Explore the vast range of titles available.

We recently reported that spliceosomes alter messenger ribonucleoprotein particle (mRNP) composition by depositing several proteins 20–24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon–exon junctions. When assembled in vitro , this so‐called ‘exon–exon junction complex’ (EJC) contains at least five proteins: SRm160, DEK, RNPS1, Y14 and REF. To better investigate its functional attributes, we now describe a method for generating spliced mRNAs both in vitro and in vivo that either do or do not carry the EJC. Analysis of these mRNAs in Xenopus laevis oocytes revealed that this complex is the species responsible for enhancing nucleocytoplasmic export of spliced mRNAs. It does so by providing a strong binding site for the mRNA export factors REF and TAP/p15. Moreover, by serving as an anchoring point for the factors Upf2 and Upf3, the EJC provides a direct link between splicing and nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay. Finally, we show that the composition of the EJC is dynamic in vivo and is subject to significant evolution upon mRNA export to the cytoplasm.

The RNA‐binding protein Y14 binds preferentially to mRNAs produced by splicing and is a component of a multiprotein complex that assembles ∼20 nucleotides upstream of exon–exon junctions. This complex probably has important functions in post‐splicing events including nuclear export and nonsense‐mediated decay of mRNA. We show that Y14 binds to two previously reported components, Aly/REF and RNPS1, and to the mRNA export factor TAP. Moreover, we identified magoh, a human homolog of the Drosophila mago nashi gene product, as a novel component of the complex. Magoh binds avidly and directly to Y14 and TAP, but not to other known components of the complex, and is found in Y14‐containing mRNPs in vivo . Importantly, magoh also binds to mRNAs produced by splicing upstream (∼20 nucleotides) of exon– exon junctions and its binding to mRNA persists after export. These experiments thus reveal specific protein–protein interactions among the proteins of the splicing‐dependent mRNP complex and suggest an important role for the highly evolutionarily conserved magoh protein in this complex.

Background The exon junction complex (EJC) is involved in most steps of the mRNA life cycle, ranging from splicing to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). It is assembled by the splicing machinery onto mRNA in a sequence-independent manner. A fundamental open question is whether the EJC is deposited onto all exon‒exon junctions or only on a subset of them. Several previous studies have made observations supportive of the latter, yet these have been limited by methodological constraints. Results In this study, we sought to overcome these limitations via the integration of two different approaches for transcriptome-wide mapping of EJCs. Our results revealed that nearly all, if not all, internal exons consistently harbor an EJC in Drosophila , demonstrating that EJC presence is an inherent consequence of the splicing reaction. Furthermore, our study underscores the limitations of eCLIP methods in fully elucidating the landscape of RBP binding sites. Our findings highlight how highly specific (low false positive) methodologies can lead to erroneous interpretations due to partial sensitivity (high false negatives). Conclusions This study contributes to our understanding of EJC deposition and its association with pre-mRNA splicing. The universal presence of EJC on internal exons underscores its significance in ensuring proper mRNA processing. Additionally, our observations highlight the need to consider both specificity and sensitivity in RBP mapping methodologies.

Nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay (NMD) represents a key mechanism to control the expression of wild‐type and aberrant mRNAs. Phosphorylation of the protein UPF1 in the context of translation termination contributes to committing mRNAs to NMD. We report that translation termination is inhibited by UPF1 and stimulated by cytoplasmic poly(A)‐binding protein (PABPC1). UPF1 binds to eRF1 and to the GTPase domain of eRF3 both in its GTP‐ and GDP‐bound states. Importantly, mutation studies show that UPF1 can interact with the exon junction complex (EJC) alternatively through either UPF2 or UPF3b to become phosphorylated and to activate NMD. On this basis, we discuss an integrated model where UPF1 halts translation termination and is phosphorylated by SMG1 if the termination‐promoting interaction of PABPC1 with eRF3 cannot readily occur. The EJC, with UPF2 or UPF3b as a cofactor, interferes with physiological termination through UPF1. This model integrates previously competing models of NMD and suggests a mechanistic basis for alternative NMD pathways.

Background Ultraviolet (UV) crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) identifies the sites on RNAs that are in direct contact with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Several variants of CLIP exist, which require different computational approaches for analysis. This variety of approaches can create challenges for a novice user and can hamper insights from multi-study comparisons. Here, we produce data with multiple variants of CLIP and evaluate the data with various computational methods to better understand their suitability. Results We perform experiments for PTBP1 and eIF4A3 using individual-nucleotide resolution CLIP (iCLIP), employing either UV-C or photoactivatable 4-thiouridine (4SU) combined with UV-A crosslinking and compare the results with published data. As previously noted, the positions of complementary DNA (cDNA)-starts depend on cDNA length in several iCLIP experiments and we now find that this is caused by constrained cDNA-ends, which can result from the sequence and structure constraints of RNA fragmentation. These constraints are overcome when fragmentation by RNase I is efficient and when a broad cDNA size range is obtained. Our study also shows that if RNase does not efficiently cut within the binding sites, the original CLIP method is less capable of identifying the longer binding sites of RBPs. In contrast, we show that a broad size range of cDNAs in iCLIP allows the cDNA-starts to efficiently delineate the complete RNA-binding sites. Conclusions We demonstrate the advantage of iCLIP and related methods that can amplify cDNAs that truncate at crosslink sites and we show that computational analyses based on cDNAs-starts are appropriate for such methods.

The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway detects aberrant transcripts containing premature termination codons (PTCs) and regulates expression of 5–10% of non-aberrant human mRNAs. To date, most proteins involved in NMD have been identified by genetic screens in model organisms; however, the increased complexity of gene expression regulation in human cells suggests that additional proteins may participate in the human NMD pathway. To identify proteins required for NMD, we performed a genome-wide RNAi screen against >21,000 genes. Canonical members of the NMD pathway were highly enriched as top hits in the siRNA screen, along with numerous candidate NMD factors, including the conserved ICE1/KIAA0947 protein. RNAseq studies reveal that depletion of ICE1 globally enhances accumulation and stability of NMD-target mRNAs. Further, our data suggest that ICE1 uses a putative MIF4G domain to interact with exon junction complex (EJC) proteins and promotes the association of the NMD protein UPF3B with the EJC. The DNA in our cells contains the hereditary information that makes each of us unique. Molecules called mRNAs are copies of this information and are used as templates for making proteins. When a strand of incorrectly copied mRNA, or one including errors from the original DNA template, is recognized, our cells destroy the mRNA to prevent it from producing a damaged protein. Organisms from yeast to humans have evolved a mechanism for finding and destroying faulty mRNAs, called mRNA surveillance. Animals are particularly reliant on mRNA surveillance, as their proteins are often made from cutting and pasting together mRNA from different portions of DNA, in a process known as splicing. Despite being a vital process, we still lack a good understanding of how mRNA surveillance works. Now, Baird et al. used human kidney cells that produced an error-containing mRNA that could be tracked. To investigate how efficient RNA surveillance is under different conditions, the levels of individual proteins were reduced one at a time. By tracking the amount of faulty mRNA, it was possible to find out if a single protein plays a role in human mRNA surveillance. If the number of faulty mRNAs is high when a protein is reduced, it suggests that this protein may be involved in mRNA surveillance. Baird et al. screened more than 21,000 proteins, the majority of proteins made in human cells. Many of the proteins that stood out as important in mRNA surveillance were the ones already known to be relevant in yeast and worm cells. But the experiments also identified new proteins that appear to play a role specifically in human RNA surveillance. One of the proteins, ICE1, is essential for the relationship between mRNA splicing and mRNA surveillance. Without ICE1, the mRNA surveillance machinery can no longer find and destroy faulty mRNAs. Nearly one-third of genetic diseases are caused by mutations that result in faulty mRNAs, which can be detected by mRNA surveillance pathways. Depending on the disease, destroying these error-containing mRNAs can either improve or worsen disease symptoms. A better understanding of the factors that control human RNA surveillance could one day help to develop treatments that affect mRNA surveillance to improve disease outcomes.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a translation-dependent, multistep process that degrades irregular or faulty messenger RNAs (mRNAs). NMD mainly targets mRNAs with a truncated open reading frame (ORF) due to premature termination codons (PTCs). In addition, NMD also regulates the expression of different types of endogenous mRNA substrates. A multitude of factors are involved in the tight regulation of the NMD mechanism. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanism of mammalian NMD. Based on the published data, we discuss the involvement of translation termination in NMD initiation. Furthermore, we provide a detailed overview of the core NMD machinery, as well as several peripheral NMD factors, and discuss their function. Finally, we present an overview of diseases associated with NMD factor mutations and summarize the current state of treatment for genetic disorders caused by nonsense mutations.

RNA-binding motif 8A (RBM8A) is a core component of the exon junction complex (EJC) that binds pre-mRNAs and regulates their splicing, transport, translation, and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Dysfunction in the core proteins has been linked to several detriments in brain development and neuropsychiatric diseases. To understand the functional role of Rbm8a in brain development, we have generated brain-specific Rbm8a knockout mice and used next-generation RNA-sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in mice with heterozygous, conditional knockout (cKO) of Rbm8a in the brain at postnatal day 17 (P17) and at embryonic day 12. Additionally, we analyzed enriched gene clusters and signaling pathways within the DEGs. At the P17 time point, between the control and cKO mice, about 251 significant DEGs were identified. At E12, only 25 DEGs were identified in the hindbrain samples. Bioinformatics analyses have revealed many signaling pathways related to the central nervous system (CNS). When E12 and P17 results were compared, three DEGs, Spp1, Gpnmb, and Top2a, appeared to peak at different developmental time points in the Rbm8a cKO mice. Enrichment analyses suggested altered activity in pathways affecting cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The results support the hypothesis that loss of Rbm8a causes decreased cellular proliferation, increased apoptosis, and early differentiation of neuronal subtypes, which may lead ultimately to an altered neuronal subtype composition in the brain.

In higher eukaryotes the accelerated degradation of mRNAs harboring premature termination codons is controlled by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), exon junction complex (EJC), and nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC) factors, but the mechanistic basis for this quality-control system and the specific roles of the individual factors remain unclear. Using Neurospora crassa as a model system, we analyzed the mechanisms by which NMD is induced by spliced 3′-UTR introns or upstream open reading frames and observed that the former requires NMD, EJC, and CBC factors whereas the latter requires only the NMD factors. The transcripts for EJC components eIF4A3 and Y14, and translation termination factor eRF1, contain spliced 3′-UTR introns and each was stabilized in NMD, EJC, and CBC mutants. Reporter mRNAs containing spliced 3′-UTR introns, but not matched intronless controls, were stabilized in these mutants and were enriched in mRNPs immunopurified from wild-type cells with antibody directed against human Y14, demonstrating a direct role for spliced 3′-UTR introns in triggering EJC-mediated NMD. These results demonstrate conclusively that NMD, EJC, and CBC factors have essential roles in controlling mRNA stability and that, based on differential requirements for these factors, there are branched mechanisms for NMD. They demonstrate for the first time autoregulatory control of expression at the level of mRNA stability through the EJC/CBC branch of NMD for EJC core components, eIF4A3 and Y14, and for eRF1, which recognizes termination codons. Finally, these results show that EJC-mediated NMD occurs in fungi and thus is an evolutionarily conserved quality-control mechanism.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a cellular surveillance mechanism that degrades mRNAs with a premature stop codon, avoiding the synthesis of C-terminally truncated proteins. In addition to faulty mRNAs, NMD recognises ~10% of endogenous transcripts in human cells and downregulates their expression. The up-frameshift proteins are core NMD factors and are conserved from yeast to human in structure and function. In mammals, NMD diversified into different pathways that target different mRNAs employing additional NMD factors. Here, we review our current understanding of molecular mechanisms and cellular roles of NMD pathways and the involvement of more specialised NMD factors. We describe the consequences of mutations in NMD factors leading to neurodevelopmental diseases, and the role of NMD in cancer. We highlight strategies of RNA viruses to evade recognition and decay by the NMD machinery.