Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Context Growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 help regulate hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism, and reductions in these hormones may contribute to development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Objective To assess relationships between hepatic expression of IGF1 and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and measures of glycemia and liver disease in adults with NAFLD. Secondarily to assess effects of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) on circulating IGFBPs. Design Analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial of GHRH. Setting Two US academic medical centers. Participants Participants were 61 men and women 18 to 70 years of age with HIV-infection, ≥5% hepatic fat fraction, including 39 with RNA-Seq data from liver biopsy. Main Outcome Measures Hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis by histopathology and measures of glucose homeostasis. Results Hepatic IGF1 mRNA was significantly lower in individuals with higher steatosis and NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) and was inversely related to glucose parameters, independent of circulating IGF-1. Among the IGFBPs, IGFBP2 and IGFBP4 were lower and IGFBP6 and IGFBP7 (also known as IGFBP-related protein 1) were higher with increasing steatosis. Hepatic IGFBP6 and IGFBP7 mRNA levels were positively associated with NAS. IGFBP7 mRNA increased with increasing fibrosis. Hepatic IGFBP1 mRNA was inversely associated with glycemia and insulin resistance, with opposite relationships present for IGFBP3 and IGFBP7. GHRH increased circulating IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3, but decreased IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-6. Conclusions These data demonstrate novel relationships of IGF-1 and IGFBPs with NAFLD severity and glucose control, with divergent roles seen for different IGFBPs. Moreover, the data provide new information on the complex effects of GHRH on IGFBPs.

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) regulate blood and lymph vessel formation through activation of three receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGFR-1, -2, and -3. The extracellular domain of VEGF receptors consists of seven immunoglobulin homology domains, which, upon ligand binding, promote receptor dimerization. Dimerization initiates transmembrane signaling, which activates the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the receptor. VEGF-C stimulates lymphangiogenesis and contributes to pathological angiogenesis via VEGFR-3. However, proteolytically processed VEGF-C also stimulates VEGFR-2, the predominant transducer of signals required for physiological and pathological angiogenesis. Here we present the crystal structure of VEGF-C bound to the VEGFR-2 high-affinity-binding site, which consists of immunoglobulin homology domains D2 and D3. This structure reveals a symmetrical 2:2 complex, in which left-handed twisted receptor domains wrap around the 2-fold axis of VEGF-C. In the VEGFs, receptor specificity is determined by an N-terminal alpha helix and three peptide loops. Our structure shows that two of these loops in VEGF-C bind to VEGFR-2 subdomains D2 and D3, while one interacts primarily with D3. Additionally, the N-terminal helix of VEGF-C interacts with D2, and the groove separating the two VEGF-C monomers binds to the D2/D3 linker. VEGF-C, unlike VEGF-A, does not bind VEGFR-1. We therefore created VEGFR-1/VEGFR-2 chimeric proteins to further study receptor specificity. This biochemical analysis, together with our structural data, defined VEGFR-2 residues critical for the binding of VEGF-A and VEGF-C. Our results provide significant insights into the structural features that determine the high affinity and specificity of VEGF/VEGFR interactions.

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease with poor prognosis. The kinase inhibitor nintedanib specific for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) significantly reduced the rate of decline of forced vital capacity versus placebo. Aim To determine the in vitro effect of nintedanib on primary human lung fibroblasts. Methods: Fibroblasts were isolated from lungs of IPF patients and from non-fibrotic controls. We assessed the effect of VEGF, PDGF-BB and basic FGF (bFGF) ± nintedanib on: (i) expression/activation of VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR, (ii) cell proliferation, secretion of (iii) matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), (iv) tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP), and (v) collagen. Results IPF fibroblasts expressed higher levels of PDGFR and FGFR than controls. PDGF-BB, bFGF, and VEGF caused a pro-proliferative effect which was prevented by nintedanib. Nintedanib enhanced the expression of pro-MMP-2, and inhibited the expression of TIMP-2. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced secretion of collagens was inhibited by nintedanib. Conclusion Our data demonstrate a significant anti-fibrotic effect of nintedanib in IPF fibroblasts. This effect consists of the drug’s anti-proliferative capacity, and on its effect on the extracellular matrix, the degradation of which seems to be enhanced.

Key Points Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling controls a myriad of processes in embryonic development and in tissue homeostasis and metabolism in the adult. Recent structural studies have provided a glimpse of the complexity of molecular control that is in place to fine-tune this signalling system to enable it to produce specific signalling outputs in diverse biological contexts. The interaction of FGFs with heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycan chains of heparan sulphate proteoglycans in the pericellular and extracellular matrix defines their mode of action, that is, whether an FGF acts in a paracrine or endocrine fashion. It also determines the shape of gradient formed by a paracrine FGF ligand in the extracellular matrix, which in turn is a determinant of the biological response to that ligand. In addition to mechanisms common to all FGFs, such as the interaction with heparan sulphate, the biological activity of individual ligands or ligand subfamilies is regulated by mechanisms unique to these ligands: amino-terminal alternative splicing controls the activity of FGF8 subfamily ligands; homodimerization autoinhibits the activity of FGF9 subfamily ligands; and site-specific proteolytic cleavage inactivates the phosphaturic hormone FGF23. Alternative splicing in the extracellular immunoglobulin-like domain 3 (D3) of FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1), FGFR2 and FGFR3 primarily determines the ligand-binding specificity of these receptors. This splicing event is fundamental to the establishment of directional paracrine FGF signalling between the epithelium and the mesenchyme, which underlies the coordinated cellular processes that govern organ development. Klotho co-receptors convert FGFRs into specific receptors for endocrine FGFs by a dual mechanism; these co-receptors not only enhance the binding affinity of FGFRs for endocrine FGFs but concomitantly suppress the binding of paracrine FGFs to FGFRs. The finding that heparan sulphate is dispensable for signalling by endocrine FGFs implies that Klotho co-receptors also promote FGFR dimerization upon endocrine FGF binding, which is required for FGFR activation. The structural findings suggest that there may be no functional redundancy among FGF ligands, and genetic data support this conclusion. Hence, future studies should concentrate on identifying novel ligand-specific functions of FGF signalling. Structural data has provided insight into the molecular mechanisms that modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling to generate distinct biological outputs in development, tissue homeostasis and metabolism. Mechanisms include alternative splicing of ligand and receptor, homodimerization and site-specific proteolytic cleavage of ligand, and interaction of ligand and receptor with heparan sulphate and Klotho co-receptors. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) mediate a broad range of functions in both the developing and adult organism. The accumulated wealth of structural information on the FGF signalling pathway has begun to unveil the underlying molecular mechanisms that modulate this system to generate a myriad of distinct biological outputs in development, tissue homeostasis and metabolism. At the ligand and receptor level, these mechanisms include alternative splicing of the ligand (FGF8 subfamily) and the receptor (FGFR1–FGFR3), ligand homodimerization (FGF9 subfamily), site-specific proteolytic cleavage of the ligand (FGF23), and interaction of the ligand and the receptor with heparan sulphate cofactor and Klotho co-receptor.

Extending the release cycle of growth factors to match the cycle of bone remodeling is difficult. When using concentrated growth factors (CGFs), the release of growth factors is excessively rapid. In the present study, CGF samples were prepared by centrifugation. CGF samples were then lyophilized and grinded into a powder, which was termed freeze-dried CGF. The freeze-dried CGF samples were mixed with chitosan-alginate composite hydrogels, and the mixture was lyophilized. The result was a chitosan-alginate composite CGF membrane, which was called sustained-release CGF. This study investigated whether freeze-dried CGF in a chitosan-alginate composite gel can release CGF steadily to achieve effective osteogenesis. The proliferation and osteogenic expression of MC3T3-E1 cells induced by the supernatants from incubation with freeze-dried CGF and sustained-release CGF were evaluated. The concentrations of the growth factors, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in these two experimental groups at different times were determined by ELISA kits. The freeze-dried CGF showed better osteogenic performance than the sustained-release CGF in the early stages. At later stages, the sustained-release CGF had significant advantages over freeze-dried CGF in terms of promoting osteogenic mineralization. By characterizing the biologic properties of the CGF in the two different forms in vitro, we obtained a better understanding of their clinical effects.

Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are classical features of granuloma formation in pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). In addition, the angiogenic factor--VEGF-A is a known biomarker for PTB. To examine the association of circulating angiogenic factors with PTB, we examined the systemic levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2 and VEGF-R3in individuals with PTB, latent TB (LTB) or no TB infection (NTB). Circulating levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C andVEGF-R2 were significantly higher in PTB compared to LTB or NTB individuals. Moreover, the levels of VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGF-R2 were significantly higher in PTB with bilateral and/or cavitary disease. The levels of these factors also exhibited a significant positive relationship with bacterial burdens in PTB. ROC analysis revealed VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 as markers distinguishing PTB from LTB or NTB. Finally, the circulating levels of all the angiogenic factors examined were significantly reduced following successful chemotherapy. Therefore, our data demonstrate that PTB is associated with elevated levels of circulating angiogenic factors, possibly reflecting vascular and endothelial dysfunction. In addition, some of these circulating angiogenic factors could prove useful as biomarkers to monitor disease severity, bacterial burden and therapeutic responses.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signalling is a crucial regulator of endothelial metabolism and vascular development. The role of fibroblasts in vascular development The development of blood vessel networks involves the growth and spread of endothelial cells. Recent studies suggest that these processes are affected by changes in cellular metabolism, but the role of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) is poorly understood. Michael Simons and colleagues identify FGF receptor signalling as a crucial regulator of vascular development andendothelial cell proliferation in adult tissues. They explore the molecular basis of this effect and find that FGFs control endothelial cell glycolysis through MYC-dependent regulation of hexokinase 2 expression. The authors suggest that understanding this pathway may guide investigations into targeted therapies for diseases associated with irregular vascular growth. Blood and lymphatic vasculatures are intimately involved in tissue oxygenation and fluid homeostasis maintenance. Assembly of these vascular networks involves sprouting, migration and proliferation of endothelial cells. Recent studies have suggested that changes in cellular metabolism are important to these processes 1 . Although much is known about vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent regulation of vascular development and metabolism 2 , 3 , little is understood about the role of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) in this context 4 . Here we identify FGF receptor (FGFR) signalling as a critical regulator of vascular development. This is achieved by FGF-dependent control of c-MYC (MYC) expression that, in turn, regulates expression of the glycolytic enzyme hexokinase 2 (HK2). A decrease in HK2 levels in the absence of FGF signalling inputs results in decreased glycolysis, leading to impaired endothelial cell proliferation and migration. Pan-endothelial- and lymphatic-specific Hk2 knockouts phenocopy blood and/or lymphatic vascular defects seen in Fgfr1 / Fgfr3 double mutant mice, while HK2 overexpression partly rescues the defects caused by suppression of FGF signalling. Thus, FGF-dependent regulation of endothelial glycolysis is a pivotal process in developmental and adult vascular growth and development.

Obesity is associated with alterations in circulating IGF1, IGF1-binding proteins (IGFBPs), insulin, inflammatory markers, and hormones implicated in cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and aging. However, the effects of 4 and 6 h time-restricted eating (TRE) on circulating IGF1 and IGFBPs is uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of TRE on plasma IGF1, IGFBP1, IGFBP2, and IGFBP3, and whether these effects were mediated by weight loss or body composition changes. Insulin sensitivity, glucose control, adipokines, and inflammatory markers were also examined. Design: An exploratory analysis of an 8-week randomized controlled trial implementing a daily TRE intervention was carried out. Participants/Setting: This study was conducted at the University of Illinois at Chicago in 2019. Participants with obesity were randomized to 4 or 6 h TRE (n = 35) or a control (n = 14) group. Plasma biomarkers were measured by ELISA at baseline and week 8. In a sub-analysis, participants were stratified into higher- (>3.5%) and lower- (≤3.5%) weight-loss groups. Intervention: Participants fasted daily from 7 p.m. to 3 p.m. in the 4 h TRE group (20 h) and from 7 p.m. to 1 p.m. in the 6 h TRE group (18 h), followed by ad libitum eating for the remainder of the day. Controls received no dietary recommendations. Main outcome measures: IGF1, IGFBPs, hsCRP, and adipokines were the main outcome measures of this analysis. Statistical Analysis: Repeated measures ANOVA and mediation analysis were conducted. Results: Body weight significantly decreased with TRE (−3.6 ± 0.3%), contrasting with controls (+0.2 ± 0.5%, p < 0.001). Significant effects of TRE over time were observed on plasma IGFBP2, insulin, HOMA-IR, and 8-isoprostane levels, without affecting other biomarkers. In the sub-analysis, IGFBP2 increased while leptin and 8-isoprostane decreased significantly only in the “higher weight loss” subgroup. Changes in insulin and HOMA-IR were related to TRE adherence. Conclusions: Eight-week daily 4 to 6 h TRE did not affect IGF1, IGFBP1, or IGFBP3 levels but improved insulin, HOMA-IR, and 8-isoprostane. IGFBP2 increased and leptin decreased when weight loss exceeded 3.5% of baseline.

The sites of targeted therapy are limited and need to be expanded. The FGF‐FGFR signalling plays pivotal roles in the oncogenic process, and FGF/FGFR inhibitors are a promising method to treat FGFR‐altered tumours. The VEGF‐VEGFR signalling is the most crucial pathway to induce angiogenesis, and inhibiting this cascade has already got success in treating tumours. While both their efficacy and antitumour spectrum are limited, combining FGF/FGFR inhibitors with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors are an excellent way to optimize the curative effect and expand the antitumour range because their combination can target both tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment. In addition, biomarkers need to be developed to predict the efficacy, and combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is a promising direction in the future. The article will discuss the FGF‐FGFR signalling pathway, the VEGF‐VEGFR signalling pathway, the rationale of combining these two signalling pathways and recent small‐molecule FGFR/VEGFR inhibitors based on clinical trials. Targeted therapies interfering with oncogenic driver alterations have achieved remarkable success in limited types of cancer with certain driver gene alterations (Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017; Lancet Oncol, 2018; Jama, 2019; Lancet, 2017). Novel therapeutics targeting other cancer driver alterations are urgently needed to be developed to improve the life quantity of the patients and prolong their life span. The FGF‐FGFR signalling plays pivotal roles in both the physiological and oncogenic processes (Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2019), but FGFRs are constitutively active in malignant cells because of the upregulation of FGF and FGFR genetic alterations (Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2019). Targeting FGF‐FGFR signalling is a promising method to treat FGFR‐altered tumours (New Engl J Med, 2019; Lancet Oncol, 2020), but patients receive limited effects by targeting only the FGF‐FGFR pathway in most clinical practice (Nat Rev Cancer, 2017; Eur J Med Chem, 2020). VEGF‐VEGFR signalling pathway also attracts our attention. The growth of tumours relies on blood supply and VEGFs are proved to be the most important angiogenic factors (Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2016). Accordingly, inhibition of the VEGF‐VEGFR signalling pathway is believed to suppress tumour development (New Engl J Med, 1971). Here we propose the simultaneous inhibition of the FGF‐FGFR pathway and VEGF‐VEGFR pathway. In terms of mechanism, the combination can target tumour cells and tumour microenvironment at the same time (Clin Cancer Res, 2019). FGFR/VEGFR inhibitors have better effects and broaden the indications in clinical use (Nat Commun, 2020; JAMA Oncol, 2018; The Lancet Oncology, 2020).

The carotid body may undergo plasticity changes during development/ageing and in response to environmental (hypoxia and hyperoxia), metabolic, and inflammatory stimuli. The different cell types of the carotid body express a wide series of growth factors and corresponding receptors, which play a role in the modulation of carotid body function and plasticity. In particular, type I cells express nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, insulin-like-growth factor-I and -II, basic fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-α and -β, interleukin-1β and -6, tumor necrosis factor-α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and endothelin-1. Many specific growth factor receptors have been identified in type I cells, indicating autocrine/paracrine effects. Type II cells may also produce growth factors and express corresponding receptors. Future research will have to consider growth factors in further experimental models of cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory diseases and in human (normal and pathologic) samples. From a methodological point of view, microarray and/or proteomic approaches would permit contemporary analyses of large groups of growth factors. The eventual identification of physical interactions between receptors of different growth factors and/or neuromodulators could also add insights regarding functional interactions between different trophic mechanisms.