Explore the vast range of titles available.

This paper aims to shift the unit of analysis in the study of organisational knowledge from individuals and their actions to practices and their relationships. It introduces the concept of \"site\" to help advance an understanding of the relationship between practice and knowing. The notion of site supports the intuition that knowing is both sustained in practice and manifests itself through practice. It also evokes the idea of knowledge as being rooted in an extended pattern of interconnected activities that only when taken in its living and pulsating entirety constitutes the site of knowing. In this paper, I review the different ways to conceptualise the relationships between knowing and practice, and I show how the idea of site adds to the existing body of work. Building on the results of a longitudinal study in the field of telemedicine, I then offer suggestions on aspects of practice where knowing manifests itself, and I use the concepts of \"translation by contact\" and \"at distance\" to explain how dispersed knowings are woven together and the power effect that can derive from these. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of this radical view and the direction for future research.

In this paper, I outline a perspective on knowing in practice which highlights the essential role of human action in knowing how to get things done in complex organizational work. The perspective suggests that knowing is not a static embedded capability or stable disposition of actors, but rather an ongoing social accomplishment, constituted and reconstituted as actors engage the world in practice. In interpreting the findings of an empirical study conducted in a geographically dispersed hightech organization, I suggest that the competence to do global product development is both collective and distributed, grounded in the everyday practices of organizational members. I conclude by discussing some of the research implications of a perspective on organizational knowing in practice.

For nearly two decades, progressives have been dismayed by the steady rise of the right in U.S. politics. Often lost in the gloom and doom about American politics is a striking and sometimes underanalyzed phenomenon: the resurgence of progressive politics and movements at a local level. Across the country, urban coalitions, including labor, faith groups, and community-based organizations, have come together to support living wage laws and fight for transit policies that can move the needle on issues of working poverty. Just as striking as the rise of this progressive resurgence has been its reception among unlikely allies. In places as diverse as Chicago, Atlanta, and San Jose, the usual business resistance to pro-equity policies has changed, particularly when it comes to issues like affordable housing and more efficient transportation systems. To see this change and its possibilities requires that we recognize a new thread running through many local efforts: a perspective and politics that emphasizes \"regional equity.\" Manuel Pastor Jr., Chris Benner, and Martha Matsuoka offer their analysis with an eye toward evaluating what has and has not worked in various campaigns to achieve regional equity. The authors show how momentum is building as new policies addressing regional infrastructure, housing, and workforce development bring together business and community groups who share a common desire to see their city and region succeed. Drawing on a wealth of case studies as well as their own experience in the field, Pastor, Benner, and Matsuoka point out the promise and pitfalls of this new approach, concluding that what they term social movement regionalism might offer an important contribution to the revitalization of progressive politics in America.

Understanding the causes of interstate conflict continues to be a primary goal of the field of international relations. To that end, scholars continue to rely on large datasets of conflict in the international system. This paper introduces the latest iteration in the most widely used dataset on interstate conflicts, the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) 4 data. In this paper we first outline the updated data-collection process for the MID4 data. Second, we present some minor changes and clarifications to the coding rules for the MID4 datasets, as well as pointing out how the MID coding procedures affect several notable \"close call\" cases. Third, we introduce updates to the existing MID datasets for the years 2002–2010 and provide descriptive statistics that allow comparisons of the newer MID data to prior versions. We also offer some best practices and point out several ways in which the new MID data can contribute to research in international conflict.

ABSTRACT Objective: this article proposes a conceptual framework of inclusion in the workplace and operationalizes the concept. Theoretical approach: metatheoretical approach of facet theory and inclusion approaches. Method: we utilized facet theory comprehensively, from the conceptualization of inclusion to the development of the scale and the analysis, using smallest space analysis. The sample for this study consisted of 145 white-collar employees in the car industry in São Paulo, Brazil. Results: the findings supported a multifaceted concept of inclusion comprised of three facets unfolded into elements: AGENT (peer and superior), ACTION (permission, recognition, and support), and ACCOMPLISHMENT (belongingness, uniqueness, and respect). Conclusion: the structural hypotheses were supported. Facets and their elements combine and are represented in the mapping sentence, as facet theory describes. This structure underpinned the creation of an inclusion scale that represents a novel way of measuring the inclusion construct, insofar as all items measure the three facets simultaneously, connected with their elements. Inclusion, from the perspective of facet theory, is a process in which the employee’s perception of actions (recognition, support, and permission to participate in formal and informal processes) practiced by agents (superior or peer) generates an accomplishment (sense of belonging, respect, and distinction) in employees.

Monitoring changes in groundwater quality over time helps identify time-dependent factors influencing water safety and supports the development of effective management strategies. This study investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of groundwater chemistry in the Debrecen area, Hungary, from 2019 to 2024, using indexing, machine learning, and multivariate statistical techniques. These techniques include self-organizing maps (SOM), hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), and groundwater quality indexing (GWQI). The hydrochemical analysis revealed that Ca-Mg-HCO₃ is the dominant water type, with a temporal shift toward Na-HCO₃, reflecting increased salinity driven by ongoing rock-water interactions. SOM analysis showed a transition from heterogeneous to more uniform groundwater chemistry over time, suggesting greater stability in the aquifer system. Elevated salinity zones shifted spatially due to changes in groundwater recharge and flow patterns, while hardness intensified and expanded, indicating continued carbonate dissolution. HCA highlighted temporal shifts in groundwater composition, with six clusters identified in 2019 and five clusters in 2024, reflecting a gradual homogenization of water quality. PCA further confirmed this trend, linking it to underlying hydrochemical processes, such as water–rock interactions, with limited contributions from anthropogenic influences. The GWQI analysis indicated a general improvement in groundwater quality over time, with most regions meeting drinking water standards. However, specific areas exhibited signs of localized contamination, requiring targeted management. These findings underscore the importance of continuous groundwater quality monitoring to detect emerging trends and guide resource management. The study highlights the need for sustainable practices to safeguard water resources and ensure long-term water security in the Debrecen area.

Participatory art turns the artwork into a process of engagement and co-creation, and it thus involves forms of time-based coordination that influence the experience of creating participatory art. In this paper I argue that participatory art is underscored by two contrasting temporal frameworks. One is the framework of long-term durational approaches that have been internalized among artists as an ethical and political obligation toward participants; the other is the short-term temporary framework that typically comes with project funding and steers the project toward delivery of target outcomes. To show the tensions to which these contrasting temporal frameworks can give rise, I analyze the development of a participatory art project in Copenhagen’s South Harbor. Specifically, the analysis emphasizes how tensions arose in respect to delimitations of project aspects such as who constitutes the creative team, what is the task before us, and what is our expected contribution to the community. By emphasizing the tensions arising from contrasting temporal frameworks, the article contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the experience of creating participatory art, and to problematizing the question of time for participatory art.

Participatory art turns the artwork into a process of engagement and co-creation, and it thus involves forms of time-based coordination that influence the experience of creating participatory art. In this paper I argue that participatory art is underscored by two contrasting temporal frameworks. One is the framework of long-term durational approaches that have been internalized among artists as an ethical and political obligation toward participants; the other is the short-term temporary framework that typically comes with project funding and steers the project toward delivery of target outcomes. To show the tensions to which these contrasting temporal frameworks can give rise, I analyze the development of a participatory art project in Copenhagen’s South Harbor. Specifically, the analysis emphasizes how tensions arose in respect to delimitations of project aspects such as who constitutes the creative team, what is the task before us, and what is our expected contribution to the community. By emphasizing the tensions arising from contrasting temporal frameworks, the article contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the experience of creating participatory art, and to problematizing the question of time for participatory art.

Recently, radical democratic initiatives have been undertaken by freelancers and founders who come together in a range of alternative forms such as ethical entrepreneurial coalitions, urban coworking spaces, and open cooperative networks. In this paper, we argue that these initiatives to invent alternative, more equal forms of organizing engage strongly with relational activities to replace hierarchical interaction with distributed peer collaboration. While the literature has emphasized the sense of experimentation and reflexivity of these alternative forms of organizing, this paper especially draws attention to the affective dynamics of everyday peer-to-peer collaboration. Drawing on an 18-month ethnography of a cooperative network of social entrepreneurs, we use a practice-based approach to study peer collaboration as a relational practice formed through a nexus of 'weaving/'sharing,' and 'caring' activities. Focusing on the affective orders enveloping relational practice, we document how the practice of peer collaboration is imbued by what we call an 'affective oscillation' forming contrasting amplitudes between confidence and frustration, exuberance and anxiety, and trust and exhaustion. As our core contribution, we problematize how the affirmative intent of radical democratic organizing is potentially jeopardized by this 'cloudy affectivity,' and we conclude that the collective pursuit of embodied ethical encounters is formed by slowing down and feeling into affective oscillation.

Sociomateriality has been attracting growing attention in the Organization Studies and Information Systems literatures since 2007, with more than 140 journal articles now referring to the concept. Over 80 percent of these articles have been published since January 2011 and almost all cite the work of Orlikowski (2007, 2010; Orlikowski and Scott 2008) as the source of the concept. Only a few, however, address all of the notions that Orlikowski suggests are entailed in sociomateriality, namely materiality, inseparability, relationality, performativity, and practices, with many employing the concept quite selectively. The contribution of sociomateriality to these literatures is, therefore, still unclear. Drawing on evidence from an ongoing study of the adoption of a computer-based clinical information system in a hospital critical care unit, this paper explores whether the notions, individually and collectively, offer a distinctive and coherent account of the relationship between the social and the material that may be useful in Information Systems research. It is argued that if sociomateriality is to be more than simply a label for research employing a number of loosely related existing theoretical approaches, then studies employing the concept need to pay greater attention to the notions entailed in it and to differences in their interpretation.