Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Different responses in human coronary arteries (HCA) and human middle meningeal arteries (HMMA) were observed for some of the novel CGRP receptor antagonists, the gepants, for inhibiting CGRP-induced relaxation. These differences could be explained by the presence of different receptor populations in the two vascular beds. Here, we aim to elucidate which receptors are involved in the relaxation to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), adrenomedullin (AM) and adrenomedullin 2 (AM2) in HCA and HMMA. Methods RNA was isolated from homogenized human arteries (23 HCAs; 12 F, 11 M, age 50 ± 3 years and 26 HMMAs; 14 F, 12 M, age 51 ± 3 years) and qPCR was performed for different receptor subunits. Additionally, relaxation responses to CGRP, AM or AM2 of the human arteries were quantified using a Mulvany myograph system, in the presence or absence of the adrenomedullin 1 receptor antagonist AM 22-52 and/or olcegepant. Results Calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) mRNA was expressed equally in both vascular beds, while calcitonin receptor (CTR) and receptor activity-modifying protein 3 (RAMP3) expression was low and could not be detected in all samples. RAMP1 expression was similar in HCA and HMMA, while RAMP2 expression was higher in HMMA. Moreover, receptor component protein (RCP) expression was higher in HMMA than in HCA. Functional experiments showed that olcegepant inhibits relaxation to all three agonists in both vascular beds. In HCA, antagonist AM 22-52 did not inhibit relaxation to any of the agonists, while a trend for blocking relaxation to AM and AM2 could be observed in HMMA. Conclusion Based on the combined results from receptor subunit mRNA expression and the functional responses in both vascular tissues, relaxation of HCA is mainly mediated via the canonical CGRP receptor (CLR-RAMP1), while relaxation of HMMA can be mediated via both the canonical CGRP receptor and the adrenomedullin 1 receptor (CLR-RAMP2). Future research should investigate whether RAMP2 predominance over RAMP1 in the meningeal vasculature results in altered migraine susceptibility or in a different response to anti-migraine medication in these patients. Moreover, the exact role of RCP in CGRP receptor signalling should be elucidated in future research.

Receptor-activity–modifying proteins (RAMPs) are single transmembrane-spanning proteins which serve as molecular chaperones and allosteric modulators of G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their signaling pathways. Although RAMPs have been previously studied in the context of their effects on Family B GPCRs, the coevolution of RAMPs with many GPCR families suggests an expanded repertoire of potential interactions. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based and cell-surface expression approaches, we comprehensively screen for RAMP interactions within the chemokine receptor family and identify robust interactions between RAMPs and nearly all chemokine receptors. Most notably, we identify robust RAMP interaction with atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs), which function to establish chemotactic gradients for directed cell migration. Specifically, RAMP3 association with atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) diminishes adrenomedullin (AM) ligand availability without changing G-protein coupling. Instead, RAMP3 is required for the rapid recycling of ACKR3 to the plasma membrane through Rab4-positive vesicles following either AM or SDF-1/CXCL12 binding, thereby enabling formation of dynamic spatiotemporal chemotactic gradients. Consequently, genetic deletion of either ACKR3 or RAMP3 in mice abolishes directed cell migration of retinal angiogenesis. Thus, RAMP association with chemokine receptor family members represents a molecular interaction to control receptor signaling and trafficking properties.

We developed a novel and convenient method for rapidly identifying CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-edited biallelic knockout (KO) cells/individuals carrying insertions or deletions of a few nucleotides (indels) by performing PCR on genomic DNA samples under stringent conditions and low MgCl 2 concentrations. The biallelic KO samples can be judged as ‘negative’ under these conditions. The sense primer corresponds to the sequence recognised by guide RNA and subsequently cleaved by Cas9 immediately upstream of a target gene’s proto-spacer adjacent motif (PAM), and the reverse primer corresponds to the sequence ~200 bp downstream from the PAM. PCR performed using this primer set under standard MgCl 2 concentrations (1.5–2.5 mM) should generate PCR products derived from both mutated and unedited alleles, whereas PCR performed using lower MgCl 2 concentrations (0.8–2 mM) should yield products derived from unedited alleles. This enables high-throughput screening of biallelic mutants among cells/embryos having ≥1 indels at a region within 5 bp upstream of the PAM (where more than 94% of indels are known to appear). We performed proof-of-principle analyses of this novel approach using genome-edited Et1, Tyr, Ramp1, Ramp3 , and Rosa26 mouse samples carrying various types of indels, and demonstrate that this new technique allows rapid identification of biallelic KO mutants among samples carrying various types of indels and mosaic mutations with 100% accuracy. We name this system detection of b iallelic KO mutants harbouring indel s using PCR (Bindel-PCR).

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a widely expressed neuropeptide that has a major role in sensory neurotransmission. The CGRP receptor is a heterodimer of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) class B G-protein-coupled receptor and a type 1 transmembrane domain protein, receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1). Here we report the structure of the human CGRP receptor in complex with CGRP and the G -protein heterotrimer at 3.3 Å global resolution, determined by Volta phase-plate cryo-electron microscopy. The receptor activity-modifying protein transmembrane domain sits at the interface between transmembrane domains 3, 4 and 5 of CLR, and stabilizes CLR extracellular loop 2. RAMP1 makes only limited direct contact with CGRP, consistent with its function in allosteric modulation of CLR. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that RAMP1 provides stability to the receptor complex, particularly in the positioning of the extracellular domain of CLR. This work provides insights into the control of G-protein-coupled receptor function.

Efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (calcitonin receptor-like receptor/receptor activity modifying protein-1, CLR/RAMP1) implicates peripherally-released CGRP in migraine pain. However, the site and mechanism of CGRP-evoked peripheral pain remain unclear. By cell-selective RAMP1 gene deletion, we reveal that CGRP released from mouse cutaneous trigeminal fibers targets CLR/RAMP1 on surrounding Schwann cells to evoke periorbital mechanical allodynia. CLR/RAMP1 activation in human and mouse Schwann cells generates long-lasting signals from endosomes that evoke cAMP-dependent formation of NO. NO, by gating Schwann cell transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), releases ROS, which in a feed-forward manner sustain allodynia via nociceptor TRPA1. When encapsulated into nanoparticles that release cargo in acidified endosomes, a CLR/RAMP1 antagonist provides superior inhibition of CGRP signaling and allodynia in mice. Our data suggest that the CGRP-mediated neuronal/Schwann cell pathway mediates allodynia associated with neurogenic inflammation, contributing to the algesic action of CGRP in mice. The mechanism of CGRP-evoked peripheral pain is unclear. Here, the authors show that the CGRP-mediated neuronal/Schwann cell pathway mediates allodynia associated with neurogenic inflammation, contributing to the algesic action of CGRP in mice.

Although amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide accumulation is considered as a key early event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), the precise pathophysiology of this deadly illness remains unclear and no effective remedies capable of inhibiting disease progression have been discovered. In addition to deposition of extracellular Aβ plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, neuroinflammation has been identified as the third core characteristic crucial in the pathogenesis of AD. More and more evidence from laboratory and clinical studies have suggested that anti-inflammatory treatments could defer or prevent the occurrence of AD. In this review, we will discuss multifaceted evidence of neuroinflammation presented in AD and the newly emerged anti-inflammatory targets both in pre-clinical and clinical AD.

Background This update of the guideline on the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was commissioned by the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and prepared in collaboration with the European Reference Network for Neuromuscular Diseases (ERN EURO‐NMD) and the support of the European Network for the Cure ALS (ENCALS) and the European Organization for Professionals and Patients with ALS (EUpALS). Methods Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the effectiveness of interventions for ALS. Two systematic reviewers from Cochrane Response supported the guideline panel. The working group identified a total of 26 research questions, performed systematic reviews, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided where insufficient evidence was available. Results A guideline mapping effort revealed only one other ALS guideline that used GRADE methodology (a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE] guideline). The available evidence was scarce for many research questions. Of the 26 research questions evaluated, the NICE recommendations could be adapted for 8 questions. Other recommendations required updates of existing systematic reviews or de novo reviews. Recommendations were made on currently available disease‐modifying treatments, multidisciplinary care, nutritional and respiratory support, communication aids, psychological support, treatments for common ALS symptoms (e.g., muscle cramps, spasticity, pseudobulbar affect, thick mucus, sialorrhea, pain), and end‐of‐life management. Conclusions This update of the guideline using GRADE methodology provides a framework for the management of ALS. The treatment landscape is changing rapidly, and further updates will be prepared when additional evidence becomes available.

CGRP, adrenomedullin (ADM), and adrenomedullin 2 (ADM2) family peptides are important neuropeptides and hormones for the regulation of neurotransmission, vasotone, cardiovascular morphogenesis, vascular integrity, and feto‒placental development. These peptides signal through CLR/RAMP1, 2 and 3 receptor complexes. CLR/RAMP1, or CGRP receptor, antagonists have been developed for the treatment of migraine headache and osteoarthritis pain; whereas CLR/RAMP2, or ADM receptor, antagonists are being developed for the treatment of tumor growth/metastasis. Based on the finding that an acylated chimeric ADM/ADM2 analog potently stimulates CLR/RAMP1 and 2 signaling, we hypothesized that the binding domain of this analog could have potent inhibitory activity on CLR/RAMP receptors. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that acylated truncated ADM/ADM2 analogs of 27-31 residues exhibit potent antagonistic activity toward CLR/RAMP1 and 2. On the other hand, nonacylated analogs have minimal activity. Further truncation at the junctional region of these chimeric analogs led to the generation of CLR/RAMP1-selective antagonists. A 17-amino-acid analog (Antagonist 2-4) showed 100-fold selectivity for CLR/RAMP1 and was >100-fold more potent than the classic CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP8-37. In addition, we showed (1) a lysine residue in the Antagonist 2-4 is important for enhancing the antagonistic activity, (2) an analog consisted of an ADM sequence motif and a 12-amino-acid binding domain of CGRP exhibits potent CLR/RAMP1-inhibitory activity, and (3) a chimeric analog consisted of a somatostatin analog and an ADM antagonist exhibits dual activities on somatostatin and CLR/RAMP receptors. Because the blockage of CLR/RAMP signaling prevents migraine pain and suppresses tumor growth/metastasis, further studies of these analogs, which presumably have better access to the tumor microenvironment and nerve endings at the trigeminal ganglion and synovial joints as compared to antibody-based therapies, may lead to the development of better anti-CGRP therapy and alternative antiangiogenesis therapy. Likewise, the use of bifunctional somatostatin-ADM antagonist analogs could be a promising strategy for the treatment of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors by targeting an antiangiogenesis agent to the neuroendocrine tumor microenvironment.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) regulates inflammation via signaling through receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1. Here, we investigated the role of RAMP1 signaling in growth of lymphatic vessels during inflammation. Lymphangiogenesis in the diaphragm of RAMP1-deficient (−/−) mice or their wild-type (WT) counterparts was induced by repeated intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Compared with WT mice, LPS-induced lymphangiogenesis in RAMP1−/− mice was suppressed. This was accompanied by the reduced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and VEGF-D. The number of CD4+ cells in diaphragm tissue from WT mice was greater than RAMP1−/− mice. Removing CD4+ cells attenuated lymphangiogenesis and expression of VEGF-C and VEGF-D. CD4+ cells isolated from RAMP1−/− mice exhibited reduced expression of VEGF-C and VEGF-D. The number of CD11b+ cells from RAMP1−/− mice was higher than WT mice and was associated with the upregulated expression of genes related to pro-inflammatory macrophage phenotype and downregulation of reparative macrophage phenotype-related expression. When fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran was injected into the peritoneal cavity, the amount of residual FITC-dextran in WT mice was lower than that in RAMP1−/− mice. The present results suggest that RAMP1 signaling in immune cells plays a critical role in inflammation-related lymphangiogenesis; therefore, it represents a novel target for controlling lymphangiogenesis.

The immune system has a critical role in orchestrating tissue healing. As a result, regenerative strategies that control immune components have proved effective 1 , 2 . This is particularly relevant when immune dysregulation that results from conditions such as diabetes or advanced age impairs tissue healing following injury 2 , 3 . Nociceptive sensory neurons have a crucial role as immunoregulators and exert both protective and harmful effects depending on the context 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 – 12 . However, how neuro–immune interactions affect tissue repair and regeneration following acute injury is unclear. Here we show that ablation of the Na V 1.8 nociceptor impairs skin wound repair and muscle regeneration after acute tissue injury. Nociceptor endings grow into injured skin and muscle tissues and signal to immune cells through the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) during the healing process. CGRP acts via receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) on neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages to inhibit recruitment, accelerate death, enhance efferocytosis and polarize macrophages towards a pro-repair phenotype. The effects of CGRP on neutrophils and macrophages are mediated via thrombospondin-1 release and its subsequent autocrine and/or paracrine effects. In mice without nociceptors and diabetic mice with peripheral neuropathies, delivery of an engineered version of CGRP accelerated wound healing and promoted muscle regeneration. Harnessing neuro–immune interactions has potential to treat non-healing tissues in which dysregulated neuro–immune interactions impair tissue healing. Experiments in mouse models show that Na V 1.8 +  nociceptors innervate sites of injury and provide wound repair signals to immune cells by releasing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP).