Explore the vast range of titles available.

Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) and endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDEE) are innovative endoscopic techniques developed to overcome the challenges of biliary access in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. EDGE facilitates the creation of a gastro-gastric anastomosis, enabling endoscopic access to the excluded stomach and subsequent duodenum for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Similarly, EDEE involves creating a gastro-jejunal anastomosis, allowing endoscopic access to the jejunum and hepaticojejunostomy for ERCP. These procedures are primarily indicated for patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or other complex gastrointestinal surgeries that render traditional ERCP unfeasible. The major advantages of EDGE and EDEE include minimally invasive access to the biliary system, reduced procedural morbidity, and the ability to perform complex biliary interventions without additional surgeries. Using lumen-apposing metal stents in these procedures has further improved their safety and efficacy. This comprehensive review delves into EDGE and EDEE’s technical nuances, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles. Our extensive literature searches reveal high procedural success rates and low complication incidences, establishing these methods as viable alternatives to traditional surgical and percutaneous approaches. We also discuss recent technological advancements, including developing enhanced stents and endoscopic ultrasound-guided instruments, which have refined these techniques and expanded their applications. Moreover, the review examines the integration of EDGE and EDEE with other therapeutic modalities, such as cholangioscopy and intraductal lithotripsy, to optimize treatment outcomes. Future directions emphasize the need for larger, multicenter trials to validate these findings further and create standardized protocols to ensure consistent procedural efficacy and safety. This review highlights the transformative potential of EDGE and EDEE in therapeutic endoscopy, advocating for their broader adoption in clinical practice and ongoing innovation in this rapidly evolving field. Plain language summary New endoscopic techniques (EDGE and EDEE) for management of bile duct and pancreatic problems in patients with surgically changed anatomy Some patients who need treatment for bile duct or pancreatic problems have had surgeries that change the shape and connections in their digestive system. These changes make it difficult for doctors to reach the bile ducts using standard endoscopic procedures. Two new methods—called EDGE (Endoscopic Ultrasound Directed Transgastric ERCP) and EDEE (Endoscopic Ultrasound Directed Transenteric ERCP)—offer a solution. They allow doctors to create a new passage between parts of the digestive system using a special stent. This passage gives doctors access to the bile ducts with standard endoscopes, avoiding the need for open surgery. These techniques are especially useful for patients who have had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or other complex surgeries, where the standard route to the bile ducts is blocked. EDGE and EDEE are minimally invasive, meaning they involve less risk and shorter recovery times compared to surgery. This review article explains how these techniques work, their advantages, and how safe and effective they are. Studies show they have a high success rate and fewer complications than traditional surgical methods. They can also be used for repeated treatments if needed. The review also looks at new improvements in technology, such as better stents and instruments, and how these techniques can be combined with other treatments to improve results. Finally, the authors highlight the need for larger studies to confirm these promising results and support the use of EDGE and EDEE in routine medical practice.

Background Diagnostic laparoscopy is often a necessary, albeit invasive, procedure to help resolve undiagnosed peritoneal diseases. Previous retrospective studies reported that EUS-FNA is feasible on peritoneal and omental lesions, however, EUS-FNA provided a limited amount of tissue for immunohistochemistry stain (IHC). Aim This pilot study aims to prospectively determine the effectiveness of EUS-FNB regarding adequacy of tissue for IHC staining, diagnostic rate and the avoidance rate of diagnostic laparoscopy or percutaneous biopsy in patients with these lesions. Methods From March 2017 to June 2018, patients with peritoneal or omental lesions identified by CT or MRI at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand were prospectively enrolled in the study. All Patients underwent EUS-FNB. For those with negative pathological results of EUS-FNB, percutaneous biopsy or diagnostic laparoscopy was planned. Analysis uses percentages only due to small sample sizes. Results A total of 30 EUS-FNB passes were completed, with a median of 3 passes (range 2–3 passes) per case. For EUS-FNB, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of EUS-FNB from peritoneal lesions were 63.6%, 100%, 100%, 20% and 66.7% respectively. Adequate tissue for IHC stain was found in 25/30 passes (80%). The tissues from EUS results were found malignant in 7/12 patients (58.3%). IHC could be done in 10/12 patients (83.3%). Among the five patients with negative EUS results, two underwent either liver biopsy of mass or abdominal paracentesis, showing gallbladder cancer and adenocarcinoma. Two patients refused laparoscopy due to advanced pancreatic cancer and worsening ovarian cancer. The fifth patient had post-surgical inflammation only with spontaneous resolution. The avoidance rate of laparoscopic diagnosis was 58.3%. No major adverse event was observed. Conclusions EUS-FNB from peritoneal lesions provided sufficient core tissue for diagnosis and IHC. Diagnostic laparoscopy can often be avoided in patients with peritoneal lesions.

Elastography endoscopic ultrasound (E-EUS) has been proved to be a valuable supplement to endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in differentiating solid pancreatic lesions, but the improvement of EUS-FNA guided during E-EUS has not been proven. Our study aimed to evaluate whether E-EUS fine-needle aspiration (E-EUS-FNA) was superior to B-mode EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses and whether the diagnostic rate was affected by specific factors. Our prospective study was conducted between 2019–2020 by recruiting patients with solid pancreatic masses. E-EUS examination was followed by one pass of E-EUS-FNA towards the blue part of the lesion and a second pass of EUS-FNA. The final diagnosis was based on surgery, E-EUS-FNA or EUS-FNA results, or a 12-month follow-up. Sixty patients with solid pancreatic lesions were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing malignancy using E-EUS-FNA and EUS-FNA were 89.5%, 100%, 90%, 93%, 100%, and 93.3%, respectively, but the differences were not significant. Neither mass location nor the lesion size influenced the results. The lengths of the core obtained during E-EUS-FNA and EUS-FNA were similar. E-EUS-FNA in solid pancreatic lesions was not superior to B-mode EUS-FNA.

Gallbladder tumors are neoplastic lesions; however, it can be difficult to distinguish between benign and malignant gall bladder tumors before surgery, although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is useful for differentiation. Fundamental B mode EUS (FB-EUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) are reported to be useful for the diagnosis of gallbladder tumor because they allow evaluation of polypoid lesion and gallbladder wall thickening. Scoring systems based on FB-EUS imaging are available for the diagnosis of malignant gallbladder polypoid lesions. The characteristic findings of malignant gallbladder polypoid lesions on CH-EUS include the presence of irregular intratumoral vessels and perfusion defects. The characteristic findings of malignant gallbladder wall thickening on FB-EUS include wall thickening >12 mm, hypoechoic internal echogenicity, inhomogeneous internal echo pattern, and disrupted wall layer, whereas CH-EUS findings include hypovascular enhancement and inhomogeneous contrast distribution pattern. In addition, FB-EUS and CH-EUS are useful for evaluating the stage of gallbladder carcinoma because they allow the evaluation of the depth of invasion of the gallbladder wall. It is usually difficult to obtain pathological evidence from gallbladder tumors before surgery and chemotherapy, even though the histological diagnosis is necessary for determining treatment policy. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful for obtaining pathological samples from gallbladder tumors before surgery and chemotherapy. The accuracy rate of EUS-FNA for gallbladder tumor is as high as 90%, but complications such as bile leakage and needle track seeding can be a problem, although it was reported that contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging is useful for avoiding them.

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology from an intracystic fluid is useful in the differentiation of pancreatic cysts, with low sensitivity, which increases when the solid component is targeted. The clinical utility of contrast-enhanced guided EUS-FNA (CH-EUS-FNA) in the solid component is not known. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CH-EUS-FNA in enhanced mural nodules and discrimination between different cysts using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS). The prospective study recruited patients with pancreatic cysts with an unclear diagnosis. The CH-EUS was followed by CH-EUS-FNA. The final diagnosis was based on surgery or the correlation between clinical history, cross-sectional imaging, echoendoscopic morphology, cystic fluid analysis, and follow-up. Fifty-eight patients with pancreatic cysts were evaluated. The mucinous cysts had wall arterial enhancement more often than non- mucinous cysts (p < 0.0001), with 90.2% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity. The CH-EUS-FNA from cystic fluid and mural nodules identified mucinous cysts and malignancy with 82.4% and 84.2% sensitivity and 92% and 100% specificity. Twenty-one cysts had solid components, but only 13 were enhanced mural nodules on EUS assessment with conclusive cytology in all cases and malignancy in 76.9%. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound should be completed in all PCN with solid components in order to avoid unnecessary EUS-FNA and to guide FNA for the identification of malignant cysts.

Currently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is widely performed worldwide for various benign and malignant biliary diseases in cases of difficult or unsuccessful endoscopic transpapillary cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Furthermore, its applicability as primary drainage has also been reported. Although recent advances in EUS systems and equipment have made EUS-HGS easier and safer, the risk of serious adverse events such as bile leak and stent migration still exists. Physicians and assistants need not only sufficient skills and experience in ERCP-related procedures and basic EUS-related procedures such as fine needle aspiration and pancreatic fluid collection drainage, but also knowledge and techniques specific to EUS-HGS. This technical review mainly focuses on EUS-HGS with self-expandable metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction and presents the latest and detailed tips for safe and successful performance of the technique.

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-based transpapillary drainage may provide alternative treatment strategies for high-risk surgical candidates with symptomatic gallbladder (GB) disease. The primary aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic GB drainage for patients with symptomatic GB disease.MethodsSearches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were performed in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Pooled proportions were calculated for measured outcomes including technical success, clinical success, adverse event rate, recurrence rate, and rate of reintervention. Subgroup analyses were performed for transmural versus transpapillary, transmural lumen apposing stent (LAMS), and comparison to percutaneous transhepatic drainage. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Publication bias was ascertained by funnel plot and Egger regression testing.ResultsThirty-six studies (n = 1538) were included. Overall, endoscopic GB drainage achieved a technical and clinical success of 87.33% [(95% CI 84.42–89.77); I2 = 39.55] and 84.16% [(95% CI 80.30–87.38); I2 = 52.61], with an adverse event rate of 11.00% [(95% CI 9.25–13.03); I2 = 7.08]. On subgroup analyses, EUS-guided transmural compared to ERC-assisted transpapillary drainage resulted in higher technical and clinical success rates [OR 3.91 (95% CI 1.52–10.09); P = 0.005 and OR 4.59 (95% CI 1.84–11.46); P = 0.001] and lower recurrence rate [OR 0.17 (95% CI 0.06–0.52); P = 0.002]. Among EUS-guided LAMS studies, technical success was 94.65% [(95% CI 91.54–96.67); I2 = 0.00], clinical success was 92.06% [(95% CI 88.65–94.51); I2 = 0.00], and adverse event rate was 11.71% [(95% CI 8.92–15.23); I2 = 0.00]. Compared to percutaneous drainage, EUS-guided drainage possessed a similar efficacy and safety with significantly lower rate of reintervention [OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.02–0.13); P < 0.001].DiscussionEndoscopic GB drainage is a safe and effective treatment for high-risk surgical candidates with symptomatic GB disease. EUS-guided transmural drainage is superior to transpapillary drainage and associated with a lower rate of reintervention compared to percutaneous transhepatic drainage.

Background and AimsData on adequacy of EUS guided biopsies using different tissue acquisition techniques and fine needle aspiration needle designs have been inconclusive. Data on newer fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles are scarce. This study compared the performance of 3 acquisition techniques and 2 fine needle biopsy designs in solid pancreatic lesions.MethodsSingle-center, randomized, pilot clinical trial (Trial registration number NCT03264092). Patients undergoing EUS biopsy of pancreatic lesions were randomized to 1 of 3 acquisition techniques (dry suction, wet suction, slow pull) and 1 of 2 22G FNB needle designs. The primary outcome was specimen cellularity. Secondary outcomes included blood contamination and number of passes needed for diagnosis.ResultsA total of 52 (35.3%), 49 (33.3%) and 46 (31.3%) specimens were obtained with slow pull, dry suction and wet suction, respectively. A total of 56 (38%) and 91 (62%) specimens were obtained with each needle, respectively. No difference in cellularity scores was identified by technique (3.28 vs 3.55 vs 2.94; p = 0.081) or needle type (3.45 vs 3.15; p = 0.19). The same was true for blood contamination and diagnostic pass. A diagnosis was reached after 3 passes in 51 patients (93%). Histological diagnosis was possible in 45 specimens (82%). No severe adverse events occurred.ConclusionsCellularity of pancreatic specimens obtained with FNB needles via EUS was not influenced by technique and needle design. Three passes were enough to obtain a histological diagnosis in most patients. Larger clinical trials are required to validate the results of this study.

The mainstay of management of acute cholecystitis is surgical. Despite the advances in anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery, there is a significant pool of patients that are not candidates for surgery given their significant comorbidities and limited functional reserve. Historically percutaneous gallbladder drainage has been utilized to temporize these patients. Recently, endoscopic approaches are being explored with transpapillary and transmural drainage. In this article, we discuss the background, current status, technical challenges, adverse events, and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for management of acute cholecystitis.

Pancreato-biliary disorders are the challenging disorders in gastroenterology practice. It  is well-known that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common procedure in managing pancreato-biliary disorders. However, imaging modalities such as abdominal CT scan and MRI has been successfully reduced the unnecessary ERCP to avoid several potential complications. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedure has become an important tool due to the limitation of imaging modalities in pancreato-biliary disorders. Its ability which is not only for diagnostic, but also for therapeutic purpose has given a new insight for most gastroenterologists in their daily practice. However, the investment, cost, and the proper training curriculum are still debatable in most developing countries, especially in Indonesia.