Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "monotonocity"
Sort by:
Difference monotonicity analysis on discrete fractional operators with discrete generalized Mittag-Leffler kernels
In this paper, we present the monotonicity analysis for the nabla fractional differences with discrete generalized Mittag-Leffler kernels (a−1ABR∇δ,γy)(η) of order 0<δ<0.5, β=1, 0<γ≤1 starting at a−1. If (a−1ABR∇δ,γy)(η)≥0, then we deduce that y(η) is δ2γ-increasing. That is, y(η+1)≥δ2γy(η) for each η∈Na:=a,a+1,…. Conversely, if y(η) is increasing with y(a)≥0, then we deduce that (a−1ABR∇δ,γy)(η)≥0. Furthermore, the monotonicity properties of the Caputo and right fractional differences are concluded to. Finally, we find a fractional difference version of the mean value theorem as an application of our results. One can see that our results cover some existing results in the literature.
On Optimality of Stepdown and Stepup Multiple Test Procedures
Consider the multiple testing problem of testing k null hypotheses, where the unknown family of distributions is assumed to satisfy a certain monotonicity assumption. Attention is restricted to procedures that control the familywise error rate in the strong sense and which satisfy a monotonicity condition. Under these assumptions, we prove certain maximin optimality results for some well-known stepdown and stepup procedures.
Constrained monotonicity and the measurement of power
In this paper we will discuss constraints on the number of (non-dummy) players & on the distribution of votes such that local monotonicity is satisfied for the Public Good Index. These results are compared to properties that are related to constraints on the redistribution of votes (such as implied by global monotonicity). The discussion shows that monotonicity is not a straightforward criterion of classification for power measures. 2 Figures, 1 Appendix, 20 References. Adapted from the source document.