Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "gear-based fisheries management index"
Sort by:
Development of a Gear-Based Fisheries Management Index Incorporating Operational Metrics and Ecosystem Impact Indicators in Korean Fisheries
Traditional single-species fisheries management has proven inadequate for capturing ecosystem interactions, leading to a shift toward ecosystem-based approaches. In Korea, diverse small- and medium-scale with varying gear types, production volumes, and practices require management tools that address both ecological and industrial needs. This study developed a Gear-based Fisheries Management Index (GFMI) for 24 coastal and offshore fisheries in Korea. The framework, based on the “ideal gear attributes” defined by ICES, is structured around three objectives: gear controllability, environmental sustainability, and operational functionality. Sub-indicators and weights were derived through expert consultation using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and standardized with Z-scores from national statistics, including production volume, license numbers, and accident rates. Results show that in coastal fisheries, coastal gillnets (61.7) and coastal improved stow nets (60.7) recorded the highest scores, largely due to negative impacts such as bycatch, reproductive capacity, and gear loss. Coastal purse seines (40.9) received the lowest score, reflecting species selectivity advantages. In offshore fisheries, large bottom pair trawls (71.8) and Southwestern medium-size bottom pair trawl (69.3) ranked highest, indicating strong habitat impacts. While coastal improved stow nets, large purse seines, and large trawls performed well in operational functionality, high costs and efficiency constraints remain key vulnerabilities.