Explore the vast range of titles available.

Hemodialysis reactions (HDRs) are a type of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), such as complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) observed during nanoparticle infusions. Our study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of human HDRs by focusing on hemodynamic and clinical chemistry changes of HSR-related or biocompatibility issues during human hemodialysis (HD) and the reinfusion of blood. Based on our recent animal experiments, we hypothesize that increased pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), and increases in thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and complement 3a (C3a) plasma concentrations will likely manifest in, or at least predict, human HDRs during HD and blood reinfusion. To verify our hypothesis, we measured these parameters during high-flux HD in patients. Since direct PAP measurement was not possible, the plasma concentration of the N-terminal fragment of the brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was determined for the noninvasive estimation of PAP. Our results show an increase in NT-proBNP and TXB2 during the reinfusion of extracorporeal blood. The plasma concentration of C3a increased in early HD already and remained elevated up to blood reinfusion. In conclusion, the observed changes in HSR-related parameters or biocompatibility issues in otherwise asymptomatic patients may suggest that a greater activation of these mechanisms could explain the development of human hemodialysis reactions.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell reinfusion (PBPC) in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) for poor prognosis malignancies, has been described as causing possible acute gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting), allergic (oedema, bronchospasm, anaphyl- axis), renal (proteinuria, haematuria) and/or cardiovascular (hypotension, arrhythmia, conduction disturbances, transient ischaemic phenomena) toxicities. To establish the clinical relevance of these observations and the possible relationship with different HDC regimens used, we performed a clinical and instrumental evaluation on 33 patients with advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, relapsed ovarian cancer, Ewing's sarcoma, extragonadal germinal tumour and small cell lung cancer. They underwent at least one reinfusion each for a total of 51 studied procedures. No patient had a previous history of cardiovascular disease or significant intercurrent illness such as diabetes or liver, renal or neurologic impairment. All patients had totally implanted central venous catheters, through which the transplants had been collected and reinfused without technical consequences. To evaluate cardiovascular function, we continuously monitored 12-lead ECGs, with arterial pressure (AP) measurements every 5 min from the beginning of the procedure to 15 min after the reinfusion ended. We did not observe any significant differences between basal and subsequent steps in AP, heart rate, PQ and QTc time, P wave and QRS complex duration or P wave and QRS electrical axes. No patient showed any ST-T tract pathological abnormality, but one patient developed a transient ectopic atrial rhythm, without any haemodynamic disfunction and with spontaneous reversion to sinus rhythm. No patient complained of symptoms of haemodynamic failure. Gastrointestinal side-effects appeared to be strictly related to speed of reinfusion and to the number of packs reinfused, probably reflecting on the amount of dimethylsulphoxide infused. In one patient a tonic-clonic seizure occurred during a vomiting episode, but no patient developed allergic or renal toxicities. We conclude that PBPC reinfusion, if managed according to the procedure we propose in patients without organic impairment, is a safe procedure not associated either with increased risk of acute arrhythmias or ischaemic or significant systemic acute toxicities. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 173-177.

Radiation (RT), temozolomide (TMZ), and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed high grade gliomas (HGG) produces severe treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) that is associated with early cancer-related deaths. This TRL may result from inadvertent radiation to circulating lymphocytes. This study reinfused lymphocytes, harvested before chemo-radiation, and assessed safety, feasibility, and trends in lymphocyte counts. Patients with newly diagnosed HGG and total lymphocyte counts (TLC) ≥ 1000 cells/mm 3 underwent apheresis. Cryopreserved autologous lymphocytes were reinfused once radiation was completed. Safety, feasibility, and trends in TLC, T cell subsets and cytokines were studied. Serial TLC were also compared with an unreinfused matched control group. Ten patients were harvested (median values: age 56 years, dexamethasone 3 mg/day, TLC/CD4 1980/772 cells/mm 3 ). After 6 weeks of RT/TMZ, TLC fell 69 % (p < 0.0001) with similar reductions in CD4, CD8 and NK cells but not Tregs. Eight patients received lymphocyte reinfusions (median = 7.0 × 10 7  lymphocytes/kg) without adverse events. A post-reinfusion TLC rise of ≥300 cells/mm 3 was noted in 3/8 patients at 4 weeks and 7/8 at 14 weeks which was similar to 23 matched controls. The reduced CD4/CD8 ratio was not restored by lymphocyte reinfusion. Severe lymphopenia was not accompanied by elevated serum interleukin-7 (IL-7) levels. This study confirms that severe TRL is common in HGG and is not associated with high plasma IL-7 levels. Although lymphocyte harvesting/reinfusion is feasible and safe, serial lymphocyte counts are similar to unreinfused matched controls. Studies administering higher lymphocyte doses and/or IL-7 should be considered to restore severe treatment-related lymphopenia in HGG.

To delineate the efficacy and safety profile of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Patients who have been on MHD for a period of at least 3 months were enrolled. Each subject underwent one HFR and one hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment. Blood samples were collected before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment to test uremic toxin levels and to calculate clearance rate. The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare uremic toxin levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), λ-free light chains (λFLC), and β -microglobulin (β -MG) before and after HFR treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints was to compare the levels of urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), P-cresol, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), leptin (LEP), hippuric acid (HPA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) before and after HFR treatment. The study also undertook a comparative analysis of uremic toxin clearance between a single HFR and HDF treatment. Meanwhile, the lever of serum albumin and branched-chain amino acids before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment were compared. In terms of safety, the study was meticulous in recording vital signs and the incidence of adverse events throughout its duration. The study enrolled 20 patients. After a single HFR treatment, levels of IS, λFLC, β -MG, IL-6, P-cresol, YKL-40, LEP, HPA, TMAO, ADMA, TNF-α, and FGF23 significantly decreased (  < 0.001 for all). The clearance rates of λFLC, β -MG, IL-6, LEP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in HFR compared to HDF ( values: 0.036, 0.042, 0.041, 0.019, and 0.036, respectively). Compared with pre-HFR and post-HFR treatment, levels of serum albumin, valine, and isoleucine showed no significant difference (  > 0.05), while post-HDF, levels of serum albumin significantly decreased (  = 0.000). HFR treatment effectively eliminates uremic toxins from the bloodstream of patients undergoing MHD, especially protein-bound toxins and large middle-molecule toxins. Additionally, it retains essential physiological compounds like albumin and branched-chain amino acids, underscoring its commendable safety profile.

Background End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with patients often experiencing micronutrient deficiencies due to dialysis treatments. Hemodiafiltration with Endogenous Reinfusion (HFR) is a novel dialysis modality that combines diffusion, convection, and adsorption mechanisms to remove uremic toxins while potentially preserving essential nutrients. This study aims to assess the impact of HFR on micronutrient levels and removal rates in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Methods This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Adult patients on maintenance HD will be randomized to two treatment arms: Arm A (Hemodiafiltration (HDF) followed by HFR) and Arm B (HFR followed by HDF), with a two-week washout period between treatments. Blood samples will be collected pre- and post-treatment to measure trace elements, water-soluble vitamins, and fat-soluble vitamins. Statistical analyses will include paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons, and repeated measures ANOVA for between-group differences, adjusting for potential confounders. Discussion This study will evaluate whether HFR offers superior retention of micronutrients compared to traditional HDF therapies, which may contribute to improved clinical outcomes for ESRD patients. Findings could provide valuable insights into the role of HFR in optimizing nutritional status and reducing dialysis-related complications. The cross-over design minimizes patient variability, enhancing the reliability of comparisons between treatment modalities. Trial registration This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500096698).

The management of refractory ascites is critical for the treatment of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites, with a focus on changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in ascitic fluid following CART. This was a retrospective cohort study including 23 patients with refractory ascites undergoing CART. Serum endotoxin activity (EA) before and after CART and the levels of coagulation and fibrinolytic factors and proinflammatory cytokines in original and processed ascitic fluid were measured. The Ascites Symptom Inventory-7 (ASI-7) scale was used for subjective symptom assessment before and after CART. Body weight and waist circumference significantly decreased after CART, whereas serum EA did not significantly change after CART. Similar to the previous reports, ascitic fluid concentrations of total protein, albumin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, γ-globulin, and immunoglobulin G levels were significantly increased after CART; mild elevations in body temperature and interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in ascitic fluid were also observed. Importantly, the levels of antithrombin-III, factor VII, and X, which are useful for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, were markedly increased in the reinfused fluid during CART. Finally, the total ASI-7 score was significantly lower following CART, compared with the pre-CART score. CART is an effective and safe approach for the treatment of refractory ascites that allows the intravenous reinfusion of coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in the filtered and concentrated ascites.

Background Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is frequently administered to patient undergoing joint replacement surgical procedures. The aim of the present research was to verify the safety of collected shed blood to be reinfused postoperatively, by measuring levobupivacaine levels in drainage blood in patients undergoing LIA during knee replacement surgery. Patients and Methods 24 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 12 scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA) who received intraoperative LIA were considered. Blood samples were collected from shed blood which was present in drainage 2 and 5 hours after surgery and serum was analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results At 2 hours postoperatively, the median levobupivacaine serum concentration in the collected shed blood was 1.2 mg/L (SD: 4.2) for TKA and 17.13 mg/L (SD: 24.4) for THA. At 5 hours, levobupivacaine concentration was 1.84 mg/L (SD: 2.2) for TKA and 17.5 mg/L (SD: 25.2) for THA. Higher values of average serum levobupivacaine concentration were reported in drains collected from patients who had undergone THA compared to TKA ( p <0.001). BMI significantly influenced levels of serum drug, that resulted to be higher in patients with BMI<25 ( p = 0.01). Conclusion Levobupivacaine from collected shed blood that would have been returned to the patient, was below toxicity level at 2 and 5 hours after LIA during total joint replacement. The average serum levobupivacaine concentration was found to be higher in drains taken from THA patients than TKA patients. Patients with lower BMI demonstrated the highest levels of levobupivacaine in shed blood and a lower blood volume needed for central nervous system toxicity. Therefore, in patients with a lower BMI undergoing THA, anaesthetic dosage should be reduced or autotransfusion should be avoided to prevent potential risks of toxicity.

Background Most hemodialysis patients have high Hepcidin-25 levels, which may be involved in the pathogenesis of several uremic complications related to an altered iron biology. The hemodialysis procedure itself can influence Hepcidin-25 levels by removing Hepcidin-25 and maybe stimulating its production due to a pro-inflammatory effect. Methods To assess the relationship between dialysis-related inflammation and intradialysis changes in Hepcidin-25, we performed a crossover trial in 28 hemodialysis patients to compare the effects on serum levels of Hepcidin-25 and inflammatory markers activated during dialysis [Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), Pentraxin-3] of a single dialysis session using a technique capable of reducing inflammation, HFR (Hemo Filtrate Reinfusion: a hemodiafiltration system combining convection, diffusion and adsorption) or bicarbonate-dialysis using either the same low-flux membrane as in the diffusion stage of HFR (LFBD) or a high-flux membrane (HFBD). Results HFR achieved a greater reduction in Hepcidin-25 levels than both LFBD [−72% (95% CI: −11 to −133), p = 0.022] and HFBD [−137% (95% CI: −2 to −272), p = 0.047], conceivably due to both a greater removal (because of its convective/adsorptive component) and a lower inflammation-related Hepcidin-25 production. HFR also led to a greater decrease in TNF-α than LFBD [−277% (95% CI: −59 to −494), p = 0.014], while the two methods induced similar changes in Interleukin-6, CRP and Pentraxin-3 levels. Conclusions Our findings suggest that a single bicarbonate-dialysis session can upregulate Hepcidin-25 synthesis and that HFR can fully overcome this effect, enabling a greater Hepcidin-25 removal during dialysis. Adequately-designed studies are needed, however, to establish whether the beneficial effect of HFR emerging from our study could reduce Hepcidin-25 (and TNF-α) burden and improve clinically-relevant outcomes. Trial registration: ISRCTN15957905

BackgroundThe management of refractory ascites in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is vital for patients with abdominal distention, respiratory distress, and anorexia due to massive ascites with cancer peritonitis. We analyzed the benefits of concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in the management of AOC.MethodsWe reviewed records of AOC patients who underwent CART between January 2011 and March 2017. We retrospectively analyzed patients’ backgrounds and physiological changes, including body weight, abdominal girth, urine volume, blood component values, blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature before and after CART. We investigated the clinicopathological significance of CART by measuring the mean number of ascites tumor cell (ATC) clusters before CART.ResultsA retrospective analysis was performed on 29 cases of AOC with massive ascites involving 47 CART sessions. The patients’ mean age was 56.6 ± 12.8 years, and the mean number of sessions was 1.7 ± 1.2. The mean volume of the processed ascites was 2,937 ± 820 mL, which was concentrated to 272 ± 84 mL containing 85.0 ± 33.2 g protein on average. Significant reductions in abdominal girth (− 5.30 ± 0.65 cm; p < 0.0001) and body weight (− 2.97 ± 0.26 kg; p = 0.0011), increased urine volume (+ 824.29 ± 145.21 mL; p < 0.0001), and improved serum albumin levels (+ 0.18 ± 0.34; p < 0.0001) were observed after CART. Analysis of variance revealed significant elevations in body temperature after CART in 11 patients with a small number of ATC clusters.ConclusionsCART is useful for the therapeutic management of AOC patients with refractory massive ascites. Elevations of body temperature after CART may be avoided by the investigation of patients’ peritoneal cytology before CART.

Key Clinical Message AL patients develop the unique toxicities of fluid retention and non‐cardiogenic pulmonary edema during the course of stem cell mobilization. We propose mobilization with CART as effective and safe treatment for AL patients with refractory anasarca. We describe a 63‐year‐old male with systemic immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis with cardiac, renal, and liver involvement. After four courses of CyBorD, mobilization with G‐CSF at 10 μg/kg was initiated and CART was simultaneously performed for fluid retention. No adverse events were observed during collection or reinfusion. Anasarca gradually disappeared and he underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The complete remission of AL amyloidosis has been maintained, and the condition of the patient has remained stable for 7 years. We propose mobilization with CART as an effective and safe treatment option for AL patients with refractory anasarca. A 63‐year‐old male with systemic AL amyloidosis with cardiac, renal, and liver involvement. Computed tomography (CT) scan showing massive ascites at presentation (A, B). After 4 courses of CyBorD and mobilization with G‐CSF at 10 μg/kg was initiated. CT scan taken after G‐CSF for mobilization showing an increase in massive ascites (C, D). CART was simultaneously performed for fluid retention. CT scan taken after CART and autologous stem cell transplantation showing improvements (E, F).