Explore the vast range of titles available.

The aim of this study was to identify the influencing factors for all-cause mortality in elderly patients with intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures and to construct predictive models. This study retrospectively collected elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures and femoral neck fractures who underwent hip fractures surgery in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2020 to December 2022. Cox proportional hazards regression is used to explore the association between fractures type and mortality. Boruta algorithm was used to screen the risk factors related to death. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent risk factors, and a nomogram prediction model was established. The ROC curve, calibration curve and DCA decision curve were drawn by R language, and the prediction model was established by machine learning algorithm. Among the 1373 patients. There were 6 variables that remained in the model for intertrochanteric fractures: age (HR 1.048, 95% CI 1.014-1.083, p = 0.006), AMI (HR 4.631, 95% CI 2.190-9.795, P < 0.001), COPD (HR 3.818, 95% CI 1.516-9.614, P = 0.004), CHF (HR 2.743, 95% CI 1.510-4.981, P = 0.001), NOAF (HR 1.748, 95% CI 1.033-2.956, P = 0.037), FBG (HR 1.116, 95% CI 1.026-1.215, P = 0.011). There were 3 variables that remained in the model for femoral neck fractures: age (HR 1.145, 95% CI 1.097-1.196, P < 0.001), HbA1c (HR 1.264, 95% CI 1.088-1.468, P = 0.002), BNP (HR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.002, P = 0.019). The experimental results showed that the model has good identification ability, calibration effect and clinical application value. Intertrochanteric fractures is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures. By constructing a prognostic model based on machine learning, the risk factors of mortality in patients with intertrochanteric fractures and femoral neck fractures can be effectively identified, and personalized treatment strategies can be developed.

Background: Few studies have investigated the differences in proximal femoral geometry and risk factors between patients with different types of hip fracture, especially in elderly Chinese. This study aimed to assess the differences in proximal femoral geometry parameters between patients with femoral neck fractures and patients with intertrochanteric fractures to provide guidance for individualized customized prosthesis and accurate reconstruction of proximal femurs in elderly Chinese patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied the electronic medical records of 198 elderly patients over 65 years of age who were admitted to the orthopedic department with hip fractures between January 2017 and December 2017 in The Third Hospital, Hebei Medical University. Age, fracture site, gender, and proximal femoral geometry parameters (neck shaft angle [NSA], center edge angle [CEA], femoral head diameter [FHD], femoral neck diameter [FND], femoral neck axial length [FNAL], hip axial length [HAL], and femoral shaft diameter [FSD]) were recorded. Student's t-test was used to compare the continuous variables, Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and multiple logistic stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of hip fracture type. Results: Statistically significant differences in NSA (137.63 ± 4.56° vs. 132.07 ± 4.17°, t = 1.598, P < 0.001), CEA (37.62 ± 6.77° vs. 43.11 ± 7.09°, t = 5.597, P < 0.001), FND (35.21 ± 3.25 mm vs. 34.09 ± 3.82 mm, t = 2.233, P = 0.027), and FNAL (99.30 ± 7.91 mm vs. 103.58 ± 8.39 mm, t = 3.715, P < 0.001) were found between the femoral neck fracture group and femoral intertrochanteric fracture group. FHD, FND, FSD, HAL, and FNAL were different between sexes (all P < 0.001). The greater NSA was the risk factor for femoral neck fractures (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70, P < 0.001), greater CEA and longer FNAL were risk factors for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (OR: 1.15, 1.17, all P < 0.001), and greater FND was a protective factor for femoral intertrochanteric fractures (OR: 0.74, P < 0.001). Conclusions: We demonstrate differences in geometric morphological parameters of the proximal femur in different hip fracture types, as well as an effect of sex. These differences should be considered in the selection of prostheses for fracture internal fixation and hip replacements. These data could help guide the design of individualized customized prostheses and improve the accurate reconstruction of the proximal femur for elderly Chinese hip fracture patients.

SummaryCurrent research on elderly patients with hip fractures often neglects specific subtypes, either grouping all fracture types or overlooking them entirely. By categorizing elderly patients based on fracture subtypes, we observed diverse baseline characteristics but found no discrepancies in measured outcomes. This emphasizes the need for caution in future research dealing with different or broader measured outcomes that were not covered by the scope of this research.Purpose/IntroductionExisting research in elderly patients with hip fractures often overlooks the distinct subtypes or lumps all fracture types together. We aim to examine the differences between hip fracture subtypes to assess if these differences are meaningful for clinical outcomes and should be considered in future research.MethodsPatients above 65 years who underwent hip fracture surgeries during a three-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were grouped based on fracture subtype: non-displaced femoral neck (nDFN), displaced femoral neck (DFN), stable intertrochanteric (sIT), and unstable intertrochanteric (uIT).ResultsAmong the 1,285 included cases, the nDFN-group had lower ASA scores (p = 0.009) and younger patients (p < 0.001), followed by the DFN-group (p = 0.014). The uIT-group had a higher proportion of female patients (72.3%, p = 0.004). Differences in preoperative ambulation status were observed (p = 0.001). However, no significant associations were found between fracture type and postoperative outcomes, including ambulation, transfusions, complications, reoperations, or mortality. Gender and preoperative ambulation status were predictors of mortality across all time frames. ASA score predicted mortality only within the first year after surgery. Age and gender were predictors of postoperative blood transfusions, while age and preoperative ambulation status were predictors of postoperative complications.ConclusionsVariations in baseline characteristics of hip fractures were observed, but no significant differences were found in measured outcomes. This indicates that the hip fracture group is not homogeneous, emphasizing the need for caution in research involving this population. While grouping all types of proximal femur fractures may be acceptable depending on the outcome being studied, it's essential not to extrapolate these results to outcomes beyond the study's scope. Therefore, we recommend consider hip fracture subtypes when researching different outcomes not covered by this study.

The aim of our study was to explore the risk factors related to blood transfusion after intramedullary nail fixation of elderly femoral intertrochanteric fracture (FTF) and establish a nomogram prediction model. We conducted a retrospective study including elderly FTF patients treated by intramedullary nail between January 2017 and December 2019. Perioperative information was obtained retrospectively, uni- and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for blood transfusion. A nomogram model was established to predict the risk of blood transfusion, and consistency coefficient (C-index) and correction curve were used to evaluate the prediction performance and consistency of the model. Of 148 patients, 119 were finally enrolled in the study and and 46 patients (38.7%) received a blood transfusion after the operation. Logistic regression analysis the female, lower preoperative Hb, ASA score >2, general anesthesia, and higher intraoperative blood loss were independently associated with the blood transfusion. The accuracy of the contour map for predicting transfusion risk was 0.910. These risk factors are shown on the nomogram and verified. Through the assessment of the risk of blood transfusion and the intervention of modifiable risk factors, we may be able to reduce the blood transfusion rate to a certain extent, so as to further guarantee the safety of the elderly patients during the perioperative period.

Background The treatment of proximal femoral fractures in geriatric osteoporotic patients continues to be a challenge in orthopaedic trauma. Various kinds of cephalomedullary nails, such as gamma nail, InterTan and PFNA were used clinically. The latest generation PFNA II, specially designed for Asian population, is commonly used for geriatric per-/intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study was to determine whether the current PFNA-II proximal segment length is suitable for the greater trochanter height, as assessed by postoperative radiograph measurements. Materials and Methods 51 consecutive patients with per-/intertrochanteric fractures treated with the PFNA-II between July 2012 and December 2012 were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males and 32 females, with an average age of 78.6 years (range 66–92 years). According to AO/OTA classification system, there were 4 cases of 31A1 fractures, 35 cases of 31A2 fractures, and 12 cases of 31A3 fractures. The nail protrusion height over the lateral greater trochanter and the Parker ratio of the helical blade tip in the femoral head were measured and compared using pelvic digital anteroposterior radiographs taken within 2 weeks postoperatively. Patients were followed up for a minimum period of 1 year to check whether they had lateral trochanter pain. Results Postoperative digital anteroposterior (AP) films were used for assessment and any prominence was recorded as positive. Overall, nail protrusion over the greater trochanter occurred in 87.8% of cases. In 60.8% of the cases, protrusion height was >5 mm. The average protrusion height was 6.25 ± 4.27 mm (male average 4.84 ± 4.38 mm, and female average 7.09 ± 4.70 mm). The average Parker ratio of all cases was 51.0 ± 6.9% (male average 49.8 ± 7.5% and female average 51.7 ± 6.5%). Protrusion height was positively correlated (r = 0.394, P = 0.004) with the helical blade position in the femoral head (Parker ratio). Clinically, a total of 42 patients were followed up at an average of 15.0 ± 2.6 months (range 12–24 months) they were able to walk independently or with a stick. There were 13 patients with lateral trochanter pain on the injured side. Protrusion height of these patients was 11.13 ± 3.75 mm, whereas the protrusion height of the remaining 29 patients was 3.87 ± 3.39 mm. Conclusions There was a morphologic mismatch between the proximal segment length of the PFNA-II and the greater trochanter in the Asian population, which may be the cause of postoperative lateral trochanter pain. A modification to shorten the proximal part of the nail is proposed to avoid protrusion over the greater trochanter.

Objective The management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures is difficult because such fractures have unique biomechanical characteristics. This study was performed to review the results of treating reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures with a long cephalomedullary nail by embedding the lateral end of the lag screw to secure axial compression. Methods We herein report the surgical outcomes in seven patients with reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures treated with our procedure. Patients whose hip screws obviously had no contact with the distal fragment and whose follow-up time was too short were excluded. The lateral end of the lag screw was embedded within the lateral cortex, and the screws were locked to the nail. All nails were long, and a distal locking screw was inserted in the dynamized position. Results No reoperation, definite leg length discrepancy, or malunion occurred in this study. Conclusions These data suggest that early complications do not seem to increase when the lateral end of the lag screw is embedded and the screw is locked to the nail in the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture at this stage.

Background External fixation is a well-known procedure for the management of intertrochanteric fractures in very elderly high-risk patients. A new compression pin that can be adapted to all fixators was designed to provide inter fragmentary compression. In the present study, its effects on the fracture stability and healing were evaluated. Materials and Methods Thirty-one patients treated using compression pin and thirty-six patients treated using standard pins were evaluated retrospectively between January 2009 and July 2014. Patients were evaluated according to age, gender, duration of preoperative period, duration of operation time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, and immediate postoperative and final femoral neck angle measurements. The stability of the fixation was evaluated by calculating the secondary varus angulation after weight bearing. Results Thirty one patients (82.1 ± 6.1 years old) comprised the compression pin group, and 36 patients (83.33 ± 6.24 years old) comprised the standard pin group. From the time of weight bearing to healing time, 1.0 ± 1.25° (0–4) and 2.5 ± 1.8° (0–9) of secondary varus angulation in the compression pin and standard pin groups were measured, respectively ( P = 0.000). With weight bearing, 2 of 31 (6%) and 9 of 36 (25%) patients in the compression and standard pin groups, respectively, had >4° of secondary varus angulation. In the compression pin group, 13 fractures were unstable, but only 2 (15%) of them had >4° of secondary varus angulation. In the standard pin group, 19 fractures were unstable, and 7 (37%) of them had >4° of secondary varus angulation. Conclusions Treatment of very elderly, high risk patients’ with intertrochanteric fractures with external fixation is effective. Compression pin maintained stability better than standard pins after weight bearing, especially for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Posterior dislocations of the hip are known to be associated with fractures of the femoral head, neck, shaft, or posterior acetabular wall. However, its association with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture has only been anecdotally described in the English literature. We report two such cases managed by open reduction (OR) of the hip and internal fixation (IF) of the intertrochanteric fracture. The first case was a 26-year-old male who was managed by OR of the hip with IF of the intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw and had a good functional result at 1-year followup. The second case was a 36-year-old female who was also managed by OR of the hip with IF of the head fragments with Herbert screw and IF of the intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic condylar screw. The patient had a fair, functional result at 1-year followup. With the increase in high energy trauma, these fracture patterns have become more common, and there is an urgent need to review the existing classifications so that these fractures are better categorized, and treatment guidelines defined.

The purpose of this study was to analyze cases of AO31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) and to identify the relationship between the loss of the posteromedial support and implant failure. Three hundred ninety-four patients who underwent operative treatment for ITF from January 2003 to December 2017 were enrolled. Focusing on posteromedial support, the A2 ITFs were divided into two groups, namely, those with (Group A, n = 153) or without (Group B, n = 241) posteromedial support post-operatively, and the failure rates were compared. Based on the final outcomes (failed or not), we allocated all of the patients into two groups: failed (Group C, n = 66) and normal (Group D, n = 328). We separately analyzed each dataset to identify the factors that exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups. In addition, a logistic regression was conducted to identify whether the loss of posteromedial support of A2 ITFs was an independent risk factor for fixation failure. The basic factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, side of affected limb, fixation method (intramedullary or extramedullary), time from injury to operation, blood loss, operative time and length of stay. The failure rate of group B (58, 24.07%) was significantly higher than that of group A (8, 5.23%) (Χ = 23.814, P < 0.001). Regarding Groups C and D, the comparisons of the fixation method (P = 0.005), operative time (P = 0.001), blood loss (P = 0.002) and length of stay (P = 0.033) showed that the differences were significant. The logistic regression revealed that the loss of posteromedial support was an independent risk factor for implant failure (OR = 5.986, 95% CI: 2.667-13.432) (P < 0.001). For AO31-A2 ITFs, the loss of posteromedial support was an independent risk factor for fixation failure. Therefore, posteromedial wall reconstruction might be necessary for the effective treatment of A2 fractures that lose posteromedial support.

IntroductionIntertrochanteric hip fractures pose a significant health problem. The proximal femur nail anti-rotation (PFNA IIDePuySynthes) is the most commonly used implant for intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures at our institution. We aim to identify the risk factors predisposing to mechanical failure of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixation with PFNAII in our Southeast Asian population.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 295 consecutive patients who underwent PFNA fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur between January 2014 and June 2018 at our institution. Exclusion criteria included a follow-up period of less than 4 months and patients with polytrauma. 204 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 22 had mechanical failure of PFNAII. We compared these patients with respect to their demographics, medical co-morbidities, quality of reduction according to the Baumgartner scale, calcar restoration, blade position according to Cleveland Zones, the stability of fracture according to OTA/AO classification, neck-shaft-angle, tip-apex distance, as well as neck of femur bone mineral density T-score. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 4 months and until fracture union or complication had occurred. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds ratio for mechanical failure for selected variables.ResultsGood quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure whilst posterior blade position in lateral hip X-ray predicted it, with odds ratios of 0.147 (95% confidence interval, 0.030–0.733; p = 0.019) and12.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.583–92.825; p = 0.016) respectively. On univariate analysis, the mechanical failure group were older, had poorer calcar restoration, more unstable fracture patterns, more varus neck-shaft angle, and trochanteric starting points that were lateral to or on the tip of the greater trochanter. However, these were not significant in multivariate analysis. Tip apex distance, the severity of osteoporosis, presence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease and serum vitamin D levels were not significant predictors of failure.ConclusionsTo avoid mechanical failure, one should aim to achieve a good quality of reduction and centre blade position on lateral hip X-ray. Tip apex distance did not predict mechanical failure in our study.