Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose There is variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics (AB) in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could overcome this variability and increase PK target attainment. The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of a dose-adaption strategy based on daily TDM on target attainment. Methods This was a prospective, partially blinded, and randomised controlled trial in patients with normal kidney function treated with meropenem (MEM) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). The intervention group underwent daily TDM, with dose adjustment when necessary. The predefined PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target was 100 % f T >4MIC [percentage of time during a dosing interval that the free ( f ) drug concentration exceeded 4 times the MIC]. The control group received conventional treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that reached 100 % f T >4MIC and 100 % f T >MIC at 72 h. Results Forty-one patients (median age 56 years) were included in the study. Pneumonia was the primary infectious diagnosis. At baseline, 100 % f T >4MIC was achieved in 21 % of the PTZ patients and in none of the MEM patients; 100 % f T >MIC was achieved in 71 % of the PTZ patients and 46 % of the MEM patients. Of the patients in the intervention group, 76 % needed dose adaptation, and five required an additional increase. At 72 h, target attainment rates for 100 % f T >4MIC and 100 % f T >MIC were higher in the intervention group: 58 vs. 16 %, p  = 0.007 and 95 vs. 68 %, p  = 0.045, respectively. Conclusions Among critically ill patients with normal kidney function, a strategy of dose adaptation based on daily TDM led to an increase in PK/PD target attainment compared to conventional dosing.

The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics, clinical efficiency, and pharmacoeconomic parameters of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by extended infusion (EI) or intermittent infusion (II) in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients with low illness severity in China. Fifty patients completed the study, with 25 patients receiving 4/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 30 min as the II group and 25 patients receiving 4/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 3 h every 6 h as the EI group. Drug assay was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The percentage of the dosing interval for which the free piperacillin concentration (% f T) exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was calculated. The patients’ therapy cost, clinical efficiency, and adverse effects were also recorded. % f T>MIC was about 100, 98.73, and 93.04 % in the EI arm versus 81.48, 53.29, and 42.15 % in the II arm, respectively, when the microorganism responsible for HAP had an MIC of 4, 8, and 16 mg/L. The therapy cost in the EI group was lower than that of the II group ($1351.72 ± 120.39 vs. $1782.04 ± 164.51, p  = 0.001). However, the clinical success rate, clinical failure rate, and drug-related adverse events did not significantly differ between groups. EI treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam was a cost-effective approach to the management of HAP, being equally clinically effective to conventional II.

Background Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that restores the in vitro activity of β-lactams, such as ceftazidime, against bacterial pathogens harboring Ambler class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases. Objective This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study (NCT01920399) evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and repeated doses of avibactam and ceftazidime in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods Sixteen healthy Chinese males aged 18–45 years were randomized 3:1 to receive 2000 mg ceftazidime and 500 mg avibactam ( n  = 12) or matched placebo ( n  = 4) as a 120-min intravenous infusion, once on Days 1 and 9, and every 8 h on Days 2–8. Results Avibactam and ceftazidime showed time-independent pharmacokinetics. Plasma exposure to avibactam and ceftazidime was similar following single and multiple dosing and accumulation of either agent was negligible. The majority of the avibactam and ceftazidime dose was recovered in urine. Adverse events were reported in three subjects (25.0 %) in the ceftazidime-avibactam group and one subject (25.0 %) in the placebo group. Two subjects in the ceftazidime-avibactam group had elevations in transaminases and one subject in the placebo group had elevated serum bilirubin levels that were considered causally related to study treatment. All adverse events were of mild intensity. Conclusions Single and multiple doses of 2000 mg ceftazidime and 500 mg avibactam were well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects, and the observed pharmacokinetics were comparable to previous studies conducted in Western subjects.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 novel β-lactam/β-lactamase combination antibiotics. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity of these antibiotics includes multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam is also active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. However, avibactam does not inactivate metallo-β-lactamases such as New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases. Both ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are only available as intravenous formulations and are dosed 3 times daily in patients with normal renal function. Clinical trials showed noninferiority to comparators of both agents when used in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (when used with metronidazole). Results from pneumonia studies have not yet been reported. In summary, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are 2 new second-generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. After appropriate trials are conducted, they may prove useful in the treatment of MDR GNB infections. Antimicrobial stewardship will be essential to preserve the activity of these agents.

Meropenem-vaborbactam is a fixed-dose combination product of a carbapenem and a cyclic boronic acid β-lactamase inhibitor with potent activity against carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). The efficacy of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis was demonstrated in a Phase III trial (TANGO I). Preliminary data from TANGO II, a separate Phase III study, support the efficacy of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of infections caused by CRE. Overall, meropenem-vaborbactam appears to be safe and well tolerated. It has favorable toxicity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared with other antibiotics with activity against CRE. Meropenem-vaborbactam is an important addition to the current armamentarium of antimicrobial agents with activity against carbapenemase-producing CRE.

The rise of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has posed a major clinical challenge, with limited treatment options. Nacubactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, combined with cefepime or aztreonam, effectively supports CRE infection treatment. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted for the first time in healthy male Chinese subjects, including both single and multiple doses 60 ± 5-min intravenous infusion. Twenty participants were randomly assigned to nacubactam or placebo in two dosage groups (1 g and 2 g, 10 subjects each) to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Nacubactam demonstrated good safety and tolerability in healthy male Chinese subjects after single and multiple doses intravenous infusion with no adverse events leading to study withdrawal. Nacubactam reached peak concentration immediately after infusion, had a short half-life, and showed dose-proportional exposure. At steady state, drug accumulation was minimal. The cumulative urinary excretion rates of nacubactam were 91.8% and 87.1% in the two dose groups, indicating primary renal elimination. Exposure to metabolites M1 and M2 was minimal. Nacubactam generally exhibited good safety and tolerability in healthy Chinese male subjects after single and multiple doses of 1 g/2 g intravenous doses. It was primarily excreted renally with minimal accumulation. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have become a growing global health threat due to limited treatment options and high morbidity and mortality. Nacubactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor that exerts dual inhibition on β-lactamases and penicillin-binding proteins. Its combination with ceftazidime or aztreonam is promising for treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. To support clinical development and future therapeutic applications, pharmacokinetic and safety data in different populations are crucial. In this work, we conducted a phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to clinically evaluate nacubactam for the first time in healthy Chinese male subjects, demonstrating its good safety profile, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, and mainly renal excretion. These data provide insights into the clinical application of nacubactam. Trial registration This trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration website, registration number ChiCTR2500103582.

Ceftazidime–avibactam is a novel cephalosporin/beta‐lactamase inhibitor combination developed to address increasing antimicrobial resistance. This report presents a comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and avibactam, utilizing in vitro data derived from two experiments with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) simulation and a comparison with a previously published in vivo case report. The results highlight the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring and the need for higher dosing or continuous infusion of ceftazidime–avibactam in critically ill children under crontinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Avibactam is a novel non–β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor currently being assessed in combination with ceftazidime, ceftaroline fosamil, and aztreonam. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of avibactam in healthy young (aged 18–45 years) and elderly (aged ≥65 years) volunteers of both sexes. This was a Phase I, open-label study in which healthy volunteers aged ≥18 years were enrolled into 4 cohorts: young male, young female, elderly male, and elderly female (n = 8 in each group). Subjects were excluded if they had any condition requiring regular medication or any other relevant conditions. All subjects received a single dose of avibactam 500 mg/100 mL given intravenously over 30 minutes. Pharmacokinetic measurements included Cmax, Tmax, AUC0–∞, plasma clearance, and t½. Within the two age categories the mean age across male and female subjects was well matched. The majority of subjects in the young cohort were black (≥62.5%), whilst the majority of those in the elderly cohorts were white (≥75%). Mean avibactam plasma clearance was similar between the young male, young female, and elderly male cohorts (10.16, 10.34, and 9.82 L/h, respectively), and slightly lower in elderly women (7.98 L/h). Mean Cmax was similar in young male, young female, and elderly female subjects (33.8, 36.9, and 38.4 µg/mL) but lower in elderly male subjects (26.5 µg/mL). Point estimates comparing the ratio of Cmax in male and female subjects over all age groups suggested that Cmax values were 18% lower (90% CI, 30%–5% lower) in male subjects compared with female subjects. Mean AUC0–∞ data were similar between the young male, young female, and elderly male cohorts (49.86, 49.75, and 52.40 µg·h/mL) but higher in elderly women (66.23 µg·h/mL). Point estimates comparing the ratio of AUC0–∞ in elderly and young subjects across both sexes suggested that AUC0–∞ values were 17% higher (90% CI, 5%–31%) in elderly subjects compared with young subjects. The t½ was slightly longer for elderly subjects compared with younger subjects. The most common adverse event was administration/venipuncture site bruising (6 events); all adverse events were mild. No notable differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between the male and female cohorts. The generalizability of the study is limited due to its small sample size. However, the small differences observed between the young and elderly cohorts are not sufficient to warrant dosing adjustments based on age.

The purpose of this study is to review the rationale of prolonged (ie, extended or continuous) infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) in critically ill patients and to perform a systematic review that compare the effectiveness of prolonged infusion with intermittent bolus of PIP/TAZ. A search of Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted up to April 2014. For systematic review, studies comparing the effectiveness of prolonged and bolus administration of PIP/TAZ were included. The level of evidence is determined using best-evidence synthesis, which consisted of 5 possible levels of evidence: strong, moderate, limited, conflicting, or no evidence. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies that account for an eventual benefit of prolonged PIP/TAZ infusion were reviewed. In the systematic review, 1 randomized controlled trial was identified that showed higher “cure” in the prolonged than in the intermittent infusion group, yet the chosen clinical outcome in this study, decline in mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score is controversial. Of 6 retrospective cohort studies, 4 showed either less mortality, a higher clinical cure rate, or shorter length of hospital stay with prolonged PIP/TAZ treatment. The level of evidence supporting a better clinical outcome with prolonged infusion of PIP/TAZ is moderate. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies provide a robust rationale to prefer prolonged above intermittent infusion of PIP/TAZ. However, although some studies suggest a better outcome in critically ill patients receiving prolonged infusion, the level of evidence is moderate.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs are significantly altered in the burn patient, and the burn patient population shows wide inter- and intraindividual variation in drug handling. Burn injury evolves in two phases. The first phase corresponds to the burn shock, which occurs during the first 48 hours after thermal injury. In this phase, hypovolaemia, oedema, hypoalbuminaemia and a low glomerular filtration rate are observed, which result in a slower rate of drug distribution and lower renal clearance. The second phase (beyond 48 hours after injury) is a hyperdynamic state with high blood flow in the kidneys and liver, an increased α 1 -acid-glycoprotein level and loss of the drug with exudate leakage. As a result, protein binding, drug distribution and clearance may be altered. Because of the alteration in these variables, wide intraindividual variation of pharmacokinetic parameters occurs depending upon the time since thermal injury and fluid resuscitation. Interindividual variations may be correlated with the percentage of the body surface area that is burnt, creatinine clearance, albuminaemia or the α 1 -acid-glycoprotein level. A number of important variations in pharmacodynamic parameters have been described, but their mechanisms are poorly understood. From a practical point of view, for the subpopulation of burn patients who eliminate drugs extremely rapidly, higher doses and/or shorter dosing intervals are required to avoid treatment inefficacy. Drug concentration measurements help to take into account interindividual variability. However, adaptation of doses based on Bayesian methods is frequently not possible because the distribution of pharmacokinetic parameters is poorly characterized in this population. Methods based only on individual data or on a surrogate marker for efficacy may be used to optimize the dosing regimen in this population.