Explore the vast range of titles available.

Ovarian cancer (OV) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in women worldwide. Late diagnosis and heterogeneous treatment result to poor survival outcomes for patients with OV. Therefore, we aimed to develop novel biomarkers for prognosis prediction from the potential molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis. Eight eligible data sets related to OV in GEO database were integrated to identify differential expression genes (DEGs) between tumour tissues and normal. Enrichment analyses discovered DEGs were most significantly enriched in G2/M checkpoint signalling pathway. Subsequently, we constructed a multi‐gene signature based on the LASSO Cox regression model in the TCGA database and time‐dependent ROC curves showed good predictive accuracy for 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year overall survival. Utility in various types of OV was validated through subgroup survival analysis. Risk scores formulated by the multi‐gene signature stratified patients into high‐risk and low‐risk, and the former inclined worse overall survival than the latter. By incorporating this signature with age and pathological tumour stage, a visual predictive nomogram was established, which was useful for clinicians to predict survival outcome of patients. Furthermore, SNRPD1 and EFNA5 were selected from the multi‐gene signature as simplified prognostic indicators. Higher EFNA5 expression or lower SNRPD1 indicated poorer outcome. The correlation between signature gene expression and clinical characteristics was observed through WGCNA. Drug‐gene interaction was used to identify 16 potentially targeted drugs for OV treatment. In conclusion, we established novel gene signatures as independent prognostic factors to stratify the risk of OV patients and facilitate the implementation of personalized therapies.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most common malignant and incurable brain tumors. The identification of a gene signature for GBM may be helpful for its diagnosis, treatment, prediction of prognosis and even the development of treatments. In this study, we used the GSE108474 database to perform GSEA and machine learning analysis, and identified a 33-gene signature of GBM by examining astrocytoma or non-GBM glioma differential gene expression. The 33 identified signature genes included the overexpressed genes COL6A2, ABCC3, COL8A1, FAM20A, ADM, CTHRC1, PDPN, IBSP, MIR210HG, GPX8, MYL9 and PDLIM4, as well as the underexpressed genes CHST9, CSDC2, ENHO, FERMT1, IGFN1, LINC00836, MGAT4C, SHANK2 and VIPR2. Protein functional analysis by CELLO2GO implied that these signature genes might be involved in regulating various aspects of biological function, including anatomical structure development, cell proliferation and adhesion, signaling transduction and many of the genes were annotated in response to stress. Of these 33 signature genes, 23 have previously been reported to be functionally correlated with GBM; the roles of the remaining 10 genes in glioma development remain unknown. Our results were the first to reveal that GBM exhibited the overexpressed GPX8 gene and underexpressed signature genes including CHST9, CSDC2, ENHO, FERMT1, IGFN1, LINC00836, MGAT4C and SHANK2, which might play crucial roles in the tumorigenesis of different gliomas.

Background The gene signatures have been considered as a promising early diagnosis and prognostic analysis to identify disease subtypes and to determine subsequent treatments. Tissue-specific gene signatures of a specific disease are an emergency requirement for precision medicine to improve the accuracy and reduce the side effects. Currently, many approaches have been proposed for identifying gene signatures for diagnosis and prognostic. However, they often lack of tissue-specific gene signatures. Results Here, we propose a new method, consensus mutual information (CoMI) for analyzing omics data and discovering gene signatures. CoMI can identify differentially expressed genes in multiple cancer omics data for reflecting both cancer-related and tissue-specific signatures, such as Cell growth and death in multiple cancers, Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism in LIHC, and Nervous system in GBM. Our method identified 50-gene signatures effectively distinguishing the GBM patients into high- and low-risk groups (log-rank p  = 0.006) for diagnosis and prognosis. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that CoMI can identify significant and consistent gene signatures with tissue-specific properties and can predict clinical outcomes for interested diseases. We believe that CoMI is useful for analyzing omics data and discovering gene signatures of diseases.

Background: Patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) exhibit significant heterogeneity in overall survival. The current tumour-node-metastasis staging system is insufficient to provide precise prediction for prognosis. Methods: We quantified the levels of various hallmarks of cancer and identified hypoxia as the primary risk factor for overall survival in early-stage LUAD. Different bioinformatic and statistical methods were combined to construct a robust hypoxia-related gene signature for prognosis. Furthermore, a decision tree and a nomogram were constructed based on the gene signature and clinicopathological features to improve risk stratification and quantify risk assessment for individual patients. Results: The hypoxia-related gene signature discriminated high-risk patients at an early stage in our investigated cohorts. Survival analyses demonstrated that our gene signature served as an independent risk factor for overall survival. The decision tree identified risk subgroups powerfully, and the nomogram exhibited high accuracy. Conclusions: Our study might contribute to the optimization of risk stratification for survival and personalized management of early-stage LUAD.

Abnormal lipid metabolism is closely related to the malignant biological behavior of tumor cells. Such abnormal lipid metabolism provides energy for rapid proliferation, and certain genes related to lipid metabolism encode important components of tumor signaling pathways. In this study, we analyzed pancreatic cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and searched for prognostic genes related to lipid metabolism in the Molecular Signature Database. A risk score model was built and verified using the GSE57495 dataset and International Cancer Genome Consortium dataset. Four molecular subtypes and 4249 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. The DEGs obtained by Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Construction analysis were intersected with 4249 DEGs to obtain a total of 1340 DEGs. The final prognosis model included CA8, CEP55, GNB3 and SGSM2, and these had a significant effect on overall survival. The area under the curve at 1, 3 and 5 years was 0.72, 0.79 and 0.87, respectively. These same results were obtained using the validation cohort. Survival analysis data showed that the model could stratify the prognosis of patients with different clinical characteristics, and the model has clinical independence. Functional analysis indicated that the model is associated with multiple cancer‐related pathways. Compared with published models, our model has a higher C‐index and greater risk value. In summary, this four‐gene signature is an independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer survival and may be an effective prognostic indicator. Abnormal lipid metabolism is closely related to the malignant biological behavior of tumor cells. In this study, we analyzed pancreatic cancer datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and searched for prognostic genes related to lipid metabolism in the Molecular Signature Database. Compared with published models, our model has a higher C‐index and greater risk value. This four‐gene signature is an independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer survival and may be an effective prognostic indicator.

Most metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients succumb to refractory disease due to secondary chemotherapy resistance. To elucidate the molecular changes associated with secondary resistance, we recruited 64 patients with mCRC and hepatic metastases before standard first-line chemotherapy between 2014 and 2018. We subjected DNA from primary tumor specimens (P), hepatic metastasis specimens after treatment (M), and liquid biopsies (L) taken prior to (pre), during (intra), and after (post) treatment to next generation sequencing. We performed Nanostring expression analysis in P and M specimens. Comparative bioinformatics and statistical analysis revealed typical mutational patterns with frequent alterations in TP53, APC, and KRAS in P specimens (n = 48). P and pre-L (n = 42), as well as matched P and M (n = 30), displayed a similar mutation spectrum. In contrast, gene expression profiles classified P (n = 31) and M (n = 23), distinguishable by up-regulation of immune/cytokine receptor and autophagy programs. Switching of consensus molecular subtypes from P to M occurred in 58.3% of cases. M signature genes SFRP2 and SPP1 associated with inferior survival, as validated in an independent cohort. Molecular changes during first-line treatment were detectable by expression profiling rather than by mutational tumor and liquid biopsy analyses. SFRP2 and SPP1 may serve as biomarkers and/or actionable targets.

Currently, decision-making regarding biochemical recurrence (BCR) following prostatectomy relies solely on clinical parameters. We therefore attempted to develop an integrated prediction model based on a molecular signature and clinicopathological features, in order to forecast the risk for BCR and guide clinical decision-making for postoperative therapy. Using high-throughput screening and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) in the training set, a novel gene signature for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) was established. Validation of the prognostic value was performed in five other independent datasets, including our patient cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the importance of risk for BCR. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tROC) was used to evaluate the predictive power. In combination with relevant clinicopathological features, a decision tree was built to improve the risk stratification. The gene signature exhibited a strong capacity for identifying high-risk BCR patients, and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the gene signature consistently acted as a risk factor for BCR. The decision tree was successfully able to identify the high-risk subgroup. Overall, the gene signature established in the present study is a powerful predictor and risk factor for BCR after radical prostatectomy.

Objectives To facilitate disease prognosis and improve precise immunotherapy of gastric cancer (GC) patients, a comprehensive study integrating immune cellular and molecular analyses on tumor tissues and peripheral blood was performed. Methods The association of GC patients’ outcomes and the immune context of their tumors was explored using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) and transcriptome profiling. Potential immune dysfunction mechanism/s in the tumors on the systemic level was further examined using mass cytometry (CyTOF) in complementary peripheral blood from selected patients. GC cohorts with mIHC and gene expression profiling data were also used as validation cohorts. Results Increased CD4+FOXP3+ T‐cell density in the GC tumor correlated with prolonged survival. Interestingly, CD4+FOXP3+ T cells had a close interaction with CD8+ T cells rather than tumor cells. High densities of CD4+FOXP3+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (High‐High) independently predicted prolonged patient survival. Furthermore, the interferon‐gamma (IFN‐γ) gene signature and PDL1 expression were up‐regulated in this group. Importantly, a subgroup of genomically stable (GS) tumors and tumors with chromosomal instability (CIN) within this High‐High group also had excellent survival. The High‐High GS/CIN tumors were coupled with increased frequencies of Tbet+CD4+ T cells and central memory CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood. Conclusion These novel findings identify the combination of CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+CD4+ T cells as a significant prognostic marker for GC patients, which also could potentially be targeted and applied in the combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockades in precision medicine. In this work, we show an increased CD4+FOXP3+ T cell density in the tumour core correlated with prolonged survival and CD4+FOXP3+ T cells clustered with CD8+ T cells rather than tumour cells. High density of CD4+FOXP3+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (High‐High) independently predicted prolonged patient survival. These High‐High tumours were coupled with an increased IFN‐γ response, antigen presentation, DCs differentiation and PDL1 upregulation in the local tumours, as well as enrichment of Tbet+ CD4+ T cells and central memory CD4+ T cells circulating in the peripheral blood.

Background As one of the core aging processes, cellular senescence is associated with tumorigenesis, growth, and immune modulation in cancers. Nevertheless, the prognosis of senescence‐associated genes (SAGs) signature in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains to be further evaluated. Methods The transcriptome and corresponding clinical datasets of SAGs in patients with HNSCC were downloaded from public databases. A new prognostic SAGs signature was established with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator discussion. Patients with HNSCC were fallen into two risk groups based on each sample's risk mark and the cutoff point. The survival analysis was extended to determine the predictive accuracy of the SAGs signature. Furthermore, the evaluation of SAGs signature was made according to clinicopathological characteristics, survival state, the infiltration of inflammatory cells, and efficacy of immunotherapy. Results 41 SAGs were recognized and adopted to establish the forecast signature. The survival analysis indicated that patients with HNSCC in the high‐senescent score group had significantly reduced overall survival compared with those in the low‐senescent score group. It was certified that the risk score of SAGs signature was a separate predicting agent for HNSCC applying Cox regression analysis. According to functional analysis, some immune‐associated pathways were increased in the low‐senescent score group significantly. High‐senescent score group was correlated with poor clinicopathological characteristics, given less the infiltration of inflammatory cells state and worse immunotherapeutic effect. Conclusion A new SAG signature predicting result and response to immunotherapy of HNSCC was identified. Cellular senescence may be a hidden target for HNSCC. In this study, HNSCC clinical data and senescence‐associated genes data were extracted from the public database. Prognostic differential genes were screened and senescence‐associated genes signature was constructed. The survival analysis indicated that patients with HNSCC in the high senescent score group had significantly reduced overall survival compared with those in the low senescent score group. Some immune‐associated pathways were increased in the low senescent score group significantly. High senescent score group was correlated with poor clinicopathological characteristics, given less the infiltration of inflammatory cells state and worse immunotherapeutic effect. Gemcitabine was more sensitive in patients with high senescent risk.