Explore the vast range of titles available.

Many populations of consumers consist of relatively specialized individuals that eat only a subset of the foods consumed by the population at large. Although the ecological significance of individual-level diet variation is recognized, such variation is difficult to document, and its underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Optimal foraging theory provides a useful framework for predicting how individuals might select different diets, positing that animals balance the “opportunity cost” of stopping to eat an available food item against the cost of searching for something more nutritious; diet composition should be contingent on the distribution of food, and individual foragers should be more selective when they have greater energy reserves to invest in searching for high-quality foods. We tested these predicted mechanisms of individual niche differentiation by quantifying environmental (resource heterogeneity) and organismal (nutritional condition) determinants of diet in a widespread browsing antelope (bushbuck, Tragelaphus sylvaticus) in an African floodplain-savanna ecosystem. We quantified individuals’ realized dietary niches (taxonomic richness and composition) using DNA metabarcoding of fecal samples collected repeatedly from 15 GPS-collared animals (range 6–14 samples per individual, median 12). Bushbuck diets were structured by spatial heterogeneity and constrained by individual condition. We observed significant individual-level partitioning of food plants by bushbuck both within and between two adjacent habitat types (floodplain and woodland). Individuals with home ranges that were closer together and/or had similar vegetation structure (measured using LiDAR) ate more similar diets, supporting the prediction that heterogeneous resource distribution promotes individual differentiation. Individuals in good nutritional condition had significantly narrower diets (fewer plant taxa), searched their home ranges more intensively (intensity-of-use index), and had higher-quality diets prediction that animals with greater endogenous reserves have narrower realized niches because they can invest more time in searching for nutritious foods. Our results support predictions from optimal foraging theory about the energetic basis of individual-level dietary variation and provide a potentially generalizable framework for understanding how individuals’ realized niche width is governed by animal behavior and physiology in heterogeneous landscapes.

Niche expansion is attained by adaptations in two generalized phenotypical traits—niche position and niche width. This gives room for a wide range of conceptual ways of niche filling. The niche variation hypothesis reduces the range by predicting that expansion occurs by increasing variation in niche position, which has been debated on empirical and theoretical grounds as also other options seem possible. Here, we propose a general theory of niche expansion. We review empirical data and show with an eco-evolutionary model how resource diversity and a trade-off in resource acquisition steer niche evolution consistent with observations. We show that the range can be reduced to a discrete set of two orthogonal ways of niche filling, through (1) strict phenotypical differentiation in niche position or (2) strict individual generalization. When individual generalization is costly, niche expansion undergoes a shift from (2) to (1) at a point where the resource diversity becomes sufficiently large. Otherwise, niche expansion always follows (2), consistent with earlier results. We show that this either–or response can operate at both evolutionary and short-term time scales. This reduces the principles of niche expansion under environmental change to a notion of orthogonality, dictated by resource diversity and a resource-acquisition trade-off.

A species's niche width reflects a balance between the diversifying effects of intraspecific competition and the constraining effects of interspecific competition. This balance shifts when a species from a competitive environment invades a depauperate habitat where interspecific competition is reduced. The resulting ecological release permits population niche expansion, via increased individual niche widths and/or increased among-individual variation. We report an experimental test of the theory of ecological release in three-spine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We factorially manipulated the presence or absence of two interspecific competitors: juvenile cut-throat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and prickly sculpin (Cottus asper). Consistent with the classic niche variation hypothesis, release from trout competition increased stickleback population niche width via increased among-individual variation, while individual niche widths remained unchanged. In contrast, release from sculpin competition had no effect on population niche width, because increased individual niche widths were offset by decreased between-individual variation. Our results confirm that ecological release from interspecific competition can lead to increases in niche width, and that these changes can occur on behavioural time scales. Importantly, we find that changes in population niche width are decoupled from changes in the niche widths of individuals within the population.

The niche variation hypothesis (NVH) predicts that populations with broader niches should exhibit greater between-individual diet variation or individual specialization (IS) relative to populations with narrower niches. Most studies that quantify population niche widths and associated levels of IS typically focus on a single or few species, but studies examining NVH in a phylogenetically informed comparative analysis among species are lacking. Here we use nitrogen isotope (δ15N) analysis to measure population niche widths and IS in a single bird community composed of 12 passerine species representing different foraging guilds. We found support for the NVH at the interspecific level; species with broader population niche widths were comprised of more individual specialists. Moreover, our results suggest that this relationship is influenced by foraging guild; specifically, omnivores have higher degrees of IS for a given population niche width than insectivores. Finally, the levels of IS among passerine species, in contrast to population niche width, were associated with their relatedness, suggesting that the potential phylogenetic effect on the prevalence of IS is higher than previously recognized.

The niche variation hypothesis (NVH) suggests that populations released from competition are able to expand their realized ecological niche. This increase in total niche width (TNW) can arise by 1) increasing heterogeneity among individuals' niche through individual specialization, i.e. inter‐individual variation in resource use, (IS) occurring when different individuals of a population use a subset of the population's resource pool, or 2) by expanding the niche of all individuals within the population. Although several morphological and phenotypical studies have confuted the NVH, there is generally strong support for this hypothesis when behavioural or ecological traits are considered, and in particular when the trophic niche is measured at the individual level. In this study our primary aim is to corroborate the NVH, providing robust evidence for a significant and positive relationship between population TNW and IS in amphibian populations, at a global scale.

Major disturbances can temporarily remove factors that otherwise constrain population abundance and distribution. During such windows of relaxed top-down and/or bottom-up control, ungulate populations can grow rapidly, eventually leading to resource depletion and density-dependent expansion into less-preferred habitats. Although many studies have explored the demographic outcomes and ecological impacts of these processes, fewer have examined the individual-level mechanisms by which they occur. We investigated these mechanisms in Gorongosa National Park, where the Mozambican Civil War devastated largemammal populations between 1977 and 1992. Gorongosa's recovery has been marked by proliferation of waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), an historically marginal 200-kg antelope species, which is now roughly 20-fold more abundant than before the war. We show that after years of unrestricted population growth, waterbuck have depleted food availability in their historically preferred floodplain habitat and have increasingly expanded into historically avoided savanna habitat. This expansion was demographically skewed: mixed-sex groups of prime-age individuals remained more common in the floodplain, while bachelors, loners, and subadults populated the savanna. By coupling DNA metabarcoding and forage analysis, we show that waterbuck in these two habitats ate radically different diets, which were more digestible and protein-rich in the floodplain than in savanna; thus, although individuals in both habitats achieved positive net energy balance, energetic performance was higher in the floodplain. Analysis of daily activity patterns from high-resolution GPS-telemetry, accelerometry, and animal-borne video revealed that savanna waterbuck spent less time eating, perhaps to accommodate their tougher, lower-quality diets. Waterbuck in savanna also had more ectoparasites than those in the floodplain. Thus, plasticity in foraging behavior and diet selection enabled savanna waterbuck to tolerate the costs of density-dependent spillover, at least in the short term; however, the already poorer energetic performance of these individuals implies that savanna occupancy may become prohibitively costly as heterospecific competitors and predators continue to recover in Gorongosa. Our results suggest that behavior can provide a leading indicator of the onset of density-dependent limitation and the likelihood of subsequent population decline, but that reliable inference hinges on understanding the mechanistic basis of observed behavioral shifts.

Intra- and inter-specific resource partitioning within predator communities is a fundamental component of trophic ecology, and one proposed mechanism for how populations partition resources is through individual niche variation. The Niche Variation Hypothesis (NVH) predicts that inter-individual trait variation leads to functional trade-offs in foraging efficiency, resulting in populations composed of individual dietary specialists. The degree to which niche specialization persists within a population is plastic and responsive to fluctuating resource availability. We quantified niche overlap and tested the NVH within an Arctic raptor guild, focusing on three species that employ different foraging strategies: golden eagles (generalists); gyrfalcons (facultative specialists); and rough-legged hawks (specialists). Tundra ecosystems exhibit cyclic populations of arvicoline rodents (lemmings and voles), providing a unique system in which to examine predator diet in response to interannual fluctuations in resource availability. Using blood δ13C and δ15N values from 189 raptor nestlings on Alaska’s Seward Peninsula (2014–2019), we calculated isotopic niche width and used Bayesian stable isotope mixing models (BSIMMs) to characterize individual specialization and test the NVH. Nest-level specialization estimated from stable isotopes was strongly correlated with indices of specialization based on camera trap data. We observed a high degree of isotopic niche overlap between the three species and gyrfalcons displayed a positive relationship between individual specialization and population niche width on an interannual basis consistent with the NVH. Our findings suggest plasticity in niche specialization may reduce intra- and inter-specific resource competition under dynamic ecological conditions.

Most empirical and theoretical studies of resource use and population dynamics treat conspecific individuals as ecologically equivalent. This simplification is only justified if interindividual niche variation is rare, weak, or has a trivial effect on ecological processes. This article reviews the incidence, degree, causes, and implications of individual‐level niche variation to challenge these simplifications. Evidence for individual specialization is available for 93 species distributed across a broad range of taxonomic groups. Although few studies have quantified the degree to which individuals are specialized relative to their population, between‐individual variation can sometimes comprise the majority of the population’s niche width. The degree of individual specialization varies widely among species and among populations, reflecting a diverse array of physiological, behavioral, and ecological mechanisms that can generate intrapopulation variation. Finally, individual specialization has potentially important ecological, evolutionary, and conservation implications. Theory suggests that niche variation facilitates frequency‐dependent interactions that can profoundly affect the population’s stability, the amount of intraspecific competition, fitness‐function shapes, and the population’s capacity to diversify and speciate rapidly. Our collection of case studies suggests that individual specialization is a widespread but underappreciated phenomenon that poses many important but unanswered questions.

The ecological impacts of freshwater invasive fishes can develop through interspecific competition where they share similar resources to native species, but with this potentially mitigated by high ecological opportunity in prey resources. The trophic ecology of invasive mrigal carp Cirrhinus mrigala and native mud carp Cirrhinus molitorella were assessed in the Pearl River, southern China, through applying DNA metabarcoding on samples collected in both the wet and dry seasons between 2019 and 2021. Both fishes had diets comprising of items including algae, ciliates, arthropods, plants, rotifers, protists, and fungi. The interaction of year and season explained the most variation in the dietary composition, individual niche width and population niche width (PNW) for each species, and the interspecific niche overlap, with their niche widths being lowest but interspecific niche overlap being highest during the 2021 dry season. The ecological opportunity, influenced by river discharge and water temperature was in negative relationships with the interspecific niche overlap. The interspecific niche overlap was significantly negatively affecting the between individual component (BIC) of PNW for each species, but with the negative effects on PNW and its within individual component (WIC) being non-significant. The significant positive linear relationships between PNW and its components of WIC and BIC for each species provided a dual expansion case for the niche variation hypothesis. The dynamic nature of the trophic interactions of these fishes indicates the importance of considering temporal and seasonal variability within invasion risk screening processes and impact assessments in sub-tropical rivers.

1. The degree of individual specialization in resource use differs widely among wild populationswhere individuals range from fully generalized to highly specialized. This interindividualvariation has profound implications in many ecological and evolutionary processes. A recentreview proposed four main ecological causes of individual specialization: interspecific andintraspecific competition, ecological opportunity and predation.2. Using the isotopic signature of subsampled whiskers, we investigated to what degree threeof these factors (interspecific and intraspecific competition and ecological opportunity) affectthe population niche width and the level of individual foraging specialization in two fur sealspecies, the Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella and Arctocephalustropicalis), over several years.3. Population niche width was greater when the two seal species bred in allopatry (low interspecificcompetition) than in sympatry or when seals bred in high-density stabilized colonies (highintraspecific competition). In agreement with the niche variation hypothesis (NVH), higherpopulation niche width was associated with higher interindividual niche variation. However, incontrast to the NVH, all Antarctic females increased their niche width during the interbreedingperiod when they had potential access to a wider diversity of foraging grounds and associatedprey (high ecological opportunities), suggesting they all dispersed to a similar productive area.4. The degree of individual specialization varied among populations and within the annualcycle. Highest levels of interindividual variation were found in a context of lower interspecificor higher intraspecific competition. Contrasted results were found concerning the effect ofecological opportunity. Depending on seal species, females exhibited either a greater or lowerdegree of individual specialization during the interbreeding period, reflecting species-specificbiological constraints during that period.5. These results suggest a significant impact of ecological interactions on the population nichewidth and degree of individual specialization. Such variation at the individual level may bean important factor in the species plasticity with significant consequences on how it mayrespond to environmental variability.