration-dependently. Hence, this study collectively revealed that the increase in ROS level is at least one of the mechanisms associated with auraptene-induced GBM cell toxicity as well as the induction of apoptosis through Bax/Bcl-2 modulation and genes expression involved that contribute to the cytotoxicity of auraptene in U87 cells. So, auraptene might be utilized as a potential novel anti-GBM agent after further studies.

The significant fatality rate associated with ovarian cancer underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic interventions in this area. The focus of this study was to assess the cytotoxic impact of auraptene nanohybrid chitosan folate on A2780 ovarian cancer cells. A combination of liquid and solid lipids were used to create auraptene-nanostructured lipid carriers. Folic acid was conjugated to chitosan in order to modify the surface. The nanoparticles containing methylene blue were dissolved in deionized distilled water to attach the chitosan-folic acid to the nanoparticles. The resazurin cell viability assay was employed to gauge the cytotoxicity of auraptene on the cells. Real-time PCR was utilized to quantify the expression levels of Bcl-2 , Bax , and P53 genes. DLS analysis exposed a spheroidal particle with an approximate diameter of 211 nm. The auraptene nanoparticles did not revealed inhibitory effect on normal cell line (HFF-1) at the concentrations that it was toxic for cancerous cells (A2780). In vitro trials suggested that auraptene nanoparticles trigger apoptosis in A2780 cells in a dose-responsive manner by promoting the expression of pro-apoptotic genes ( Bax and P53 ), while suppressing the expression of the anti-apoptotic gene ( Bcl-2 ). Furthermore, auraptene nanoparticles also heightened the production of reactive oxygen species within the cancerous cells. The notable cytotoxic and lethal influence of auraptene nanoparticles on human ovarian cancer may be attributed to their capacity to generate oxidative stress conditions and induce apoptosis.