Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "locally swept-back"
Sort by:
Towards a Balanced Design of a Grid Fin with Lightweight Aerodynamics and Structural Integrity
It is widely accepted that the lightweight design of a grid fin is closely related to its aerodynamic performance and structural integrity, while limited work seeks their balance. This study proposes a lightweight grid fin design method by taking the locally swept-back angle as a variable based on three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics and fluid–thermo–structure coupling analysis for Mach numbers ranging from 0.8 to 5. The effect of the swept-back angle on the relative aerodynamic efficiency profit, weight saving, and structural integrity (with a focus on static strength) was analyzed. The results showed that the locally swept-back configuration maintained structural integrity while enabling simultaneous aerodynamic performance improvement and weight saving across different Mach numbers through swept-back angle adjustment. At Mach 0.8, 1.5, and 2.0, the 20° swept-back configuration achieved a 13.2% weight saving and improved aerodynamic performance. At Mach 0.9, the 15° configuration delivered optimal aerodynamic enhancement with a 10% weight saving. Notably, the 15° configuration demonstrated excellent balance after evaluating all Mach number operating conditions. All these highlight a good attempt for the trade-off design of structures among weight saving, aerodynamic performance, and structural integrity.