Explore the vast range of titles available.

AbstractObjectiveTo assess efficacy and safety of laughter exercise in patients with symptomatic dry eye disease.DesignNon-inferiority randomised controlled trial.SettingRecruitment was from clinics and community and the trial took place at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, the largest ophthalmic centre in China, between 18 June 2020 to 8 January 2021.ParticipantsPeople with symptomatic dry eye disease aged 18-45 years with ocular surface disease index scores ranging from 18 to 80 and tear film break-up time of eight seconds or less.InterventionsParticipants were randomised 1:1 to receive laughter exercise or artificial tears (0.1% sodium hyaluronic acid eyedrop, control group) four times daily for eight weeks. The laughter exercise group viewed an instructional video and participants were requested to vocalise the phrases “Hee hee hee, hah hah hah, cheese cheese cheese, cheek cheek cheek, hah hah hah hah hah hah” 30 times per five minute session. Investigators assessing study outcomes were masked to group assignment but participants were unmasked for practical reasons.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the mean change in the ocular surface disease index (0-100, higher scores indicating worse ocular surface discomfort) from baseline to eight weeks in the per protocol population. The non-inferiority margin was 6 points of this index score. Main secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with a decrease from baseline in ocular surface disease index score of at least 10 points and changes in dry eye disease signs, for example, non-invasive tear break up time at eight weeks.Results299 participants (mean age 28.9 years; 74% female) were randomly assigned to receive laughter exercise (n=149) or 0.1% sodium hyaluronic acid (n=150). 283 (95%) completed the trial. The mean change in ocular surface disease index score at eight weeks was −10.5 points (95% confidence interval (CI) −13.1 to −7.82) in the laughter exercise group and −8.83 (−11.7 to −6.02) in the control group. The upper boundary of the CI for difference in change between groups was lower than the non-inferiority margin (mean difference −1.45 points (95% CI −5.08 to 2.19); P=0.43), supporting non-inferiority. Among secondary outcomes, the laughter exercise was better in improving non-invasive tear break up time (mean difference 2.30 seconds (95% CI 1.30 to 3.30), P<0.001); other secondary outcomes showed no significant difference. No adverse events were noted in either study group.ConclusionsThe laughter exercise was non-inferior to 0.1% sodium hyaluronic acid in relieving subjective symptoms in patients with dry eye disease with limited corneal staining over eight weeks intervention.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04421300.

Dry eye disease (DED) is the most common ocular surface disease, characterized by insufficient production and/or instability of the tear film. Tear substitutes are usually the first line of treatment for patients with DED. Despite the large variety of tear substitutes available on the market, few studies have been performed to compare their performance. There is a need to better understand the specific mechanical and pharmacological roles of each ingredient composing the different formulations. In this review, we describe the main categories of ingredients composing tear substitutes (e.g., viscosity-enhancing agents, electrolytes, osmo-protectants, antioxidants, lipids, surfactants and preservatives) as well as their effects on the ocular surface, and we provide insight into how certain components of tear substitutes may promote corneal wound healing, and/or counteract inflammation. Based on these considerations, we propose an approach to select the most appropriate tear substitute formulations according to the predominant etiological causes of DED.

BackgroundDry eye disease (DED) affects more than 14% of the elderly population causing decrease of quality of life, high costs and vision impairment. Current treatments for DED aim at lubricating and controlling inflammation of the ocular surface. Development of novel therapies targeting different pathogenic mechanisms is sought-after. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops in patients with DED.MethodsForty consecutive patients with moderate to severe DED were included in a phase IIa, prospective, open label, multiple-dose, clinical trial to receive rhNGF eye drops at 20 µg/mL (Group 1: G1) or at 4 µg/mL (Group 2: G2) concentrations, two times a day in both eyes for 28 days (NCT02101281). The primary outcomes measures were treatment-emerged adverse events (AE), Symptoms Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) scale, ocular surface staining and Schirmer test.ResultsOf 40 included patients, 39 completed the trial. Both tested rhNGF eye drop concentrations were safe and well tolerated. Twenty-nine patients experienced at least one AE (14 in G1 and 15 in G2), of which 11 had at least 1 related AE (8 in G1 and 3 in G2). Both frequency and severity of DED symptoms and ocular surface damage showed significant improvement in both groups, while tear function improved only in G1.ConclusionsThe data of this study indicate that rhNGF eye drops in both doses is safe and effective in improving symptoms and signs of DED. Randomised clinical trials are ongoing to confirm the therapeutic benefit of rhNGF in DED.Trial registration number NCT02101281.

Corneal abrasion is a frequent complication in critically ill, intubated patients, potentially leading to visual impairment. This study compares the efficacy of three ocular care methods in preventing corneal abrasion among this vulnerable population. We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 156 intubated adult patients admitted to the ICU. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three intervention groups (n = 52 per group): (1) polyethylene cover only, (2) polyethylene cover with artificial tear drops, and (3) polyethylene cover with Lubratex eye ointment. One eye per patient was randomly assigned as the control, receiving standard ICU eye care. Daily assessments over five days included a standardized dryness and corneal abrasion checklist, graded strip evaluation of eye dryness, and documentation of corneal abrasion incidence. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (SPSS-18). The incidence of corneal abrasion was significantly lower in the group receiving polyethylene cover with Lubratex eye ointment (4%) compared to the polyethylene cover with artificial tears group (36%, p < 0.001) and the polyethylene cover only group (60%, p < 0.001). The combined application of a polyethylene cover with Lubratex eye ointment effectively prevents corneal abrasion in intubated ICU patients. This method demonstrates superior efficacy compared to polyethylene covers used alone or with artificial tears. We recommend its implementation as standard practice for corneal abrasion prophylaxis in this high-risk population. Trial Registration . This study is registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201506294736N8) and can be accessed at www.IRCT.ir .

Dry eye syndrome is a common disease which can damage the corneal epithelium. It is treated with eye drops to stimulate tear production and hydrate the corneal surface. The most prescribed artificial tear remedies contain hyaluronic acid (HA), which enhances epithelial wound healing, improving tissue health. To the best of our knowledge, only a few recent studies have investigated cross-linked HA (HA-CL) in eye drops for human applications. This work consists in an in vitro evaluation of the re-epithelialization ability of two different preparations containing a recently synthetized HA cross-linked with urea: 0.02% (w/v) HA-CL (solution 1, S1), and 0.4% (w/v) HA-CL (solution 2, S2). The study was conducted on both 2D human corneal cells (HCEpiC) and 3D reconstructed tissues of human corneal epithelium (HCE). Viability by 3(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2)2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test, pro-inflammatory cytokine release (interleukin-8, IL-8) by ELISA, and morphology by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were evaluated. In addition, to understand the molecular basis of the re-epithelialization properties, cyclin D1 levels were assessed by western blot. The results showed no cellular toxicity, a slight decrease in IL-8 release, and restoration of epithelium integrity when the wounded 3D model was treated with S1 and S2. In parallel, cyclin D1 levels increased in cells treated with both S1 and S2.

The therapeutic management of Sjögren syndrome (SjS) has not changed substantially in recent decades: treatment decisions remain challenging in clinical practice, without a specific therapeutic target beyond the relief of symptoms as the most important goal. In view of this scenario, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) promoted and supported an international collaborative study (EULAR SS Task Force) aimed at developing the first EULAR evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the management of patients with SjS with topical and systemic medications. The aim was to develop a rational therapeutic approach to SjS patients useful for healthcare professionals, physicians undergoing specialist training, medical students, the pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory organisations following the 2014 EULAR standardised operating procedures. The Task Force (TF) included specialists in rheumatology, internal medicine, oral health, ophthalmology, gynaecology, dermatology and epidemiology, statisticians, general practitioners, nurses and patient representatives from 30 countries of the 5 continents. Evidence was collected from studies including primary SjS patients fulfilling the 2002/2016 criteria; when no evidence was available, evidence from studies including associated SjS or patients fulfilling previous sets of criteria was considered and extrapolated. The TF endorsed the presentation of general principles for the management of patients with SjS as three overarching, general consensus-based recommendations and 12 specific recommendations that form a logical sequence, starting with the management of the central triplet of symptoms (dryness, fatigue and pain) followed by the management of systemic disease. The recommendations address the use of topical oral (saliva substitutes) and ocular (artificial tear drops, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical corticosteroids, topical CyA, serum tear drops) therapies, oral muscarinic agonists (pilocarpine, cevimeline), hydroxychloroquine, oral glucocorticoids, synthetic immunosuppressive agents (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide and mycophenolate), and biological therapies (rituximab, abatacept and belimumab). For each recommendation, levels of evidence (mostly modest) and TF agreement (mostly very high) are provided. The 2019 EULAR recommendations are based on the evidence collected in the last 16 years in the management of primary 2002 SjS patients and on discussions between a large and broadly international TF. The recommendations synthesise current thinking on SjS treatment in a set of overarching principles and recommendations. We hope that the current recommendations will be broadly applied in clinical practice and/or serve as a template for national societies to develop local recommendations.

Dry eye disease is highly prevalent worldwide, causing discomfort and visual disturbances that can limit basic activities such as reading and driving. Although artificial tears represent first-line therapy, there is a paucity of published controlled clinical trials. The present study compared the efficacy, clinical safety, and acceptability of 2 multicomponent, lipid-based tear formulations (ADV1 and ADV2) to those of an existing lipid-based tear formulation (DET) in patients with signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. This 3-month, multicenter, double-masked study was conducted in patients with dry eye symptoms, reduced tear break-up time (TBUT), and ocular surface damage. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 2 lipid-based tear formulations containing carboxymethylcellulose, glycerin, polysorbate 80, and emulsified lipid (ADV1 or ADV2) or DET, and instilled 1 to 2 drops per eye at least twice daily. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in Subjective Evaluation of Symptom of Dryness score at day 90 to determine noninferiority of the 2 ADV formulations versus DET. Secondary end points included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, TBUT, ocular surface staining, and tolerability. Of 288 randomized patients, 256 completed the study. All 3 groups showed improvement in symptoms, and the 2 lipid-based formulations were noninferior to DET in reducing the severity of symptoms of dryness at 90 days. Of the 3 treatment groups, the ADV2 group had the greatest improvements in TBUT and OSDI. Significant improvements in mean tolerability scores for comfort, soothing, burning/stinging, and discomfort were observed in the ADV2 group versus the DET group at 90 days. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 13 patients (13.4%) receiving ADV1, 8 (8.4%) receiving ADV2, and 21 (21.9%) receiving DET. Four patients (4.1%) in the ADV1 group and 2 (2.1%) in the ADV2 group discontinued owing to an adverse event compared with 14 (14.6%) receiving DET. In these patients with dry eye symptoms, ADV2 was an effective and relatively well-tolerated artificial tear for first-line therapy and should be considered as a treatment option for dry eye, especially in those patients who would benefit from a lipid-based formulation in addition to lubrication. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01010282.

This prospective, single-arm study investigates the effects of preservative-free artificial tears on ocular symptoms, visual task performance, and tear film stability in visual display terminal (VDT) users. Thirty VDT users with digital eye strain and dryness symptoms were prescribed preservative-free artificial tears four times daily for one month. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Computer–Vision Symptom Scale (CVSS17) questionnaires were collected at four visits (screening, initial, one week and one month). Blink rate and eye fixations during six simple computer tasks and out-loud reading speed were determined before and after computer use. Noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT) and tear meniscus height (TMH) were also recorded. VDT users’ symptoms [CVSS17 (35.70 ± 3.72 to 27.27 ± 4.43; P  < 0.01); OSDI (19.99 ± 3.20 to 10.52 ± 6.04; P  < 0.01)] improved after artificial tear use at final visit. Out-loud reading speed did not significantly change, although a slight improvement in the normalized value was observed after computer use between the initial (0.99 ± 0.13) and final (1.02 ± 0.15; P  < 0.01) visits. No significant differences between visits were found in the blink rate, eye fixations, NIBUT or TMH. Preservative-free artificial tears effectively reduce subjective symptoms in VDT users, although this relief does not translate into measurable improvements in visual task performance or tear film metrics.

Background and Objectives: Dry eye disease (DED) affects 5–50% of the global population and deeply influences everyday life activities. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of novel Respilac artificial tears containing lipidure and hypromellose (HPMC) with the widely used Nextal artificial tears, which are also HPMC-based, for the treatment of moderate DED in contact lenses (CL) wearers. Materials and Methods: In a prospective, single-center, randomized investigation, 30 patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with moderate DED, and wearing CL were randomly assigned to the Respilac (n = 15) or Nextal group (n = 15). Patients self-administrated one drop of Respilac or Nextal in both eyes three times daily for 21 days. Changes in the endpoint (visual analogue scale (VAS) score for ocular tolerability, symptom assessment in dry eye (SANDE) score, non-invasive first break-up time (NIF-BUT) results, tear analysis value, meibography results, and CL tolerability results were assessed, comparing treatment groups and time-point evaluations. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded and evaluated. Results: VAS scores decreased with time (p < 0.001) in both groups, showing no statistically significant difference among them (p = 0.13). Improvements were also detected from screening to end-of-treatment, which were indicated by the SANDE scores for severity and frequency (p < 0.001) and by tear analysis results (p < 0.001) with no observed difference between the Nextal and Respilac arms. NIF-BUT, meibography, and CL tolerability values were shown to be non-significantly affected by treatment and time. There were no AEs detected in this study cohort. Conclusions: Respilac was confirmed to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated. Lipidure-based ophthalmic solution was shown not to be inferior to the currently used Nextal, however, showing improvements in DED symptoms. Within the existing literature, our study is one of the first to report that MPC plus HPMC-containing eye drops are an effective option for the treatment of moderate dry eye disease and desiccation damage prevention in contact lens wearers.

Background Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent condition affecting over 16 million patients in the USA. DED and the symptoms of ocular discomfort are debilitating and a significant burden on patients. If left untreated, DED can progress to cause severe pathology. Treatment is often initiated by patients without consulting a healthcare professional. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of a novel lipid-containing eye drop (BTC), which might better mimic the components of natural tears. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active control, two arm, parallel group study of eye drops in adult subjects with self-reported DED. Subjects were randomly assigned to BTC or control (commercially available non-lipid eye drops; NLED) arm and were followed for 30 days. Assessments using visual analog scale and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires, non-invasive tear break up time, slit-lamp examination, and subject-reported ocular symptoms were conducted at baseline and at days 7 and 30. The primary endpoint was change in overall ocular comfort score from baseline to day 30. Results 158 subjects were randomized, of whom 130 completed the study per protocol (PP). Mean (SD) age was 47.8 (14.14) years. The mean (95% CI) change in overall comfort scores at the 30-day follow-up in the PP population was 21.4 (15.1, 27.7) for the test drop and 10.0 (3.9, 16.1) for the comparator. The mean (95% CI) treatment difference was 11.3 (2.6, 20.1); this met the pre-defined requirements for non-inferiority. There was no significant difference in the proportion of eyes with reported ocular symptoms between the groups. At day 7, the OR (95% CI) was 0.967 (0.528, 1.770) and at day 30 was 1.160 (0.610, 2.203). There were no Grade 3 or higher corneal edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, conjunctival injection, tarsal abnormalities or any other biomicroscopy findings, and no corneal infiltrates observed during the study. Conclusions The investigational lipid eye drop BTC was noninferior to the commercially available non-lipid comparator in all parameters measured and has the potential to provide an effective therapy for subjects with symptoms of dry eye who would benefit from a lipid-based artificial tear. Trial Registration NCT03995355 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ), registered June 24, 2019.