Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
566 result(s) for "in situ soil moisture"
Sort by:
Evaluation of SMOS, SMAP, ASCAT and Sentinel-1 Soil Moisture Products at Sites in Southwestern France
This study evaluates the accuracy of several recent remote sensing Surface Soil Moisture (SSM) products at sites in southwestern France. The products used are Soil Moisture Active Passive “SMAP” (level 3: 36 km × 36 km, level 3 enhanced: 9 km × 9 km, and Level 2 SMAP/Sentinel-1: 1 km × 1km), Advanced Scatterometer “ASCAT” (level 2 with three spatial resolution 25 km × 25 km, 12.5 km × 12.5 km, and 1 km × 1 km), Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity “SMOS” (SMOS INRA-CESBIO “SMOS-IC”, SMOS Near-Real-Time “SMOS-NRT”, SMOS Centre Aval de Traitement des Données SMOS level 3 “SMOS-CATDS”, 25 km × 25 km) and Sentinel-1(S1) (25 km × 25 km, 9 km × 9 km, and 1 km × 1 km). The accuracy of SSM products was computed using in situ measurements of SSM observed at a depth of 5 cm. In situ measurements were obtained from the SMOSMANIA ThetaProbe (Time Domaine reflectometry) network (7 stations between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2017) and additional field campaigns (near Montpellier city in France, between 1 January 2017 and 31 May 2017) in southwestern France. For our study sites, results showed that (i) the accuracy of the Level 2 SMAP/Sentinel-1 was lower than that of SMAP-36 km and SMAP-9 km; (ii) the SMAP-36 km and SMAP-9 km products provide more precise SSM estimates than SMOS products (SMOS-IC, SMOS-NRT, and SMOS-CATDS), mainly due to higher sensitivity of SMOS to RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) noise; and (iii) the accuracy of SMAP-36 km and SMAP-9 km products was similar to that of ASCAT (ASCAT-25 km, ASCAT-12.5 km and ASCAT-1 km) and S1 (S1-25 km, S1-9 km, and S1-1 km) products. The accuracy of SMAP, Sentinel-1 and ASCAT SSM products calculated using the average of statistics obtained on each site is defined by a bias of about −3.2 vol. %, RMSD (Root Mean Square Difference) about 7.6 vol. %, ubRMSD (unbiased Root Mean Square Difference)about 5.6 vol. %, and R coefficient about 0.57. For SMOS products, the station average bias, RMSD, ubRMSD, and R coefficient were about −10.6 vol. %, 12.7 vol. %, 5.9 vol. %, and 0.49, respectively.
Evaluation of Satellite and Reanalysis Soil Moisture Products over Southwest China Using Ground-Based Measurements
Long-term global satellite and reanalysis soil moisture products have been available for several years. In this study, in situ soil moisture measurements from 2008 to 2012 over Southwest China are used to evaluate the accuracy of four satellite-based products and one reanalysis soil moisture product. These products are the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth observing system (AMSR-E), the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS), the European Space Agency’s Climate Change Initiative soil moisture (CCI SM), and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interim). The evaluation of soil moisture absolute values and anomalies shows that all the products can capture the temporal dynamics of in situ soil moisture well. For AMSR-E and SMOS, larger errors occur, which are likely due to the severe effects of radio frequency interference (RFI) over the test region. In general, the ERA-Interim (R = 0.782, ubRMSD = 0.035 m3/m3) and CCI SM (R = 0.723, ubRMSD = 0.046 m3/m3) perform the best compared to the other products. The accuracy levels obtained are comparable to validation results from other regions. Therefore, local hydrological applications and water resource management will benefit from the long-term ERA-Interim and CCI SM soil moisture products.
Soil moisture-vegetation interaction from near-global in-situ soil moisture measurements
Although the interactions between soil moisture (SM) and vegetation dynamics have been extensively investigated, most of previous findings are derived from satellite-observed and/or model-simulated SM data, which inevitably include multiple sources of error. With the effort of many field workers and researchers in in-situ SM measurement and SM data integration, it is now possible to obtain the integrated in-situ SM dataset in the global range. Here we used the in-situ SM dataset of the International Soil Moisture Network to analyze the anomaly correlation between SM and leaf area index (LAI). We found that positive (negative) correlations exist between SM (LAI) and temporally lagged LAI (SM). The peak correlation and lagging time to reach it (often less than 3 months) depends on climate, land cover and rooting depths. The high SM-LAI anomaly correlation prevails in water-limited regions, e.g. dryland, where plant physiology has strong sensitivity to subsurface water stress. Dynamics of vegetation with deeper maximum rooting depths are not always correlated with SM in deeper soil layers, and vegetation dynamics with shallower maximum rooting depth may strongly correlate with SM in deeper soil layers. Overall, we highlight the potential of the global in-situ SM observation network to analyze the interactions between SM and vegetation dynamics.
A sensitivity study on the response of convection initiation to in situ soil moisture in the central United States
Soil moisture can affect precipitation, however there is significant debate about the sign and strength of land–atmosphere coupling. This may be due to the differences regarding the selection of data sources, the presence of atmospheric persistence, and the spatial and temporal scales of the analysis. This study is a sensitivity analysis that quantifies how each of these factors influences land–atmosphere coupling in the central United States from 2005 to 2007. Four different sources of soil moisture are used to represent soil moisture: in situ measurements and three satellite products. The Thunderstorm Observation by Radar (ThOR) algorithm is used to identify convective events. The results show that warm-season afternoon convection initiates preferentially over dry soil, if in situ measurements are used. However, when satellite data are used the sign and strength of the soil moisture-precipitation coupling varies depending on which satellite dataset is used. This demonstrates that evaluations of land–atmosphere coupling strength are sensitive to the source of soil moisture. Our results also show that accounting for atmospheric persistence tends to weaken apparent land–atmosphere coupling. Changing the spatial scale of the analysis can also influence the sign and coupling strength. Analyses that are performed at a coarser spatial resolution tend to indicate a wet preference because they do not capture the local negative feedbacks. This study demonstrates that contradictions in the literature regarding the sign and strength of soil moisture-precipitation feedbacks can be partly attributed to differences in datasets, methods and scale of the analysis.
Estimating high-resolution soil moisture by combining data from a sparse network of soil moisture sensors and remotely sensed MODIS LST information
The present work demonstrates a methodology for acquiring high-resolution soil moisture information, namely at 1 km at a daily time step, utilizing data from a sparse network of soil moisture sensors and remotely sensed Land Surface Temperature (LST). Building on previous research and highlighting the strong correlation between surface soil moisture and LST, as a result of the thermal inertia, we first evaluated the correlation between Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LST and ground-based soil moisture information from soil moisture sensors installed in a pilot area in Northeastern Greece. Second, a regression formula was developed for three out of six soil moisture sensors, keeping the three remaining monitoring stations serving as a validation set. Furthermore, regression coefficients were interpolated at 1 km and the regression equations were applied for the entire study area, thus acquiring soil moisture information at a spatial resolution of 1 km at the daily time step. The verification process indicated a reasonable accuracy, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of <0.02 m3/m3. The results were considerably better than using a simple interpolation or downscaled daily 1-km SMAP soil moisture.
Evaluation of satellite-based and reanalysis soil moisture products using ground-observations in the Qilian Mountains
Critical to the reliable application of gridded soil moisture (SM) products is a thorough assessment of their quality, particularly in water conservation and supply areas such as Qilian Mountains (QLM). The study systematically evaluated the accuracy of surface soil moisture (SSM) and root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) using 14 ground-based sites in the QLM from 2019 to 2021. The study evaluated seven SSM products, comprising four satellite-based datasets (AMSR2-LPRM, SMOS-IC, SMAP-L3, and ESA CCI) and three reanalysis datasets (SMAP-L4, GLDAS-Noah, and ERA5-Land). Furthermore, the performance of three RZSM products derived from these reanalysis datasets was also examined. For SSM products, reanalysis products generally exhibit higher R (0.56) and lower ubRMSE (0.04 m3/m3) compared to satellite-based products (0.44, 0.05 m3/m3). The SMAP-L3 showed the best performance (R = 0.71), followed by the ERA5-Land and SMAP-L4. For RZSM products, compared to GLDAS and ERA5-Land, SMAP-L4 demonstrated better performance (R = 0.59) and shown greater potential for application in QLM. The average R (0.65) of SSM was highest for grassland sites, attributed to fewer land cover heterogeneity. For forest sites, the SSM performance was generally lowest (average R = −0.11). In Arou site, the superior spatial representativeness of Cosmic ray neutron sensor (CRNS) measurements enhanced the evaluation performance (higher R, lower ubRMSE) of nearly all products. Notably, the comparative evaluation with in-situ data underscored the robustness of CRNS as a reference for SM evaluation and proved its mesoscale applicability. The research aimed to provide a reference for the application of gridded SM products in water resources monitoring and ecosystem services in QLM.
Validation of the SMOS Level 1C Brightness Temperature and Level 2 Soil Moisture Data over the West and Southwest of Iran
The European Space Agency (ESA) Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission with the MIRAS (Microwave Imaging Radiometer using Aperture Synthesis) L-band radiometer provides global soil moisture (SM) data. SM data and products from remote sensing are relatively new, but they are providing significant observations for weather forecasting, water resources management, agriculture, land surface, and climate models assessment, etc. However, the accuracy of satellite measurements is still subject to error from the retrieval algorithms and vegetation cover. Therefore, the validation of satellite measurements is crucial to understand the quality of retrieval products. The objectives of this study, precisely framed within this mission, are (i) validation of the SMOS Level 1C Brightness Temperature (TBSMOS) products in comparison with simulated products from the L-MEB model (TBL-MEB) and (ii) validation of the SMOS Level 2 SM (SMSMOS) products against ground-based measurements at 10 significant Iranian agrometeorological stations. The validations were performed for the period of January 2012 to May 2015 over the Southwest and West of Iran. The results of the validation analysis showed an RMSE ranging between 9 to 13 K and a strong correlation (R = 0.61–0.84) between TBSMOS and TBL-MEB at all stations. The bias values (0.1 to 7.5 K) showed a slight overestimation for TBSMOS at most of the stations. The results of SMSMOS validation indicated a high agreement (RMSE = 0.046–0.079 m3 m−3 and R = 0.65–0.84) between the satellite SM and in situ measurements over all the stations. The findings of this research indicated that SMSMOS shows high accuracy and agreement with in situ measurements which validate its potential. Due to the limitation of SM measurements in Iran, the SMOS products can be used in different scientific and practical applications at different Iranian study areas.
Upland Rootzone Soil Water Deficit Regulates Streamflow in a Catchment Dominated by North American Tallgrass Prairie
Intermittent tallgrass prairie streams depend on surface runoff and are highly susceptible to hydrological disturbances such as droughts. The objective of this study was to investigate the timing of intermittent streamflow pulses and upstream rootzone soil water deficit in a watershed dominated by tallgrass prairie. The study was conducted from July to December 2021 in the Kings Creek watershed located within the Konza Prairie Biological station, Kansas, USA. Hourly precipitation and soil moisture observations in the 0–10, 10–30, and 30–50 cm depth were obtained from a hydrological network consisting of 16 monitoring stations across the Kings Creek watershed. Rootzone soil water storage (S) was computed at hourly time steps as the sum of the soil water storage of each soil layer. A drained upper limit (DUL) was estimated as the soil moisture remaining 24 h after the soil had been thoroughly wetted during large (~100 mm) rainfall events. A lower limit (LL) was estimated as the lowest rootzone soil water storage during the study period. Hourly soil water deficit (D) was computed as D = (DUL − S)/(DUL − LL). The study period had 19 precipitation events totaling 436 mm, and only 14 out of the 19 precipitation events exceeded a common canopy and litter interception threshold of 4 mm for tallgrass prairies in this region. Only two precipitation events resulted in measurable streamflow, and the inception of these two streamflow events was associated with a negative weighted soil water deficit (i.e., S > DUL). This pilot study revealed that upland rootzone soil water deficit plays a major role controlling the timing of streamflow in the Kings Creek watershed and possibly in other catchment areas with intermittent prairie streams.
The Potential Utility of Satellite Soil Moisture Retrievals for Detecting Irrigation Patterns in China
Climate change and anthropogenic activities, including agricultural irrigation have significantly altered the global and regional hydrological cycle. However, human-induced modification to the natural environment is not well represented in land surface models (LSMs). In this study, we utilize microwave-based soil moisture products to aid the detection of under-represented irrigation processes throughout China. The satellite retrievals used in this study include passive microwave observations from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) and its successor AMSR2, active microwave observations from the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT), and the blended multi-sensor soil moisture product from the European Space Agency (i.e., ESA CCI product). We first conducted validations of the three soil moisture retrievals against in-situ observations (collected from the nationwide agro-meteorological network) in irrigated areas in China. It is found that compared to the conventional Spearman’s rank correlation and Pearson correlation coefficients, entropy-based mutual information is more suitable for evaluating soil moisture anomalies induced by irrigation. In general, around 60% of uncertainties in the anomaly of “ground truth” time series can be resolved by soil moisture retrievals, with ASCAT outperforming the others. Following this, the potential utility of soil moisture retrievals in mapping irrigation patterns in China is investigated by examining the difference in probability distribution functions (detected by two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) between soil moisture retrievals and benchmarks of the numerical model ERA-Interim without considering the irrigation process. Results show that microwave remote sensing provides a promising alternative to detect the under-represented irrigation process against the reference LSM ERA-Interim. Specifically, the highest performance in detecting irrigation intensity is found when using ASCAT in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, followed by advanced microwave scanning radiometer (AMSR) and ESA CCI. Compared to ASCAT, the irrigation detection capabilities of AMSR exhibit higher discrepancies between descending and ascending orbits, since the soil moisture retrieval algorithm of AMSR is based on surface temperature and, thus, more affected by irrigation practices. This study provides insights into detecting the irrigation extent using microwave-based soil moisture with aid of LSM simulations, which has great implications for numerical model development and agricultural managements across the country.
Temporal Variability of Uncertainty in Pixel-Wise Soil Moisture: Implications for Satellite Validation
In-situ soil moisture was widely used to validate and calibrate the satellite-retrieved data of different footprints. However, it contained unavoidable uncertainty when used as spatial representative. This paper examined the uncertainty in pixel-wise soil moisture designed for satellite validation in the HiWATER project. Two in-situ data sets were used for the examination, which were carefully designed to capture the spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture at different scales. Our results indicated that the pixel-wise uncertainty increased with increasing extent. At a small area, the uncertainty referred to the natural spatial variability of in-situ soil moisture. With respect to a large area, sampling error of spatial soil moisture played an important role, particularly of dry condition. Temporally, the uncertainty was higher during rainfall than that after then. It suggested that in-situ soil moisture could be more spatially representative at a small area after rainfall, valuable for satellite validation. Uncertainty was correlated to soil moisture. It was strongly correlated to spatial mean at a small scale and was to the spatial pattern at a large scale. Results of this study offered some clues to examine the uncertainty of in-situ soil moisture for satellite validation.