Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
87,156
result(s) for
"epithelial"
Sort by:
Expression and function of epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM: where are we after 40 years?
by
Canis, Martin
,
Pan, Min
,
Gires Olivier
in
CD44 antigen
,
Cell adhesion & migration
,
Cell adhesion molecules
2020
EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) was discovered four decades ago as a tumor antigen on colorectal carcinomas. Owing to its frequent and high expression on carcinomas and their metastases, EpCAM serves as a prognostic marker, a therapeutic target, and an anchor molecule on circulating and disseminated tumor cells (CTCs/DTCs), which are considered the major source for metastatic cancer cells. Today, EpCAM is reckoned as a multi-functional transmembrane protein involved in the regulation of cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, stemness, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of carcinoma cells. To fulfill these functions, EpCAM is instrumental in intra- and intercellular signaling as a full-length molecule and following regulated intramembrane proteolysis, generating functionally active extra- and intracellular fragments. Intact EpCAM and its proteolytic fragments interact with claudins, CD44, E-cadherin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and intracellular signaling components of the WNT and Ras/Raf pathways, respectively. This plethora of functions contributes to shaping intratumor heterogeneity and partial EMT, which are major determinants of the clinical outcome of carcinoma patients. EpCAM represents a marker for the epithelial status of primary and systemic tumor cells and emerges as a measure for the metastatic capacity of CTCs. Consequentially, EpCAM has reclaimed potential as a prognostic marker and target on primary and systemic tumor cells.
Journal Article
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer
by
Kieffer, Jacobien M
,
Arts, Henriëtte J
,
van der Velden, Jacobus
in
Aged
,
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
,
Cancer surgery
2018
The addition of HIPEC with cisplatin to cytoreductive surgery in stage III ovarian cancer resulted in recurrence-free survival that was longer by 3.5 months and overall survival that was longer by nearly a year than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects.
Journal Article
Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
by
Scott, Clare L
,
Sun, James
,
Rolfe, Lindsey
in
Aged
,
Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology
,
Biomarkers
2017
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in ovarian carcinomas with homologous recombination deficiency. Along with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) might also represent homologous recombination deficiency. In ARIEL2, we assessed the ability of tumour genomic LOH, quantified with a next-generation sequencing assay, to predict response to rucaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor.
ARIEL2 is an international, multicentre, two-part, phase 2, open-label study done at 49 hospitals and cancer centres in Australia, Canada, France, Spain, the UK, and the USA. In ARIEL2 Part 1, patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma were classified into one of three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups on the basis of tumour mutational analysis: BRCA mutant (deleterious germline or somatic), BRCA wild-type and LOH high (LOH high group), or BRCA wild-type and LOH low (LOH low group). We prespecified a cutoff of 14% or more genomic LOH for LOH high. Patients began treatment with oral rucaparib at 600 mg twice per day for continuous 28 day cycles until disease progression or any other reason for discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All patients treated with at least one dose of rucaparib were included in the safety analyses and all treated patients who were classified were included in the primary endpoint analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01891344. Enrolment into ARIEL2 Part 1 is complete, although an extension (Part 2) is ongoing.
256 patients were screened and 206 were enrolled between Oct 30, 2013, and Dec 19, 2014. At the data cutoff date (Jan 18, 2016), 204 patients had received rucaparib, with 28 patients remaining in the study. 192 patients could be classified into one of the three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups: BRCA mutant (n=40), LOH high (n=82), or LOH low (n=70). Tumours from 12 patients were established as BRCA wild-type, but could not be classified for LOH, because of insufficient neoplastic nuclei in the sample. The median duration of treatment for the 204 patients was 5·7 months (IQR 2·8–10·1). 24 patients in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 56 patients in the LOH high subgroup, and 59 patients in the LOH low subgroup had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival after rucaparib treatment was 12·8 months (95% CI 9·0–14·7) in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 5·7 months (5·3–7·6) in the LOH high subgroup, and 5·2 months (3·6–5·5) in the LOH low subgroup. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the BRCA mutant (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·16–0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high (0·62, 0·42–0·90, p=0·011) subgroups compared with the LOH low subgroup. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (45 [22%] patients), and elevations in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (25 [12%]). Common serious adverse events included small intestinal obstruction (10 [5%] of 204 patients), malignant neoplasm progression (10 [5%]), and anaemia (nine [4%]). Three patients died during the study (two because of disease progression and one because of sepsis and disease progression). No treatment-related deaths occurred.
In patients with BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type and LOH high platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinomas treated with rucaparib, progression-free survival was longer than in patients with BRCA wild-type LOH low carcinomas. Our results suggest that assessment of tumour LOH can be used to identify patients with BRCA wild-type platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers who might benefit from rucaparib. These results extend the potential usefulness of PARP inhibitors in the treatment setting beyond BRCA mutant tumours.
Clovis Oncology, US Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program, Stand Up To Cancer—Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance—National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant, and V Foundation Translational Award.
Journal Article
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer (CHIPOR): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
2024
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at interval cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer improves overall survival but its role in recurrent disease is uncertain. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients treated with or without HIPEC during surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer.
The multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 CHIPOR trial was conducted at 31 sites in France, Belgium, Spain, and Canada, and enrolled patients with first relapse of epithelial ovarian cancer at least 6 months after completing platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with WHO performance status of less than 2. After six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (and optional bevacizumab), patients amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery were randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio, using a web-based system and a minimisation procedure, during surgery to receive HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 in 2 L/m2 of serum at 41±1°C for 60 min) or not, stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction score, platinum-free interval, and latterly, planned poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor use. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomly assigned patients. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01376752.
Between May 11, 2011, and May 14, 2021, 415 female patients were randomly assigned (207 HIPEC, 208 no HIPEC). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 6·2 years, IQR 4·1–8·1), 268 (65%) patients had died (126 [61%] of 207 in the HIPEC group; 142 [68%] of 208 in the no-HIPEC group). Overall survival was significantly improved with HIPEC (stratified hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·56–0·96; p=0·024). Median overall survival was 54·3 months (95% CI 41·9–61·7) with HIPEC versus 45·8 months (38·9–54·2) without. Grade 3 or worse adverse events within 60 days after surgery occurred in 102 (49%) of 207 patients receiving HIPEC versus 56 (27%) of 208 receiving no HIPEC, the most common being anaemia (47 [23%] vs 30 [14%]), hepatotoxicity (23 [11%] vs 18 [9%]), electrolyte disturbance (28 [14%] vs two [1%]), and renal failure (20 [10%] vs three [1%]). There were three deaths within 60 days of surgery, all in the no-HIPEC group.
Adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery after response to platinum-based chemotherapy at first epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence significantly improved overall survival. When treating patients with late first relapse of high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer amenable to complete cytoreductive surgery at specialist centres, platinum-based HIPEC should be considered to extend overall survival.
French National Cancer Institute and French League Against Cancer.
Journal Article
Combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib alone for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 study
2014
Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an anti-angiogenic agent with activity against VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3. Both oral agents have antitumour activity in women with recurrent ovarian cancer, and their combination was active and had manageable toxicities in a phase 1 trial. We investigated whether this combination could improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib monotherapy in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
In our randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, we recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who had measurable platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, or those with deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutations from nine participating US academic medical centres. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to permuted blocks, stratified by germline BRCA status and previous anti-angiogenic therapy, to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or the combination at the recommended phase 2 dose of cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The phase 2 trial is no longer accruing patients. An interim analysis was conducted in November, 2013, after 50% of expected events had occurred and efficacy results were unmasked. The primary analysis was performed on March 31, 2014, after 47 events (66% of those expected). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01116648.
Between Oct 26, 2011, and June 3, 2013, we randomly allocated 46 women to receive olaparib alone and 44 to receive the combination of olaparib and cediranib. Median PFS was 17·7 months (95% CI 14·7–not reached) for the women treated with cediranib plus olaparib compared with 9·0 months (95% CI 5·7–16·5) for those treated with olaparib monotherapy (hazard ratio 0·42, 95% CI 0·23–0·76; p=0·005). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more common with combination therapy than with monotherapy, including fatigue (12 patients in the cediranib plus olaparib group vs five patients in the olaparib monotherapy group), diarrhoea (ten vs none), and hypertension (18 vs none).
Cediranib plus olaparib seems to improve PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, and warrants study in a phase 3 trial. The side-effect profile suggests such investigations should include assessments of quality of life and patient-reported outcomes to understand the effects of a continuing oral regimen with that of intermittent chemotherapy.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (3 U01 CA062490-16S2); Intramural Program of the Center for Cancer Research; and the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH.
Journal Article
Incorporation of Bevacizumab in the Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
2011
Incorporating bevacizumab in a chemotherapy regimen (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks for five or six cycles) and then continuing bevacizumab alone for a total of 12 months of treatment extended progression-free survival in advanced and high-risk early-stage ovarian cancer.
Epithelial ovarian cancer and related cancers lead to 15,000 deaths in the United States annually, representing the fifth leading cause of death from cancer among women.
1
The poor prognosis is usually attributed to advanced stage at diagnosis and inadequate chemotherapy.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenesis are important promoters of ovarian-cancer progression.
2
–
6
Both correlate directly with the extent of disease and inversely with progression-free survival
7
–
9
and overall survival,
8
,
10
–
13
often independently of known prognostic factors.
7
–
10
,
12
,
13
Bevacizumab, a humanized VEGF-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, inhibits tumor angiogenesis
14
and has shown single-agent activity in phase 2 epithelial . . .
Journal Article
A Phase 3 Trial of Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer
by
Ledermann, Jonathan A
,
Sehouli, Jalid
,
Kimmig, Rainer
in
Angiogenesis
,
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - adverse effects
,
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use
2011
The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy (15 mg/kg for six cycles) followed by extended therapy with bevacizumab every 3 weeks for a total of 15 months of treatment improved progression-free survival by 4 months in incompletely resected stage III or IV ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women, with an estimated 200,000 cases and 125,000 deaths occurring annually worldwide. For the past decade, the standard treatment for women with advanced ovarian cancer has been surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Attempts to improve this standard two-drug chemotherapy by adding a third cytotoxic drug failed to affect either progression-free survival or overall survival and resulted in an increase in toxic effects.
1
–
4
Although intraperitoneal chemotherapy has extended overall survival by 12 to 17 months, it is an option only for women with advanced ovarian cancer who have a . . .
Journal Article
Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Phase III Study
by
Efstathiou, E.
,
Kalantzi, N.
,
Spiliotis, J.
in
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
,
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
,
Combined Modality Therapy
2015
Background
The current treatment of ovarian cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to examine if hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an alternative modality to treat this category of patients along with a second attempt of surgical resection and second- or third-line systemic chemotherapy afterward.
Methods
In an 8-year period (2006–2013), 120 women with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] III
c
and IV) who experienced disease recurrence after initial treatment with conservative or debulking surgery and systemic chemotherapy were randomized into two groups. Group A comprised 60 patients treated with CRS followed by HIPEC and then systemic chemotherapy. Group B comprised 60 patients treated with CRS only and systemic chemotherapy.
Results
The mean survival for group A was 26.7 versus 13.4 months in group B (
p
< 0.006). Three-year survival was 75 % for group A versus 18 % for group B (
p
< 0.01). In the HIPEC group, the mean survival was not different between patients with platinum-resistant disease versus platinum-sensitive disease (26.6 vs. 26.8 months). On the other hand, in the non-HIPEC group, there was a statistically significant difference between platinum-sensitive versus platinum-resistant disease (15.2 vs. 10.2 months,
p
< 0.002). Complete cytoreduction was associated with longer survival. Patients with a peritoneal cancer index score of <15 appeared also to have longer survival.
Conclusions
The use of HIPEC along with the extent of the disease and the extent of cytoreduction play an important role in the survival of patients with recurrence in an initially advanced ovarian cancer.
Journal Article
Astragaloside IV modulates TGF‐β1‐dependent epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in bleomycin‐induced pulmonary fibrosis
by
Cai, Xinrui
,
Qian, Weibin
,
Wang, Dongli
in
1-Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
,
A549 Cells
,
AKT protein
2018
Epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Astragaloside IV (ASV), a natural saponin from astragalus membranaceus, has shown anti‐fibrotic property in bleomycin (BLM)‐induced pulmonary fibrosis. The current study was undertaken to determine whether EMT was involved in the beneficial of ASV against BLM‐induced pulmonary fibrosis and to elucidate its potential mechanism. As expected, in BLM‐induced IPF, ASV exerted protective effects on pulmonary fibrosis and ASV significantly reversed BLM‐induced EMT. Intriguing, transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1) was found to be up‐regulated, whereas Forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) was hyperphosphorylated and less expressed. However, ASV treatment inhibited increased TGF‐β1 and activated FOXO3a in lung tissues. TGF‐β1 was administered to alveolar epithelial cells A549 to induce EMT in vitro. Meanwhile, stimulation with TGF‐β1‐activated phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) pathway and induced FOXO3a hyperphosphorylated and down‐regulated. It was found that overexpression of FOXO3a leading to the suppression of TGF‐β1‐induced EMT. Moreover, ASV treatment, similar with the TGF‐β1 or PI3K/Akt inhibitor, reverted these cellular changes and inhibited EMT in A549 cells. Collectively, the results suggested that ASV significantly inhibited TGF‐β1/PI3K/Akt‐induced FOXO3a hyperphosphorylation and down‐regulation to reverse EMT during the progression of fibrosis.
Journal Article
Type I and Type III Interferons Drive Redundant Amplification Loops to Induce a Transcriptional Signature in Influenza-Infected Airway Epithelia
by
Mahlakoiv, Tanel
,
Crotta, Stefania
,
Wack, Andreas
in
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing - genetics
,
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing - immunology
,
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing - metabolism
2013
Interferons (IFNs) are a group of cytokines with a well-established antiviral function. They can be induced by viral infection, are secreted and bind to specific receptors on the same or neighbouring cells to activate the expression of hundreds of IFN stimulated genes (ISGs) with antiviral function. Type I IFN has been known for more than half a century. However, more recently, type III IFN (IFNλ, IL-28/29) was shown to play a similar role and to be particularly important at epithelial surfaces. Here we show that airway epithelia, the primary target of influenza A virus, produce both IFN I and III upon infection, and that induction of both depends on the RIG-I/MAVS pathway. While IRF3 is generally regarded as the transcription factor required for initiation of IFN transcription and the so-called \"priming loop\", we find that IRF3 deficiency has little impact on IFN expression. In contrast, lack of IRF7 reduced IFN production significantly, and only IRF3(-/-)IRF7(-/-) double deficiency completely abolished it. The transcriptional response to influenza infection was largely dependent on IFNs, as it was reduced to a few upregulated genes in epithelia lacking receptors for both type I and III IFN (IFNAR1(-/-)IL-28Rα(-/-)). Wild-type epithelia and epithelia deficient in either the type I IFN receptor or the type III IFN receptor exhibit similar transcriptional profiles in response to virus, indicating that none of the induced genes depends selectively on only one IFN system. In chimeric mice, the lack of both IFN I and III signalling in the stromal compartment alone significantly increased the susceptibility to influenza infection. In conclusion, virus infection of airway epithelia induces, via a RIG-I/MAVS/IRF7 dependent pathway, both type I and III IFNs which drive two completely overlapping and redundant amplification loops to upregulate ISGs and protect from influenza infection.
Journal Article