Explore the vast range of titles available.

Monitoring communities of fish is important for the management and sustainability of fisheries and marine ecosystems. Baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVs) are among the most effective nondestructive techniques for sampling bony fishes and elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, and skates). However, BRUVs sample visually conspicuous biota; hence, some taxa are undersampled or not recorded at all. We compared the diversity of fishes characterized using BRUVs with diversity detected via environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding. We sampled seawater and captured BRUVs imagery at 48 locales that included reef and seagrass beds inside and outside a marine reserve (Jurien Bay in Western Australia). Eighty-two fish genera from 13 orders were detected, and the community of fishes described using eDNA and BRUVs combined yielded >30% more generic richness than when either method was used alone. Rather than detecting a homogenous genetic signature, the eDNA assemblages mirrored the BRUVs’ spatial explicitness; differentiation of taxa between seagrass and reef was clear despite the relatively small geographical scale of the study site (~35 km²). Taxa that were not sampled by one approach, due to limitations and biases intrinsic to the method, were often detected with the other. Therefore, using BRUVs and eDNA in concert provides a more holistic view of vertebrate marine communities across habitats. Both methods are noninvasive, which enhances their potential for widespread implementation in the surveillance of marine ecosystems. El monitoreo de comunidades de peces es importante para el manejo y sustentabilidad de las pesquerías y los ecosistemas marinos. Los sistemas remotos de video submarino con carnada (SRVSC) están entre las técnicas no destructivas más efectivas para el muestreo de peces óseos y elasmobranquios (tiburones, mantarrayas y rayas). Sin embargo, los SRVSC muestrean biota que es conspicua visiblemente; entonces, algunos taxones están mal muestreados o simplemente no se registran en los muestreos. Comparamos la diversidad de peces caracterizada usando SRVSC con la diversidad detectada por medio del metacódigo de barras de ADN ambiental (eDNA, en inglés). Muestreamos el agua de mar y capturamos imágenes con SRVSC en 48 localidades que incluyeron el arrecife y los pastos marinos dentro y fuera de una reserva marina (Bahía Jurien en el oeste de Australia). Se detectaron 83 géneros de peces de 13 órdenes, y la comunidad de peces descrita con el uso combinado del eDNA y el SRVSC produjo >30% riqueza más genérica que cuando cualquiera de los dos métodos se usó individualmente. En lugar de detectar una firma genética homogénea, los ensamblados de eDNA reflejaron la claridad espacial del SRVSC; la diferenciación de los taxones entre los pastos marinos y el arrecife fue clara a pesar la escala geográfica relativamente pequeña del sitio de estudio (~35 km²). Los taxones que no fueron muestreados por uno de los métodos, por causa de limitaciones y sesgos intrínsecos al método, casi siempre fueron detectados usando el otro método. Por lo tanto, el uso de SRVSC y el eDNA en concreto proporciona una visión más holística de las comunidades marinas de vertebrados en todos los hábitats. Ambos métodos son no invasivos, lo que incrementa su potencial para ser una implementación de uso amplio en la vigilancia de los ecosistemas marinos.

Elasmobranchs are an evolutionarily ancient group of cartilaginous fishes that can hear underwater sounds but are not historically viewed as active sound producers. Three recent reports of several species of rays producing clicks in response to approaching divers have cast doubt on this long prevailing view and resulted in calls for more research into sound production in elasmobranchs. This study shows that the rig, Mustelus lenticulatus, produces clicks (mean SPLrms = 156.3 dB re. 1 μPa ± 0.9 s.e.m. at approx. 30 cm) when handled underwater, representing the first documented case of deliberate sound production by a shark. Clicks were broadband (mean bandwidth = 23 kHz ± 0.1 s.e.m.), with peak energies between 2.4 and 18.5 kHz (mean peak frequency = 9.6 kHz ± 0.3 s.e.m.), and mean duration of 48.42 ms ± 2.9 s.e.m. Clicks contained considerably less energy in frequencies below 1 kHz, which overlap with the hearing range of the rig. We propose that forceful snapping of flattened teeth may be the sound producing mechanism based on the plated tooth morphology and the acoustic characteristics of these clicks. Further behavioural studies are needed to test whether clicks are incidental to the handling or a natural acoustic response of behavioural significance.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are being increasingly used in studies of marine fauna. Here, we tested the use of a UAV (DJI Phantom II®) to assess fine-scale variation in densities of 2 elasmobranchs (blacktip reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus and pink whiprays Himantura fai) on reef systems off Moorea (French Polynesia). We flew parallel transects designed to sample reef habitats (fringing, channel and sandflat habitats) across 2 survey blocks. Block 1 included a shark and ray provisioning site with potentially higher elasmobranch densities, whereas Block 2 most likely had lower densities with no provisioning activities. Across 10 survey days in July 2014, we flew 3 transects (400 m) within each survey block (n = 60 total transect passes). As expected, densities (animals ha−1) were significantly higher in Block 1 than in Block 2, particularly where provisioning activities occur. Differences between habitats surveyed were also found. Our study provides the first direct estimates of shark and ray densities in coral-reef ecosystems and demonstrates that UAVs can produce important fishery-independent data for elasmobranchs, particularly in shallow-water habitats.

Any attempt to describe the spatial ecology of sharks and rays should consider the drivers responsible for movement. Research has shown fluctuations in the environment (abiotic factors) can trigger movement and changes in behaviour and habitat use for many elasmobranch species. Most studies to date have selectively focused on a small number of abiotic factors (i.e. temperature, salinity); however, other factors such as dissolved oxygen, tide, photoperiod, barometric pressure and pH have also been documented to act as drivers of movement in shark and ray species. Although usually examined individually, abiotic factors rarely act in isolation and often differ in their level of influence between species, sex, ontogenetic stage, season and geographic location. This paper reviews the role of abiotic factors as a driver of movement and changes in behaviour and habitat use in elasmobranchs. In the context of a changing climate, insight into how sharks and rays may respond to fluctuating environmental conditions projected under future scenarios is required.

Mercury is an element with potential risk to fish and those who consume it. Thus, this study aimed to determine the levels of total mercury (THg), carry out a health risk assessment related to the consumption of the freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon motoro, and determine the physical and chemical properties of the water where stingrays occur. Stingrays of the species P. motoro were obtained from the Amazon River, and samples of the animals’ musculature were collected to determine THg levels. Risk assessment was conducted using pre-established formulas of estimated monthly intake (EMI), maximum monthly intake rate (IRmm), and hazard quotient (HQ). Three population scenarios were evaluated, considering both sexes and differences between rural and urban areas. There was no relationship between weight and THg concentration nor between total length and THg concentration. Higher EMI values were observed in rural children; for the IRmm, male children had the lowest consumption levels. For the hazard quotient, there was a similarity between the three age groups when comparing the male and female sexes. In addition, the representatives of the rural area always had lower values than the urban area. Freshwater stingrays, like other elasmobranchs, can be crucial animal species because they act as sentinels in studies that assess harmful chemicals like mercury.

Niche partitioning of time, space or resources is considered the key to allowing the coexistence of competitor species, and particularly guilds of predators. However, the extent to which these processes occur in marine systems is poorly understood due to the difficulty in studying fine-scale movements and activity patterns in mobile underwater species. Here, we used acceleration data-loggers to investigate temporal partitioning in a guild of marine predators. Six species of co-occurring large coastal sharks demonstrated distinct diel patterns of activity, providing evidence of strong temporal partitioning of foraging times. This is the first instance of diel temporal niche partitioning described in a marine predator guild, and is probably driven by a combination of physiological constraints in diel timing of activity (e.g. sensory adaptations) and interference competition (hierarchical predation within the guild), which may force less dominant predators to suboptimal foraging times to avoid agonistic interactions. Temporal partitioning is often thought to be rare compared to other partitioning mechanisms, but the occurrence of temporal partitioning here and similar characteristics in many other marine ecosystems (multiple predators simultaneously present in the same space with dietary overlap) introduces the question of whether this is a common mechanism of resource division in marine systems.

The Paleogene deposits in Alabama, USA, contain abundant marine invertebrate and vertebrate fossils that represent diverse paleofaunas, but the fish taxa contained within these units remain understudied. The present work, based primarily on cataloged specimens from museum and university collections, discusses 12 chondrichthyan and 9 osteichthyan taxa that are newly recognized from Paleogene lithostratigraphic units in Alabama. All the chondrichthyan taxa are represented by teeth, whereas the bony fishes were identified by otoliths, teeth, and scales. The fossils we discuss include a previously unreported morphology of Otodus sp., as well as Striatolamia cederstroemi Siverson, 1995, Odontaspis substriata (Stromer, 1910), Microscyliorhinus leggetti Case, 1994, Hemipristis cf. intermedia Cicimurri, Ebersole, Stringer, Starnes and Phillips, 2025, Physogaleus aff. contortus Gibbes, 1849, ‘Sphyrna’ robustum Cicimurri, Ebersole, Stringer, Starnes and Phillips, 2025, Galeocerdo aff. platycuspidatum Cicimurri, Ebersole, Stringer, Starnes and Phillips, 2025, Casierabatis cf. lambrechtsi Reinecke, Mollen, Gijsen, D’Haeze and Hoedemakers, 2024, Hypolophities sp., ‘Rhinoptera’ prisca Woodward, 1907, and a batoid identified only as Myliobatidae indet. The teleosts include Pterothrissus conchaeformis (Koken, 1885), Synodus sp., Holocentrities ovalis Conrad, 1941, Arnoglossus sp., Centropristis aff. priaboniana Nolf and Stringer, 2003, aff. Scorpaenopsis sp., Aplodinotus distortus Nolf, 2003, Lobodus pedemontanus Costa, 1866, and Lutjanidae indet. These newly recognized taxa provide further insights into Paleogene ecologies in Alabama, as well as the paleobiogeographical distribution and evolutionary history of the species.

Detailed information on shark and ray fisheries in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India are limited, including information on the diversity and biological characteristics of these species. We carried out fish landing surveys in South Andamans from January 2017 to May 2018, a comprehensive and cost-effective way to fill this data gap. We sampled 5,742 individuals representing 57 shark and ray species landed from six types of fishing gears. Of the 36 species of sharks and 21 species of rays landed, six species of sharks (Loxodon macrorhinus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, Sphyrna lewini, C. albimarginatus, C. brevipinna, and Paragaleus randalli) comprised 83.35% of shark landings, while three species of rays (Pateobatis jenkinsii, Himantura leoparda and H. tutul) comprised 48.82% of ray landings, suggesting a species dominance in the catch or fishing region. We provide insights into the biology of species with extensions in maximum size for seven shark species. Additionally, we document an increase in the known ray diversity for the islands and for India with three previously unreported ray species. We found that amongst sharks, mature individuals of small-bodied species (63.48% males of total landings of species less than 1.5 m total length when mature) and immature individuals of larger species (84.79% males of total landings of species larger than 1.5 m total length when mature) were mostly landed; whereas for rays, mature individuals were predominantly landed (80.71% males of total landings) likely reflecting differences in habitat preferences along life-history stages across species and fishing gear. The largest size range in sharks was recorded in landings from pelagic longlines and gillnets. Further, the study emphasizes the overlap between critical habitats and fishing grounds, where immature sharks and gravid females were landed in large quantities which might be unsustainable in the long-term. Landings were female-biased in C. amblyrhynchos, S. lewini and P. jenkinsii, and male-biased in L. macrorhinus and H. leoparda, indicating either spatio-temporal or gear-specific sexual segregation in these species. Understanding seasonal and biological variability in the shark and ray landings over a longer study period across different fisheries will inform future conservation and fishery management measures for these species in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Through elasmobranch (sharks and rays) evolutionary history, gigantism evolved multiple times in phylogenetically distant species, some of which are now extinct. Interestingly, the world’s largest elasmobranchs display two specializations found never to overlap: filter feeding and mesothermy. The contrasting lifestyles of elasmobranch giants provide an ideal case study to elucidate the evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in the oceans. Here, we applied a phylogenetic approach to a global dataset of 459 taxa to study the evolution of elasmobranch gigantism. We found that filter feeders and mesotherms deviate from general relationships between trophic level and body size, and exhibit significantly larger sizes than ectothermic-macropredators. We confirm that filter feeding arose multiple times during the Paleogene, and suggest the possibility of a single origin of mesothermy in the Cretaceous. Together, our results elucidate two main evolutionary pathways that enable gigantism: mesothermic and filter feeding. These pathways were followed by ancestrally large clades and facilitated extreme sizes through specializations for enhancing prey intake. Although a negligible percentage of ectothermic-macropredators reach gigantic sizes, these species lack such specializations and are correspondingly constrained to the lower limits of gigantism. Importantly, the very adaptive strategies that enabled the evolution of the largest sharks can also confer high extinction susceptibility.