Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "ice-bed coupling"
Sort by:
Ice-bed coupling beneath and beyond ice streams: Byrd Glacier, Antarctica
Ice sheet thickness is determined mainly by the strength of ice‐bed coupling that controls holistic transitions from slow sheet flow to fast streamflow to buttressing shelf flow. Byrd Glacier has the largest ice drainage system in Antarctica and is the fastest ice stream entering Ross Ice Shelf. In 2004 two large subglacial lakes at the head of Byrd Glacier suddenly drained and increased the terminal ice velocity of Byrd Glacier from 820 m yr−1 to 900 m yr−1. This resulted in partial ice‐bed recoupling above the lakes and partial decoupling along Byrd Glacier. An attempt to quantify this behavior is made using flowband and flowline models in which the controlling variable for ice height above the bed is the floating fraction of ice along the flowband and flowline. Changes in before and after drainage are obtained from available data, but more reliable data in the map plane are required before Byrd Glacier can be modeled adequately. A holistic sliding velocity is derived that depends on , with contributions from ice shearing over coupled beds and ice stretching over uncoupled beds, as is done in state‐of‐the‐art sliding theories. Key Points The height of ice above the bed is determined mainly by ice‐bed coupling Uncoupling occurs mainly along ice streams which discharge up to 90% of ice Because of #1 and #2 ice sheets can rapidly self‐destruct
Variations of ice bed coupling beneath and beyond ice streams: The force balance
A geometrical force balance that links stresses to ice bed coupling along a flow band of an ice sheet was developed in 1988 for longitudinal tension in ice streams and published 4 years later. It remains a work in progress. Now gravitational forces balanced by forces producing tensile, compressive, basal shear, and side shear stresses are all linked to ice bed coupling by the floating fraction ϕ of ice that produces the concave surface of ice streams. These lead inexorably to a simple formula showing how ϕ varies along these flow bands where surface and bed topography are known: ϕ = hO/hI with hO being ice thickness hI at x = 0 for x horizontal and positive upslope from grounded ice margins. This captures the basic fact in glaciology: the height of ice depends on how strongly ice couples to the bed. It shows how far a high convex ice sheet (ϕ = 0) has gone in collapsing into a low flat ice shelf (ϕ = 1). Here ϕ captures ice bed coupling under an ice stream and hO captures ice bed coupling beyond ice streams.