Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Cancer‐associated myositis (CAM) has poor prognosis and causes higher mortality. In general, myositis‐specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis‐associated autoantibodies (MAAs) have been shown to be useful biomarkers for its diagnosis. Methods In the present study, focus was given in assessing the presence, prevalence, and diagnostic values of myositis autoantibodies in Chinese patients diagnosed with CAM. The sera collected from 49 CAM patients, 108 dermatomyositis/polymyositis (DM/PM) patients without cancer, 105 disease controls, and 60 healthy controls were detected for the presence of 16 autoantigens (Jo‐1, OJ, EJ, PL‐7, PL‐12, MDA5, TIF1γ, Mi‐2α, Mi‐2β, SAE1, NXP2, SRP, Ku, PM‐Scl75, PM‐Scl100, and Ro‐52) using a commercial Euroline assay. Results The frequency of anti‐TIF1γ was significantly higher in CAM patients than in DM/PM patients without cancer (46.9% vs 14.8%, P < .001). Importantly, the sensitivity and specificity for this MSA were 46.9% and 85.2%, respectively. These helped to differentiate CAM patients from DM/PM patients without cancer. However, there was no difference in other MSAs and MAAs between CAM and DM/PM patients without cancer. Conclusion The present study indicates that anti‐TIF1γ levels can serve as important biomarkers for CAM diagnosis and help in distinguishing between CAM and DM/PM patients without cancer.

Background Anti‐signal recognition particle (anti‐SRP) antibodies are myositis‐specific autoantibodies associated with immune‐mediated necrotizing myopathy. This study was undertaken to better understand how patients with anti‐SRP antibodies have been managed at our tertiary centre and to assess the spectrum of clinical features and outcomes in routine clinical practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 25 patients with anti‐SRP antibodies identified via line‐blot immunoassay at a tertiary care centre (2019–2024). Demographic, clinical, serological, and imaging data were reviewed. Results The group of patients had a mean age of 60.1 years, with a female‐to‐male ratio of 10:15. Eight patients (32%) were diagnosed with myositis, primarily presenting with proximal muscle weakness. Interstitial lung disease was observed in 53% of the group of patients, and 50% of the subset of patients with myositis. Coexisting myositis‐specific autoantibodies were present in 32%, and 48% had positive antinuclear antibody titres (≥ 1:400). Cardiac involvement was reported in two myositis patients. Corticosteroids, often combined with mycophenolate mofetil or other immunosuppressants, formed the basis of treatment. Conclusion Anti‐SRP antibodies are associated with a heterogeneous clinical spectrum, with many patients lacking myositis features. There was a high prevalence of coexisting autoantibodies. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathogenic role of anti‐SRP and optimise management strategies.

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a systemic disease characterized by chronic inflammation in the skin and muscle. A variety of myositis‐specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are detected in patients with DM. These antibodies are associated with unique clinical subsets in DM. Panniculitis is a rare cutaneous manifestation of DM that most commonly presents as tender, erythematous subcutaneous nodules on the thighs, arms, and buttocks. We herein describe the clinical features of two DM‐associated panniculitis patients with anti‐TIF1 antibodies. Both are female patients and showed characteristic cutaneous features, including heliotrope rashes and Gottron's signs with muscle involvement. While one patient had a posterior mediastinum tumor, another had no cancer. Furthermore, to elucidate the clinical significance of anti‐TIF1 antibodies in DM patients with panniculitis, we analyzed all cases with detailed information on the clinical features, including MSAs. A PubMed search of keywords “panniculitis” and “DM” was conducted. We found 23 cases with the detection of MSAs. A review of these cases and our two cases revealed a predominance of female gender (80%) with a median age of 48 years. Anti‐MDA5 antibodies were detected in 11 patients (11/23, 48%), and anti‐TIF1 antibodies were observed in four patients, including the current cases (4/23, 17%). Anti‐Mi‐2 antibodies were observed in four patients (4/23, 17%). Each patient had anti‐NXP‐2 antibodies or anti‐SAE antibodies (2/23; 9%). Although the pathogenesis of panniculitis in DM remains unknown, differences in pathogenesis of DM‐associated panniculitis according to MSAs may exist. Accumulation of additional cases is required to clarify the relationship between panniculitis and MSAs. Panniculitis is a rare cutaneous manifestation of DM. We herein describe the clinical features of two DM‐associated panniculitis patients with anti‐TIF1 antibodies. Although the pathogenesis of panniculitis in DM remains unknown, differences in pathogenesis of DM‐associated panniculitis according to MSAs may exist.

Background Cancer is a significant complication contributing to increased mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), and the association between IIMs and cancer has been extensively reported. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) can help to stratify patients into more homogeneous groups and may be used as a biomarker for cancer-associated myositis. In this study, we aimed to systematically define the cancer-associated MSAs in IIMs. Methods Serum from 627 patients with IIMs was tested for MSAs. The cancer risk with different MSAs was estimated by standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Paraneoplastic manifestation, such as the close temporal relationship between myositis onset and cancer diagnoses in patients with different MSAs, was also evaluated. Results Compared with the general Chinese population, patients with IIMs and anti-transcriptional intermediary factor (TIF1)-γ antibodies (SIR = 17.28, 95% CI 11.94 to 24.14), anti-nuclear matrix protein (NXP2) antibodies (SIR = 8.14, 95% CI 1.63 to 23.86), or anti-SAE1 antibodies (SIR = 12.92, 95% CI 3.23 to 32.94), or who were MSAs-negative (SIR = 3.99, 95% CI 1.96 to 7.14) faced increased risk of cancer. There was no association between specific MSAs subtypes and certain types of cancer. Paraneoplastic manifestations were observed in the patients carrying anti-TIF1-γ, as well as other MSAs. There were no prognostic differences among the patients with cancer-associated myositis (CAM) from different MSAs subgroups. However, in comparison to those with cancer unrelated to myositis, CAM had a worse prognosis, with an age-adjusted and sex-adjusted Cox hazard ratio (HR) of 10.8 (95% CI 1.38-84.5, p  = 0.02) for all-cause mortality. Conclusions Our study demonstrates in what is, to our knowledge, the largest population examined to date, that anti-SAE1, and previously reported anti-TIF1-γ and anti-NXP2 antibodies, are all associated with an increased risk of cancer in patients with IIMs. Moreover, our data suggest that in some cases, anti-HMGCR, anti-Jo-1 and anti-PL-12 antibody production might also be driven by malignancy. This can aid in the etiologic research of paraneoplastic myositis and clinical management.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1674437.].

Background The increased availability of myositis autoantibodies represents new possibilities and challenges in clinical practice (Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, de Visser M, et al. 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1955–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211468 .). The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective data analysis of patient cases with positive myositis autoantibodies to analyse their significance in routine rheumatology practice. Methods A monocentric analysis of all the orders used to determine myositis autoantibodies from July 2019 to May 2022 in the Department of Rheumatology, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, Cologne, Germany, was carried out. Results In the defined time interval, a total of 71,597 laboratory values for the antibodies mentioned above were obtained. A total of 238 different positive autoantibodies ​​were detected in 209 patients. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy was diagnosed in 37 patients (18%), and inflammatory rheumatic diseases other than idiopathic inflammatory myopathy were diagnosed in 90 patients (43%). No inflammatory rheumatic disease was diagnosed in 82 patients (39%). General clusters of clinical manifestations were observed. Conclusions In our cohort, we were able to show that a relevant proportion of patients with positive myositis antibodies did not have idiopathic inflammatory myopathies or inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This finding indicates the importance of myositis autoantibodies in this group of patients. However, further studies on the course of symptoms and examination results in patients without inflammatory rheumatic diseases and with positive myositis antibodies are necessary.

Background Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a systemic autoimmune disease with a prominent interferon (IFN) signature, but the pathogenesis of JDM and the etiology of its IFN signature remain unknown. The Mendelian autoinflammatory interferonopathies, Chronic Atypical Neutrophilic Dermatosis with Lipodystrophy and Elevated temperature (CANDLE) and STING-Associated Vasculopathy with onset in Infancy (SAVI), are caused by genetic mutations and have extremely elevated IFN signatures thought to drive pathology. The phenotypic overlap of some clinical features of CANDLE and SAVI with JDM led to the comparison of a standardized interferon-regulated gene score (IRG-S) in JDM and myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) JDM subgroups, with CANDLE and SAVI. Methods A peripheral 28-component IRG-S assessed by NanoString™ in 57 JDM patients subtyped by MSA was compared with IRG-S in healthy controls (HC) and CANDLE/SAVI patients. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and individual genes were evaluated for their contribution to the score. IRG-S were correlated with disease assessments and patient characteristics. Results IRG-S in JDM patients were significantly higher than in HC but lower than in CANDLE or SAVI. JDM IRG-S overlapped more with SAVI than CANDLE by PCA. Among MSA groups, anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive patients’ IRG-S overlapped most with SAVI. The IFI27 proportion was significantly higher in SAVI and CANDLE than JDM, but IFIT1 contributed more to IRG-S in JDM. Overall, the contribution of individual interferon-regulated genes (IRG) in JDM was more similar to SAVI. IRG-S correlated moderately with JDM disease activity measures ( r s  = 0.33–0.47) and more strongly with skin activity ( r s  = 0.58–0.79) in anti-TIF1 autoantibody-positive patients. Weakness and joint disease activity (multinomial OR 0.91 and 3.3) were the best predictors of high IRG-S. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate peripheral IRG expression in JDM overlaps with monogenic interferonopathies, particularly SAVI, and correlates with disease activity. Anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM IRG-S were notably more similar to SAVI. This may reflect both a shared IFN signature, which is driven by IFN-β and STING pathways in SAVI, as well as the shared phenotype of vasculopathy in SAVI and JDM, particularly in anti-MDA5 autoantibody-positive JDM, and indicate potential therapeutic targets for JDM.

Purpose of reviewDermatomyositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy with a variety of systemic and cutaneous manifestations. The myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are associated with phenotypic features and provide a tool for sub-classification of dermatomyositis patients. This review focuses on recent work characterizing the clinical features that accompany the MSAs in dermatomyositis.Recent findingsThere is increasing recognition of the distinct clinical and pathological phenotypes associated with each MSA. Most of these features display considerable overlap between MSA groups. Despite this, there are notable differences between the typical combinations of cutaneous and systemic manifestations, response to therapy, prognosis, and disease sequelae that define each dermatomyositis MSA group.SummaryThe MSAs may ultimately improve diagnosis and sub-classification of dermatomyositis patients. However, more work is needed to understand the pathologic basis for much of the heterogeneity found within these subgroups.

Myositis-specific (MSAs) or-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) have been linked to particular clinical phenotypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and appear to aid diagnosis. The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of MSAs and MAAs and their possible clinical associations in Greek IIM patients. This study comprised 95 IIM patients classified based on the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria. All patients had MSAs and MAAs measured in their sera by line immunoblot assay. Dermatomyositis was the most prevalent IIM clinical subtype. MSAs were found in 44% of the patients, whereas MAAs in 23%. The most frequently detected MSA was anti-Jo-1 (22%), while the most frequently detected MAA was anti-Ro-52 (30%). The distributions of MSAs/MAAs did not differ between the five IIM subgroups, except for anti-Mi-2 which was only detected in dermatomyositis patients. Patients with at least one MSA and/or MAA positivity showed more frequently IIM characteristic skin rashes, while those presenting solely MAA positivity had more often puffy hands and Raynaud’s phenomenon. Anti-Jo1-positive patients presented more frequently lung disease, while anti-Ro52 positivity related to mechanic’s hands. Anti-Ro-52 and anti-Jo-1 strongly associated with one another. Prevalence of IIM subtypes and of MSAs/MAAs in our patients is in line with published reports in populations of similar geographic distribution. While MSA and/or MAA positivity did associate with particular clinical manifestations, it did not predict in our cohort specific IIM subgroup as defined by the latest EULAR/ACR classification criteria. Future studies are warranted to conclusively decide if these autoantibodies, measured with a standardized method, should or not be incorporated in every day clinical practice to aid IIM diagnosis.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) in a cohort of Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and to examine their associations with clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis. Methods Adult patients with confirmed IIMs ( n  = 515) were studied using the EUROLINE Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies 16 Ag (IgG) commercial line blot test to detect MSAs/myositis-associated autoantibodies. We collected the laboratory data and clinical features. The frequencies of MSAs and their associations with clinical phenotypes were evaluated using SPSS 25.0 software. Results At least one MSA was found in 88.2% of the 515 IIM patients studied. The most frequently detected MSAs were anti-MDA5 (25.4%), anti-Jo-1(15.1%), and anti-EJ (9.5%). Autoantibodies against MDA5, TIF1-γ, and NXP2 were significantly correlated with cutaneous involvement ( P  < 0.001 or P  < 0.01). Anti-TIF1-γ-positive patients had an enhanced risk of malignancy ( OR  = 3.51). Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) was significantly correlated with anti-MDA5 ( P  < 0.0001). Anti-MDA5-positive patients had increased risks of elevated ferritin and decreased lymphocyte counts ( OR  = 5.65 and OR  = 5.74, respectively). Kaplan–Meier survival revealed that individuals positive for anti-MDA5, especially anti-MDA5 combined with anti-Ro52, had the worst prognosis ( P  = 0.03). Male, old age, RP-ILD, and elevated ferritin were identified as predictors of poor prognosis in IIM patients. Conclusions MSAs were present in the majority of the IIM patients. Numerous MSAs were independent factors for identifying exceptional clinical phenotypes. Key Points • This is a large Chinese cohort of IIM patients to analyze possible associations of MSA profiles with clinical characteristics, aiming to provide valuable data for clinical work. • MSAs were present in approximately 90% of IIM patients with distinct clinical subsets. Patients with anti-Jo-1 and non-anti-Jo-1 ASAs exhibited similar characteristics. • The association of anti-TIF1-γ with malignancy was confirmed in adult patients. Patients with IIMs who were positive for both anti-Ro52 and anti-MDA5 had a worse prognosis. • Male, RP-ILD, and heliotrope rash were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in patients with IIMs.