Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TU2670, a novel orally active, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administered to healthy female participants. Methods This was a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose ascending trial that took place in multiple medical centers. A total of 16 healthy premenopausal women (23 to 45 years of age) were randomized and received 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg TU2670 (GnRH antagonist) or placebo 7 days (±1 day) after the onset of menstrual bleeding. We performed a noncompartmental analysis for pharmacokinetic parameters and calculated relative minimum concentration values (Cmin, % Baseline) of serum pharmacodynamic (PD) markers (luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and estradiol). Results There were no significant differences among treatments with respect to vital signs, electrocardiography, adverse events, ovulation test results, and ultrasonography. The median Tmax of TU2670 occurred 0.75 to 1.00 hours after dosing, and concentrations then declined, with a mean apparent half-life (t1/2) of 3.0 to 5.9 hours. AUClast (17.7-417.9 ng·h/mL) and Cmax (8.1-95.4 ng/mL) increased in a dose-dependent manner. The PD analysis after a single administration of TU2670 revealed dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol. Maximal suppression of the pre-dose baseline (%) was 58% to 82% at 6 to 8 hours for LH, 28% to 39% at 6 to 12 hours for FSH, and 34% to 82% at 12 to 24 hours for estradiol. Conclusion The single administration of TU2670 in healthy premenopausal women was well tolerated and resulted in the dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol, suggesting rapid and significant inhibition of pituitary and ovarian hormones.

Abstract Context SJX-653 is a novel neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) antagonist. The NK3 pathway is a central regulator of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and has also been implicated in the generation of hot flashes. Therefore, decreases of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in men serve as sensitive pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of central NK3 antagonism. Objective To characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic activity of SJX-653 in healthy men. Design A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study. Setting Phase 1 unit. Patients or Other Participants Seven cohorts of 6 healthy men 18–45 years of age (4:2 randomization to SJX-653/placebo per cohort). Intervention(s) Single oral doses of 0.5–90 mg SJX-653. Main Outcome Measure(s) Safety assessments and serial pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD measurements. Results SJX-653 was well tolerated at all dose levels. Cmax and AUC0-24 increased in a dose-proportional manner. The terminal elimination half-life ranged between 9.8 and 12.5 hours independent of dose. A statistically significant, dose-dependent, reversible reduction of LH and testosterone was observed with near maximal effect after 15 mg and little to no effect at 4.5 mg. Maximal LH reduction was 70 ± 7% (mean ± sd) at 6 hours after 30 mg SJX-653 versus 10 ± 43% for placebo (P = 0.0006); maximal T reduction was of 68 ± 5% at 8 hours after 60 mg SJX-653 versus 18 ± 11% for placebo (P < 0.0001). The plasma IC50 for LH reduction was 33 ng/mL. Conclusions These data demonstrate clinical proof-of-mechanism for SJX-653 as a potent centrally-acting NK3R antagonist.

Elagolix (ORILISSA™), an orally bioavailable, second-generation, non-peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, is being developed AbbVie and Neurocrine Biosciences for the treatment of reproductive hormone-dependent disorders in women. In July 2018, the US FDA approved elagolix tablets for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. This approval was based on positive results in two replicate phase III trials; additional phase III trials in the USA, Canada and Puerto Rico are currently evaluating elagolix as both monotherapy and in combination with low-dose hormone add-back therapy in the same indication. Elagolix with and without low-dose hormone add-back therapy is also undergoing phase III clinical development for heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in the aforementioned locations. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of elagolix leading to its first approval for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis.

Research question Does luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger day (LH HCG ) affect the clinical outcomes of patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol? Methods Retrospective analysis fresh embryo transfer cycles of DOR patients who underwent GnRH-ant protocol from August 2019 to June 2023. The participants were divided into different groups according to LH HCG level and age. The clinical data and outcomes were compared between groups. Results In patients with DOR, the HCG positive rate (59.3% versus 39.8%, P  = 0.005), embryo implantation rate (34.5% versus 19.7%, P  = 0.002), clinical pregnancy rate (49.2% versus 28.4%, P  = 0.003), live birth rate (41.5% versus 22.7%, P  = 0.005) in LH HCG < 2.58 IU/L group were significantly higher than LH HCG ≥ 2.58 IU/L group. There was no significant correlation between LH HCG level and clinical pregnancy in POSEIDON group 3. In POSEIDON group 4, the HCG positive rate (52.8% versus 27.0%, P  = 0.015), embryo implantation rate (29.2% versus 13.3%, P  = 0.023), clinical pregnancy rate (45.3% versus 18.9%, P  = 0.010) in LH HCG < 3.14 IU/L group were significantly higher than LH HCG ≥ 3.14 IU/L group. Logistic regression analysis indicated that LH HCG level was an independent influencing factor for clinical pregnancy in POSEIDON group 4 patients (OR = 3.831, 95% CI: 1.379–10.643, P  < 0.05). Conclusions LH HCG level is an independent factor affecting pregnancy outcome of fresh embryo transfer in DOR patients undergoing GnRH-ant protocol, especially for advanced-aged women. LH HCG had a high predictive value for POSEIDON group 4 patients, and LH HCG ≥ 3.14 IU/L predicts poor pregnancy outcomes.

Background A consensus has been reached on the preferred primary outcome of all infertility treatment trials, which is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Some recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies have compared the effectiveness of GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols but showed inconsistent results. Studies commonly used conservative estimates and optimal estimates to described the CLBR of one incomplete assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and there are not many previous studies with data of the complete cycle to compare CLBRs in GnRH-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist protocols. Methods A total of 18,853 patients have completed their first IVF cycle including fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed cycles during 2016–2019, 16,827 patients were treated with GnRH-a long and 2026 patients with GnRH-ant protocol. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocol in relation to CLBR. Utilized Propensity Score Matching(PSM) for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. Results Before PSM, significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics and the CLBR was 50.91% in the GnRH-a and 33.42% in the GnRH-ant (OR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.88–2.28; P  < 0.001). Stratified analysis showed the CLBR of GnRH-ant was lower than GnRH-a in suboptimal responders(46.89 vs 27.42%, OR = 2.34, 95%CI = 1.99–2.74; P  < 0.001) and no differences of CLBR were observed in other patients between protocols. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic analysis found the CLBR of GnRH-ant group was lower than that of GnRH-a group (OR = 2.11, 95%CI:1.69–2.63,  P  < 0.001). After PSM balenced the confounders between groups, the CLBR of GnRH-a group was higher than that of GnRH-ant group in suboptimal responders((38.61 vs 28.22%, OR = 1.60, 95%CI = 1.28–1.99; P  < 0.001) and the normal fertilization rate and number of available embryo in GnRH-a were higher than these of GnRH-ant groups in suboptimal responders (77.39 vs 75.22%; 2.86 ± 1.26 vs 2.61 ± 1.22; P  < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other patients between different protocols. Conclusions It is crucial to optimize the utilization of protocols in different ovarian response patients and reconsider the field of application of GnRH-ant protocols in China.

Elagolix is a nonpeptide, oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist being developed for sex-hormone-dependent diseases in women. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of elagolix. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending dose study in 45 healthy premenopausal women at a research unit. Elagolix [150 mg once daily or 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg twice daily (BID)] or placebo was administered for 21 days. Main outcome measures were elagolix pharmacokinetics, suppression of gonadotropics [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH)] and ovarian hormones [estradiol (E2), progesterone (P)], and adverse events. Elagolix was rapidly absorbed after oral dosing, reaching maximum concentrations at 1.0 to 1.5 hours, with a half-life of 4 to 6 hours. FSH, LH, and E2 were suppressed within hours of elagolix administration on day 1. Dose-dependent suppression of E2 was observed, with maximum suppression achieved with elagolix 200 mg BID. Dose-dependent suppression of FSH and LH was also observed, with maximal or near-maximal suppression achieved at 300 mg BID and 200 mg BID, respectively. At elagolix doses ≥100 mg BID, P concentrations remained at anovulatory levels throughout 21 days of dosing. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache and hot flush. Elagolix administration allows for modulation of gonadotropin and ovarian hormone concentrations, from partial suppression at lower doses to nearly full suppression at higher doses. The results of this study provide a rationale for elagolix dose selection for treatment of sex hormone-dependent diseases in women.

Cycles with progesterone elevation during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI are commonly managed with a \"freeze-all\" strategy, due to a well-recognized detrimental effect of high progesterone levels on endometrial receptivity. However, also a detrimental effect of elevated progesterone on day-3 embryo quality has recently been found with regards to top quality embryo formation rate. Because blastocyst culture and cryopreservation are largely adopted, we deemed relevant to determine whether this detrimental effect is also seen on blastocyst quality on day 5-6. This issue was investigated through a large two-center retrospective study including 986 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles and using top quality blastocyst formation rate as the main outcome. Results showed that on multivariate analysis sperm motility (p<0.01) and progesterone levels at ovulation triggering (p = 0.01) were the only two variables that significantly predicted top quality blastocyst formation rate after adjusting for relevant factors including female age, BMI, basal AMH and total dose of FSH used for COS. More specifically, progesterone levels at induction showed an inverse relation with top quality blastocyst formation (correlation coefficient B = -1.08, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.02) and ROC curve analysis identified P level >1.49 ng/ml as the best cut-off for identification of patients at risk for the absence of top quality blastocysts (AUC 0.55, p<0.01). Our study is the first to investigate the top quality blastocyst formation rate in relation to progesterone levels in IVF/ICSI cycles, showing that increasing progesterone is associated with lower rates of top quality blastocyst. Hence, the advantages of prolonging COS to maximize the number of collected oocytes might eventually be hindered by a decrease in top quality blastocysts available for transfer, if increasing progesterone levels are observed. This observation extends the results of two recent studies focused on day-3 embryos and deserves further research.

What is the threshold for the prediction of moderate to severe or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) based on the number of growing follicles ≥ 11 mm and/or estradiol (E2) levels? The optimal threshold of follicles ≥11 mm on the day of hCG to identify those at risk was 19 for both moderate to severe OHSS and for severe OHSS. Estradiol (E2) levels were less prognostic of OHSS than the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm. In comparison to long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocols, the risk of severe OHSS is reduced by approximately 50% in a GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation prior to in vitro fertilisation (IVF), while the two protocols provide equal chances of pregnancy per initiated cycle. Nevertheless, moderate to severe OHSS may still occur in GnRH antagonist protocols if human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is administered to trigger final oocyte maturation, especially in high responder patients. Severe OHSS following hCG trigger may occur with an incidence of 1-2% in a relatively young (aged 18 to 36 years) IVF population treated in a GnRH-antagonist protocol. From the Engage, Ensure and Trust trials, in total, 2,433 women who received hCG for oocyte maturation and for whom the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm and the level of E2 on the day of hCG administration were known were included in the analyses. The threshold for OHSS prediction of moderate and severe OHSS was assessed in women treated with corifollitropin alfa or daily recombinant follicle stimulation hormone (rFSH) in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses for moderate to severe OHSS and severe OHSS were performed on the combined dataset and the sensitivity and specificity for the optimal threshold of number of follicles ≥ 11 mm, E2 levels on the day of (hCG), and a combination of both, were determined. The optimal threshold of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of hCG to identify those at risk of moderate to severe OHSS was 19 (sensitivity and specificity 62.3% and 75.6%, respectively) and for severe OHSS was also 19 (sensitivity and specificity 74.3% and 75.3%, respectively). The positive and negative predictive values were 6.9% and 98.6%, respectively, for moderate to severe OHSS, and 4.2% and 99.5% for severe OHSS. This was a retrospective analysis of combined data from three trials following ovarian stimulation with two different gonadotropins. For patients with 19 follicles or more ≥11 mm on the day of hCG, measures to prevent the development of OHSS should be considered. Secondary preventive measures include cycle cancellation or coasting, use of a GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in place of hCG and a freeze all strategy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702845 NCT00696800 NCT00696878.

Alcoholism, or alcohol use disorder, is a major public health concern that is a considerable risk factor for morbidity and disability; therefore, effective treatments are urgently needed. Here, we demonstrated that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone reduces alcohol intake in alcohol-dependent rats but not in nondependent animals. Both systemic delivery and direct administration into the central nucleus of the amygdala, a critical stress-related brain region, were sufficient to reduce alcohol consumption in dependent animals. We also tested the use of mifepristone in 56 alcohol-dependent human subjects as part of a double-blind clinical and laboratory-based study. Relative to placebo, individuals who received mifepristone (600 mg daily taken orally for 1 week) exhibited a substantial reduction in alcohol-cued craving in the laboratory, and naturalistic measures revealed reduced alcohol consumption during the 1-week treatment phase and 1-week post-treatment phase in mifepristone-treated individuals. Mifepristone was well tolerated and improved liver-function markers. Together, these results support further exploration of GR antagonism via mifepristone as a therapeutic strategy for alcoholism.

The study investigates whether a 3-day pretreatment course with a GnRH antagonist in the early follicular phase has an impact on the number of retrieved COCs in a GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol. This is a retrospective single center crossover study involving women who did not conceive after one GnRH antagonist stimulation cycle (“standard cycle”) and proceeded with another GnRH antagonist stimulation cycle preceded by early administration of GnRH antagonist for 3 days (“pretreatment cycle”) with fresh embryo transfer or frozen embryo transfer. 430 patients undergoing 860 cycles were included. The mean female age was 34.4 ± 4.8 years. Indications for fertility treatment included unexplained infertility (34.3%), male-factor infertility (33.3%), age (16.9%), PCOS (8.2%), tubal (4.7) and endometriosis (2.6%). All cycles were divided into two groups: group 1 (standard, 430 cycles) and group 2 (pretreatment, 430 cycles). The mean duration of stimulation was similar in both groups (10.3 vs 10.3 days, p = 0.28). The starting dose of gonadotropin (234.9 vs 196.8 IU, p<0.001), total amount of gonadotropin used (2419 vs 2020 IU, p<0.001), the total number of retrieved COCs (10 vs 7.8 p<0.001) and the number of mature oocytes (8 vs 5.8 p<0.001) were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. The Generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression analysis showed that the pretreatment strategy had a significant positive effect on the number of COCs (coefficient 2.4, p <0.001 after adjusting for known confounders (age, indication, stimulation dose, type, and duration of stimulation). In conclusion, A 3-day course of GnRH antagonist pretreatment increases the number of COCs obtained after ovarian stimulation.