Explore the vast range of titles available.

We considered the limnological literature for an overview of biomanipulation methods that were implemented to avoid or reduce cyanobacterial bloom development in ponds and lakes. For this purpose, we reviewed 48 publications representing 34 whole-lake and large-scale case studies of different biomanipulation approaches clearly mentioning the extent of a cyanobacteria bloom problem and the cyanobacteria taxa involved. This delivered complementary information to the suite of review papers already providing elaborated syntheses on biomanipulation and associated ecotechnological measures as a restoration tool for overall eutrophication reduction and control. We considered nature-based solutions such as fish removal and associated water drawdown, addition of piscivorous fish, filter-feeding planktivorous fish, Daphnia or bivalves, re-introduction of macrophytes and a combination of accompanying restoration methods. Reasons for success or failure to control cyanobacterial blooms of especially Anabaena, Pseudanabaena, Aphanizomenon, Aphanocapsa, Limnothrix, Microcystis , Oscillatoria or Spirulina spp. could be explained through bottlenecks encountered with fish removal, stocking densities, cascading effects, associated zooplankton grazing, diet shifts away from cyanobacteria, macrophyte recovery, nutrient or pH status. Threshold values to avoid failures are synthesized from experiments or monitoring studies and presented in a conceptual scheme about cyanobacteria reduction through (1) direct abatement of existing blooms and forcing/maximization of biotic key interactions (2) reducing risk of blooms and improving lake or pond multi-functionality and (3) avoiding blooms, balancing biotic communities and enhancing existing ecosystem services. More information will be required on temporal dynamics and abundances of cyanobacteria taxa in whole-lake pre- and post-biomanipulation conditions to better evaluate the applicability and effectiveness of such nature-based solutions.

Monitoring changes in fishery resources, such as the density and growth of fish, following large-scale fish stocking in a reservoir is important. In this study, BioSonics DT-X (201 kHz) was used to assess the seasonal changes in the density, size distribution, and biomass of fish in Duihekou Reservoir, Zhejiang province, China, in 2020. The fish density was significantly lower in spring (3.33 ind./1000 m3) than in summer (75.24 ind./1000 m3), autumn (56.22 ind./1000 m3), and winter (20.37 ind./1000 m3) (p < 0.01). No significant difference in fish density was apparent between summer and autumn. Additionally, the average target strength (TS) values in spring (−41.05 dB) were significantly higher than in summer (−44.66 dB) and autumn (−45.55 dB) (p < 0.01), but significantly higher in winter (−38.12 dB) than in the other seasons (p < 0.01); no significant difference was observed between the summer and autumn values (p > 0.01). The fish biomass in winter (14.3 g/m3) was 13 times that in spring (1.1 g/m3). These results indicate that large-scale fish stocking can effectively adapt to reservoir habitats to achieve growth. The catch composition revealed silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) to be dominant species, mostly comprising young individuals. Stock enhancement plays a critical role in reshaping the fishery population structure in a reservoir. These findings enhance our understanding of fishery resource changes in reservoirs after non-classical biomanipulation and demonstrate how hydroacoustic techniques can be successfully used to quantify the density and size distribution of fish for more effective fishery management.

Stocking of filter-feeding fish is a common tool used in Chinese reservoirs to increase fish production because of low natural recruitment. Whether such stocking has important negative effects on zooplankton with cascading effects on phytoplankton is debated. We compared the zooplankton communities in fourteen reservoirs with different nutrient concentrations and fish densities. Both chlorophyll a (Chla) and fish catch were positively related with total phosphorus (TP), whereas zooplankton biomass did not show a similar relationship with TP. Zooplankton seemed to be influenced by fish as high fish catches coincided with a low proportion of calanoids of the total copepod biomass, a high proportion of rotifers of the total zooplankton biomass, a low zooplankton:phytoplankton biomass ratio, and the absence of Daphnia irrespective of TP concentration. Both zooplankton biomass and most of the zooplankton:phytoplankton biomass ratios were among the lowest reported in the literature for the nutrient range studied. Furthermore, the Chla:TP ratio was higher than what is typically observed in temperate lakes. We conclude that top-down control of zooplankton is of key importance in reservoirs in South China where frequent stocking of filter-feeding fish seems to contribute to poor water quality in the form of higher algal biomass and reduced clarity.

Stocking of filter-feeding fish (mainly Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Aristichthys nobilis ) is a common method used in lakes and reservoirs in (sub)tropical China to control phytoplankton, but the results are ambiguous and lack long-term data to support. We analysed a decade (2010-2020) of monitoring data from a subtropical plateau reservoir, southwest China, to which filter-feeding fish were stocked annually. We found that the total phytoplankton biomass, cyanobacteria biomass and average individual mass of phytoplankton decreased significantly during the study period despite absence of nutrient concentration reduction. However, the grazing pressure of zooplankton on phytoplankton also decreased markedly as judged from changes in the ratio of zooplankton biomass to phytoplankton biomass and Daphnia proportion of total zooplankton biomass. This is likely a response to increasing predation on zooplankton by the stocked fish. Our results also indicated that water temperature, total phosphorus and water level promoted phytoplankton growth. Our results revealed that filter-feeding fish contributed to the decline in the biomass of phytoplankton but that it also had a strong negative effect on the grazing pressure of zooplankton on phytoplankton, even in this deep reservoir where zooplankton may have a better chance of survival through vertical migration. The particular strong effect on zooplankton is most likely due to imbalance of stocking and harvesting of fish. In the management of eutrophic reservoirs, the reduction of external nutrient loading should have highest priority. In highland (low temperature) deep-water eutrophic reservoirs, stocking of filter-feeding fish may help to control filamentous phytoplankton provided that the fish stocking is properly managed. The optimal stocking intensity of filter-feeding fish that can help control phytoplankton in such reservoirs without excessive impact on large-bodied zooplankton is a topic for further elucidation, however.

Bighead and silver carp are well established in the Mississippi River basin following their accidental introduction in the 1980s. Referred to collectively as Asian carp, these species are filter feeders consuming phytoplankton and zooplankton. We examined diet overlap and electivity of Asian carp and three native filter feeding fishes, bigmouth buffalo, gizzard shad, and paddlefish, in backwater lakes of the Illinois and Mississippi rivers. Rotifers, Keratella spp., Brachionus spp., and Trichocerca spp., were the most common prey items consumed by Asian carp and gizzard shad, whereas crustacean zooplankton were the preferred prey of paddlefish. Bigmouth buffalo diet was broad, including both rotifers and crustacean zooplankton. Dietary overlap with Asian carp was greatest for gizzard shad followed by bigmouth buffalo, but we found little diet overlap for paddlefish. Diet similarity based on taxonomy correlated strongly with diet similarity based on size suggesting filtration efficiency influenced the overlap patterns we observed. Although rotifers were the most common prey item consumed by both bighead and silver carp, we found a negative relation between silver carp CPUE and cladoceran density. The competitive effect of Asian carp on native fishes may be forestalled because of the high productivity of Illinois and Mississippi river habitats, yet the potential for negative consequences of Asian carp in less productive ecosystems, including Lake Michigan, should not be underestimated.

To assess top-down effects of planktivorous fish and Leptodora in the freshwaters of southern China, a mesocosm experiment was conducted by manipulating bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) and Leptodora richardi within in situ enclosures installed in an oligo-mesotrophic reservoir. During the winter–spring transition, a low biomass (≈1 g wet weight m⁻³) of fish significantly reduced Daphnia biomass and zooplankton clearance rates and markedly increased the biomass of total phytoplankton, small phytoplankton (GALD <30 μm), and large phytoplankton (GALD ≥30 μm). However, there was no significant effect of Leptodora and no interactive effect from fish and Leptodora on herbivorous zooplankton and phytoplankton. By contrast, exclusion of fish from the enclosures triggered the outbreak of Daphnia and thus resulted in higher zooplankton clearance rates. Algal biomass decreased to a low level in the absence of fish relative to in their presence, particularly during the last 10 days (mean biomass ratio, 1:7–1:36). Our results indicate that fish play a more important role in top-down effects than Leptodora. This study, together with previous research, suggests that fish may prey heavily on large-bodied herbivores, especially Daphnia, in southern China and reduce the chances for top-down control of phytoplankton.

Silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix ) and bighead carp ( Hypophthalmichthys nobilis ) are among the most important fish species in aquaculture and have been introduced to many countries. The feeding ecology of these filter-feeding cyprinids is not well understood and has been mostly based on gut content analyses. We analyzed δ 13 C and δ 15 N stable isotope ratios of food resources and fish muscle tissues in four Chinese lakes, where these two species co-occur. Data analysis through Bayesian mixing models revealed that both fish species had similar diets within lakes, and where dietary shifts occurred, both species displayed dietary shifts simultaneously. Diet was generally based on plankton, however, detritus was the main food in eutrophic lake subjected to urban pollution, likely due to resource availability. Niche overlap and width were also variable but in general clear size-based resource partitioning was observed, with bighead carp preying more on zooplankton and occupying a higher trophic position and silver carp feeding more on phytoplankton. Food particles smaller than 64 μm, had little importance in their diets.

Classical models of phytoplankton-zooplankton interaction show that with nutrient enrichment such systems may abruptly shift from limit cycles to stable phytoplankton domination due to zooplankton predation by planktivorous fish. Such models assume that planktivorous fish eat only zooplankton, but there are various species of filter-feeding fish that may also feed on phytoplankton. Here, we extend these classical models to systematically explore the effects of omnivory by planktivorous fish. Our analysis indicates that if fish forage on phytoplankton in addition to zooplankton, the alternative attractors predicted by the classical models disappear for all realistic parameter settings, even if omnivorous fish have a strong preference for zooplankton. Our model also shows that the level of fish biomass above which zooplankton collapse should be higher when fish are omnivorous than when fish are zooplanktivorous. We also used the model to explore the potential effects of the now increasingly common practice of stocking lakes with filter-feeding fish to control cyanobacteria. Because omnivorous filter-feeding fish forage on phytoplankton as well as on the main grazers of phytoplankton, the net effect of such fish on the phytoplankton biomass is not obvious. Our model suggests that there may be a unimodal relationship between the biomass of omnivorous filter-feeding fish and the biomass of phytoplankton. This implies that to manage for reductions in phytoplankton biomass, heavy stocking or strong reduction of such fish is best.

Performance of pre-treating algae-laden raw water by silver carp during a non-Microcystis-dominated period (period I) and a Microcystis-dominated period (period II) was investigated in terms of algae cell concentration, total phosphorus content, chlorophyll a and phytoplankton species structure. During period I the ineffective filter-feeding for small green algae resulted in the increase of small single algae, which led to the negative removal of chlorophyll a, and when the biomass was higher, the negative was more significant. However, due to the effective filter-feeding of silver carp for Microcystis flos-aquae, the average removal efficiency exceeded 50% at all stocking biomass levels (20–120 g/m3) used in experiments during period II. Total phosphorus removal efficiencies could exceed 50% at silver carp biomass stocking levels of 60–80 g/m3 during both period I and period II. The experimental results indicated that silver carp stocking contributed to the removal of colony-forming cyanobacteria, but led to the increase of single-cell algae (mainly green algae and diatoms) during both period I and period II. The initial phytoplankton community structure and the control of nutrient level were important factors in the choice of silver carp stocking biomass when used to purify algae-loaded water.

A pilot-scale facility was originally designed to control phytoplankton in algae-laden reservoir water characterized by summer cyanobacteria blooms (mainly Microcystis flos-aquae). The system made good use of the different food habits of Daphnia magna and silver carp. Zooplankton (Daphnia magna), filter-feeding fish (silver carp), and zooplankton (Daphnia magna) were stocked in three separated tanks in sequence, respectively. Thus, single-cell phytoplankton and some Microcystis flos-aquae in small size were first grazed by Daphnia magna in the first tank, and in the second tank phytoplankton larger than 10 μm were filtered by silver carp, and the concentration of the remaining phytoplankton was further reduced to a rather low level by Daphnia magna in the third tank. The results showed that the system had good removal efficiencies of phytoplankton and chlorophyll a, 86.85% and 59.41%, respectively, and permanganate consumption (CODMn) and turbidity were lowered as well. A high phytoplankton removal efficiency and low cost indicated that the system had a good advantage in pre-treating algae-laden source water in drinking water works.