Explore the vast range of titles available.

Electric-toothbrush vibrations, which remove plaque, are transmitted to the gingival connective tissue via epithelial cells. Physical energy affects cell function; however, the effects of electric-toothbrush vibrations on gingival extracellular matrix (ECM) protein expression remain unknown. We aimed to examine the effects of these vibrations on the expression of ECM proteins—type I collagen (col I), type III collagen (col III), elastin, and fibronectin (FN)—using human gingival fibroblasts (HGnFs). HGnFs were seeded for 5 days in a six-well plate with a hydrophilic surface, exposed to electric-toothbrush vibrations, and cultured for 7 days. Subsequently, the mRNA and protein levels of col I, col III, elastin, and FN were examined. To investigate the role of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling on ECM protein expression in vibration-stimulated cells, the cells were treated with siRNA against protein tyrosine kinase (PTK). Electric-toothbrush vibrations increased col I, col III, elastin, and FN expression; promoted collagen and non-collagen protein production; and enhanced FAK phosphorylation in HGnFs. Moreover, PTK2 siRNA completely blocked the effects of these vibrations on the expression of col I, col III and elastin mRNA. The results suggest that electric-toothbrush vibrations increase collagen, elastin, and FN production through the FAK-signaling pathway in fibroblasts.

Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various supplementary vibrational frequencies with orthodontic force on the rate of canine movement. Materials and methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar, with the final search on February 17, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants undergoing orthodontic treatment with upper first premolar extraction, assessed the effect of different vibration frequencies on canine movement rate were included. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) for pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) and a frequentist-based network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated relative effects, with mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated for all comparisons. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool. Results Ten RCTs examined the effects of five vibration frequencies. The RoB ranged from low to high. The PMA found vibrations significantly increased tooth movement (MD = 0.084 mm, 95% CI [0.004, 0.164]). Conversely, NMA showed no significant differences across all comparisons. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve ranked 125 Hz as the most effective, followed by 100, 60, 30, and 0 Hz. The confidence in evidence ranged from low to moderate. Conclusions The use of supplementary vibration in conjunction with orthodontic force statistically effectively accelerates tooth movement, with higher frequencies showing a tendency to yield better acceleration results. Clinical relevance While vibration therapy demonstrated a statistically significant effect on canine movement, the magnitude of this effect was not sufficient to be considered clinically significant for orthodontic treatment. Further research is required to optimize the effectiveness.

Objectives Electric toothbrushes with various features are used as an alternative to manual toothbrushes to protect oral health. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of electric toothbrushes on the surface topography and gloss of resin composites. Materials and methods In this study, microhybrid, nanohybrid and supra-nano resin composite specimens (10 × 2 mm) were prepared in a silicon mold. After polishing using diamond spirals, the initial topography (Ra, Sa) and gloss values ​​were measured. The specimens were then brushed with a conventional toothpaste for 4 and 8 min using sonic and micro-vibration electric toothbrushes. A manual toothbrush served as the control group. Following toothbrushing, the surface topography and gloss of the resin composites were evaluated. Surface roughness and gloss data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( p  < 0.05). Results The simulated toothbrushing process significantly increased the Ra and Sa values of the resin composites ( p  < 0.05). The greatest increase in surface roughness was observed among the microhybrid and nanohybrid composites ( p  < 0.05), while the supra-nano composite with spherical fillers exhibited the lowest Ra and Sa values. Sonic and micro-vibration electric toothbrushes increased the surface roughness of resin composites more than the manual toothbrush ( p  < 0.05). The initial surface gloss of the composites exceeded 80 GU. Electric toothbrushes caused a significantly greater reduction in surface gloss compared with the manual toothbrush ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions Electric toothbrushes increase the surface roughness and reduce the gloss of resin composites. The surface gloss and roughness of resin composites are influenced by filler particle size. Clinical relevance The use of electric toothbrushes increases the surface roughness of resin composites to a greater extent than manual toothbrushing, while simultaneously reducing surface gloss.

Abstract Objective: To investigate the effects of application of vibratory stimuli, using an electric toothbrush, on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement during maxillary canine retraction. Methods: A split-mouth study was conducted in 28 subjects (mean age = 20.8 years; ranging from 18 to 24 years) whose bilateral maxillary first premolars were extracted with subsequent canine retraction. On the Vibration side, light force (100 g) was applied to the canine for 90 days, in combination with vibratory stimuli provided by an electric toothbrush; only orthodontic force was applied to the canine on the non-vibration side. Amount of canine movement was measured monthly. Related to electronic toothbrush usage, a diary was provided to each patient for recording discomfort during experimental period, having 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The paired t-test was used to assess the differences in amount of tooth movement between canines of the vibration and non-vibration sides. Results: The amount of tooth movement was similar for canines on the vibration side and on the non-vibration side (mean 0.81 ± 0.10 mm and 0.82 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, p> 0.05). Plaque accumulation was minimal in any subject throughout the study. No subject reported discomfort as a result of using the electric toothbrush. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that application of vibratory stimuli using an electric toothbrush, in combination with light orthodontic force, do not accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Resumo Objetivo: investigar os efeitos da aplicação de estímulo vibratório, usando escova elétrica, sobre a taxa de movimentação dentária ortodôntica durante a retração dos caninos superiores. Métodos: um estudo de boca-dividida foi realizado em 28 pacientes (idade média de 20,8 anos, variando entre 18 e 24 anos) cujos dois primeiros pré-molares superiores foram extraídos, com subsequente retração dos caninos. No lado Com Vibração, uma força leve (100g) foi aplicada no canino durante 90 dias, em combinação com o estímulo vibratório gerado por uma escova de dentes elétrica; enquanto os caninos do lado Sem Vibração foram submetidos apenas à aplicação da força ortodôntica. A quantidade de movimentação dos caninos foi aferida mensalmente. Quanto ao uso da escova de dentes elétrica, diários foram fornecidos aos pacientes para que esses anotassem, em Escalas Visuais Analógicas (EVA) de 100 mm, o desconforto sentido durante o período experimental. O teste t pareado foi utilizado para avaliar as diferenças na quantidade de movimentação dos caninos nos lados Com Vibração e Sem Vibração. Resultados: os valores da movimentação dentária foram semelhantes nos lados Com Vibração e Sem Vibração (médias de 0,81 ± 0,10 mm e 0,82 ± 0,11 mm, respectivamente, p> 0,05). O acúmulo de placa dentária nos pacientes dessa amostra foi mínimo, ao longo de todo o estudo. Nenhum paciente relatou desconforto durante o uso da escova elétrica. Conclusões: o presente estudo demonstrou que a aplicação de estímulo vibratório usando uma escova elétrica, associada a forças ortodônticas leves, não foi capaz de acelerar a movimentação dentária ortodôntica.

Background Application of topical anesthetic agent prior to injection is the most commonly used method to control initial needle penetration pain of local anesthetic injection. Ice and vibration stimulus application are other nonpharmacologic methods used to reduce painful sensations of injection. The present study aims to verify and compare topical anesthetic, ice pretreatment, and electric toothbrush as a vibratory device, to reduce the pain of local anesthetic injections. The study was conducted on children aged 5–12 years, requiring extraction of a maxillary primary tooth. A randomized control trial design was used wherein each child was randomly assigned by permuted block randomization design method to receive either lignocaine 5% as topical anesthetic or ice pretreatment or motorized toothbrush as a vibratory device during local anesthetic injections. Sound, eye, and motor (SEM) scale was used for objective evaluation of pain during injection, and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) was used for subjective evaluation. For statistical analysis, nonparametric test — Kruskal Wallis/ANOVA test for three groups and between two groups Mann–Whitney U -test, was used to compare SEM and FPS values. Level of significance chosen was p  < 0.05. Results SEM (palatal) and FPS (palatal) scores were slightly higher in topical anesthetic group as compared to ice pretreatment or vibration group, but the differences were not statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences among SEM (buccal) and FPS (buccal) scores in all the three groups. Conclusions Ice cooling and electric toothbrush-induced vibration were as effective as topical anesthetic for reduction in pain due to injection. Trial registration The CTRI number of the trial is CTRI/2021/03/032046.

Background Breeding programs and research activities where artificial buzz-pollinations are required to have primarily relied upon using tuning forks, and bumble bees. However, these methods can be expensive, unreliable, and inefficient. To find an alternative, we tested the efficiency of pollen collection using electric toothbrushes and compared it with tuning forks at three vibration frequencies—low, medium, and high and two extraction times at 3 s and 16 s- from two buzz—pollinated species (Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum elaeagnifolium). Results Our results show that species, and extraction time significantly influenced pollen extraction, while there were no significant differences for the different vibration frequencies and more importantly, the use of a toothbrush over tuning fork. More pollen was extracted from S. elaeagnifolium when compared to S. lycopersicum, and at longer buzzing time regardless of the instrument used. Conclusions Our results suggest that electric toothbrushes can be a viable and inexpensive alternative to tuning forks, and regardless of the instrument used and buzzing frequency, length of buzzing time is also critical in pollen extraction.