Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Background Fecal calprotectin is a reliable surrogate marker for disease activity in ulcerative colitis. However, there are no consensus cutoff values for histoendoscopic remission. This study aimed to correlate fecal calprotectin with Mayo endoscopic score and histological disease activity (Geboes score) for ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission. Methods Prospective study including adult ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission or disease relapse, undergoing endoscopy for disease activity or dysplasia surveillance at an inflammatory bowel disease center between 2013 and 2020. Fecal calprotectin was collected before bowel preparation and Mayo endoscopic score was documented during colonoscopy. Biopsies were taken throughout the colon and histological activity was assessed using Geboes score by a blinded expert gastrointestinal pathologist. Results Two hundred fifty-three patients were included, 117 (46%) were male (mean age of 38.2 years—standard deviation ± 24.8). A fecal calprotectin ≥ 123 μg/g predicts Mayo endoscopic score > 0 (58% sensitivity and 70% specificity), also aiding to differentiate Mayo endoscopic score 0 from 1 (61% sensitivity and 70% specificity). A fecal calprotectin ≥ 80 μg/g identified histological disease activity using Geboes score > 3.1 in patients with clinical remission (64.7% sensitivity, 58.7% specificity). Using Geboes score > 2, a fecal calprotectin ≥ 50 μg/g, is the most clinically relevant to identify patients in clinical remission with active histologic inflammation (49.6% sensitivity, 41.6% specificity). Conclusions Fecal calprotectin correlates with endoscopic and histologic disease activity and can be used as a surrogate marker for disease activity. Our study prospectively demonstrated optimal cutoff values to discriminate histoendoscopic remission. Lay Summary This study correlates fecal calprotectin with Mayo endoscopic and Geboes scores in ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission. Fecal calprotectin ≥123 μg/g predicts endoscopic activity, while ≥80 μg/g indicates histological inflammation. The findings establish optimal cutoff values for histoendoscopic remission.

Limited research has been performed to determine if histologic improvement serves as a prognosticator for endoscopic remission, a key therapeutic target for ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary aim of the study was to evaluate if histological activity could predict endoscopic remission in UC patients with Mayo endoscopic subscores (MES) of 0 or 1. In addition, we compared the clinical outcomes between histologic improvement group and active group. This research encompassed 492 individuals with UC with MES of 0 or 1, who underwent histological assessment as per the established protocol of Samsung Medical Center between January 2018 and December 2020. Participants were categorized into two cohorts based on the degree of histological activity: those showing histologic improvement and those with ongoing histologic activity. The endoscopic activity was assessed during follow-up, and the primary outcome was endoscopic remission according to histologic activity. Out of the total participants, endoscopic activity was scrutinized in 435 patients during the colonoscopic follow-up and in 146 during the subsequent one. The histologic improvement group at the index colonoscopy was more likely achieve endoscopic remission than the histologic active group. Clinical relapse was more likely in the histologic active group than in the histologic improvement group.

Abstract Background This study prospectively evaluated the risk of relapse according to the status of histologic activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieved deep remission. Methods Patients with UC in clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤1) and endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity ≤1) were enrolled. Rectal biopsies were performed in patients, and histologic remission was defined as a Robarts histopathology index of ≤3. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine fecal calprotectin cutoff values for histologic remission. The cumulative risk of relapse was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among the 187 patients enrolled, 82 (43.9%) achieved histologic remission. The best cutoff value of fecal calprotectin for predicting histologic remission was 80 mg/kg (area under the curve of 0.646, sensitivity of 74%, and specificity of 61%). Among 142 patients who were followed up for >3 months, 56 (39.4%) showed clinical relapse during a median of 42 weeks. The risk of relapse was lower in patients with histologic remission than in those with histologic activity (P = .026). In multivariable analysis, histologic remission (hazard ratio [HR], 0.551; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.316-0.958; P = .035), elevated C-reactive protein levels (HR, 3.652; 95% CI, 1.400-9.526; P = .008), and history of steroid use (HR, 2.398; 95% CI, 1.196-4.808; P = .014) were significantly associated with clinical relapse. Conclusions In patients with UC who achieved clinical and endoscopic remission, histologic remission was independently associated with a lower risk of clinical relapse. Lay Summary In patients with ulcerative colitis who achieved clinical and endoscopic remission, histologic remission was independently associated with a lower risk of clinical relapse. This benefit of reaching histologic remission was maintained regardless of treatment de-escalation.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, relapsing conditions characterized by dysregulated immune responses and persistent intestinal inflammation. This review aims to examine new potential therapeutic targets in IBD starting from the STRIDE-II statements. Key targets now include clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and biomarker normalization (such as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin). Moreover, histologic remission, transmural remission, and in the future molecular targets are emerging as important indicators of sustained disease control. The treatment goals for inflammatory bowel disease are varied: to relieve symptoms, prevent permanent intestinal damage, promote inflammation remission, and minimize complications. Consequently, the therapeutic targets have evolved to become broader and more ambitious. Integrating these advanced therapeutic targets has the potential to redefine IBD management by promoting deeper disease control and improved patient outcomes. Further research is essential to validate these strategies and optimize their clinical implementation.

The terminal ileum poses a predilection for Crohn's disease (CD) but is less susceptible to undergo healing to treatment with biologics and small molecules. This study aimed to evaluate histologic features associated with endoscopic remission (ER). This is a post hoc analysis of patients with moderately to severely active CD, defined as Crohn's disease activity index 220 to 450, and terminal ileal ulceration treated with antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor adalimumab from the EXTEND trial. We studied whether baseline total Global Histologic Disease Activity Scores (GHAS), any individual histologic element, and specific immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of chronic inflammation from biopsy specimens were associated with postinduction (week 12) and maintenance (week 52) ER, defined as Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease of 0. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were used to assess the relationship between histologic markers and 1-year outcomes. Seventy-one adult patients with CD affecting the ileum were included in this analysis. Both baseline ileal GHAS scores and individual histologic components were not found to be associated with ER at weeks 12 or 52. Increased expression of interleukin-13 receptor (IL-13R) on IHC stains was associated with reduced likelihood of achieving 1-year ER (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.92; P = .044). No other biomarker assessed was associated with 1-year ER. Ileal histologic disease activity and IHC activation markers of chronic mucosal inflammation were not associated with 1-year ER. However, strong staining for IL-13 receptor in the ileum was associated with reduced odds of 1-year ER using adalimumab. Mucosal cellular disease profiles might pose an opportunity to guide treatment of CD.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic, antigen-driven, immune-mediated disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction and significant eosinophilic infiltration. Its rising incidence and prevalence over recent decades reflect both increased clinical awareness and the influence of environmental factors such as dietary patterns and allergen exposure. Among food allergens, cow’s milk proteins are the most commonly implicated triggers, contributing to esophageal inflammation through complex immunological pathways involving both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated mechanisms. Dietary elimination of cow’s milk has been shown to induce histologic remission in over 60% of pediatric patients, underscoring its pivotal role in eosinophilic esophagitis management. Despite these promising results, challenges persist, including variability in individual responses, the burden of adherence to restrictive diets, and gaps in understanding the molecular mechanisms driving cow’s milk-induced esophageal inflammation. This review examines the complex relationship between eosinophilic esophagitis and cow’s milk, focusing on its role in disease pathogenesis and management, offering insights into its therapeutic implications. Understanding the interplay between eosinophilic esophagitis and dietary allergens, particularly cow’s milk, may inform the development of targeted interventions and improve clinical outcomes for affected patients.

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into histologic disease assessment is transforming the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AI-aided histology enables precise, objective evaluations of disease activity by analysing whole-slide images, facilitating accurate predictions of histologic remission (HR) in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Additionally, AI shows promise in predicting adverse outcomes and therapeutic responses, making it a promising tool for clinical practice and clinical trials. By leveraging advanced algorithms, AI enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces assessment variability and streamlines histological workflows in clinical settings. In clinical trials, AI aids in assessing histological endpoints, enabling real-time analysis, standardising evaluations and supporting adaptive trial designs. Recent advancements are further refining AI-aided digital pathology in IBD. New developments in multimodal AI models integrating clinical, endoscopic, histologic and molecular data pave the way for a comprehensive approach to precision medicine in IBD. Automated assessment of intestinal barrier healing – a deeper level of healing beyond endoscopic and HR – shows promise for improved outcome prediction and patient management. Preliminary evidence also suggests that AI applied to colitis-associated neoplasia can aid in the detection, characterisation and molecular profiling of lesions, holding potential for enhanced dysplasia management and organ-sparing approaches. Although challenges remain in standardisation, validation through randomised controlled trials and ethical considerations. AI is poised to revolutionise IBD management by advancing towards a more personalised and efficient care model, while the path to full clinical implementation may be lengthy. However, the transformative impact of AI on IBD care is already shining through. Plain language summary Enhancing IBD tissue analysis through artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly advancing in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). By analysing tissue samples, AI can accurately assess disease activity and predict outcomes, helping physicians personalise treatment plans and improve patient care in clinical practice. In clinical research, AI enhances trials by quickly analysing tissue samples and potentially identifying patients likely to respond to treatments. As AI develops, its potential to integrate various data sources promises a future where IBD treatment is more precise, efficient, and personalised. Infographic: AI-aided pathology in IBD. This infographic provides a schematic overview of the capabilities of AI applied to histology in IBD. It highlights AI’s potential for disease assessment, predictions of outcomes and responses to therapy, integration and harmonisation of multimodal data, automated evaluation of barrier healing and detection and characterisation of IBD-related lesions. In the lower section, the infographic summarises the transformative impact of AI on clinical trials and routine clinical practice, showcasing its potential to revolutionise IBD management. Source: Created with ‘Biorender.com’. AI, artificial intelligence; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.

Background and Objectives: Therapeutic goals for ulcerative colitis (UC) have expanded beyond symptom control to include mucosal and histological healing. However, the long-term prognostic value of achieving both targets remains uncertain, particularly in Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and relapse predictors in patients with UC who achieved both endoscopic and histologic remission. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study consecutively enrolled adults with clinically inactive UC who attained endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0) and histologic remission (Nancy index ≤1) between June 2014 and May 2018. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data—including fecal calprotectin—were collected. Clinical relapse was defined as a Mayo score increase >3 or initiation of systemic corticosteroids or biologics. Patients were followed longitudinally for a median of 55 months (minimum 12 months), and relapse risk was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and univariate Cox regression analyses. Results: A total of 41 patients were included (mean age 54 ± 14 years; 56% male). The median follow-up was 54 months (range 17–78). Ten patients (24.4%) relapsed during follow-up, with cumulative relapse rates of 9.8%, 10.3%, 15.8%, and 24.1% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated significantly higher relapse in patients with non-E1 disease (E2 + E3, p = 0.021), immunomodulator use (p = 0.008), and biologics use (p = 0.007). In univariate Cox regression, immunomodulator (HR 4.7, 95% CI 1.3–16.4, p = 0.02) and biologics use (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.4–17.5, p = 0.01) were significant predictors of relapse, whereas disease extent showed only a non-significant trend with wide CIs. Baseline fecal calprotectin was higher in the relapse group (182 ± 370 μg/g vs. 108 ± 164 μg/g) but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of UC patients who achieved dual remission relapsed within 4 years. These findings highlight the limitations of using dual remission as the sole therapeutic endpoint and underscore the need for additional prognostic factors. High-risk subgroups—such as those with extensive disease or prior exposure to advanced therapies—may require closer monitoring and individualized strategies. Future multicenter studies integrating clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and biomarker data are needed to refine relapse prediction.

Background The threshold concentration of infliximab during maintenance therapy has not been well-defined in relation to histologic remission. The aim of the study is to dentify the maintenance-phase infliximab concentration associated with histologic remission in inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD). Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out in 104 IBD patients seen at a tertiary care centre in London, Canada. Infliximab trough concentrations were collected during the maintenance phase of treatment and compared between participants with and without evidence of histologic remission. Participants were additionally evaluated for sustained histologic remission, and relapse to active disease. Results Participants in histologic remission attained higher mean concentrations of infliximab during the maintenance phase (10.34 ± 0.69 μg/ml) compared to those with persistent disease activity (6.23 ± 0.67 μg/ml, p-value < 0.0001). Additionally, during the maintenance phase, sustained histologic remission was also associated with a higher mean concentration of infliximab (10.81 ± 5.46 μg/ml) compared to those who relapsed to active disease (5.68 ± 3.70, p < 0.001). Overall, participants with a mean infliximab trough concentration greater than 8ug/ml were more likely to have histologic remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUROC = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.65–0.84, p < 0.0001) and sustained histologic remission (AUC = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.63–0.91, p = 0.002). Conclusion Maintenance-phase infliximab trough concentrations greater than 8 μg/ml, which is higher than the currently recommended target concentration, are highly associated with histologic remission and sustained histologic remission.

The effects of azathioprine (AZA) and budesonide (BUD) on mucosal healing and histologic remission of Crohn's disease (CD) are insufficiently studied. In this prospective study we evaluated the comparative effects of AZA and BUD on endoscopic and histologic activity in patients with steroid-dependent Crohn's ileocolitis or proximal colitis who had achieved clinical remission on conventional steroids.MethodsPatients were randomized to AZA (2.0–2.5 mg/kg a day) or BUD (6–9 mg a day) for 1 year. The study protocol included clinical examination, laboratory tests, calculation of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), completion of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), at baseline and then every 2 months for 1 year. Ileocolonoscopy with regional biopsies was performed at baseline and then at the end of the study to assess mucosal healing and the histologic activity of CD.ResultsThirty-eight patients were randomized to AZA and 39 to BUD. At the end of the study 32 and 25 patients in the AZA and BUD groups, respectively, were in clinical remission (P = 0.07). The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) score fell significantly only in the AZA group (P < 0.0001). Complete or near complete healing was achieved in 83% of AZA-treated patients compared with only 24% of BUD-treated patients (P < 0.0001). Histologic activity as assessed by an average histology score (AHS) fell significantly only in the AZA group (P < 0.001 versus baseline) and was significantly lower than in the BUD group at the end of the study (P < 0.001). Eight patients in the AZA group were withdrawn for adverse events (n = 6) or relapse of disease compared with 14 patients in the BUD group who were withdrawn for relapse of disease.ConclusionsIn patients with steroid-dependent inflammatory Crohn's ileocolitis or proximal colitis who achieve clinical remission with conventional steroids, a 1-year treatment with AZA was superior to BUD in achieving and maintaining mucosal healing and histologic remission.