Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"easl-clif criteria"
Sort by:
Predictive machine learning model in intensive care unit patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and two or more organ failures
2025
Background/Aims: Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management.
Methods: To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed.
Results: Of 5,994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1,511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1,692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (area under curve [AUC] of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-to-use online tool was created to predict mortality rates.
Conclusions: We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31:1355-1371)
Journal Article
Predictive machine learning model in intensive care unit patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and two or more organ failures
by
Yan, Taotao
,
Sun, Xiaodan
,
Zu, Jian
in
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure - complications
,
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure - diagnosis
,
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure - mortality
2025
Background/Aims: Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management.Methods: To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed.Results: Of 5,994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1,511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1,692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (area under curve [AUC] of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-to-use online tool was created to predict mortality rates.Conclusions: We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores.
Journal Article