Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose In an ultrahigh‐resolution CT (U‐HRCT), deep learning‐based reconstruction (DLR) is expected to drastically reduce image noise without degrading spatial resolution. We assessed a new algorithm's effect on image quality at different radiation doses assuming an abdominal CT protocol. Methods For the normal‐sized abdominal models, a Catphan 600 was scanned by U‐HRCT with 100%, 50%, and 25% radiation doses. In all acquisitions, DLR was compared to model‐based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), filtered back projection (FBP), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). For the quantitative assessment, we compared image noise, which was defined as the standard deviation of the CT number, and spatial resolution among all reconstruction algorithms. Results Deep learning‐based reconstruction yielded lower image noise than FBP and HIR at each radiation dose. DLR yielded higher image noise than MBIR at the 100% and 50% radiation doses (100%, 50%, DLR: 15.4, 16.9 vs MBIR: 10.2, 15.6 Hounsfield units: HU). However, at the 25% radiation dose, the image noise in DLR was lower than that in MBIR (16.7 vs. 26.6 HU). The spatial frequency at 10% of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in DLR was 1.0 cycles/mm, slightly lower than that in MBIR (1.05 cycles/mm) at the 100% radiation dose. Even when the radiation dose decreased, the spatial frequency at 10% of the MTF of DLR did not change significantly (50% and 25% doses, 0.98 and 0.99 cycles/mm, respectively). Conclusion Deep learning‐based reconstruction performs more consistently at decreasing dose in abdominal ultrahigh‐resolution CT compared to all other commercially available reconstruction algorithms evaluated.

ObjectiveThe study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning–based reconstruction method (DLRecon) in 3D MR neurography for assessment of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus.Materials and methodsThirty-five exams (18 brachial and 17 lumbosacral plexus) of 34 patients undergoing routine clinical MR neurography at 1.5 T were retrospectively included (mean age: 49 ± 12 years, 15 female). Coronal 3D T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery fast spin echo with variable flip angle sequences covering plexial nerves on both sides were obtained as part of the standard protocol. In addition to standard-of-care (SOC) reconstruction, k-space was reconstructed with a 3D DLRecon algorithm.Two blinded readers evaluated images for image quality and diagnostic confidence in assessing nerves, muscles, and pathology using a 4-point scale. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between nerve, muscle, and fat were measured.For comparison of visual scoring result non-parametric paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank testing and for quantitative analysis paired sample Student’s t-testing was performed.ResultsDLRecon scored significantly higher than SOC in all categories of image quality (p < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence (p < 0.05), including conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology. With regard to artifacts there was no significant difference between the reconstruction methods.Quantitatively, DLRecon achieved significantly higher CNR and SNR than SOC (p < 0.05).ConclusionDLRecon enhanced overall image quality, leading to improved conspicuity of nerve branches and pathology, and allowing for increased diagnostic confidence in evaluation of the brachial and lumbosacral plexus.

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of T1-weighted 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions on contrast-enhanced MRI. Methods We evaluated 24 patients with pituitary adenoma or residual tumor using CUBE with and without DLR, 1-mm slice thickness 2D T1WI (1-mm 2D T1WI) with DLR, and 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR) as contrast-enhanced MRI. Depiction scores of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions were assigned by two neuroradiologists, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Results CUBE with DLR showed significantly higher scores for depicting pituitary adenoma or residual tumor compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR, and SPGR ( p  < 0.01). The depiction score for delineation of the boundary between adenoma and the cavernous sinus was higher for CUBE with DLR than for 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR ( p  = 0.01), but the difference was not significant when compared to SPGR ( p  = 0.20). CUBE with DLR had better interobserver agreement for evaluating adenomas than 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR (Kappa values, 0.75 vs. 0.41). The CNR of the adenoma to the brain parenchyma increased to a ratio of 3.6 (obtained by dividing 13.7, CNR of CUBE with DLR, by 3.8, that without DLR, p  < 0.01). CUBE with DLR had a significantly higher CNR than SPGR, but not 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR. Conclusion On the contrast-enhanced MRI, compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR and SPGR, CUBE with DLR improves the depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions.

ObjectiveTo compare standard-of-care two-dimensional MRI acquisitions of the cervical spine with those from a single three-dimensional MRI acquisition, reconstructed using a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. We hypothesized that the improved image quality provided by deep-learning-based reconstruction would result in improved inter-rater agreement for cervical spine foraminal stenosis compared to conventional two-dimensional acquisitions.Materials and methodsForty-one patients underwent routine cervical spine MRI with a conventional protocol comprising two-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scans (2 axial planes, 1 sagittal plane), and an isotropic-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scan reconstructed over a 4-h time window with a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. Three radiologists retrospectively assessed images for the degree to which motion artifact limited clinical assessment, and foraminal and central stenosis at each level. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed with weighted Fleiss’s kappa (k) and comparisons between two-dimensional and three-dimensional sequences were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsInter-rater agreement for foraminal stenosis was “substantial” for two-dimensional sequences (k = 0.76) and “excellent” for the three-dimensional sequence (k = 0.81). Agreement was “excellent” for both sequences (k = 0.85 and 0.83) for central stenosis. The three-dimensional sequence had less perceptible motion artifact (p ≤ 0.001–0.036). Mean total scan time was 10.8 min for the two-dimensional sequences, and 7.3 min for the three-dimensional sequence.ConclusionThree-dimensional MRI reconstructed with a deep-learning-based algorithm provided “excellent” inter-observer agreement for foraminal and central stenosis, which was at least equivalent to standard-of-care two-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional MRI with deep-learning-based reconstruction was less prone to motion artifact, with overall scan time savings.

This bicenter retrospective analysis included 162 patients who had undergone prostate biopsy following prebiopsy MRI, excluding those with PCa identified only in the peripheral zone (PZ). DLR T2WI achieved a 69% reduction in scan time relative to TSE T2WI. The intermethod agreement between the two T2WI sets in terms of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification and extraprostatic extension (EPE) grade was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and diagnostic performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was found in 74 (45.7%) patients. Both T2WI methods showed high intermethod agreement for the overall PI-RADS classification (ICC: 0.907–0.949), EPE assessment (ICC: 0.925–0.957) and lesion size measurement (ICC: 0.980–0.996). DLR T2WI and TSE T2WI showed similar AUCs (0.666–0.814 versus 0.684–0.832) for predicting EPE. The AUCs for detecting csPCa with DLR T2WI (0.834–0.935) and TSE T2WI (0.891–0.935) were comparable in 139 patients with TZ lesions with no significant differences ( P  > 0.05). The findings suggest that DLR T2WI is an efficient alternative for TZ lesion assessment, offering reduced scan times without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose We aimed to evaluate the effect of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo (HR-3D T2-FASE) imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. Methods This study included 13 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative HR-3D T2-FASE imaging using a 3 T MRI scanner. The reconstruction voxel size of HR-3D T2-FASE imaging was 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the structures were compared between HR-3D T2-FASE images with and without DLR. The observers’ preferences based on four categories on the tumor side on HR-3D T2-FASE images were evaluated. The facial nerve in relation to the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images was assessed with reference to intraoperative findings. Results The mean CNR between the tumor and trigeminal nerve and between the cerebrospinal fluid and trigeminal nerve was significantly higher for DLR images than non-DLR-based images (14.3 ± 8.9 vs. 12.0 ± 7.6, and 66.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.9 ± 8.5, P  < 0.001, respectively). The observer’s preference for the depiction and delineation of the tumor, cranial nerves, vessels, and location relation on DLR HR-3D T2FASE images was superior to that on non-DLR HR-3D T2FASE images in 7 (54%), 6 (46%), 6 (46%), and 6 (46%) of 13 cases, respectively. The facial nerves around the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images were visualized accurately in five (38%) cases with DLR and in four (31%) without DLR. Conclusion DLR HR-3D T2-FASE imaging is useful for the preoperative assessment of CPA tumors.

Objectives To investigate potential of enhancing image quality, maintaining interobserver consensus, and elevating disease diagnostic efficacy through the implementation of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) processing in 3.0 T cervical spine fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, compared with conventional images. Methods The 3.0 T cervical spine MRI images of 71 volunteers were categorized into two groups: sagittal T2-weighted short T1 inversion recovery without DLR (Sag T2w-STIR) and with DLR (Sag T2w-STIR-DLR). The assessment covered artifacts, perceptual signal-to-noise ratio, clearness of tissue interfaces, fat suppression, overall image quality, and the delineation of spinal cord, vertebrae, discs, dopamine, and joints. Spanning canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, herniated discs, annular fissures, hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum or vertebral facet joints, and intervertebral disc degeneration were evaluated by three impartial readers. Results Sag T2w-STIR-DLR images exhibited markedly superior performance across quality indicators (median = 4 or 5) compared to Sag T2w-STIR sequences (median = 3 or 4) ( p  < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two sequences in terms of diagnosis and grading ( p  > 0.05). The interobserver agreement for Sag T2w-STIR-DLR images (0.604–0.931) was higher than the other (0.545–0.853), Sag T2w-STIR-DLR (0.747–1.000) demonstrated increased concordance between reader 1 and reader 3 in comparison to Sag T2w-STIR (0.508–1.000). Acquisition time diminished from 364 to 197 s through the DLR scheme. Conclusions Our investigation establishes that 3.0 T fast MRI images subjected to DLR processing present heightened image quality, bolstered diagnostic performance, and reduced scanning durations for cervical spine MRI compared with conventional sequences.

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI).Materials and methodsThis retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR −) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test.ResultsBH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR − (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR − (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR − (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR − (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR − (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR − (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

Purpose Recent advances in deep learning have facilitated the exploration of mesh reconstruction techniques; however, these approaches have not yet been applied to mesh reconstruction of hydronephrosis lesions in pediatric patients. Three surgical strategies are currently available for robot-assisted pyeloplasty in children, but there remains no consensus on which yields superior clinical benefits. Materials and methods A total of 36 patients received robot-assisted pyeloplasty were divided into three groups based on different surgical procedures: large anastomosis group (LAG), middle anastomosis group (MAG) and small anastomosis group (SAG).A deep learning network was utilized to reconstruct upper urinary tract models from patients’ magnetic resonance urography (MRU) images, followed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to measure urine flow dynamics parameters in the reconstructed models. Statistical comparisons of parameters were performed among the three groups. Results Statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups in terms of improvement in differential renal function (DRF), reduction in postoperative anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the renal pelvis, postoperative pressure reduction, pressure gradient between the upper and lower planes, changes in urinary flow velocity, and alterations in wall eddy viscosity. DRF was significantly improved in both the MAG and LAG, whereas it was significantly decreased in the SAG. The MAG exhibited the most remarkable reduction in the anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis. Postoperative pressure reduction was more pronounced in the MAG when compared with the LAG and SAG. The median postoperative pressure gradient between the upper and lower planes was the highest in the LAG. Postoperative urinary flow velocity increased significantly in the LAG, only slightly in the MAG, but decreased in the SAG. Postoperative wall eddy viscosity increased significantly in the LAG, whereas it decreased in both the MAG and SAG. Conclusions Deep learning-based upper urinary tract model reconstruction combined with CFD simulation constitutes a novel noninvasive method for measuring upper urinary tract urine flow dynamics parameters. Among the three robot-assisted pyeloplasty techniques, the middle anastomosis approach yields the optimal postoperative recovery.

A fully diagnostic MRI glioma protocol is key to monitoring therapy assessment but is time-consuming and especially challenging in critically ill and uncooperative patients. Artificial intelligence demonstrated promise in reducing scan time and improving image quality simultaneously. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance, the impact on acquisition acceleration, and the image quality of a deep learning optimized glioma protocol of the brain. Thirty-three patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent standardized brain tumor imaging according to the glioma consensus recommendations on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner. Conventional and deep learning-reconstructed (DLR) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2- and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced Turbo spin echo images with an improved in-plane resolution, i.e., super-resolution, were acquired. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently evaluated the image datasets for subjective image quality, diagnostic confidence, tumor conspicuity, noise levels, artifacts, and sharpness. In addition, the tumor volume was measured in the image datasets according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0, as well as compared between both imaging techniques, and various clinical–pathological parameters were determined. The average time saving of DLR sequences was 30% per MRI sequence. Simultaneously, DLR sequences showed superior overall image quality (all p < 0.001), improved tumor conspicuity and image sharpness (all p < 0.001, respectively), and less image noise (all p < 0.001), while maintaining diagnostic confidence (all p > 0.05), compared to conventional images. Regarding RANO 2.0, the volume of non-enhancing non-target lesions (p = 0.963), enhancing target lesions (p = 0.993), and enhancing non-target lesions (p = 0.951) did not differ between reconstruction types. The feasibility of the deep learning-optimized glioma protocol was demonstrated with a 30% reduction in acquisition time on average and an increased in-plane resolution. The evaluated DLR sequences improved subjective image quality and maintained diagnostic accuracy in tumor detection and tumor classification according to RANO 2.0.