Explore the vast range of titles available.

There have been suggestions that Long COVID might be purely functional (meaning psychological) in origin. Labelling patients with neurological dysfunction in Long COVID as having functional neurological disorder (FND) in the absence of proper testing may be symptomatic of that line of thought. This practice is problematic for Long COVID patients, as motor and balance symptoms have been reported to occur in Long COVID frequently. FND is characterized by the presentation of symptoms that seem neurological but lack compatibility of the symptom with a neurological substrate. Although diagnostic classification according to the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR is dependent predominantly on the exclusion of any other medical condition that could account for the symptoms, current neurological practice of FND classification allows for such comorbidity. As a consequence, Long COVID patients with motor and balance symptoms mislabeled as FND have no longer access to Long COVID care, whereas treatment for FND is seldom provided and is ineffective. Research into underlying mechanisms and diagnostic methods should explore how to determine whether motor and balance symptoms currently diagnosed as FND should be considered one part of Long COVID symptoms, in other words, one component of symptomatology, and in which cases they correctly represent FND. Research into rehabilitation models, treatment and integrated care are needed, which should take into account biological underpinnings as well as possible psychological mechanisms and the patient perspective.

Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are neurological symptoms that cannot be explained by an underlying neurological lesion or other medical illness and that do not have clear neuropathological correlates. Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are a common and highly disabling form of FND, characterized by paroxysmal episodes of involuntary movements and altered consciousness that can appear clinically similar to epileptic seizures. PNES are unique among FNDs in that they are diagnosed by video electroencephalographic (VEEG), a well-established biomarker for the disorder. The course of illness and response to treatment of PNES remain controversial. This study aims to describe the epidemiology of PNES in the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA), evaluate outcomes of veterans offered different treatments, and compare models of care for PNES. This electronic health record (EHR) cohort study utilizes an informatics search tool and a natural language processing algorithm to identify cases of PNES nationally. We will use VA inpatient, outpatient, pharmacy, and chart abstraction data across all 170 medical centers to identify cases in fiscal years 2002-2018. Outcome measurements such as seizure frequency, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, suicide-related behavior, and the utilization of psychotherapy prior to and after PNES diagnosis will be used to assess the effectiveness of models of care. This study will describe the risk factors and course of treatment of a large cohort of people with PNES. Since PNES are cared for by a variety of different modalities, treatment orientations, and models of care, effectiveness outcomes such as seizure outcomes and utilization of emergency visits for seizures will be assessed. Outcome measurements such as seizure frequency, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, suicide-related behavior, and psychotherapy prior to and after PNES diagnosis will be used to assess the effectiveness of models of care.

Effective communication is essential for delivering quality healthcare, particularly for individuals with Functional Neurological Disorders (FND), who are often subject to misdiagnosis and stigmatising language that implies symptom fabrication. Variability in communication styles among healthcare professionals may contribute to these challenges, affecting patient understanding and care outcomes. This study employed natural language processing (NLP) to analyse clinician-to-clinician and clinician-to-patient communication regarding FND. A total of 869 electronic health records (EHRs) were examined to assess differences in language use and emotional tone across various professionals-specifically, neurologists and psychologists-and different document types, such as discharge summaries and letters to general practitioners (GPs). Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modelling and two complementary sentiment models (VADER and Flair) were applied to the corpus. Sentiment analysis was also applied to evaluate the emotional tone of communications. Findings revealed distinct communication patterns between neurologists and psychologists. Psychologists frequently used terms related to subjective experiences, such as \"trauma\" and \"awareness,\" aiming to help patients understand their diagnosis. In contrast, neurologists focused on medicalised narratives, emphasising symptoms like \"seizures\" and clinical interventions, including assessment (\"telemetry\") and treatment (\"medication\"). Sentiment analysis indicated that psychologists tended to use more positive and proactive language, whereas neurologists generally adopted a neutral or cautious tone. These findings highlight differences in communication styles and emotional tones among professionals involved in FND care. The study underscores the importance of fostering integrated, multidisciplinary care pathways and developing standardised guidelines for clinical terminology in FND to improve communication and patient outcomes. Future research should explore how these communication patterns influence patient experiences and treatment adherence.

Previous studies suggest that subjective distress in children with functional neurological disorder (FND) is associated with stress-system dysregulation and modulates aberrant changes in neural networks. The current study documents illness-promoting psychological processes in 76 children with FND (60 girls and 16 boys, aged 10.00−17.08 years) admitted to the Mind–Body Program. The children completed a comprehensive family assessment and self-report measures, and they worked with the clinical team to identify psychological processes during their inpatient admission. A total of 47 healthy controls (35 girls and 12 boys, aged 8.58–17.92 years) also completed self-report measures, but were not assessed for illness-promoting psychological processes. Children with FND (vs. controls) reported higher levels of subjective distress (total DASS score, t(104.24) = 12.18; p ˂ 0.001) and more adverse childhood experiences across their lifespans (total ELSQ score, t(88.57) = 9.38; p ˂ 0.001). Illness-promoting psychological processes were identified in all children with FND. Most common were the following: chronic worries about schoolwork, friendships, or parental wellbeing (n = 64; 84.2%); attention to symptoms (n = 61; 80.3%); feeling sad (n = 58; 76.3%); experiencing a low sense of control (helplessness) in relation to symptoms (n = 44; 57.9%); pushing difficult thoughts out of mind (n = 44; 57.9%); self-critical rumination (n = 42; 55.3%); negative/catastrophic-symptom expectations (n = 40; 52.6%); avoidance of activities (n = 38; 50%); intrusive thoughts/feelings/memories associated with adverse events (n = 38, 50%); and pushing difficult feelings out of mind (n = 37; 48.7%). In children with FND—disabled enough to be admitted for inpatient treatment—illness-promoting psychological processes are part of the clinical presentation. They contribute to the child’s ongoing sense of subjective distress, and if not addressed can maintain the illness process. A range of clinical interventions used to address illness-promoting psychological processes are discussed, along with illustrative vignettes.

Background: The emergence of acute-onset functional neurological symptoms, the focus of this study, is one of three stress responses related to immunisation. This case–control study documents the experience of 61 young people with past or current functional neurological disorder (FND) in relation to the COVID-19 vaccination program in Australia. Methods: Information about the young person’s/parent’s choice and response pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination was collected as part of routine clinical care or FND research program follow-up. Results: 61 young people treated for FND (47 females, mean age = 16.22 years) and 46 healthy controls (34 females, mean age = 16.37 years) were included in the study. Vaccination rates were high: 58/61 (95.1%) in the FND group and 45/46 (97.8%) in the control group. In the FND group, 2 young people (2/61, 3.3%) presented with new-onset FND following COVID-19 vaccination; two young people with resolved FND reported an FND relapse (2/36, 5.56%); and two young people with unresolved FND (2/20, 10.0%) reported an FND exacerbation. In the control group no FND symptoms were reported. Conclusions: Acute-onset FND symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination are uncommon in the general population. In young people prone to FND, COVID-19 vaccination can sometimes trigger new-onset FND, FND relapse, or FND exacerbation.

Background and purpose Prior studies highlighted the high diagnostic specificity (ranging from 92% to 100%) of clinical signs observed in functional neurological disorders (FNDs). However, these signs are rarely looked for by epileptologists when trying to distinguish between functional dissociative seizure (FDS) and epileptic seizure. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of inter‐ictal clinical signs of FND in a cohort of patients with probable FDS. The secondary objective was to compare the prevalence of inter‐ictal FND clinical signs in FDS patients with age‐ and gender‐matched epileptic patients without FDS. Methods Patients diagnosed with FDS seen at two tertiary care centres and epileptic outpatients were included in the study. Each patient underwent a physical examination, searching for inter‐ictal clinical signs of FND. Results In the FDS group, 79% of patients presented at least one sign of FND, compared to 16.6% of patients with epilepsy (p < 0.001). Moreover, 66.6% of FDS patients presented three or more FND signs, whereas only 4.1% of epileptic patients did (p < 0.001). The median number of FND clinical signs in the FDS group was four (SD 1.7; 5.5). Using the threshold of three signs or more, the specificity of detecting three or more FND signs was 83.3%, with a sensitivity of 79.2%. Conclusion Inter‐ictal clinical signs of FND are present in patients with FDS and should be looked for during neurological examination.

Purpose of ReviewFunctional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and severely debilitating condition lacking clinical ownership, existing between neurology and psychiatry. This article reports the findings of recent research investigating the economic costs of FND diagnosis and management. We define what the costs are, why they exist, and suggest actionable steps to reduce them.Recent FindingsThe financial burden of FND exists across the globe characterized by high healthcare utilization resulting in exorbitant direct and indirect costs for the patient, healthcare system, and society. Inadequate medical education and stigmatization of the disorder prolong the time to diagnosis, during which cyclical utilization of inpatient and emergency department services drive up costs. Despite being cost-effective, lack of accessible treatment compounds the issue, leaving patients without a reliable exit.SummaryRecent findings support an increased awareness and the need for a cultural shift to overcome the financial burden associated with this underserved population.

Background: Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) encompasses a spectrum of symptoms—including motor, cognitive, and seizure-like manifestations—that are not fully explained by structural neurological disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that comorbid psychiatric and somatic conditions significantly influence the clinical course, diagnostic complexity, and treatment response in FND. Objective: This study systematically explores psychiatric and medical comorbidities across major FND subtypes—Functional Cognitive Disorder (FCD), Functional Movement Disorder (FMD), and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES)—with an emphasis on subtype-specific patterns and shared vulnerabilities. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the published literature, guided by systematic principles for transparency, covering both foundational and contemporary sources to examine comorbid conditions in patients with FCD, FMD, PNES, PPPD and general (mixed) FND populations. Relevant studies were identified through structured research and included based on methodological rigor and detailed reporting of comorbidities (PRISMA). Extracted data were organized by subtype and comorbidity type (psychiatric or medical/somatic). Results: Across all FND subtypes, high rates of psychiatric comorbidities were observed, particularly depression, anxiety, PTSD, and dissociative symptoms. FCD was predominantly associated with internalizing symptoms, affective misattribution, and heightened cognitive self-monitoring. FMD demonstrated strong links with trauma, emotional dysregulation, and personality vulnerabilities. PNES was characterized by the highest burden of psychiatric illness, with complex trauma histories and dissociation frequently reported. Somatic comorbidities—such as fibromyalgia, chronic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, and fatigue—were also prevalent across all subtypes, reflecting overlapping mechanisms involving interoception, central sensitization, and functional symptom migration. Conclusions: Comorbid psychiatric and medical conditions are integral to understanding the presentation and management of FND. Subtype-specific patterns underscore the need for individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, while the shared biopsychosocial mechanisms suggest benefits of integrated care models across the FND spectrum.

Background The high prevalence of functional neurological disorders (FND) in specialized neurological services such as epilepsy centers or dizziness clinics is well established. Few studies exist that investigate the frequency of FND among neurology in‐patients. Methods In‐hospital patients with functional neurological symptoms as part of the presenting complaint were identified by combining prospective and retrospective case ascertainment over a period of 2 years. Demographic and clinical features as well as reimbursements were analyzed. Results Across a total of 4648 in‐hospital patients, 267 (5.7%) had functional neurological symptoms as a presenting complaint, and 217 (4.7%) were given a standalone FND diagnosis. All age groups and subtypes of FND were represented. FND comprised 2.4% of all cases admitted to the stroke unit for suspected stroke; 11.8% of all cases undergoing specialized epileptological workup; and 7.6% of cases admitted through the emergency department with a seizure disorder. Diagnostic coding of FND was inconsistent and associated with significantly lower per‐day revenue when performed accurately. Conclusions FND is the third most common diagnosis among in‐hospital neurological patients, which stands in stark contrast to its underrepresentation in clinical training, service provision, and research funding. Stroke‐like presentations and seizures are common forms of FND among emergency admissions. Reimbursement mechanisms of the diagnosis‐related groups system might disincentivize accurate diagnostic coding and contribute to a cycle of neglect within health care. Functional neurological disorder (FND) was the third most‐common diagnosis across a total of 4648 consecutive in‐hospital neurology patients. In patients with functional neurological symptoms as the leading complaint, diagnostic coding of FND was inconsistent, with 28% receiving a non‐functional primary diagnosis. Diagnostic coding as FND was associated with significantly lower per‐day revenue when performed accurately; potentially contributing to a cycle of under‐recognition and misdiagnosis.

The diagnosis of functional dystonia is challenging because it is difficult to distinguish functional dystonia from other types of dystonia. After diagnostic explanation, multidisciplinary care is recommended, but some patients are resistant to treatments. We used motor blocks in three patients with severe resistant functional dystonia of the upper limbs to test (i) whether joint contracture was present and (ii) whether motor blocks have a therapeutic effect on functional dystonia. Patient 1 showed a good and sustained therapeutic response, Patient 2 experienced a resolution of the dystonic posture that lasted for 10 days, and Patient 3 experienced no effect. Motor blocks may be a useful therapeutic option in chronic treatment‐resistant functional dystonia. The treatment effect might be achieved through the experience of normal positioning and functioning of the limb.