Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
5 result(s) for "by-catch reduction"
Sort by:
Guarding net effects on landings and discards in Mediterranean trammel net fishery: Case analysis of Egadi Islands Marine Protected Area (Central Mediterranean Sea, Italy)
Discards remain among the main negative impacts of fishing activities, and their reductions are strengthened by the European Common Fisheries Policy (European Regulation 1380/2013). Trammel net fisheries appear more sustainable compared with other fishing techniques, especially from an ecological viewpoint. Despite this, reports show that trammel net fisheries deliver discard quantities between 10% and 43% of the total catch biomass. To supplement existing information, this current work attempts to address the discard reduction using guarding net in the small-scale fisheries of Egadi Islands MPA (Western Sicily, Central Mediterranean Sea). To assess the reduction of unwanted catches, 48 experimental fishing trials were conducted within a 6-month period. The experimental fishing trial employed a trammel net made up of 20 panels alternated with two different net configurations. The control panels (CN) held a large outer (180 mm) and small inner (31.25 mm) meshes. The test panels (GN) with guarding net constituted a three-mesh-high (50-mm mesh size) net placed between trammel net panels and a lead line. A total of 3,310 individuals belonging to 106 taxa and nine phyla were caught. Crustaceans were the most abundant unwanted catches in the control panels, whereas bioconstructions occurred in the guarding net panels. The discard ratios of CN and GN panels were statistically different ( t -value = –2.55; p < 0.05). The analysis of catch per unit effort showed higher catches of CN panels for both commercial and discard fractions ( p < 0.05). Moreover, the guarding net panels caught the main discarded species at 20% lower compared with the control. The overall value of the catch at the CN panels (€ 3,366.90) was higher than the total income (€ 2,043.70) generated using the GN panels, which suggests a significant commercial loss of 40% ( p < 0.05).
Influences of hanging ratio, fishing height, twine diameter and material of bottom-set gillnets on catches of dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus and non-target species in New South Wales, Australia
:  Three experiments were done to test for the influences of different (i) hanging ratios (E = 0.5, 0.65 and 0.8); (ii) fishing heights (25 and 12 meshes); and (iii) twine diameters (0.41, 0.56 and 0.62 mm) and materials (multifilament nylon and multimonofilament nylon polyamide) on catches and by‐catches in the estuarine gillnet fishery for Platycephalus fuscus in New South Wales, Australia. In each experiment, the various 100‐m treatment panels comprising 80‐mm (nominal) mesh rigged according to the different configurations being examined were configured in a single gang between 1090 and 1310 m in length, and fished according to commercial practices. The results showed no significant differences between different hanging ratios or twine diameters for the numbers, weights and size compositions of catches and by‐catches. Twine material had an effect on only one key by‐catch species (Acanthopagrus australis), with fewer caught in panels made from multifilament nylon compared with multimonofilament nylon. In contrast to the above modifications, lowering the fishing height of the floatline significantly reduced total by‐catch by up to 46% and the individuals of key by‐catch species (Mugil cephalus, A. australis and Girella tricuspidata) by between 60 and 85% with no effect on catches of targeted P. fuscus, or legally retained byproduct, Portunus pelagicus. The results are used to provide directions for the future management of this fishery and have relevance to other similar bottom‐set gillnet fisheries.
Experiments with By-Catch Reduction Devices to Exclude Diamondback Terrapins and Retain Blue Crabs
Experiments were completed in SE Virginia during June-July 2014 and 2015 to examine the responses of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) and diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) to commercial-style crab pots modified in visual and other ways that might attract and retain crabs while excluding terrapins as by-catch. In a seawater tank, far fewer crabs entered crab pots fitted with red plastic by-catch reduction devices (BRDs), relative to pots without BRDs. Crab retention times, however, were significantly longer in pots fitted with red BRDs. In a second experiment, fewer terrapins entered crab pots with funnels painted red relative to black. From a field pilot study, the legal crab catch from pots with red BRDs was similar to pots without BRDs, and terrapin by-catch was reduced. Relative to those treatments, fewer crabs and more terrapins were captured in pots with orange BRDs and blue BRDs, and in pots with a magnetic field directed into the funnel openings. Based on these results, a final field trial yielded comparable crab catch from 15 pots without BRDs and 15 pots fitted with red plastic BRDs. Of a by-catch of 68 terrapins, 58 were from pots without BRDs. The structure and color of BRDs can exclude most terrapins; because crab retention rates are high, the net effect of BRDs on crab catch is relatively minor, even though fewer crabs may enter pots fitted with BRDs.
By-catch Reduction in an Ocean Shrimp Trawl from a Simple Modification to the Trawl Footrope
Two footrope configurations commonly used in the ocean shrimp trawl fishery were fished side by side from a double-rigged vessel to compare catch rates of shrimp (Pandalus jordani) and by-catch. The control net footrope incorporated a traditional \"tickler chain\" groundline which runs below and in front of the fishing line of the trawl. The other net utilized a ladder chain groundline with a short roller section in the center, set to run under and slightly behind the fishing line. An acoustic mensuration system was used to monitor net efficiency in terms of net spread and rise. The trawl with the ladder/roller groundline caught 84% fewer slender sole (Eopsetta exilis), 49% fewer greenstriped rockfish (Sebastes elongatus) and 47% fewer juvenile rockfish (Sebastes spp.) (<8 cm total length) than with the tickler chain groundline. After allowing for a wider net spread with the ladder/roller gear, catches of shrimp and other fish species were comparable for both gears. These results indicate that ocean shrimp trawls rigged with a groundline that runs behind the fishing line of the trawl fish efficiently for shrimp and marketable fish while excluding unmarketable species. The exact mechanism behind the increased by-catch escapement is unclear. We recommend underwater camera work to determine how small fish escape capture, and also testing a trawl without a groundline, using only dropper chains to maintain a constant height of the fishing line above bottom.
The ‘W’ Prawn-Trawl with Emphasised Drag-Force Transfer to Its Centre Line to Reduce Overall System Drag
For prawn trawling systems, drag reduction is a high priority as the trawling process is energy intensive. Large benefits have occurred through the use of multiple-net rigs and thin twine in the netting. An additional positive effect of these successful twine-area reduction strategies is the reduced amount of otter board area required to spread the trawl systems, which leads to further drag reduction. The present work investigated the potential of redirecting the drag-strain within a prawn trawl away from the wings and the otter boards to the centre line of the trawl, where top and bottom tongues have been installed, with an aim to minimise the loading/size of the otter boards required to spread the trawl. In the system containing the new 'W' trawl, the drag redirected to the centre-line tongues is transferred forward through a connected sled and towing wires to the trawler. To establish the extent of drag redirection to the centre-line tongues and the relative drag benefits of the new trawl system, conventional and 'W' trawls of 3.65 m headline length were tested firstly over a range of spread ratios in the flume tank, and subsequently at optimum spread ratio in the field. The developed 'W' trawl effectively directed 64% of netting-drag off the wings and onto the centre tongues, which resulted in drag savings in the field of ∼20% for the associated 'W' trawl/otter-board/sled system compared to the traditional trawl/otter-board arrangement in a single trawl or twin rig configuration. Furthermore, based on previously published data, the new trawl when used in a twin rig system is expected to provide approximately 12% drag reduction compared to quad rig. The twin 'W' trawl system also has benefits over quad rig in that a reduced number of cod-end/By-catch Reduction Device units need to be installed and attended each tow.