Explore the vast range of titles available.

A randomized trial compared standard chemotherapy plus dostarlimab or placebo. Patients with mismatch repair–deficient tumors had 2-year progression-free survival of 61.4% with dostarlimab and 15.7% with placebo.

G12C is a mutation that occurs in approximately 3 to 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Monotherapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors has yielded only modest efficacy. Combining the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib with panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, may be an effective strategy. In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer with mutated G12C who had not received previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor to receive sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), sotorasib at a dose of 240 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), or the investigator's choice of trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib (standard care; 54 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Key secondary end points were overall survival and objective response. After a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range, 0.1 to 13.9), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 6.3) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.8) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab and 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9) in the standard-care group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group as compared with the standard-care group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; P = 0.006), and the hazard ratio in the 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.03). Overall survival data are maturing. The objective response was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3), 5.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 15.7), and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.6) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, and standard-care groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.8%, 30.2%, and 43.1% of patients, respectively. Skin-related toxic effects and hypomagnesemia were the most common adverse events observed with sotorasib-panitumumab. In this phase 3 trial of a KRAS G12C inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, both doses of sotorasib in combination with panitumumab resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard treatment. Toxic effects were as expected for either agent alone and resulted in few discontinuations of treatment. (Funded by Amgen; CodeBreaK 300 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05198934.).

Two defined immune checkpoints have been exploited for cancer treatment. LAG-3 is a third immune checkpoint that blocks lymphocyte activation. Relatlimab, a monoclonal antibody against LAG-3, interferes with this block. Relatlimab plus nivolumab as compared with nivolumab alone in melanoma produced superior progression-free survival.

Previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus nivolumab, or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, the two nivolumab regimens resulted in longer overall survival than chemotherapy. The side-effect profile was consistent with past reports on these agents.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has not improved disease-free survival among patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In this trial, after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and resection, patients with residual disease were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab or placebo. Nivolumab doubled the median disease-free survival from 11.0 to 22.4 months.

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Despite the fact that they are relatively rare, they cause significant morbidity and mortality. High-grade gliomas or glioblastomas are rapidly progressing tumors with a very poor prognosis. The presence of an intrinsic immune system in the central nervous system is now more accepted. During the last decade, there has been no major progress in glioma therapy. The lack of effective treatment for gliomas can be explained by the strategies that cancer cells use to escape the immune system. This being said, immunotherapy, which involves blockade of immune checkpoint inhibitors, has improved patients’ survival in different cancer types. This novel cancer therapy appears to be one of the most promising approaches. In the present study, we will start with a review of the general concept of immune response within the brain and glioma microenvironment. Then, we will try to decipher the role of various immune checkpoint inhibitors within the glioma microenvironment. Finally, we will discuss some promising therapeutic pathways, including immune checkpoint blockade and the body’s effective anti-glioma immune response.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are cornerstones of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, optimal treatment sequencing after progression is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of tivozanib–nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy in the post-ICI setting. TiNivo-2 is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 190 sites across 16 countries, in Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and progression during or after one to two previous lines of therapy (including one ICI) were randomised 1:1 to tivozanib (0·89 mg per day, orally) plus nivolumab (480 mg every 4 weeks, intravenously) or tivozanib (1·34 mg per day, orally). Randomisation was stratified by immediate previous therapy (ICI or non-ICI) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk category. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to first documentation of objective progressive disease according to RECIST 1·1 or death from any cause, whichever came first, by independent radiology review. Efficacy was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04987203) and is active and not recruiting. From Nov 4, 2021, to June 16, 2023, 343 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib–nivolumab (n=171) or tivozanib monotherapy (n=172). Median follow-up was 12·0 months. Median PFS was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0–7·4) with tivozanib–nivolumab and 7·4 months (5·6–9·2) with tivozanib monotherapy (hazard ratio 1·10, 95% CI 0·84–1·43; p=0·49). Among those with an ICI as their immediate previous therapy (n=244), median PFS was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6–9·6) with tivozanib–nivolumab and 9·2 months (7·4–10·0) with tivozanib monotherapy. With non-ICIs as the most recent therapy, lower median PFS was observed, with no difference between groups (tivozanib–nivolumab 3·7 months [95% CI 2·7–5·4] and with tivozanib monotherapy 3·7 months [1·9–7·2]). Serious adverse events occurred in 54 (32%) of 168 patients receiving tivozanib–nivolumab and 64 (37%) of 171 patients receiving tivozanib monotherapy. One (<1%) treatment-related death occurred (tivozanib group). These data further support that ICI rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, these data suggest that tivozanib monotherapy has efficacy in the post-ICI setting. Aveo Pharmaceuticals.

In a phase 1–2 trial involving patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, sotorasib (a KRAS G12C inhibitor) resulted in a response in 21% of the patients and a median progression-free survival of 4 months.

Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with a high pretreatment plasma concentration of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) DNA remain at high risk for recurrence after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant–adjuvant treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre in Guangzhou, China. Adult patients (aged 18–65 years) with newly diagnosed high-risk stage III–IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a pretreatment plasma EBV DNA concentration of at least 1500 copies per mL and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0–1, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six), stratified by TNM stage (III vs IVa), to neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 2 weeks for two cycles, followed by concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 during intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03925090, and is closed to enrolment; follow-up is ongoing. Between Dec 6, 2019, and Dec 9, 2021, 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the toripalimab group (n=100) or placebo group (n=50). 115 (77%) patients were male and 35 (23%) were female. As of data cutoff (May 31, 2024), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 37·8 months (IQR 34·2–46·5) for the intention-to-treat population analyses. 2-year progression-free survival was higher in the toripalimab group (92·0% [95% CI 86·7–97·3]) than in the placebo group (74·0% [61·8–86·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·40 [95% CI 0·18–0·89]; log-rank p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or worse acute adverse events (occurring within 1 year of randomisation) were leukopenia (40 [40%] of 99 patients in the toripalimab group vs 22 [44%] of 50 patients in the placebo group), mucositis (28 [28%] vs ten [20%]), neutropenia (17 [17%] vs nine [18%]), anaemia (16 [16%] vs five [10%]), and weight loss (12 [12%] vs six [12%]). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse events (occurring >1 year after randomisation) was auditory or hearing loss (eight [8%] vs four [8%]). Immune-mediated adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in ten (10%) patients only in the toripalimab group. One (2%) of 50 patients in the placebo group died due to septic shock caused by bacteraemia considered not treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths in the toripalimab group. Our findings suggested that a so-called sandwich approach involving toripalimab (in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy could be a highly promising therapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Phase 3 non-inferiority trials are warranted comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

In an interim analysis of this phase 3 trial, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone among patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors expressed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS; the number of PD-L1-staining tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages, divided by the total number of viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100) of 10 or more. The results of the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported. We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks plus the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin) or placebo plus chemotherapy. The primary end points were progression-free survival (reported previously) and overall survival among patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a CPS of 10 or more (the CPS-10 subgroup), among patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a CPS of 1 or more (the CPS-1 subgroup), and in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed. A total of 847 patients underwent randomization: 566 were assigned to the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group, and 281 to the placebo-chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 44.1 months. In the CPS-10 subgroup, the median overall survival was 23.0 months in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 16.1 months in the placebo-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; two-sided P = 0.0185 [criterion for significance met]); in the CPS-1 subgroup, the median overall survival was 17.6 and 16.0 months in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.04; two-sided P = 0.1125 [not significant]); and in the intention-to-treat population, the median overall survival was 17.2 and 15.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05 [significance not tested]). Adverse events of grade 3, 4, or 5 that were related to the trial regimen occurred in 68.1% of the patients in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and in 66.9% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in 0.4% of the patients in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and in no patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Among patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a CPS of 10 or more, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; KEYNOTE-355 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02819518.).