Explore the vast range of titles available.

The management of patients undergoing stem cell transplantation requires a multipurpose central venous catheter (CVC) to facilitate drug administration, parenteral nutrition, transfusion of blood products, and collection of blood samples. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) appear to meet these requirements but are rarely used for stem cell infusion. We aimed to retrospectively assess the safety and feasibility of stem cell infusion through PICC and to evaluate its impact on transplantation kinetics. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation in patients receiving cryopreserved autologous or allogeneic PBSC by PICCs and compared the results with patients receiving transplants through a conventionally inserted central venous catheter (CICC). Despite statistically significant differences in CD34+ dose, infusion rate, and total length of administration, the clinical outcomes of transplantation, exemplified by platelet and neutrophil engraftment, along with the length of hospitalization, were not affected by the prolonged infusion time and lower infusion velocity in the PICC group. Our study showed that the clinical outcomes of PBSC transplantation did not differ between the PICC and CICC groups, suggesting that both types of catheters can be implemented in a PBSC transplantation setting.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy that can manifest with skin nodules and erythematous plaques. In most cases BPDCN progresses rapidly, causing multiple skin lesions and also affecting internal organs and bone marrow, warranting initiation of systemic therapies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Although not curative, radiotherapy for isolated lesions might be indicated in case of (imminent) ulceration and large or symptomatic lesions. To this end, doses of 27.0–51.0 Gy have been reported. Here, we present the case of an 80-year-old male with BPDCN with multiple large, nodular, and ulcerating lesions of the thorax, abdomen, and face. Low-dose radiotherapy of 2 × 4.0 Gy was administered to several lesions, which resolved completely within 1 week with only light residual hyperpigmentation of the skin in affected areas and reliably prevented further ulceration. Radiotoxicity was not reported. Therefore, low-dose radiotherapy can be an effective and low-key treatment in selected cases of BPDCN, especially in a palliative setting, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Background and Objectives: Teicoplanin (TEIC) is an effective drug for patients with febrile neutropenia (FN); however, it has been reported that these patients may have increased TEIC clearance compared with patients who do not have FN. The purpose of this study was to study therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with FN when the TEIC dosing design was based on the population mean method. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine FN patients with hematological malignancy were included in the study. To calculate the predicted blood concentration of TEIC, we used the two population pharmacokinetic (population PK) parameters (parameters 1 and 2) reported by Nakayama et al. and parameter 3, which is a modification of the population PK of Nakayama et al. We calculated the mean prediction error (ME), an indicator of prediction bias, and the mean absolute prediction error (MAE), an indicator of accuracy. Furthermore, the percentage of predicted TEIC blood concentration within 25% and 50% of the measured TEIC blood concentration was calculated. Results: The ME values were −0.54, −0.25, and −0.30 and the MAE values were 2.29, 2.19, and 2.22 for parameters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For all of the three parameters, the ME values were calculated as minus values, and the predicted concentrations tended to be biased toward smaller values relative to the measured concentrations. Patients with serum creatinine (Scr) < 0.6 mg/dL and neutrophil counts < 100/μL had greater ME and MAE values and a smaller percentage of predicted TEIC blood concentration within 25% of measured TEIC blood concentrations compared with other patients. Conclusions: In patients with FN, the accuracy of predicting TEIC blood concentrations was good, with no significant differences between each parameter. However, patients with a Scr < 0.6 mg/dL and a neutrophil count < 100/μL showed slightly inferior prediction accuracy.

Objective: This study aimed to derive and validate a prognostic scoring system to identify patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) and sepsis who have a high mortality rate. Methods: Cohorts for derivation and validation were created from all data. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, the independent variables connected to 28-day mortality in the derivation cohort were found. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the predictive power and determine their cutoff points. These risk variables were given a score weighted by risk prediction function, and a new scoring system was also developed. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and sensitivity and specificity for mortality of the risk category of the new scoring system were compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Results: 90 (45.22%) of the 199 patients passed away within 28 days. Ninety-nine patients made up the derivation cohort, with 47 (47.47%) fatalities. Ages in the non-survival group were higher (61.47 [+ or -] 14.53 vs 55.13 [+ or -] 15.66) than in the survival group. As independent predictors of death, multivariable analysis identified SOFA score (OR 1.442, 95% CI 1.035, 2.009), age (OR 1.242, 95% CI 1.026, 1.503), and prothrombin time (PT) (OR 1.213, 95% CI 1.030, 1.430). The AUROC with 95% CI of the new scoring system and its sensitivity and specificity to mortality were virtually all superior to SOFA score in both derivation and validation cohorts: AUROC (0.757 vs 0.716), Sensitivity (75 vs 67.3%), and Specificity (68.1% vs 63.8%) are the Derivation cohort; Validation cohort: Sensitivity (91.2% vs 84.2%), AUROC (0.792 vs 0.733), and Specificity (58.1% vs 58.1%). The model was correctly calibrated, according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Conclusion: The new scoring system was more accurate in predicting 28-day mortality among patients with HMs and sepsis than the SOFA score. Keywords: sepsis, hematological malignancies, scoring system

The outcomes of cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for hematological malignancies need to be improved because of graft failure and delayed engraftment. Intrabone infusion of cord blood cells has the potential to resolve the problems. In this phase II study, 21 adult patients with hematological malignancy received intrabone transplantation of serological HLA‐A, B, and DR ≥4/6 matched single cord blood with a median number of cryopreserved total nucleated cells of 2.7 × 107/kg (range, 2.0–4.9 × 107/kg) following non‐irradiated fludarabine‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning. Short‐term methotrexate and tacrolimus were given as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis, and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor was given after transplantation. No severe adverse events related to intrabone injection were observed. The cumulative incidences of neutrophils ≥0.5 × 109/L, reticulocytes ≥1%, and platelets ≥20 × 109/L recoveries were 76.2%, 71.4%, and 76.2%, respectively, with median time to recoveries of 17, 28, and 32 days after transplantation, respectively. The probability of survival with neutrophil engraftment on day 60 was 71.4%, and overall survival at 1 year after transplantation was 52.4%. The incidences of grade II–IV and III–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease were 44% and 19%, respectively, with no cases of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease. The present study showed the safety of direct intrabone infusion of cord blood. Further analysis is required to confirm the efficacy of intrabone single cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated reduced‐intensity conditioning for adult patients with hematological malignancy. This study was registered with UMIN‐CTR, number 000000865. Twenty‐one adult patients with hematological malignancy received intrabone single unit cord blood transplantation with non‐irradiated fludarabine‐based reduced‐intensity conditioning. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil recovery was 76.2% with median time to recovery of 17 days after transplantation. Overall survival at 1 year after transplantation was 52.4%.

The role of chest computed tomography (CT) in distinguishing the causative pathogens of pulmonary infections in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) is unclear. The aim of our study was to compare and assess the clinical characteristics, radiologic features and potential differential diagnostic value of CT in HM patients and other different immune statuses patients with pulmonary infections. Patients were divided into immunocompetent (105 cases) and immunocompromised groups (99 cases) according to immune status. Immunocompromised patients included the HM group (63 cases) and the non-HM group (42 cases). The basic clinical data and CT findings were collected and statistically analyzed. Regarding the pathogen distribution, viral, and mixed infections were more common in the immunocompromised group than the immunocompetent (p < 0.01), but viral infections were more common in the HM group than in the non-HM group (p=0.013). Immunocompromised patients had more diverse CT findings and more serious lesions (mostly graded 2-4) than immunocompetent patients. The most common CT findings in HM patients were consolidation and ground-glass opacities (GGO), which were also found in the non-HM group. The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT was lower in immunocompromised patients than in immunocompetent patients (25.7% vs 50.5%, p< 0.01). CT had better diagnostic efficacy for fungi and in HM patients. CT diagnosis is less efficient in distinguishing the causative pathogens of HM patients. However, CT can help distinguish fungal pneumonia and pneumonia in HM patients. Our study might facilitate clinical decision-making in fungal pneumonia and pneumonia in HM patients.

Flow Cytometry of Hematological Malignancies contains an array of graphical outputs produced by the technique in the study of the most (and the least) common diseases. The images included allow you to compare your own results with a third party reference pattern. There is a detailed description of the main leukocyte antigens, together with a description of their distribution amongst normal and abnormal blood cells. The book also provides a comprehensive description of the phenotype of every neoplastic blood disease recorded in the WHO classification system, including all the instructions needed to recognise and classify even the least common entity. Designed to be practical, the book is perfect for quick consultation and is divided into two main sections. Section I deals with the direct object of immunophenotyping, and Section II deals with the ultimate target of the analysis. More than 50 antigens are covered and every antigen is dealt with in three main parts: general features, cytometric features and practical hints. This authoritative and state-of-the-art reference will be invaluable for clinicians directly involved in the diagnosis and analysis of hematological diseases, including hematologists, hematopathologists, oncologists, pathologists and technicians working in diagnostic laboratories.

Introduction This phase 2 study evaluated magrolimab+venetoclax (VEN)+azacitidine (AZA) in untreated, unfit acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and magrolimab+mitoxantrone+etoposide+cytarabine in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Methods Endpoints included complete remission rate (CRR), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Eighteen and 36 patients were enrolled into the unfit and R/R AML arms, respectively. CRR was 38.9% and 25.0%, ORR was 66.7% and 38.9%, and median OS was 15.3 and 10.5 months in the unfit AML and R/R AML arms, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or magrolimab‐related deaths occurred. Conclusion Magrolimab was safely combined with existing AML therapies with no new safety signals. Clinical Trial Registration This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04778410.

Serum protein electrophoresis can sometimes reveal polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. This electrophoretic abnormality can be caused by a variety of conditions and can be difficult to investigate. We sought to investigate screening practices in patients with hypergammaglobulinemia in order to establish diagnostic guidance strategies. We selected all patients with polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia greater than or equal to 20 g/L over one year to identify the etiologies causing a significant increase in gammaglobulins in the absence of a monoclonal abnormality. We then selected patients who presented with this abnormality for the first time, with no known etiology. Clinical, medication, biological and imaging data were collected. In our study population with polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia (n = 155), the main etiologies identified were infections (56%), autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases (20%), liver diseases (18%) and hematological and non-hematological malignancies (6%). Once hypergammaglobulinemia was identified, the clinical examination provided diagnostic orientation but was not sufficient to make the diagnosis. The initial assessment must investigate the most common pathologies including analysis of liver function, viral status, the search for signs of intravascular haemolysis, inflammatory markers, and blood cell count. At the second time point (unless there were suggestive clinical signs at presentation), more specific biological and imaging analyses were required. Finally, we propose a diagnostic guideline for a current, rational and optimal medical practice to assist clinicians in the management of patients with hypergammaglobulinemia.

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are prone to present with antibody production deficits associated with recurrent or severe bacterial infections that might benefit from human immunoglobulin (Ig) (IVIg/SCIg) replacement therapy. However, the original IVIg trial data were done before modern therapies were available, and the current indications do not take into account the shift in the immune situation of current treatment combinations and changes in the spectrum of infections. Besides, patients affected by other B cell malignancies present with similar immunodeficiency and manifestations while they are not covered by the current IVIg indications. A potential beneficial strategy could be to vaccinate patients at monoclonal B lymphocytosis and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance stages (for CLL and MM, respectively) or at B-cell malignancy diagnosis, when better antibody responses are attained. We have to re-emphasize the need for assessing and monitoring specific antibody responses; these are warranted to select adequately those patients for whom early intervention with prophylactic anti-infective therapy and/or IVIg is preferred. This review provides an overview of the current scenario, with a focus on prevention of infection in patients with hematological malignancies and the role of Ig replacement therapy.