Explore the vast range of titles available.

Lay Summary Authors performed a chart review to identify cases of mycophenolate mofetil gastrointestinal toxicity at our institution. In this cohort, friability was associated with severe disease; and nausea and erythema were associated with poor prognosis.

Prophylactic immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), including post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), exhibit complex pharmacokinetic profiles. Interindividual variations in pharmacokinetic exposure to these immunosuppressants or their metabolites may interfere with treatment outcomes. A feasibility study (n = 11) was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship in patients undergoing HLA-haploidentical alloHCT with standard high-dose PTCy (50 mg·kg ·day on days +3/+4) combined with MMF and tacrolimus or sirolimus. Blood samples were collected to assess the variability in pharmacokinetic biomarkers, including exposures [areas under the curve (AUCs)] to cyclophosphamide (Cy), carboxycyclophosphamide (cepm), -dechloroethyl cyclophosphamide (dccy), 4-ketocyclophosphamide (ketocy), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG). Serial dynamic changes in immune cell populations, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), over the first 3 post-transplant weeks were monitored. A transient reduction in the proliferation (Ki-67 ) of activated (HLA-DR ) T cells coincided with Cy treatment. The ratio of Tregs to the CD4 T-cell population increased in a time-dependent manner within the first 21 days post-transplant. We observed moderate interindividual variability across all pharmacokinetic biomarkers. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels positively correlated with exposure to Cy and MMF metabolites, including cepm, MPA, and MPAG. Using correlation analysis, we further confirmed the negative association between pharmacokinetic (PK) biomarkers and lymphocyte count, but not Treg percentage, suggesting that careful optimization of Cy and MMF dosing may have the potential to support immune recovery, although this requires further validation in larger studies. The relationship of pharmacokinetic biomarkers to immune and clinical outcomes warrants further investigation in larger studies but holds promise for personalizing dosing of GVHD prophylaxis to improve patient outcomes after alloHCT.

Introduction The association between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not been clarified. This study evaluated the degree and factors in effect of MMF use on infection in patients with SLE. Methods A hospitalized-based observational study was conducted to collect medical records on patients with SLE during 2010–2021. A nested case–control study was performed among 3339 patients with SLE, including 1577 cases and 1762 controls by whether they developed any type of infection. The exposure of MMF use was determined within 1 year before diagnosed infection or the end of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for association between MMF and subsequent infection. Results MMF was significantly associated with the risk of overall infection (adjusted OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.48–2.44) and different types of infections, including bacterial infection (adjusted OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.55–2.75), viral infection (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23–3.01), and opportunistic infection (adjusted OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.31–3.46). The top three risks of specific types of infections were bacteremia/septicemia, urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis, and herpes zoster. Stratification analysis showed risk of overall infection increased especially in MMF users with age over 55 years, diabetes, central nervous system involvement, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, the risk of infection increased with increasing dosage and duration of MMF use. Additionally, the combination of MMF with CYC and other immunosuppressants significantly increases the risk of infections compared to using a single one. Conclusions MMF use is associated with various type of infections in patients with SLE, particularly in those with longer use, older age, complications with comorbidities, and concomitant use of CYC or other immunosuppressants.

Background Visceral disseminated varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection is a rare but life-threatening complication in immunosuppressed patients. Herein, we report a survival case of visceral disseminated VZV infection in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Case presentation A 37-year-old woman was diagnosed as SLE and initial induction therapy was started. Two months after starting the immunosuppressive therapy consisting of 40 mg of prednisolone (PSL) and 1500 mg of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) daily, she suddenly developed strong abdominal pain, which was required opioid analgesics, followed by systemic skin blisters, which were diagnosed as varicella. Laboratory findings showed rapid exacerbation of severe liver failure, coagulation abnormalities and increased numbers of blood VZV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Therefore, she was diagnosed as visceral disseminated VZV infection. Multidisciplinary treatment with acyclovir, immunoglobulin and antibiotics was started, the dose of PSL was reduced, and MMF was withdrawn. By their treatment, her symptoms were resolved and she finally discharged. Conclusions Our case highlights the importance of a clinical suspicion of visceral disseminated VZV infections, and the necessity of immediate administration of acyclovir and reduced doses of immunosuppressant to save patients with SLE.

Mycophenolate mofetil （MMF） is an important immunosuppressant used in renal transplantation, and mycophenolic acid （MPA） is the active component released from the ester prodrug MMF. The objective of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid （MPA） following oral administration of MMF in Chinese adult renal transplant recipients and to identify factors that explain MPA pharmacokinetic variability. Pharmacokinetic data for MPA and covariate information were retrospectively collected from 118 patients （79 patients were assigned to the group for building the population pharmacokinetic model, while 39 patients were assigned to the validation group）. Population pharmacokinetic data analysis was performed using the NONMEM software. The pharmacokinetics of MPA was best described by a two-compartment model with a first-order absorption rate with no lag time. Body weight and serum creatinine level were positively correlated with apparent clearance （CL/F）. The polymorphism in uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase gene, UGT2B7, significantly explained the Jnterindividual variability Jn the initial volume of distribution （V~/ F）I The estimated population parameters （and interindividual variability） were CL/F 18.3 L/h （34.2%） and V1/F 27.9 L （21.3%）. The interoccasion variability was 13.7%. These population pharmacokinetic data have significant clinical value for the individualization of MMF therapy in Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by fluctuating muscle weakness due to autoantibodies targeting neuromuscular junction proteins. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive therapy, has shown potential for managing MG with fewer side effects compared to other treatments. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of MMF in MG patients in a real-life multicenter setting. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on generalized MG patients, refractory to azathioprine (AZA) and treated with MMF alone or with steroids, at three Italian centers from January 2011 to February 2024. Patients were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification, MG composite score (MGCS), and MG activity of daily living (MGADL) scores at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Statistical analyses included the Spearman correlation, the Friedman test, and ANOVA. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled (13 males, mean age 66.5 ± 11.5 years). Significant improvements in MGADL and MGCS scores were observed at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001), with continued improvement over 24 months. Side effects were reported in 12% of patients. MMF showed a faster onset of symptom control compared to azathioprine, with a significant improvement noted within 6 months. Conclusions: A recent study found that MMF and AZA were equally effective in improving patients’ quality of life, but because AZA had more serious adverse events than MMF, lower doses of AZA were therefore recommended to reduce the adverse events while maintaining efficacy. Conversely, results showed that MMF is effective and well-tolerated in the long-term management of MG, providing faster symptom control and a favorable safety profile. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings and explore sex differences in response to MMF treatment.

Background Approximately 30% of children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome develop a complicated course with frequent relapses or steroid dependency. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is a safe and effective alternative to steroids or other immunosuppressants for achieving and maintaining remission in this population at short term. Despite the good initial response relapses inevitably occur after regeneration of B lymphocytes, necessitating either repeat courses of rituximab or addition of another steroid-sparing immunosuppressant. Methods This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, two-parallel-arm randomized controlled phase III study among children with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome who are maintained in remission with oral steroids. One hundred children will be randomized to either Rituximab and maintenance Mycophenolate mofetil (A) or repeated courses of prophylactic Rituximab only (B). In arm A, mycophenolate mofetil (1200 mg/m 2 per day) will be started 3 months after Rituximab administration. In arm B, Rituximab infusions will be administered at 0, 8 and 16 months if B cell count normalize at the given time points. Prednisolone will be discontinued in both groups 2 weeks following first course of rituximab. Primary aim is to evaluate the difference in 24-month relapse-free survival. Main secondary endpoints are cumulative prednisolone dose, frequency of relapses and changes in anthropometry. Circulating B lymphocyte populations will be studied as biomarkers or predictors of rituximab responsiveness and adverse events will be analysed. Discussion The study will provide evidence as to the comparative safety and efficacy of two alternative steroid-sparing therapeutic options in children suffering from steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. The two-year study design will address the long-term results obtained with the alternative treatment protocols. Trial registration This trial was prospectively registered to the Clinicaltrial.gov ( NCT03899103 dated 02/04/2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) and Clinical Trials Registry of India ( CTRI/2019/04/018517 dated 09/04/2019).

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease of the brain due to a polyoma virus, JC virus. Despite the ubiquity of this virus, PML is rare and almost always seen in association with an underlying immunosuppressive condition. In the last 30 years, AIDS has been the most common predisposing factor. The observation of PML attending the use of certain monoclonal antibody therapies and other pharmacological agents has raised concerns about the safety profile of these agents, but has also provided a window into the pathogenesis of PML. Certain agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies natalizumab, an [alpha]4 [beta]1 and [alpha]4 [beta]7 integrin inhibitor, and efalizumab, an antibody directed against CD11a, appear to uniquely predispose to PML. Prior to their introduction for multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease with respect to natalizumab, and psoriasis with respect to efalizumab, PML had never been observed with these disorders. PML occurring with other agents that currently carry US FDA-mandated 'blackbox' warnings, such as rituximab, an antibody directed to CD20, or mycophenolate mofetil, a drug that inhibits T- and B-cell proliferation, typically occur in the background of underlying disorders that have already been identified as risks for PML. This review will focus on the available data regarding the risk for PML with monoclonal antibodies and other drugs. A biologically plausible explanation for the increased risk of PML will be proposed, as well as potential strategies for mitigating disease risk.

Background Combination therapy with glucocorticoids and adjunctive immunomodulating drugs has been generally accepted as a standard treatment regimen for meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology (MUE). We hypothesized that treatment with MMF as an adjunctive agent along with glucocorticoids would be effective and well-tolerated protocol in dogs with MUE. Eighty-six dogs with MUE between May 2009 and June 2017 were included (59 females and 27 males; mean age of 5.93 years; mean body weight of 3.83 kg). The medical records of dogs with MUE treated with prednisolone and MMF were retrospectively evaluated to determine the therapeutic response, survival time, and treatment-related adverse effects. Results A partial or complete response (CR) was recorded for 75 dogs. The overall median survival time from the initiation of treatment was 558 days. Dogs that showed CR with no relapse over the treatment period (from diagnosis to death) had significantly longer median survival times. A significantly higher mortality hazard ratio of 4.546 was recorded in dogs that failed to achieve CR. The interval between the onset of clinical signs and the clinical presentation was not significantly associated with CR, relapse rate, and survival time. Adverse effects included gastrointestinal upsets in 26 dogs (30.23%), sporadic infections in 17 dogs (19.77%), and pancreatitis in seven dogs (8.14%). Conclusions The results suggest that adjunctive MMF treatment for MUE is safe and comparable to other immunosuppressive protocols. The treatment should focus on the achievement of CR and preventing relapse for successful management.