Explore the vast range of titles available.

Excess adiposity is a reversible etiologic risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea. In this trial, tirzepatide reduced the apnea–hypopnea index of participants with obstructive sleep apnea and obesity.

Abstract Study Objectives Insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) commonly co-occur which makes OSA difficult to treat with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We conducted a randomized controlled trial in participants with OSA and co-occurring insomnia to test the hypothesis that initial treatment with cognitive and behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-i), versus treatment as usual (TAU) would improve insomnia symptoms and increase subsequent acceptance and use of CPAP. Methods One hundred and forty-five participants with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15) and comorbid insomnia were randomized to either four sessions of CBT-i, or TAU, before commencing CPAP therapy until 6 months post-randomization. Primary between-group outcomes included objective average CPAP adherence and changes in objective sleep efficiency by 6 months. Secondary between-group outcomes included rates of immediate CPAP acceptance/rejection, and changes in; sleep parameters, insomnia severity, and daytime impairments by 6 months. Results Compared to TAU, participants in the CBT-i group had 61 min greater average nightly adherence to CPAP (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9 to 113; p = 0.023, d = 0.38) and higher initial CPAP treatment acceptance (99% vs. 89%; p = 0.034). The CBT-i group showed greater improvement of global insomnia severity, and dysfunctional sleep-related cognitions by 6 months (both: p < 0.001), and greater improvement in sleep impairment measures immediately following CBT-i. There were no between-group differences in sleep outcomes, or daytime impairments by 6 months. Conclusions In OSA participants with comorbid insomnia, CBT-i prior to initiating CPAP treatment improves CPAP use and insomnia symptoms compared to commencing CPAP without CBT-i. OSA patients should be evaluated for co-occurring insomnia and considered for CBT-i before commencing CPAP therapy. Clinical Trial Treating comorbid insomnia with obstructive sleep apnea (COMSIA) study: A new treatment strategy for patients with combined insomnia and sleep apnea, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365184 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001178730. Universal Trial Number: U1111-1149-4230.

This randomized trial showed no effect of early adenotonsillectomy, as compared with watchful waiting, on the primary outcome of attention and executive functioning in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Many secondary outcomes favored early surgery. The childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes, including cognitive and behavioral deficits. 1 The most commonly identified risk factor for the childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Thus, the primary treatment is adenotonsillectomy, which accounts for more than 500,000 procedures annually in the United States alone. 2 Nevertheless, there has been no controlled study evaluating the benefits and risks of adenotonsillectomy, as compared with watchful waiting, for the management of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT) was designed to evaluate the efficacy of early adenotonsillectomy versus watchful waiting with supportive . . .

In patients with obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure produced a small reduction in 24-hour mean arterial pressure; nocturnal supplemental oxygen had no benefit. Although CPAP is more difficult for patients to use, it is preferred over supplemental oxygen. Obstructive sleep apnea is a highly prevalent, chronic illness in adults, affecting an estimated 9% of middle-aged women and 24% of middle-aged men, with 4% and 9%, respectively, having moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. 1 Cohort studies have shown that obstructive sleep apnea is a risk factor for hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, and death. 2 – 9 The mechanisms underlying these associations are thought to include sympathetic activation, oxidative stress, and inflammation. 10 Although reports from uncontrolled, clinic-based studies have indicated that cardiovascular risk is reduced among patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as compared with . . .

Abstract Study Objectives This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of high and low-intensity expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) on disease severity, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, symptoms, daytime sleepiness, fatigue severity, and sleep quality in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Methods Thirty-one male patients diagnosed with moderate OSAS were included in this double-blind, randomized, parallel study. Patients were randomized into two groups: High-EMST and Low-EMST groups. EMST was used at home 7 days/week, once a day, for 25 breaths, 12 weeks. Respiratory muscle strength was measured using a mouth pressure device. Disease severity (Apnea–Hypopnea Index [AHI]) and, respiratory sleep events by polysomnography, total oxidant level(TOS), total antioxidant level(TAS), oxidative stress index (OSI), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels by blood serum were evaluated. Results The percentage of AHI change in the high-EMST group(50.8%) was significantly higher than in the low-EMST group(6.3%; p = .002, d = 1.31). In general, as MEP increased by one unit, AHI decreased by 0.149 points (b = −0.149; CR = −3.065; p = .002), and as AHI increased by one unit, ODI increased by 0.746 points (b = 0.746; CR = 10.604; p < .001). TOS, OSI, TNF-α and IL-6 levels decreased at similar rates in both groups. Conclusions EMST significantly reduces systemic inflammation and oxidative stress while improving expiratory muscle strength in male patients with moderate OSAS. High-EMST is more effective in enhancing the severity of disease than low-EMST. EMST is a practical, effective, and promising treatment for pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with moderate OSAS. Clinical Trials Effect of EMST systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with moderate OSAS, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05242406, with the number NCT05242406. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

In this study, continuous positive airway pressure plus weight loss was no better than either one alone in reducing C-reactive protein levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, but improvements were seen in insulin resistance, triglyceride levels, and blood pressure. Available clinical data derived largely from observational studies link obstructive sleep apnea 1 to proatherosclerotic risk factors, including insulin resistance, 2 dyslipidemia, hypertension, 3 and inflammation. 4 Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea are strongly associated. 5 – 8 Like obstructive sleep apnea, obesity is linked to insulin resistance, 6 dyslipidemia, 9 hypertension, 9 , 10 and inflammation. 10 However, the relative causal roles that obstructive sleep apnea and obesity play in these abnormalities is unclear. 6 , 11 , 12 The interrelationships between obesity and obstructive sleep apnea are complex and bidirectional, and they cannot be confidently discerned in observational studies. Randomized trials have shown the beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiovascular risk . . .

Background: Obesity is strongly associated with prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and weight loss has been shown to reduce disease severity. Objective: To investigate whether liraglutide 3.0 mg reduces OSA severity compared with placebo using the primary end point of change in apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) after 32 weeks. Liraglutide’s weight loss efficacy was also examined. Subjects/Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, non-diabetic participants with obesity who had moderate (AHI 15–29.9 events h −1 ) or severe (AHI ⩾30 events h −1 ) OSA and were unwilling/unable to use continuous positive airway pressure therapy were randomized for 32 weeks to liraglutide 3.0 mg ( n =180) or placebo ( n =179), both as adjunct to diet (500 kcal day −1 deficit) and exercise. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age 48.5 years, males 71.9%, AHI 49.2 events h −1 , severe OSA 67.1%, body weight 117.6 kg, body mass index 39.1 kg m −2 , prediabetes 63.2%, HbA 1c 5.7%). Results: After 32 weeks, the mean reduction in AHI was greater with liraglutide than with placebo (−12.2 vs −6.1 events h −1 , estimated treatment difference: −6.1 events h −1 (95% confidence interval (CI), −11.0 to −1.2), P =0.0150). Liraglutide produced greater mean percentage weight loss compared with placebo (−5.7% vs −1.6%, estimated treatment difference: −4.2% (95% CI, −5.2 to −3.1%), P <0.0001). A statistically significant association between the degree of weight loss and improvement in OSA end points ( P <0.01, all) was demonstrated post hoc . Greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were seen with liraglutide versus placebo (both P <0.001). The safety profile of liraglutide 3.0 mg was similar to that seen with doses ⩽1.8 mg. Conclusions: As an adjunct to diet and exercise, liraglutide 3.0 mg was generally well tolerated and produced significantly greater reductions than placebo in AHI, body weight, SBP and HbA 1c in participants with obesity and moderate/severe OSA. The results confirm that weight loss improves OSA-related parameters.

The effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on mediators of cardiovascular disease and depression in women with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of CPAP therapy on a variety of biomarkers of inflammation, antioxidant activity, and depression in women with OSA. We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial in 247 women diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥ 15). Women were randomized to CPAP (n = 120) or conservative treatment (n = 127) for 12 weeks. Changes in tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were assessed. Additional analyses were conducted in subgroups of clinical interest. Women had a median (25th-75th percentiles) age of 58 (51-65) years, body mass index 33.5 (29.0-38.3) kg/m2, and AHI 33.3 (22.8-49.3). No differences were found between groups in the baseline levels of the biomarkers. After 12 weeks of follow-up, there were no changes between groups in any of the biomarkers assessed. These results did not change when the analyses were restricted to sleepy women or to those with severe OSA. In women with CPAP use at least 5 hours per night, only TNFα levels decreased compared to the control group (-0.29 ± 1.1 vs -0.06 ± 0.53, intergroup difference -0.23 [95% CI = -0.03 to -0.50]; p = 0.043). Twelve weeks of CPAP therapy does not improve biomarkers of inflammation, antioxidant activity, or depression compared to conservative treatment in women with moderate-to-severe OSA. NCT02047071.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), many of whom do not report daytime sleepiness. First-line treatment for symptomatic OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but its value in patients without daytime sleepiness is uncertain. To determine the effects of CPAP on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcome risk in patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA. This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded evaluation trial was conducted between December 2005 and November 2010. Consecutive patients with newly revascularized CAD and OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h) without daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score <10) were randomized to auto-titrating CPAP (n = 122) or no positive airway pressure (n = 122). The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Median follow-up was 57 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly in patients who did versus did not receive CPAP (18.1% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.41; P = 0.449). Adjusted on-treatment analysis showed a significant cardiovascular risk reduction in those who used CPAP for ≥4 versus <4 hours per night or did not receive treatment (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.86; P = 0.026). Routine prescription of CPAP to patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA did not significantly reduce long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the intention-to-treat population. There was a significant reduction after adjustment for baseline comorbidities and compliance with the treatment. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00519597).

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy are commonly used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Differences in efficacy and compliance of these treatments are likely to influence improvements in health outcomes. To compare health effects after 1 month of optimal CPAP and MAD therapy in OSA. In this randomized crossover trial, we compared the effects of 1 month each of CPAP and MAD treatment on cardiovascular and neurobehavioral outcomes. Cardiovascular (24-h blood pressure, arterial stiffness), neurobehavioral (subjective sleepiness, driving simulator performance), and quality of life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, Short Form-36) were compared between treatments. Our primary outcome was 24-hour mean arterial pressure. A total of 126 patients with moderate-severe OSA (apnea hypopnea index [AHI], 25.6 [SD 12.3]) were randomly assigned to a treatment order and 108 completed the trial with both devices. CPAP was more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP AHI, 4.5 ± 6.6/h; MAD AHI, 11.1 ± 12.1/h; P < 0.01) but reported compliance was higher on MAD (MAD, 6.50 ± 1.3 h per night vs. CPAP, 5.20 ± 2 h per night; P < 0.00001). The 24-hour mean arterial pressure was not inferior on treatment with MAD compared with CPAP (CPAP-MAD difference, 0.2 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, -0.7 to 1.1]); however, overall, neither treatment improved blood pressure. In contrast, sleepiness, driving simulator performance, and disease-specific quality of life improved on both treatments by similar amounts, although MAD was superior to CPAP for improving four general quality-of-life domains. Important health outcomes were similar after 1 month of optimal MAD and CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSA. The results may be explained by greater efficacy of CPAP being offset by inferior compliance relative to MAD, resulting in similar effectiveness. Clinical trial registered with https://www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN 12607000289415).