Explore the vast range of titles available.

In long-term follow-up of more than 500 patients with melanoma containing a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation, a combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with progression-free survival in 19% of the patients and overall survival in 34% at 5 years. A complete response to dabrafenib plus trametinib was the strongest predictor of long-term survival.

Blocking programmed death 1 (PD-1) may enhance the durability of anti-tumor responses that are induced by the combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK 1 . Here we performed a randomized phase 2 trial ( NCT02130466 ), in which patients with treatment-naive BRAF V600E/K -mutant, advanced melanoma received the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib together with the PD-1-blocking antibody pembrolizumab (triplet; n  = 60) or placebo (doublet; n  = 60). The primary end point of progression-free survival was numerically improved in the triplet group—16.0 months—compared with 10.3 months in the doublet group (hazard ratio, 0.66; P  = 0.043); however, the trial did not reach the planned benefit for a statistically significant improvement. Median duration of response was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval, 10.1–22.1) and 12.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.0–14.1); 59.8 and 27.8% of responses were estimated to have lasted for more than 18 months for triplet and doublet treatment, respectively. Grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.3 and 26.7% of patients treated with triplet and doublet therapies, respectively, which were most commonly fever, increased transaminase levels and rash. One patient who received triplet therapy died of pneumonitis. In summary, triplet therapy with dabrafenib, trametinib and pembrolizumab conferred numerically longer progression-free survival and duration of response with a higher rate of grade 3/4 adverse events compared with the doublet therapy of dabrafenib, trametinib and placebo. A randomized phase 2 trial testing triple combination of BRAF, MEK and PD-1 inhibition as first-line therapy in patients with BRAF -mutant melanoma shows durable responses and encouraging progression-free survival.

In patients with melanomas containing activating BRAF mutations, the combination of a BRAF inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor improved overall survival, as compared with a BRAF inhibitor alone, and was associated with many fewer second skin tumors. The treatment of metastatic melanoma is rapidly evolving. The potent and specific BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib, as compared with chemotherapy, have significantly improved response rates, along with progression-free and overall survival, in patients with metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. 1 , 2 However, acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors frequently develops through reactivation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 6 to 8 months. 2 – 5 In addition, the use of BRAF inhibitors may result in the development of secondary skin tumors, originating from a paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in cells . . .

Melanoma treatment has progressed in the past decade with the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, as well as small molecule inhibitors of BRAF and/or MEK for the subgroup of patients with BRAF V600 mutations 1 – 9 . BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies have effects on the tumor microenvironment that support their combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors 10 – 20 . This phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01656642 ) evaluated the safety and anti-tumor activity of combining atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) with vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor), or cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor) + vemurafenib, in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma. Triple combination therapy with atezolizumab + cobimetinib + vemurafenib, after a 28-d run-in period with cobimetinib + vemurafenib, had substantial but manageable toxicity. Exploratory biomarker data show that the cobimetinib + vemurafenib run-in was associated with an increase in proliferating CD4 + T-helper cells but not with an increase in T-regulatory cells, as observed in the vemurafenib-only run-in period. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.8% (95% confidence interval 55.1–85.0). The estimated median duration of response was 17.4 months (95% confidence interval 10.6–25.3) with ongoing response in 39.3% of patients after 29.9 months of follow-up. Further investigation in a phase III trial is underway. Treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors followed by addition of anti-PD-L1 in BRAF -mutant melanoma patients is safe and shows promising anti-tumor activity.

Oncogene-targeted therapy with B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors induces a high initial response rate in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma, with a median duration of response of approximately 1 year 1 – 3 . Immunotherapy with antibodies to programmed death 1 (PD-1) produces lower response rates but with long response duration. Preclinical models suggest that combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with PD-1 blockade therapy improves antitumor activity 4 – 6 , which may provide additional treatment options for patients unlikely to have long-lasting responses to either mode of therapy alone. We enrolled 15 patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma in a first-in-human clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib and pembrolizumab ( NCT02130466 ). Eleven patients (73%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, the most common being elevation of liver function tests and pyrexia, most of which resolved with drug interruption or discontinuation of either the anti-PD-1 antibody or the targeted therapy combination. Eleven patients (73%; 95% confidence interval = 45–92%) had an objective response, and six (40%; 95% confidence interval = 16–68%) continued with a response at a median follow-up of 27 months (range = 10.3–38.4+ months) for all patients. This study suggests that this triple-combined therapy may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma by increasing the frequency of long-lasting antitumor responses. Triple therapy combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma.

In the BRIM-3 trial, vemurafenib was associated with risk reduction versus dacarbazine of both death and progression in patients with advanced BRAF(V600) mutation-positive melanoma. We present an extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation subgroups. Patients older than 18 years, with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma and whose tumour tissue was positive for BRAF(V600) mutations were eligible. Patients also had to have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned by interactive voice recognition system to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m(2) of body surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (n=675), with data censored at crossover. A sensitivity analysis was done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01006980. 675 eligible patients were enrolled from 104 centres in 12 countries between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 16, 2010. 337 patients were randomly assigned to receive vemurafenib and 338 to receive dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 12·5 months (IQR 7·7-16·0) on vemurafenib and 9·5 months (3·1-14·7) on dacarbazine. 83 (25%) of the 338 patients initially randomly assigned to dacarbazine crossed over from dacarbazine to vemurafenib. Median overall survival was significantly longer in the vemurafenib group than in the dacarbazine group (13·6 months [95% CI 12·0-15·2] vs 9·7 months [7·9-12·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·87]; p=0·0008), as was median progression-free survival (6·9 months [95% CI 6·1-7·0] vs 1·6 months [1·6-2·1]; HR 0·38 [95% CI 0·32-0·46]; p<0·0001). For the 598 (91%) patients with BRAF(V600E) disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·9-14·9) compared with 10·0 months (8·0-14·0) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0085); median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·2-7·0) and 1·6 months (1·6-2·1), respectively (HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·33-0·47]; p<0·0001). For the 57 (9%) patients with BRAF(V600K) disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 14·5 months (95% CI 11·2-not estimable) compared with 7·6 months (6·1-16·6) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·21-0·90]; p=0·024); median progression-free survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 4·4-9·0) and 1·7 months (1·4-2·9), respectively (HR 0·30 [95% CI 0·16-0·56]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3-4 events were cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (65 [19%] of 337 patients) and keratoacanthomas (34 [10%]), rash (30 [9%]), and abnormal liver function tests (38 [11%]) in the vemurafenib group and neutropenia (26 [9%] of 287 patients) in the dacarbazine group. Eight (2%) patients in the vemurafenib group and seven (2%) in the dacarbazine group had grade 5 events. Inhibition of BRAF with vemurafenib improves survival in patients with the most common BRAF(V600E) mutation and in patients with the less common BRAF(V600K) mutation. F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech.

Immune and targeted therapies achieve long-term survival in metastatic melanoma; however, new treatment strategies are needed to improve patients’ outcomes 1 , 2 . We report on the efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis from the single-arm safety run-in (part 1; n  = 9) and biomarker (part 2; n  = 27) cohorts of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMBI-i trial ( NCT02967692 ) of the anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab, in combination with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and MEK inhibitor trametinib. Patients ( n  = 36) had previously untreated BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. In part 1, the recommended phase 3 regimen was identified based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; primary endpoint): 400 mg of spartalizumab every 4 weeks plus 150 mg of dabrafenib twice daily plus 2 mg of trametinib once daily. Part 2 characterized changes in PD-L1 levels and CD8 + cells following treatment (primary endpoint), and analyzed additional biomarkers. Assessments of efficacy and safety were key secondary endpoints (median follow-up, 24.3 months). Spartalizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib led to an objective response rate (ORR) of 78%, including 44% complete responses (CRs). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 72% of patients. All patients had temporary dose modifications, and 17% permanently discontinued all three study drugs due to TRAEs. Early progression-free survival (PFS) events were associated with low tumor mutational burden/T cell–inflamed gene expression signature (GES) or high immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) GES levels at baseline; an immunosuppressive TME may also preclude CR. Overall, the efficacy, safety and on-treatment biomarker modulations associated with spartalizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib are promising, and biomarkers that may predict long-term benefit were identified. Clinical activity and biomarker analysis from the COMBI-i trial evaluating PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition in patients with metastatic melanoma demonstrate high response rates and uncover molecular correlates of long-term treatment benefit.

The combination of inhibitors to BRAF and MEK improved response rates and progression-free survival among patients with metastatic melanoma. Some toxicity was increased, but the incidence of second skin cancers was drastically reduced by the combination therapy. Approximately 50% of metastatic cutaneous melanomas harbor a BRAF V600 mutation, resulting in constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. 1 , 2 These discoveries led to the development of agents that specifically target this driver mutation. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (Zelboraf, Genentech) was approved worldwide on the basis of results from a phase 3 trial showing improved progression-free survival and overall survival, as compared with chemotherapy alone; the relative reduction in the risk of death was 63% and in the risk of disease progression was 74%. 3 Similar results were also reported for another BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib, 4 which has also . . .

The addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor improved response rates by nearly 16 percentage points (from 51% to 67%) and improved progression-free survival by 0.5 months (from 8.8 to 9.3 months). Targeted inhibition of the RAF–MEK–ERK (MAPK) pathway with BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib or vemurafenib, as compared with chemotherapy, improves the progression-free and overall survival of patients who have metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. 1 , 2 However, resistance develops in a majority of patients, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 6 to 7 months. 3 , 4 Most reported resistance mechanisms reactivate the MAPK pathway. 5 – 7 In addition, BRAF-inhibitor–induced paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway 8 – 10 can result in secondary cancers, including cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, and may reactivate RAS-mutant tumors. 11 – 13 Independently, single-agent trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, improves the overall survival of patients . . .

Preclinical modeling suggests that intermittent BRAF inhibitor therapy may delay acquired resistance when blocking oncogenic BRAF V600 in melanoma 1 , 2 . We conducted S1320, a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02196181) evaluating whether intermittent dosing of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib improves progression-free survival in patients with metastatic and unresectable BRAF V600 melanoma. Patients were enrolled at 68 academic and community sites nationally. All patients received continuous dabrafenib and trametinib during an 8-week lead-in period, after which patients with non-progressing tumors were randomized to either continuous or intermittent dosing of both drugs on a 3-week-off, 5-week-on schedule. The trial has completed accrual and 206 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized 1:1 to the two study arms (105 to continuous dosing, 101 to intermittent dosing). Continuous dosing yielded a statistically significant improvement in post-randomization progression-free survival compared with intermittent dosing (median 9.0 months versus 5.5 months, P  = 0.064, pre-specified two-sided α  = 0.2). Therefore, contrary to the initial hypothesis, intermittent dosing did not improve progression-free survival in patients. There were no differences in the secondary outcomes, including overall survival and the overall incidence of treatment-associated toxicity, between the two groups. The randomized phase 2 trial S1320 comparing different dosing schedules of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination in BRAF -mutated advanced melanoma shows intermittent therapy does not result in superior progression-free survival in patients.