Explore the vast range of titles available.

Model Predictive Control (MPC) predicts the vehicle’s motion within a fixed time window, known as the prediction horizon, and calculates potential collision risks with obstacles in advance. It then determines the optimal steering input to guide the vehicle safely around obstacles. For example, when a sudden obstacle appears, sensors detect it, and MPC uses the vehicle’s current speed, position, and heading to predict its driving trajectory over the next few hundred milliseconds to several seconds. If a collision is predicted, MPC computes the optimal steering path among possible avoidance trajectories that are feasible within the vehicle’s dynamics. The vehicle then follows this input to steer away from the obstacle. In the proposed method, MPC is combined with Adaptive Artificial Potential Field (APF). The APF dynamically adjusts the repulsive force based on the distance and relative speed to the obstacle. MPC predicts the optimal driving path and generates control inputs, while the avoidance vector from APF is integrated into MPC’s constraints or cost function. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves obstacle avoidance response, steering smoothness, and path stability compared to the baseline MPC approach.

This paper is centered on the guidance systems used to increase the autonomy of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs). The new Robust Reactive Static Obstacle Avoidance System (RRSOAS) has been specifically designed for USVs. This algorithm is easily applicable, since previous knowledge of the USV mathematical model and its controllers is not needed. Instead, a new estimated closed-loop model (ECLM) is proposed and used to estimate possible future trajectories. Furthermore, the prediction errors (due to the uncertainty present in the ECLM) are taken into account by modeling the USV’s shape as a time-varying ellipse. Additionally, in order to decrease the computation time, we propose to use a variable prediction horizon and an exponential resolution to discretize the decision space. As environmental model an occupancy probability grid is used, which is updated with the measurements generated by a LIDAR sensor model. Finally, the new RRSOAS is compared with other SOA (static obstacle avoidance) methods. In addition, a robustness study was carried out over a set of random scenarios. The results obtained through numerical simulations indicate that RRSOAS is robust to unknown and congested scenarios in the presence of disturbances, while offering competitive performance with respect to other SOA methods.